Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, February 19, 2022

Cheese Hiding

 By Anna Von Reitz

I know most of my Readers don't seriously use the internet for research. Most people just find and stick with a web browser they like and stay with that one browser, but when that browser is Google, you are missing huge amounts of information.
Google is the browser of the Least Common Denominator.
It's fine if you want to look up the location and phone number of Brown's Department Store in Little Rock, Arkansas or find a great meatloaf recipe, but increasingly over the past ten years, Google has been deleting more and more information in an effort to censor access to information. Increasingly, when you plug in a proper URL, you get the "Page Not Found" or "Error 401" message ------and for many people, the search stops there.
They figure that the link is bad and that's that. End of story.
But if they happen to go to other browsers, the "missing" page pops right up.
Here's an example of it. One of my Readers recently sent me this gem: "Construction and Applications of SARS-CoV-2". If you scroll down, you see the following:
Packaging systems for SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses.
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)-based lentiviral packaging system.
There it is, the Smoking Gun.
The absolute proof that they "packaged" HIV using SARS-CoV-2.
This is proof of intent behind the fact that so many people are now testing positive for HIV and developing AIDS.
In order to find goodies like this, you have to leave Google far behind and start expanding your horizons to include such browser services as DIGG, DuckDuckGo, Manta, Edgar, Thomas.com, PubMed.gov, and many, many more, because, once again, they are hiding the cheese, keeping the public ignorant and helpless to defend themselves by artificially limited access to information and actively hiding information.
With law, this sort of thing got kicked into High Gear circa 1925, when the Revised United States Statutes were NOT adopted, but nonetheless were used to impose a new numbering and citation system that buried the actual United States Statutes-at-Large.
Similarly, all Split Jurisdiction cases were subjected to a new and deceitful reference system. If you look up a case called "Moynaham v. Kasson" you will find the decision rendered under the Law of the Sea, but if you look up "Kasson v. Moynaham" you will find the decision rendered under the Law of the Land.
Then, to make things that much more confusing, circa 1953, they reversed things again, so that depending on when the case occurred, the land case is found under a different ordering of the names than prior to 1953. It's completely nuts.
Not surprisingly, many of these decisions are radically different. Generations of patriots and less adept attorneys have been bamboozled by this when they look up the wrong jurisdiction case and can't find information or decisions that are referenced.
Too often, like our Google users, they throw up their hands and think they've been given a bad citation. Page Not Found.
I recently gave everyone a citation from Title 22 USCA 286(e) that proves that when a government devolves to the status of an incorporated entity, it loses all the immunities and powers of government and has only those powers inherent to incorporated entities.
Period.
Almost immediately I got a chorus of, "I can't find it!"
And I had to go back and explain that they would have to go back and search prior years to find the group of years where the citation lines up with the numbering system.
Sure enough, they went back circa 2010 and found exactly what I told them was there, at the citation I gave them.
But if you innocently took that citation and looked at the most current rendition of their crap, you would find blather about entirely different subjects.

They are hiding the cheese. Seeking to obscure the law.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

26 comments:

  1. Posting comments for this posting below has been disabled, so I am posting this here.
    Posted by Paul Stramer at 4:06 PM Thursday, February 17, 2022
    WW-4: RESISTANCE ROCKS RESET!

    In regards to the comment posted from;
    woman:janmarieFebruary 19, 2022 at 10:19 AM

    “Force Majeure,” refer to comments and time stamp where this was first brought forth;

    Video posted on Thursday, February 3, 2022 by Paul Stramer at 12:41 PM
    “Battlefield America: 2022 - 2024, Episode 2, Steve Quayle and Mike Adams”;
     https://www.brighteon.com/31880fec-6fff-475d-a4a2-3eade3cdfc3d

    Well today is “February 20, 2022, two days before “Their” cryptic numbering (numbing) ball (Baal) game might rear it’s “Janus’ ” cheeks. If it does, let Us not fall for it this time, and allow “Them” to make “History”--"His" story more than a footnote on the annals (anal) of a gnats behind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also have been working on the request concerning the “word” exousia / eksousía / ἐξουσία, hopefully I will have everything compiled later today. Researching into this one word has been most thought provoking. Many thanks up front goodE.

      Delete
    2. oh fun!
      foscolos00 i can hardly wait to see what you come up with!
      looking forward to comparing notes. :)

      Delete
    3. hey foscolos00, ive cancelled all evil planned for 02222022. :):):):!!!!

      Delete
    4. Tomorrow is the 22nd day of February which is considered the 2nd month of the year 2022. Thus it would be written 22-02--2022. It is a forward backwards read for this year exclusively. For "Them" it has cryptic meanings that "They" use to justify "Their" esoteric beliefs. To me it is just another day that The Lord has made, I will be glad and rejoice in it.

      Delete
    5. yes 22022022. but of course... twisting numbers... thats all theyve got. the little dinks.

      Delete
  2. Shocked the comments are open!
    One comment we shoul be addressing the deliberate extermination of 6 1/2 billion people .
    They have done a lot of damage using nano technologies to bypass our defenses the cells assort the toxin and eventually you die of a myriad of circulatiraly problems.
    However the last assembly meeting was good on how to deal with courts .the speaker lost his son to the judicial system and has a ax to grind .
    Playing defense but that’s what we got .
    We should be educating all militias on how they are hiding since OKC false flag and need to see the light of who is who the policy enforcers don’t have the authority the feds are a corporation with no authority you can’t delegate what you yourself don’t have.
    Might makes right and a test case needs to break that fear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Playing defense but that’s what we got ."

      yes, when an American man or woman walks into THEIR MADEUP FICTIONAL PRIVATE Courts *As* the TitleRole: "DefendantFICTION"/ Loser, yes, that’s what we got ."
      ________
      ...As long as we dont move our American asses back over under our own American common law authority and *require* our American common law court of record where we belong and have a right to be, then, yes, we can only DEFEND.
      because in their MADEUP FICTION WORLD they are all "HONORABLE SIR FICTIONS" who can do no wrong in their PRIVATE IMAGINARY CONSTRUCT. So, if an HONORARY SIRFICTION accuses a YOU:FICTION of breaking a ruleFICTION in their PrivateGameFICTION, then nothing YOU:FICTION can say will change that because YOU:FICTION ARE DEAD AND HAVE NO VOICE; AND the only way you have to speak is for ANOTHER BROTHER SIRFICTION to the HONORABLE SIRFICTION who accused youFICTION to speakFICTION for youFICTION before ANOTHERBROTHER SIR FICTION pretending to be a JudgeFICTION. ALL of them are IN the same BROTHERHOOD FICTION under the same OATHFICTION except YOUFICTION.
      So, they generally ACTUALLY ROB you:not fictoon, and divide among themselves the fruit of your labor that they charge you for their service of robbing you:not-fiction by using the YOU:FICTION CONSTRUCT as their claw\JOINDERFICTION.

      Delete
    2. its hard wired for the Defender to LOSE.

      we must, and we have a right to: use American common law.

      Delete
  3. [1.] Here are a just few instances where the word ἐξουσία is righteously used
    G1849 - exousia - Strong's Greek Lexicon (kjv)
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g1849/kjv/tr/0-1/
    Luk 4:32
    And they were astonished at his doctrine: for his word was with power. G1849
    Luk 4:36
    And they were all amazed, and spake among themselves, saying, What a word is this! for with authority G1849 and power he commandeth the unclean spirits, and they come out.
    Luk 9:1
    Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority G1849 over all devils, and to cure diseases.
    Luk 12:11
    And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, G1849 take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say:
    Luk 23:7
    And as soon as he knew that he belonged unto Herod's jurisdiction, G1849 he sent him to Herod, who himself also was at Jerusalem at that time.
    Jhn 1:12
    But as many as received him, to them gave he power G1849 to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
    Jhn 5:27
    And hath given him authority G1849 to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

    G1849 - exousia - Strong's Greek Lexicon (kjv)
    https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g1849/kjv/tr/0-1/
    John 1:12 - But as many as received him, to them gave he power G1849 to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

    exousia / eksousía / ἐξουσία
    Strong's Greek: 1849. ἐξουσία (exousia) -- power to act, authority
    https://biblehub.com/greek/1849.htm
    Strong's Concordance
    exousia: power to act, authority
    Original Word: ἐξουσία, ας, ἡ
    Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
    Transliteration: exousia
    Phonetic Spelling: (ex-oo-see'-ah)
    Definition: power to act, authority
    Usage: (a) power, authority, weight, especially: moral authority, influence, (b) in a quasi-personal sense, derived from later Judaism, of a spiritual power, and hence of an earthly power.
    HELPS Word-studies
    1849 ****eksousía**** (from 1537 /ek, "out from," which intensifies 1510 /eimí, "to be, being as a right or privilege") – authority, conferred power; delegated empowerment ("authorization"), operating in a designated jurisdiction.
    In the NT, 1849 /eksousía ("delegated power") refers to the authority God gives to His saints – authorizing them to act to the extent they are guided by faith (His revealed word).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. [2.] All the below was gleaned from the “Godrules” link. I compared it with what was provided in the hard cover copy Strong’s Expanded Red Letter edition that I have, and found it to be lacking. So I added the additional information that was contained within this Strong’s Expanded Red Letter edition.

      KJV w/ Strong's Concordance - Matthew 9:6
      http://www.godrules.net/library/kjvstrongs/kjvstrongsmat9.htm
      1849. ἐξουσία
      Word: exousia
      Pronounce: ex-oo-see'-ah
      Strongs Number: ***G1849***
      Originating : from ***1832*** (in the sense of ability); privilege, i.e. (subjectively) force, capacity, competency, freedom, or (objectively) mastery (concretely, magistrate, superhuman, potentate, token of control), delegated influence:—authority {29x}, jurisdiction {1x}, liberty {1x}, power {69x}, right {2x}, strength {1x}
      Exousia, as a noun, denotes (1) “authority” (from the impersonal verb existi. “it is lawful”)
      (2) from the meaning of “leave or permission,” or liberty of doing as one pleases, (2a) it passed to that of “the ability or strength with which one is edged,” (2c) then to that of the “power of authority,” the right to exercise power, e.g., Mt. 9:6; 21:23; 2 Cor 10:8; (2d) or “the power of rule or government,” the power of one whose will and commands must be obeyed by others, e.g.,
      Mt. 28:18; Jn 17:2; Jude 25; Rev. 12:10; 17:13; (2e) more specifically apostolic “authority”
      2 Cor 10:8; 13:10; (3) the “power” (3a) of judicial decision, Jn. 19:10; (3b) of “managing domestic affairs,” Mk. 13:34. (4) By metonymy, or name change (the substitution of a suggestive word for the name of the ting meant), it stands for “that which is subject to authority or rule,” Lk 4:6 “power”; (5) or as with the English “authority,” “one who possesses authority, a ruler, magistrate,”
      Rom 13:1-3; Lk12:11; Titus 3:1; (6) or “a spiritual potentate,” e.g., Eph 3:10; 6:12; Col 1:16; 2:10,15; 1 Pet 3:22. (7) In 1 Cor 11:10 it is used of the veil with which a woman is required to cover herself in an assembly or church, as a sign of the Lord’s “authority” over the church.
      See: TDNT - 2:562, 238; BAGD - 277d; THAYER .- 225a

      Use: TDNT-2:562,238 Noun Feminine
      Heb Strong: H1884 H4475 H7982 H7985 H7989 H8614
      power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases
      1a) leave or permission
      2) physical and mental power
      2a) the ability or strength with which one is endued, which he either possesses or exercises
      3) the power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege)
      4) the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)
      4a) universally
      4a1) authority over mankind
      4b) specifically
      4b1) the power of judicial decisions
      4b2) of authority to manage domestic affairs
      4c) metonymically
      4c1) a thing subject to authority or rule
      4c1a) jurisdiction
      4c2) one who possesses authority
      4c2a) a ruler, a human magistrate
      4c2b) the leading and more powerful among created beings superior to man, spiritual potentates
      4d) a sign of the husband's authority over his wife
      4d1) the veil with which propriety required a women to cover herself
      4e) the sign of regal authority, a crown
      For Synonyms see entry G5820

      Delete
    2. [3.] 1850. ἐξουσιάζω {4x} exousiazo, ex-oo-see-ad’-zo: from 1849; to control: exercise authority upon {1x}, bring under the power of {1x}, have power of {2x}.
      Exousiazo, as a verb, means (1) exercise authority upon, Gentile rulers, Lk 22:25; (2) bring under the power of a thing, 1 Cor 6:12, All are within my power; but I will not put myself undertone power of any one of all things; (3) have power over one’s body in proper marital relationships, 1 Cor 7:4 (twice). See: TDNT - 2:574, 238; BAGD - 279a; THAYER - 225d.

      1832. ἔξεστι {32x} exesti, ex’-es-tee or ἔξεστιν existen, ex’-es-teen
      Strongs Number: ***G1832***
      Orig: third person singular present indicative of a compound of 1537 and 1510; so also ἐξον, exon ex-on' neuter present participle of the same (with or without some form of 1510 expressed); impersonally, it is right (through the figurative idea of being out in public):--be lawful, let,
      X may(-est). ***G1537 *** ***G1510***
      Use: TDNT-2:560,238 Verb
      Heb Strong:
      it is lawful

      1510. εἰμί {146X} eimi, i-mee’;
      Strongs Number: ***G1510***
      Orig: the first person singular present indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb; I exist (used only when emphatic):— I am + 1473 {74x}, am {55x}, it is I +1473 {6x}, be {2x},
      I was + 1473 {1x}have been {1x}, not tr {7x}. See BAGD - 222D; THAYER 175c See also 1488, 1498, 1511, 1527, 2258, 2071, 2070, 2075, 2076, 2771, 2468, 5600. G1488 G1511 G2258 G2070 G2076 G2468
      Use: TDNT-2:398,206 Verb
      Heb Strong:
      to be, to exist, to happen, to be present

      1511. εἰναι {126x}, i’-nahee;
      Strongs Number: ***1511***
      present infinitive, from *1510*; to exist— to be {33x}, be {28x}, was {15x}, is {14x}, am {7x}, are {6x}, were {4x}, no tr {11x}, misc. {8x} = come, X lust after,
      X please well, there is. See: BAGD - 223a; THAYER 176c

      1537. εκ {921x} ek, ek or ἐξ ex, ex;
      Strongs Number: ***G1537***
      a primary preposition denoting origin (the point whence motion or action proceeds), from out (of place, time, or cause; lit. or fig.; direct or remote): - of {367x},
      from {181x}, out of {162x}, by {155x}, on {134x}, with {25x}, misc. {97x} = after, among, are, at, betwixt, beyond, by the means of, exceedingly, (abundantly above), for (th), grudgingly, heartily, heavenly, hereby, very highly, in, …ly, (because, by reason) of, off (from), out among, out from, over, since, thenceforth, through, unto, vehemently, without. Often used in composition, with the same general import; often of completion. See: BAGD 234b; THAYER 189a
      Heb Strong:
      out of, from, by, away from

      Delete
    3. [4.] This is were it gets attorned by the scribes… Oh boy there’s a lot to digest.

      A Greek-English lexicon : Liddell, Henry George, 1811-1898 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive;
      https://archive.org/details/greekenglishlex00lidduoft/page/506/mode/1up?view=theater
      ἐξουσία - Page 506 First column (Center Left)
      ἐξουσία, ἠ, ( ἒξεστι) power, means, authority to do a thing, c. inf., χαιρειν καὶ νοσεῖν ἐξ. πά ρεστι Soph. Fr. 109 ; έξ. έστί μοι, inf., Antipho 112. 13, Thuc. 7. 12; ἐξουσίαν διδόναι ποιεῖν to give authority or power to do .. , Plat. Symp. 182 E, Crito 51 D, etc. ; opp. to ἐξ. ἔχειν, λαυβάνειν, etc., Andoc. 23. 14, Xen. Mem. 2. 6, 24, etc.; τῆ τῆς εἰρήνης ἐξ. with the freedom permitted by peace, Dem. 240. 23 ; ἐξ.ἒχειν θανάτον power of life and death,Arist. Fr. 374; but, c. gen. objecti, ἐξ. τινός power over, licence in a thing, τοῦ λέγειν Plat. Gorg. 461 E; ἐν μεγάλη ἐξ. τοῦ ἀδικεῖν lb. 526 A, cf. Rep. 554 C ; περί τινος Id. Legg. 936 A; κατὰ τὴν οὐκ ἐξ. τῆς ἀγωνίσεως from want of qualification for . . ,Thuc. 5- 50 2. licence, arrogance, Dem. 559. 24, cf. 403. 26; ὴ ἂγαν ἐξ. Id. 428. 22. II. absol. power, authority, might, as opp. to right, Eur. Fr. 778, Thuc. I. 38, cf. 3. 45. 2. an office, magistracy, Lat. potestas, Plat. Alc. I. 135 B; οί ἐν ταῖς ἐξουσίαις in Arist. Eth. N. I- 5, 3; οἰ ἐν ἐξουσία῍ὄντες Id. Rhet. 2. 6, 9; oὶ ἐπ` ἐξουσιῶν Lxx (Dan. 3. 2); ὴ ὺπατικὴ ὲξ. the consulate, Diod. 14. 113, etc.; ὴ ταμιευτικὴ ὲξ. the quaestorship, Dion. H. 8. 77; ή τοῦ θαλάμου έξ., in the Roman empire, lordship of the bedchamber, Hdn. I. 12. 3. as concrete, also like Lat. potestas, the body of the magistrates, Dion. H. II. 32; αί έξ. (as we say) the authorities, Plut. Philop. 17, and often in N. T. ; cf. τέλος. III. like περιουςία, abundance of means, resources, έξουσίας ὲπίδειξις Thuc. 6. 31, cf. 1. 123; ἐνδεεστέρως ἢ πρὸς τὴν ἐξ. Id. 4. 39; τῶν ἀναγκαίων ἐξ. Plat. Legg. 828 D. IV. pomp, Plut. Aemil. 34., ἐξουσιάζω to exercise authority, Arist. Eth. E. 1.5, 5, Dion. H. 9. 44, Lxx. 2. to exercise authority over, τοῦ μνήματος C. I. 4584, cf. Ev. Luc. 22. 25., 1 Ep. Cor. 7. 4 : Pass, to be held under authority, lb. 6. 12.


      Glance up a few words, and take a gander at the definition to the word that is prior to ἐξουσία;

      ἐξουLns δίκη, ὴ, ἐξείλλω like the Roman actio unde vi, an action of ouster or ejectment, Phryn. Com. Ποάστρ. 4: this was a process by which one, who alleged that he had been unlawfully excluded (ejected) from his property, might obtain redress : it presupposed a previous entry ( ἐμβατευειν ) on the part of the plaintiff, and an ouster ( ἐξάγειν, ἐξαγωγή ) on that of the defendant ; - both of which might be fictitious or formal : v. Harp. s. v., Suid. : but,
      II. in the Orators, the ἐξούλης δίκη is like the Lat. actio rei judicatae, an action of ejectment brought by one who claims property in consequence of a judgment of court and is excluded {ejected) from it by the former defendant or his agent, (such was the suit against Onetor, Dem. 864. 1-16, cf. 528. 12), against a defendant who has seized or refused to surrender property. Id. 540. 24., 541. 7., 543. 27; cf. Att. Process pp. 485, 749 sq., Dict, of Antt. s. v. ευβατεία, Buttm. Dem. Mid. Ind. s. v. The gen. is the only case used, except in Andoc. IO. 15, where we have an acc. pl., ἐξούλας ἢ γραφὰς ὦφλον.

      And checkout. What this 1940’s supplement that gives this addition for “ἐξουσία” on page 57 ;
      A Greek-English lexicon : Liddell, Henry George, 1811-1898 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive:
      https://archive.org/details/b31364949_0003/page/57/mode/1up?ref=ol&view=theater
      Ἐξουσία I. I, add ‘; licence conferred on teachers of Jewish law, Ev.Marc. I.22’

      Delete
    4. [5.] A Greek–English Lexicon - Wikipedia
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Greek–English_Lexicon

      This offers up a few rare insights such as this sentence;
      “The first editor of the LSJ, Henry George Liddell, was Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, and the father of Alice Liddell, the eponymous Alice of the writings of Lewis Carroll. The eighth edition (1897) was the last edition published during Liddell's lifetime.”
      There is another sentence with Greek words that wikipedia felt needed to show, that I would rather not rewrite.
      [

      Delete
    5. [6.] And here is an African corporation;
      Exsousia — Founded in the year 2012 and located in the Gauteng province of South Africa, Exsousia International (Pty) Ltd is a building and civil engineering consulting ...
      https://exsousia.co.za/

      Delete
    6. [7.] An article on why , and when a woman covers her head;
      “Why I Cover My Head” – Light of the World
      https://kaylened.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/why-i-decided-to-wear-a-head-covering/
      “…since a man is the image and glory of God, but a woman (gune’) is the glory of man.”
      1 Corinthians 11:7

      Delete
    7. [8.] First I would like to give my thanks for offering up the word “ἐξουσία”. From the research that was involved on my part I was able to find an old Greek to English Lexicon that I didn’t know existed that is extremely expansive(and probably expensive as well). Both of my Greek to English Dictionaries don’t even come close. It reinforced what I have known all along how limiting the internet is with what is provided for mass consumption versus having a true hard copy reference book. It brought back memories of my younger years when we would see what new words would be added into the new editions of Dictionaries, along with the Encyclopedias . This is what was available in my era, along with countless hours in the Public Libraries. Lastly, one must know what context that the one is using these words are being applied to. That is where the teacher can’t be some “Government” churned out Educator. Because what I am seeing, the whole underlining of these words, and their roots are quite clearly about having the power against entrapment, enslavement, and those that like to wield their power to do both. It brings another memory of a youngster wanting someone to listen to them that would keep saying “excuse me…excuse me…excuse me…excuse me…excuse me…excuse me…excuse me… until finally someone acknowledged them, but by that time the youngster forgot what they were going to say. But did they? This youngster just used the Power to stop an elder from doing what they were doing, and divert the attention to themselves. This word ἐξουσία may have the same if not more weight if used correctly.

      Delete
    8. Here is my take for [7.] that was supposed to go with;
      Maybe this is the bit of scripture that gave these Pagan Converts / of the Priestly Class the supposed authority to lay claim to the “Mary” / “Mother” side of our Creator’s creation (ie., Woman folk) ?

      Delete
    9. This is an addendum to [5.];
      Now after reading the definition for ἐξούλns δίκη then going to wikipedia and reading how;
      “The LSJ's definitions reflect the Victorian morality of its time…”, which then sites three Greek expletives for “Their” example to make “It’s” case.Instead of using an example such as;
      ἐξούλns δίκη to show the scope, and breadth, or better yet latitudes that this Dictionary brought forward should show all of Us how subtle “Their” Psyops agenda is. Pretty slick schtick to get the reader to read smut in order to divert their attention away from what could possibly set them free, or at least gain their property back. Property ie., what is proper to each one of Us.

      Delete
    10. lol!!!
      foscolos00, did you come to any:
      1. general conclusion(s) about "exousia"?!
      2. its meaning (s)
      3. usage(s)?

      are you done exploring it?
      glad you found a great new study tool.
      yes, internet leaves so much out that it often changes the meaning, or at least the depth of ones understanding about the whirrrd. i just use an old hardcover Strongs... you know those HUGE ones that weigh about 8 pounds!!

      • did you go ahead and run the references on "huperecho" too? :):)
      • put them together as a phrase?
      just curious.
      _____
      i really luv 1510. and the Gk. whirrrd ieme. such a descriptive language.

      Delete
    11. omg, my eyes landed on a word youd typed foscolos00 as i was "publishing" that last comment:
      the way you spelled exsousia; is that a typo?

      the reason im asking is bec it struck me that "sous" is part of ie-sous G2424 ["transliteration of 3091H/Lot Yehoshua, Joshua, ywhw saves. - strongs online.]

      if you say iesous, it sounds like isis. ive done a whirrrd study on iesous, too...
      woooohoohoohoo, thats a lengthy one too! it just literally goes all over the place... i mean in many different directions... then finally you circle back and drop the previously- unrelated pieces in and they form up an overall picture... at least one corner of the picture anyway. :)

      that seemed to be the only way to really find out the truth.

      but the deeper you dig, the more you discover is there to find. :):) Fun!

      Delete
    12. correction:
      that was *eimi* not ieme.

      Delete
    13. Have to construct an outline, because this one word can almost be placed in just about every part of speech, and sentence structure. it appears that it was also hijacked, and used for "licence conferred on teachers of Jewish law" (See the 1940's addendum I provided above). All of Us know how it goes; A Gift is given, and then another steals it out of want, not necessity, it then becomes abused because the thief never had any care for it in the first place. Usually the thief only wanted to take it because he, or she didn't want the one to whom it was given to have it. It also appears that there were some of the best researchers in the early 1800's that were able to compile extraordinary reference manuals. The uncensored resources that they must of had at their beckon call must have been off the charts.
      Also, look how licence is spelled back in the 1800's compared to now.
      And no, in this instance the spelling of "Exsousia" was not a type o, It is a name of a Corporation.

      Delete
    14. name: Exsousia: yes. i see now.
      _____
      your 11:40AM comment: yes, agree:
      that is EXACTLY what happens to our gifts, EXACTLY.
      _____
      i feel like this is important, what were doing right now.... i just typed that and my comment got wiped out at that very moment!! haha! confirmation!!? lol!
      anyway, what im picking up right now (not to take YOU off your track foscolos00,... just sharing about the particular whirrrds that are standing out to me at the moment):
      _______
      theres:
      • eimi * "i exist"
      • sous, sou, sui, su * "you"
      • exousia * "power"
      • huperecho * "(be) above" (5242G).

      "Who (is) above you?" :):)
      _____
      romans 13: "let every soul..."
      from biblehub: strongs 5590G: psyxe, from psyxo: to breathe, blow: corresponds exactly to OT5315(H): phago, soul.
      "The soul is the direct aftermath of God breathing (blowing) His gift of life into a person making them an ensouled being." ...yeh,alrightnow! :):)

      be subject: obey, subdue, submit:

      to the higher powers.
      4755G magistrates: strategos [what??? is that a *strata-GY??? A STRATEGY??!!] base of a stratia!!
      " a general. (by implication or analogy) a (*military*!!!?!?) governor (praetor), the chief (praefect):

      ******OF THE (LEVITICAL) TEMPLE-*WARDENS*"!!!!! OMG!!!*****
      _________
      and here! get this reference thats given with it!!:
      8614H: "tiphtaye" = the TREASURERS, the judges, the magistrates and all "RULERS"!

      am i reading this right?!!!!

      well, if so, there is yet another puzzle piece!:
      in their whirrrled, their
      • "Treasurer/ Treasury" (BankingFICTIONS)" is intrinsically woven
      together with their:
      • "Rulers" (their "King's Bench", Governors/ Military RulingFICTIONS);
      and also their
      • "Judges"/ Religion, Ecclesiastical = Judging; their "JudicialBench/ BenchFICTION"!!!

      ***********

      so, there is the:
      FICTIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM: Treasury/Bank=Bench [still?]
      FICTIONAL MILITARY SYSTEM: Governors/ Military:KingsBench
      FICTIONAL RELIGIOUS SYSTEM:
      Ecclesiastical/ JudgesBench.

      ALL TRYING TO "HUPERECHO EXOUSIA/Arcing:Arch-ingPower
      over man?
      ______
      who (is) over (a) man?
      another man on a man-made bench, sitting above (the) man?
      or that man's creator and fellow-equal man?
      ______
      NOW HEAR THIS!!!!:
      I CHOOSE MY CREATOR!!!

      NO FICTIONS JUDGING MAN FOR ME!!! OH NO YOU DONT!!!
      "OFFER" NOT ACCEPTED!!! :):):)
      eimi RETURN IT "FROM WHENCE IT ORIGINATED" ("ek", Grk.), MULTIPLIED!!
      eimi:MAN UNDER CREATOR ONLY! AND UNDER OTHER MAN IF eimi HARMS MAN.
      NOTHING ELSE APPLIES TO (A) MAN WITHOUT (THAT) MANS:
      1. INTENT
      2. DECLARATION BEFORE PEOPLE
      3. FREELY DO, FROM HIS OWN WILL!!! haha,yes!
      ______
      = is:American common law; and
      the man they call jesus taught this very exact same law system for man to use!!!!!

      Delete
    15. They are god and their interpretation of the Bible and your expulsion from Heaven, ie Earth
      https://www.hasidicuniversity.org/index.php?page=hu_theocracy/th_toc.htm

      Delete
  4. [6.] And here is an African corporation;
    Exsousia — Founded in the year 2012 and located in the Gauteng province of South Africa, Exsousia International (Pty) Ltd is a building and civil engineering consulting ...
    https://exsousia.co.za/

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE Anonymous or unknown; YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.