Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Monday, January 8, 2018

Bundys Freed -- Extra! Extra! Hear All About It!


By Anna Von Reitz

It is my understanding that the bad behavior of the FBI and BLM in this matter has finally caught up to them and that the Bundys and all those who have likewise been falsely accused and prosecuted and persecuted will now be set free and the record established as a finding in their favor "with prejudice"----preventing the vermin responsible for this travesty from ever coming back and bringing forward any more complaints.


Thank God. Finally. 

And now, I have a few more choice words:

18 U.S. Code Subsection 2333-- Civil Remedies

(a) Action and Jurisdiction---

Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefore in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney's fees.

Hear that, Guys?  3X plus court costs. Guaranteed. 

And since the Municipal United States is a foreign government and the FBI and BLM are both foreign corporations acting outside their jurisdiction to wreck havoc and attempt unlawful conversion of assets and threaten (and take, in the case of LaVoy Finicum) the lives of the American People, aka, United States Nationals, this IS an act of "international terrorism" by "uniformed officers" against peaceful non-combatant civilian Third Parties. 

There you go. 

Just remember that in America the words "interstate" and "international" are completely interchangeable, because each state is also a nation---- and also remember that the federal government, whether territorial or municipal, is foreign with respect to us. There you have it---- acts of "international terrorism" being promoted by our own employees against us. 

They will put themselves right out of business if they continue with these abuses, and I hope and I pray that the Bundys and Steve Curry and everyone else who has been wrongfully attacked by these vermin take such a bite out of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC.  commercial profits that they learn their lessons and never, ever do these things again on American soil ---or anywhere else for that matter.

Which brings up my final good thought for the day: Trey Gowdy seems like a real American----a tough, intelligent example of the breed.  I like him.  And he just happens to be cochair of the all-powerful House Oversight Subcommittee.... and they just happen to be investigating the actions and inactions of the FBI....

Now, the FBI and the BLM, which have both played such a disgraceful part in the prosecution of the ranchers that is just ending, are owned and operated by what appears to be a private, for-profit agency holding company calling itself the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC. 

I've mentioned this fact before.  BLM wasn't just calling on the FBI for help with a problem within FBI jurisdiction.  BLM was colluding with a sister company, being directed by the same parent corporation.  Ah, so, can anyone tell us who is responsible for the Bad Behavior of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC.--their parent company?

Who is on the Board of Directors of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC.? 

Who is accountable for the misdirection and misconduct of these agencies?  Who isn't doing their job to properly inform, direct, and deploy the BLM and the FBI to do the actual jobs that they are supposed to do? 

We didn't hire them to harass innocent ranchers over grazing rights they are owed.  We certainly didn't hire them to ambush and murder LaVoy Finicum in cold blood.  So who set these public servants on such a misdirected path?  And why?

Americans want to know--- so we make changes to this little "system" of things gone so horribly wrong.  It's abundantly clear that somebody somewhere needs the fear of God put into them.  And I bet Trey Gowdy can find out who without burning up too many calories.  

Let's ask him.  Let's ask the whole House Oversight Subcommittee. 

 ----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

28 comments:

  1. Jeff Sessions needs to take heed.

    Americans need to strike while the iron is hot, on their path to throwing off the presumed "U.S. Citizen" mis-characterization.

    Let's exit that federal plantation.

    More fuel to Living Law Firm's fire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, unfortunately i do not believe the bundys went in to this in their proper status originally nor do other U.S. Citizens/14th amendment persons...but it is not a mischaracterization if you have contracted with them and have not properly rebutted their presumptions; you must do what they tell us to do to recognize it in their system otherwise they will not respect anything else done that cannot be proven without a preponderance of evidence. In other words, without court orders, good luck in court and with their fine peace officers on the side of the road and/or homeland security.

      Delete
    2. Sessions need to be fired, for non-performance. He is a big coward with a small backbone, and a big lying mouth. With all these treasonists still running loose for this entire past year, while he is presently all wrapped up in trying to interfere with states rights in passing their own marijuana laws. Personally, I have no use for MJ but its still one of those things constitutionally that ''is left to the states' to decide.
      Sessions just needs to go, and get a Trey Gowdy type in there who will swear to DO the job. I wonder what his salary is; what a waste of good money that is !

      Delete
  2. love trey gowdy he is a bulldog and as clever as they come

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not sure how much he really knows or if he is just a brainwashed slave to the system. he must know something though if he knows he hasnt been able to touch HRC im sure he knows why, or the rest of the congressional slime he has been trying to get at somewhat unsuccessfully. they know the real game but as an attorney he has taken an oath to never divulge what they truly know that isnt a part of the club.

      Delete
    2. penny took the words right out of my mouth!!! Yes, trey talks tuff but...what has he done!!!??? Absolutely nothing!!! THAT ought to tell you something!!! Agreed also that he isn't going to rock that boat. But he is like your typical politician, all "show" and no "go"!!!!!! And WHO is running this sorry country is the same cliché that operates the Fed Board. Also, the Masons run with all of their 33* buddies all trying to get Albert Pike's Plan, word war 3 going so they can destroy Christianity, Islam, and Judaism and get that Luciferian religion set up. For all you good masons out there that want to call me a liar about this, google "Pike's Plan" and then READ "Morals and Dogmas" and ALL through that book Pike states that they worship Lucifer, but all degrees below 30* are told the symbols mean something else. Also, do history search of Albert Pike and you find he worshipped the devil all his life!!! That was one EVIL dude!!! But it remains to be seen if the masons can stab the jews in the back as the jews are trying to set up Jerusalem as the world capital to rule over all of their gentile slaves that are left after billions have been culled, and the masons want Jerusalem destroyed to rid itself of all monotheistic religions and get daddy devil worship installed worldwide. But to answer the original question as to WHO is in charge of the good ole USSA, Satanic Jews and Satanic worshipping masons!!! Don't believe it!!!??? Then get off the butt and do some RESEARCH!!!

      Delete
    3. All this ridiculous fighting for the one top rulership position; the islamists, the jews, the masonics, the vatican, the one worlder's, the establishment folks, the liberals, the satanists, on and on it goes, like a bunch of street thugs just wanting to punch somebody's lights out, for sport.
      Poor bastards, full of personal 'issues' playing russian roulette with Life itself; full of themselves and too stupid to realize life is something to be lived within all that God has given us. What a pack of ingrates they all are !
      So, the question on the minds of most of the 7.4 billion, who is going to win this fight and get that Rulership?
      NONE OF THEM. They ALL toil in vain.

      Delete
    4. You forgot me Abby...I would like that thrown for just one week....thats all, just give me a week and then God can have it for eternity. Just so I can see every single CEO, JUDGE, all attorneys, all previous presidents still living, all law enforcement, all of Congress, everyone in the court system profiting off people, all intelligent agencies, and wait a minute..half the country works for govt.....the he'll with it, it is easier for God to handle this all at once...!! But I think about it all the time...!!!

      Delete
  3. So now what happens to all the thugs responsible for the harm done to the Bundy's? I say lock up every last criminal behind this entire event. The prosecutors, AHO's armed guards and all the rest and what about the murder of LaVoy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, its far from over with, John. I think this has just begun to sprout a lot of legs.

      Delete
    2. John Gault....the answer is...its civil sir...!! Go sue them..!! I say change the LAW to read everything is criminal.....that way when we are wronged, the cops and courts can't play that stupid game anymore....are you going to arrest this person or not...thats all I want to know. Because if you dont, your under arrest....put your hands behind your head NOW..!! Don't even think about going for that gun or resisting arrest or you will be doing life imprissionment...!! Now that's what I call "RIGHTS"!!!!

      Delete
    3. The problem we all make when we are charged by the STATE is that they are handing us a complaint (only an information), never a true BILL through a "Grand Jury" .. So we are only going in as defendants..!! But in order to get true justice and quickly is to make a "counterclaim " against the STATE so at the end of the trial the State is automatically found guilty and has to pay up right then like us..And that "counterclaim" is mandatory or they won't be liabile...what about all their crimes that they never had to prove because you didn't take a mandatory counterclaim...!! That's just how Admiralty works...!! You can't just walk into court as a defendant, without naming their indiscretions too..!! Then they have something to lose to...

      Delete
  4. The Prime Law

    Article I
    No person, group, of persons, or government shall initiate force, threat of force, or fraud, against any individual's, self, property, or contract.


    Article II
    Force is morally-and-legally justified only for protection from those who violate Article I.


    Article III
    No execptions shall exist for Articles I and II

    All those who are a part of the justus system should be the ones locked up. These rogue foreign agent blood sucking pariah all need to go down and extracted from the planet.




    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When I first read this article I got excited until I realized that this is for U.S. nationals. Isn't a "national of the United States" a "citizen or non citizen national of the United States" and a federal person subject to the jurisdiction of United States?

    8 U.S. Code § 1101 - Definitions
    (a)As used in this chapter—
    (22)The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.
    Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1101

    national of the United States
    (2)the term “national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;

    18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions
    As used in this chapter—
    (2)the term “national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
    Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331

    IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT \ INA: ACT 101 - DEFINITIONS \
    Act 101(a)
    (22) The term "national of the United States" means:
    (A) a citizen of the United States, or
    (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.
    Source: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-101/0-0-0-195.html

    So then how can this possibly be a remedy for us as non US citizen state nationals? What am I missing here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1FreeMan, my thoughts exactly. Wow, what a blow. So then if a ''thoroughly paper filed' individual gets into Court and claims to be an American National, the courts would take that to mean they are a 'citizen' - - so then what good is all the paper filing, and just what exactly are the People ''taking back''!
      So yeah, then where is the 'remedy' on this ball of dirt.
      Nada.

      Delete
    2. No, Abby. Don't mix them up. You are an "American national" but not a "national of the US". Let me give you the rundown here.
      You are:
      __A "national" pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.” (lower case s)
      __An "American national" pursuant to 8 U.S. Code § 1502
      __A "Constitutional State Citizen" pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of America Article 4 Section 2a; “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.” (Privileges and Immunities Clause)
      __A Citizen of the united States* of America, NOT the same as a U.S. (federal) citizen.
      __A Citizen of (your state), being an inhabitant and having your domicile in (your state) and therefore a Citizen of these united States* of America.
      __The Supreme Court has officially defined the key term "United States" to have three separate and distinct meanings: *(3) It may be the collective name for the fifty States, which are united by and under the U.S. Constitution. - Hooven & Allison Co. vs. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)
      __"A person who is a citizen of the United States (Federal government; Fourteenth Amendment citizen) is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States (Federal government; Fourteenth Amendment citizen). To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, - the right to declare who are its citizens." [State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380] [6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]
      __"It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States (Federal government; Fourteenth Amendment citizen) and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual." - Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 [(1873) emphasis added]
      __"There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States (Federal government; Fourteenth Amendment citizen) and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter." [Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
      __An "alien" pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(3) The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States.
      __If not born here but inhabit a state, then "naturalized" pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(23) "The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever."

      You are not:
      __A 14th Amendment Federal citizen “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Amendment XIV
      Section 1.
      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. (lower case c)
      __A "U.S. citizen" (lower case c) pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(22)(A)
      __A "national of the United States" pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(22)(A) which is "a citizen of the United States," (same as above)
      __A "national of the United States" pursuant to 8 USC § 1101(a)(22)(B) which is "a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States." (only if you are born in a US territory like Samoa)
      __A "citizen or non-citizen national of the United States" according to the DS-11 Passport application.
      Hope this helps.

      Delete
    3. PS: the remedy is in who you say that your are and having the public record corrected to back it up.

      Delete
    4. 1FM, however, who listens to us and what we claim/say who or what we are. Do any prosecutors or judges check the Record before they pull out their daggers?
      In the case of ever ending up in court for something, I think it will also take a demeanor of confidence and assuredness that we know what we are talking about, and present ourselves as 'we know we are right''. Presentation is the other half of 'winning'.
      But throughout all the presentations in here, all the information and 'what to file', there has never even been any frosting on the cake. By that I mean, when and how to USE it.
      Where I got disgusted with the whole matter, is when I wasted a lot of time trying to find 'sessions laws' (which they must have buried in the outhouse someplace where it cannot be found, in my state). To this day, there are folks who still can't find any such 'laws' that are applicable.
      Honestly, the whole mess turns my stomach. I have to go see a doc, do I have ulcers now, or what. Feels like we're living in some matrix; or like victims of some psy-ops operation; words, words and more words, and no reality. There is not a shred of evidence that anything is happening to our advantage.
      A few years back, we had out of state income, so did not feel a need to file our state income tax. In conjunction with other matters, we ended up filing it later on. Lo and behold our state charges a $500 late filing fee. This for a tax which was $2xx some dollars. I decided we are just not going to pay any of it. So I tapdanced the collection agency around for awhile, and just played wait-and-see.
      Now, the gov. decided there are just too many like me and offering tax amnesty, dropping all fees and interest. That's right; drop it in my lap, otherwise, do with $0 from me.

      But for this worldwide catastrophe,well it only has One solution and you know what that is.

      1Free, love reading your information; ya never know what just might ''stick'.

      Delete
    5. That's it, Abby, a total pay-ops! And they have been running it for so long now that everyone believes that it's the norm. Its called Assumpsit or assumption of guilt until proven innocent. Their biggest assumption is that you are a US citizen. That is why they don't check the record. And that is why you have to have to correct the record in your favor. Once you do, you can now file a JN or Judicial Notice and Demand to dismiss the case. No need to go to court. A JN demands an answer and may not be ignored. You are putting the court on notice that you are not a 14th amendment US citizen nor subject to US jurisdiction, but are a non-citizen state national and that this court has no juridpsdiction over you and therefor demand the case be dismissed. You would, add as exhibits all your proofs that you have added to the record such as a certified copy of your DS-11 application and ES (Explanatory Statement) form the SOS/DOS, a copy of your new passport, a certified copy of your recorded Act of Expatriation, Reconveyence of Deed, and Copyright of your Name, an authenticated COLB, etc.

      Delete
    6. Here we go again with all the paperwork...!! You all missed the part where the case has to be filed.....all cases have to be filed in the "district court of the United States....Where!! There are only DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES...!! Another trap in my opinion. The court of original jurisdiction is the "united states District Court. But no court on the LAND is listed that way..!! That's the reason for 28USC1333 "saving to suitors" law..It is affective only in "diversity"(status) cases, when you are challenging who you are and that they are a different status. So your paperwork has to reflect the fact that you are invoking the actual constitutional district court in a case involving a "diversity" of status.. And it's up to them to prove it, not you..!! As far as you are concerned, you never had any "nexus" with the corporate state....!! Make them prove it, not you...Dont make statements...nobody will be liable for your statements, no matter how true they are...You have to get everyone in court to make statements of fact, not you..!! You are there only as a National state man or woman....prove me wrong judge!! And then tell me how all those contracts the STATE had me forceably sign, under non disclosure and without "consideration" were lawful contracts and not "unconsciousable". And for God sakes, bond the case under "subragation" filling in the judges name if he tries any semantic deceit or intentionally using words or phrases to trap you foolishly into thinking anyone in their has a "claim " against you...!!ale the bond unreasonably high, but not stratospheric.....like $100 million, not $100trillion...!!

      Delete
    7. And you don't need to prove your an American national to invoke a "Judicial Notice"..! I did one years ago and no one in the court would accept it, even though it was handed to them by a notary!! Next time I walked into court everyone had a completely different attitude...if you all think that "paperwork" alone will save you in court, your in for a big surprise...its much better to know how a courtroom functions and how to handle a judge...!!

      Delete
  7. United States also means the 48 states of the union plus 2. National is not a citizen as a citizen is a creation, office of the corporation. USC 26 refers to Nations as non resident aliens, to confuse......

    ReplyDelete
  8. "...and everyone else who has been wrongfully attacked by these vermin take such a bite out of the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC. commercial profits that they learn their lessons and never, ever do these things again on American soil ---or anywhere else for that matter."

    Nice sentiment Mrs. Von Reitz.

    Yet, that will never work because the traitorous employees will never do that.
    They must be removed from their positions and replaced by competent people of service to others and are non-corruptible.

    Until that happens, expect business as usual with these psychotic employees within our hijacked government.

    Namaste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The corruption, deceit, and game playing and shear tyranny runs way too deep and dark, to ever work in this evil laden world. There is not even a flicker of advancement; just words on paper.
      Looks like psy-ops to me.

      Delete
    2. That's because half the country works either directly or indirectly for govt.

      Delete
  9. The person you were given by the State is the National and has its roots in that source. Men and women can not be to wear a brand of slavery. C,mon people.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Let's prey on it...!! Next time I go into court, I'm bringing my bible...you honor, this is the only law I recognize and slap it on the desk...how would you like to continue....???

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.