Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

A Repeat of Answers Already Given

By Anna Von Reitz

Certain people who will remain unnamed and hopefully forgotten are tramping around pretending that they have valid questions that I haven't answered.  In fact, I answered these questions (and more) a long time ago, and the replies are published.  But just so that everyone sees the answers and knows that I answered them and that I have no purpose of evasion, here are the answers again.  Would someone please make sure that Jeff Dougherty in Portland, Oregon, gets these plastered in front of his nose, so that he can stop pretending that I haven't answered?

1. Who swore you in as Judge? - please provide doc 

The Chaplain of our State Assembly, as it happens, heard my Acceptance of Office, because the last competent judge in our Assembly died of complications of old age. Who hears your Acceptance doesn't matter. The fact that you Accepted the Office and that there were Witnesses to the fact --- that matters.   

No documentation beyond the memory of those present  and a written Witness Testimony exists; and it wasn't a "swearing" in.  Land jurisdiction judges don't swear oaths at all, and if you read your Bible and knew your Land Law, you would already know this.

What oath did you take? and please provide a copy

As explained above, land jurisdiction Justices don't "swear Oaths" and NEVER have.

By what authority has made your husband Head of State?

Blood inheritance is what rules in the international jurisdiction of the sea -- this is the realm of Monarchs. It has nothing directly to do with the land jurisdiction that we are restoring, but since you ask --- he inherited the duty and responsibility from his ancestors all the way back to William the Conqueror.  He didn't ask for it and didn't want it and avoided it most of his life. He came forward to challenge the Queen's bid to claim all our "abandoned" land as hers.

This was bad news for the Queen, but as Jim's ancestor, William Belcher, already granted you the status of being a "sovereign in your own right", it doesn't preclude 350 million other Americans from stepping forward and challenging her claim, too.  Having Jim do it from a pre-established American sovereignty based on the Norman Conquest was simply a matter of demonstrating to the whole world that, yes, we are still here, and no, this land is not abandoned nor is it lacking valid sovereigns to operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

What impact did the 1783 Treaty of Peace have for We the People being recognized as sovereign people? 

The language of the Treaty is complex enough so that many people -- apparently including you -- are deceived by it.  

Among other stumbling blocks, even though it's purpose is to put the final touches on a peace process ending the Revolutionary War, the Treaty continues to call King George the "Prince of the United States" and also to name him the "Arch-Treasurer" thereof.

It speaks of the "free and independent and sovereign people of the United States" in almost the same breath that it speaks of "inhabits" remaining to provide essential services.

So what are we do make of all this?

The Treaty was written in 1783, but "the United States" -- which is the Municipal Holy Roman Empire Government and not "The United States" most people assume---was already established here by Benjamin Franklin in the 1750's when he applied to be Post Master and established a seat of government for it in Philadelphia. 

So under the Treaty of Peace some thirty years later, they are agreeing that King George will act as the "Prince" (under the Pope) and the Arch-Treasurer of the Commonwealth and Municipal interests of "the United States". 

This has nothing to do with our Union of republican states: The United States, which the King doesn't even deign to mention.

But in the second context, when speaking about the "free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States" versus the "inhabitants" thereof, as you can see down to this day, nobody living as a member of a Commonwealth and nobody subject to the Pope's Municipal Government can be considered "free", "sovereign" or "independent".  

This references "the people" of the soil jurisdiction who are already recognized as "sovereigns in their own right" as "free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States" --- meaning free, sovereign, and independent people outside of "he United States" which is again, the Municipal Government.

The "inhabitants" remaining to provide "essential services" are British troops and loyalists and employees of the Holy Roman Empire, all working in various government-related jobs.  They were allowed to remain here and work here to provide a continuity of services. Thus they are "inhabitants" --- temporarily "residing" here, but not part of the people. 

In modern terms, these "inhabitants" then were fulfilling the same position as "US Citizens" now, even though the creation of "United States Citizens" (British) and "Citizens of the United States" (Holy Roman Empire) would not be more formally defined until the adoption of the Original Federal Constitution, "The Constitution for the united States of America", four years later.

What impact did the 1st Act of Congress 1789 have on the oath of office? 

None at all, so far as the land and soil jurisdictions of this country are concerned, since none of us swear Oaths at all. 

But both the international jurisdiction of the sea and the global municipal realm of commerce not only allow but require the swearing of oaths and the imposition of punishments, so, before the Congress could adopt the (British) Territorial Constitution called "The Constitution of the United States of America", in 1789, they had to change things to allow "swearing" and taking of oaths, yet make it clear that these pertained only to British Territorial and Municipal Officers and Offices.  Which is precisely what the First Act of Congress in 1789 does.

What have you accomplished for the people of your home state Alaska?

My "home state" is Wisconsin, but as for Alaska---

Well, let's see, I kept the Queen from selling off her "tribute" rights and interest in our underground minerals to China, and I kept the Russians from claiming that the only valid land interests remaining in Alaska belonged to the Russian Orthodox Church here --- thereby forestalling their excuse to claim back Alaska as Russian land.

What have you done for your State of the Union that can compare to that?

Let's see what you can answer.


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. Paul, Get thisand all POS "unknown" off this site! You can BLOCK ALL UNKNOWN commentators! You have stated you would do this, now PLEASE DO IT!!!!!

    1. Paul I second the motion to toss out the commentators whose comments have no interest in the subject of re-construction our State National Assemblies and are aimed at denigrating and hurling only low brow disrespect and insulting slurs at Anna. Allowing them to be heard on Anna's blog gives them a stage onto which their dim wits and unrefined mentality do not entitle them.

    2. ...UCADIA
      Thank you for providing an "example" of what Joel mentions!!!!

      "Learn to Swim to Land or drown in the deceit"

  2. Among many related aids to reconstruction of the organic States of the United States of America, you Anna have laid down the path for Americans to follow en mass who comprehend their duped and enslaved condition - to re-assemble our State Jural Assemblies, our Common Law courts, empaneling 12 State National Citizens to hear evidence and to bring indictments against the accused who violate our Common Law, to populate our Courts with Judges, Clerks, Recorders, Bailiffs, Sheriffs, Public Notaries, to assemble State Militias, to correct errant "tax parcel" records with Deeds of Re-conveyance of our land, our Names, our purloined TRADE NAMES, back to the organic sovereign independent States and people, which we have been owed since they have fraudulently been "held in abeyance" post the commercial conflict called the Civil War.
    Early along the way American State Nationals can and should revoke the election they ignorantly were presumed to have granted to the IRS to pay huge sums of their hard earned earnings in imaginary "income tax" to pay the interest on printing Federal Reserve Notes. And Anna you have shown the path to re-claim the wealth now flowing in international commerce back to Common law trading and banking with lawful money.