Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Saturday, June 8, 2019

States vs. States of States

By Anna Von Reitz

Why, you might ask yourselves, was it necessary for the fledgling government of this country to create multiple organizations of states?  

We have the Union, The United States, formed of republican states occupying the national soil jurisdiction of this country.  

We have the Federation, The United States of America, formed of Sovereign States occupying the international jurisdiction of the land and sea.  

We have a Confederation of States of States, the States of America, formed of commercial corporations, occupying the global jurisdiction of the air.  

If you look at this list you will see the answer.  Each of these different organizations--- The United States, The United States of America, and the States of America----  all serve in different capacities and occupy different jurisdictions.  

Their member "states" are different in nature, too.   The national-level republican states and the international States of the Union are defined by physical borders, but the global States of States represented by the States of America Confederation are commercial corporations.   

So as you can see, each one of these organizations operate in profoundly different capacities and in different jurisdictions.  A state is not the same as a State, and a State is not a State of State [Confederate State]. 

We rarely have a reason to differentiate between our states and our States, because soil and land jurisdictions work so closely together that the evidence of one is evidence of the other.  General Session Laws of the State are supposed to reflect the will of the republican state and people, whereas State of State Statutes are supposed to "codify" and regulate the operations of the Territorial Government and their corporate personnel on our shores.  

An important distinction needs to be made here and underlined in Day-Glo Orange Highlighter.  

A State is corporate in that it is partially fictional by virtue of having a name --- say, Wisconsin---- but it is a free-standing entity that is physically defined, much as a man named Thomas Tinker is a free-standing entity that is physically defined. Neither Wisconsin nor Thomas Tinker is incorporated as part of some greater entity.  

In keeping with the Law of Kinds, a State like Wisconsin, is operated by People, like Thomas Tinker. 

A State of State, like the State of Wisconsin,  may be incorporated (chartered) by the greater, free-standing entity --- the State, which is what our original plan was when the Confederation of States was formed.  

Or, a State of State could also be chartered by a foreign government --- and merely set in place as a "service provider" which is in fact what has gone on here since the Civil War, when the British Government secretively came in here and arbitrarily put a Scottish corporation in charge of our State of State administration "for" us. 

States are sovereign entities; States of States, by definition, are not.  

Under the constitutional agreements, our States agreed not to operate directly as States of States, which is also part of the reason that we can be absolutely sure that none of our actual States were involved in the Civil War, which was a commercial mercenary fight among commercial corporations--- States of States, which are also called "Confederate States" even though they are not actually States at all.   

Since World War II we have further compounded the confusion between States and States of States by allowing the deployment of Municipal STATES OF STATES on our shores.  These incorporated franchises are totally foreign and are chartered by foreign governments in the business of providing essential government services.  

That is, the STATE OF WASHINGTON is not chartered by nor operating under the auspices of Washington, the State.  It is a franchise of the foreign Municipal United States Government and its infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, dba, the UNITED STATES.  

So, we have our native States which are corporate, but not incorporated, which are sovereign free-standing entities with physically-defined borders, and then, we have a plethora of foreign "service organizations" operating as Territorial States of States and Municipal STATES OF STATES, none of which are actually chartered by our States. 

This is not the way our government is supposed to be organized or operated. 

What should happen in a sane world is that the State, such as Georgia, charters a State of State and incorporates it to conduct business for Georgia.  

The original States of State were put out of commission by the Civil War and never "reconstructed" which has led to this situation wherein foreign Territorial and Municipal franchise organizations have been here on our soil conducting business "for" us and recklessly spending our money and credit as if we ever authorized them to do this.  

To solve this conundrum requires us to organize our actual States of the Union and to act in our capacity as the People of this country, and to finish the so-called "Reconstruction" that has been pending since the end of the Civil War.  

Put simply, the People of Georgia need to re-charter The State of Georgia to conduct business for them.  

We have been hampered from doing this necessary work by the foreign-chartered government services organizations on our shores arbitrarily conferring citizenship obligations upon us.  The British Territorial States of States claim that we are United States Citizens.  The Municipal STATES OF STATES claim that we are Citizens of the United States.  

It is up to us to thumb our noses at these patently false presumptions and tell our subcontractors and their employees that no, in fact, we are State Citizens and nothing else: Virginians, Californians, Minnesotans and so on, for each of the fifty States of the Union. 

It is also up to us to act in our own best interests and explicitly return to the land and soil jurisdiction of our States which is our natural home --- and deny them any excuse for their insupportable presumptions. 


See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. Thank You!

    I am finding the above article to be one of the clearest on this subject matter that I have seen presented here.

  2. The States of States and their planning to bring about total destruction as per their masters bidding
    Destruction and depopulation all over the world using covert operations
    First hand account of what these rogue corporations did after hurricane andrew - hundreds of thousands lost and thrown in to open graves and buried while mainstream media ran bogus stories
    No prior warning to the people they were advised they were safe
    Katrina same destruction - released those dams on purpose
    Gulf Oil Spill
    Rockefeller Oil moves in
    Absolutely insane is what these freaks are and unless they are eliminated these so called biblical climate change global warming disasters will continue

  3. Around 1995, several of us that held lawful meetings (many thanks to Ralph Winterrowd) to try and understand lawful matters in Alaska, wrote to the Secretary of State of Alaska, requesting true and correct certified copies of the Seal for: Alaska, State of Alaska and Alaska State. Three ever so slightly different seals were sent back to us!

  4. As we speak I am involved in contracting a surveyor, licensed by "State of Idaho" in behalf of my daughter to survey soil and land in Idaho and make the fact of the land being in Idaho, not State of Idaho, made very plain on his survey.

    He has complied with our instructions about using the proper English name of my daughter, spelled in proper English including her full middle name.

    He has complied in substitution of the adjacent property owners by using their names spelled in proper English, however their middle initials are not given the full middle name, only the initial. This replaced the former "Tax Parcel Number" that was shown on previous surveys. Also the State is called out in the surveyors survey as "State of Idaho", and we have directed the surveyor to not show State of Idaho (his term), and replace it with merely "Idaho", or as "land and soil of Idaho". We will instruct him to use the word Idaho, and delete the phrase "State of Idaho".

    What other corrections to the typical styles of corporate nomenclature would be appropriate for us to instruct the surveyor to use in keeping with making the survey a correct reflection of the land being in Idaho, and the owner being a non-corporate entity?

    We do have the Range, Section, and Township named, and distances in metes and bounds are called out on the survey. Also it is called out that the survey is for Valley County, not County of Valley (though some County letters have shown the latter name on the letterhead).

    Any suggestions or directions, Anna? Others?

    1. Joel: I have no answers for you, but am interested in how your process is going for you, has it done anything for you, any response from the County. I'm trying to get my land situation straight, so any info would be welcomed.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.