Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Friday, July 23, 2021

Shut Them Down -- Info for Litigation Committees

 By Anna Von Reitz

I recently recommended that all of our State Assemblies set up a Litigation Subcommittee as part of their Jural Assembly functions.
There are many reasons why it's worthwhile to do this as one of the first Subcommittees, but let's briefly run through why I am recommending this particular action even before you may have your jury pool and other parts complete.
Here's my reasoning --- (1) Many people who join our Assemblies have been attacked by the vermin and are confused, scared, hurting, or plain enraged. They come to us for help, but they are already entangled in a battle with the skunks and don't know what to do. (2) It's the nature of the Beast to attack on all sides at once, seeking to devour the victims. So we have people hurting from all sorts of causes --- IRS, foreclosures, CPS, and on and on. Every case is different, and it is impossible to cover all the causes with limited funding and personnel. (3) Once they come to our doors, these people feel relief, but if they don't get the attention and help they seek to cure their "legal" problems up front, they go on and cause more problems. They start trying to commandeer the Assemblies to help them deal with their lawsuits, etc.
So here is what we do --- we nip all attacks in the bud and we teach people how to do it and we come together to support each other in doing it --- and we organize this response through our Litigation Subcommittees. This will be a rallying point for Americans who have been similarly afflicted, and for Americans who know that they need a firmer understanding of the laws and jurisdictions.
We can run our law education classes through the Litigation Committees at the same time we are assisting each other with current cases.
Now please read the "conversation" below using Florida as an example, and notice the pleasant, laid back, country-style tone that you need to establish with the Judge. Remember that the Judge is the Referee. You don't attack the Referee. You prosecute the Prosecutor, instead.
The Prosecutor is the one who has to establish jurisdiction for the court and also prove his own standing to bring any claim before the court --- and even though this example is far from exhaustive, it's a good place for everyone to start.
At your first hearing, you say something like, "I am sorry, Judge _________ (whatever their name is). We all don't seem to be communicating very well, and I am sorry about that. I am not trying to be misunderstood or hard to understand.
I object to what this man, the Prosecutor, is presuming about me and I accordingly wish for a hearing of the facts and evidence beginning with discovery of who this man, Mr. Prosecutor, is, and the capacity in which he is acting, because I understand this much --- he has to prove the jurisdiction of the court over both subject matter and my person, and he has to prove his standing to bring any claim against me.
So can we just start over and establish the nature of the claim and the parties? Because I am challenging the prosecutor and his ability to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. (This is your counterclaim and denial of jurisdiction.)
I don't believe that the prosecutor is acting as a Public Officer in any public office related to me and my activities, so I would like to see his license to practice law in this country --- not a guild card, not a green card -- an actual license issued by any level of my American Government. Mr. Prosecutor, do you have such a license enabling you to address me?
[He won't have one.]
Well, if you don't have a license, and you still claim to be acting in a Public Office related to me, do you have a bond and an Oath of Office, as required to be an American Public Official? If so, I'd like to see your Bond and Oath of Office. [He won't have either.]
Now, I understand that you are working for the State of Florida, and I further understand that the State of Florida is an incorporated entity that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and that it has the Dunn and Bradstreet Number 004078374. [You can find these DUNS numbers in the Appendix of "You Know Something is Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".]
So, Mr. Prosecutor, when you come to court representing an incorporated entity, you are required to have the corporation's charter in your hand, and I would like to see it, please? And if you are not representing the State of Florida or are representing other entities or are representing multiple incorporated entities besides the State of Florida, I would like to examine those charter documents, too. [He won't have anything to show.]
Okay, well, without any valid proof I or the court can see, you are claiming to represent the State of Florida. Mr. Prosecutor, and I need to see some proof of your relationship with the State of Florida and any other entities you are representing here as plaintiffs, so please produce proof that you have a contract with the plaintiffs allowing you to represent them? I need something that has the official State of Florida seal on it.
Now, if you are representing the State of Florida, I assume you have a Business License and a Personal Liability Bond to ensure your Performance--- may I see those, please?
If we assume, and at this point, that's assuming a lot, that you are enabled and entitled to represent the State of Florida, you are representing a franchise organization that is a federated state ---- and that means that you need to have a Foreign Agents Registration on file. May I see proof of your registration as a Foreign Agent with respect to Florida and its people?
Ok, well, Mr. Prosecutor, we're not doing so good here proving that you have the standing to invoke any court in Florida, but nonetheless, just to be on the safe side, I need to give you and the Clerk and the Judge and the Court fair notice of my Foreign Sovereign status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Many people wonder about the meaning of that Act, and you may be one of them, so I will just observe to you that it is Federal Law under the United States Code that requires me to tell you outright that I am a Foreign Sovereign with respect to you, because I am a Floridian and I live in Florida, which is a foreign jurisdiction with respect to the State of Florida, where you and this court reside.
Now, Mr. Prosecutor, do you have a wet, blue ink signature of mine and Witnesses that I signed it, and established a contract between myself and the State of Florida, that you are using as the basis of your complaint?
[He won't have anything. If he refers to The Constitution of the State of Florida, you remind him, "But I, Mr. Prosecutor, live in Florida, not the State of Florida. Are you confused on that point?" If so, you tell him, "Well, the Florida where I live is three dimensional and has physical borders and rocks and trees and rivers. The State of Florida is what they call an incomplete state --- it only exists on paper as an incorporated entity. The Constitution of the State of Florida has nothing to do with me. I haven't signed it and haven't even read it, because it's a foreign service contract.]
Nobody actually lives in the State of Florida, which is part of the problem here. In order for me to have anything to do with the State of Florida, I'd have to be an elected official or officer or a dependent of the State of Florida corporation, and I am notably not any such person. I am a living, native Floridian, with no office of personhood or dependency related to the State of Florida, however styled.
So I am a bit perplexed, and wondering who or what you have mistaken me for? And why? Isn't it apparent who I am? And what I am? Do I need to show you the record of my political status as a Floridian? Or otherwise prove to you my membership in The Florida Assembly? I have proof on the public record, I just wasn't able to bring it with me today.
Mr. Prosecutor, I don't feel that you have demonstrated any contract with me, nor any contract with the State of Florida enabling you to do or say much of anything in this courtroom. You shouldn't be addressing me and making assumptions about me and my political status, and you shouldn't be attempting to subject me to laws that don't apply to me. I stand under the Public Law, not any private law, and I believe that I have made that abundantly clear today.
May I have your agreement that you have failed the good faith and competency tests and are not able to establish either subject matter or in personam jurisdiction for this court? [He will most likely stand silent.]
Judge______________, I think we've all heard enough. The evidence is what it isn't--- the Prosecutor has no standing to address me and has failed to establish the required jurisdictions for the court, so I believe that all consideration of his pleadings should be dismissed, and would ask you to deliver the same conclusions and set me free.
If the Judge has a brain in his head, he will lay down the gavel and dismiss the case on the spot.
Now, what else can you and your fellow Assembly Members do to ensure this good result --- that is, that the bloodsuckers let loose and get back on their side of the fence?
Go to: Declare your political status as an American, record it, and join your State Assembly.
State Assemblies, form your Litigation Subcommittees under the authority of your Jural Assemblies.
The Living Law Firm has been banned from THEIR courts, and with good reason. They were taking it in the shorts too often and on too many subjects and they just couldn't take it any more.
We are going to teach each and every one of you, all those who will study and make themselves approved, how to defend yourselves and stop these false claims where they start, how to remove corrupt and incompetent judges from their benches, and how to help each other to secure justice and enforce the public law of this country again.
It has to start somewhere, and no place better than here and now, in our State Assemblies, within our Jural Assembly Committees and our Litigation Subcommittees.

Let's go. Get ready to polish your cross-examination skills.


See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. Thats not enough..the prosecutor needs to take liability for his/her actions by countersuing them for barratry, press ganging, constuctive fraud, idenity theft, personage , etc.
    Why are we letting these people get away with this unscathed..!! Either he puts up a bond or he is going to jail...!!

    1. were not letting them go unscathed james.

      it looks like many of the "Patriot Groups" were set up to get their cohorts out unscathed, but its not working.

      most of us realize by now that whoever BROUGHT the "charge" is the responsible for seeing that it gets "paid".

      but since its all in "fiction" --ALL THAT IS EXCEPT FOR THE THEFT OF OUR PROPERTY, ABUSE OF OUR FAMILIES AND LOVED ONES AND OURSELVES AND OUR NEIGHBORS -- it doesnt matter to them what or how much the fiction charge is because they can just as easily fictionally DIScharging the fictional charge -- letting themselves go free and trying to run off scotfree with all that theyve stolen from us.

      their problem is:
      the good people of the world refused to be manipulated; we refused to attack each other.
      they didnt see that coming because they think were all sellouts like them and were not.

      they have a big problem on their hands:
      no where to run and its a small world. theres no where to hide where we cant locate them and the property theyve have stolen from us, if any.

      their cohorts are being exposed.

      they cant hide.

      over 20% of man and woman are 70% "awake" and dont want to participate.

      thats enough to collapse the plan. its outside the laws of our creator so its fragile.

    2. according to christ and new testament, there are no good people of the world. new testament is based on grace, not works

      "so that noone may boast". works is for the dead in revelation to be judged by as they get their 2nd death and cast into the lake of fire for 1000 years or however long.

      "creator" doesnt mean anything. old test is "the lord". new test christ is god. revelation is lucifer morning star/evening star aka mercury aka quetzalcoatl aka jupiter aka nature's god aka key of david aka hourglass aka saturn lord of time makes all things new aka all the pagan pre-christ entities unleashed.

      not unlike the ghostbusters "vault" breaking open lol.

      guess which one all of america, of any stripe, has always been under? nature's god. also yezidi peacock god, the elohim. see see maimonedes -- elohim are not god, not even 2nd level angels/messengers. thats who created the world in genesis

      "king of the world". not heaven. guess who else is god of this world? good for alchemy, but that entity was never god. bad for old testament or new testament. yezidi make this clear peacock angel is not god and does not claim to be.

      beware the scribes.

      however, he does have many redeeming qualities. the peacock angel refused to bow to adam who was of the dust. this was the greatest act of faith to god. same applies to modern day millenialism. whoever wants heaven cannot bow to any worldly kingdom.

      all law is cursed. read galatians. "our creator" is "some other gospel".

      "laws of our creator" is a meaningless phrase on those grounds as well. peacock angel is king of the world. which is just alchemy. which was never "god". see maimonedes for the jewish "angels" ranking.

      (paraphrase) all us jews know, elohim is a homonym (lists a few possible meanings)

      quetzalcoatl, the feathered serpent, made the laws of nature and "the world", and also time (flaming sword in genesis that surrounds the garden, aka ouroborus).

      that was kind of why christ had to come "save" people.

      there was an old world catholic order. that is long gone, as masons will tell you, luthers 2 kingdoms sort of rules nowadays, separation of church and state.

      "creator" of what? of who? the state assemblies rejected christ for "the lord" and his cursed "law" instead.

      flesh and blood cannot inherit anything.

      the devil is all around. same as it always was. nothing has changed here. there is no salvation in "law" -- read galatians.

      those who lead into captivity will be bound themselves. cest la vie.

      and actual "jews" are on hold, because worldly israel holds up their messiah from appearing. see, use wayback machine

      also (IIRC).

      while it is sad to see the federales and traitors, america is and was always doomed largely because its make-believe "religion" has never been anything but a house of cards.

      there is no solution in "law". all law is cursed. nature's law, a so-called observer of times, is also obsolete for both old and new testament.

      america is damned on many fronts. always was, probably always will be.

    3. new testament: noone goes to the father except through christ.

      any spirit that does not confess christ is of the antichrist

      such is "our creator"

      america will probably always remain damned. no, that doesn't excuse the current mess, but doesnt seem like america of any stripe will ever do anything but hell on earth of one brand or another.

    4. one cannot be under grace and law at the same time. the law is cursed/damned and has no salvation. those who lead into captivity and bondage will be bound themselves.

      nature's law is a 1000-eyed peacock refusing to bow to adam and his cursed descendents. smart peacock, but anyone mistaking "nature's law" and "nature's god" for actual god is damned. the peacock angel is above this, and he is still not god. alchemy never claimed this. jews never claimed this.

      only very confused millenialists/fake gnosticism/unwitting kabbalists.

      there was a non-cursed adam. he is hermaphroditic, before "eve" broke off. are people claiming to be hermaphrodites and that means they are not cursed? LOL.

      there also was a non-cursed adam after christ went to hell to rescue him. but that is not "the lord" or his "law" or "nature's law" etc. and that adam did not make any more descendants after being rescued from hell, he presumably was "rescued" and went to heaven. besides, anyone claiming such would still be denying christ, so those people would still be damned.

    5. hi xerces :)

      1. however, we actually have no idea where the new testament came from.

      2. there was no new testament for almost 400 years after the death of the man they call jesus (who, by the way, after decades of study, i:woman find absolutely no flaw in anything attributed to his teaching altho i do acknowledge that there are contradictions pertaining to the way some of what he said has been "scribed"/ "scripted").

      3. presently, there isnt a single known or claimed original MAN-you-scrip-t from the new testament.

      4. the french created the first (first Catholic) church, then they passed it on to italy.

    6. even in the LAWBOOK they take their public oaths on is scribed/ written:

      [ref only]
      old testament:
      "i will put my law within them, and i will write it on their hearts..."jeremiah 31:33
      new testament:
      "...i will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will i write them;"... hebrews 10:16.

      also, we, being created from the dust of the earth itself, can look at how the laws of nature work and apply those same principles/ laws to ourselves.
      our fathers and mothers recognized this.

      imo, its been made WAAAAAAAAY, waywaywaywaaaaay too complicated imo. too complexed. too confusing. too churned. too scribed. too scripted. too statu-ized/tized. too coded. too veiled. too monetized. too corrupt. too fake.

      the simplicity of it is exactly what we, actual and true American man and woman, have in our American common law, that is:
      dont harm your neighbor or what belongs to your neighbor; and if you accidentally do, then restore your neighbor or your neighbors property to his/her/its former state and condition.

      thats it.
      its so simple even a simpleton can understand it and thats the beauty of it.

      mothers teach their 18 (27) month old sons and daughters that and the s and ds comprehend the concept.
      dont hit.
      play nice.
      dont break sallys tea set.

      that covers 99.9% of what could happen in life imo.
      everything on gods green earth doesnt have to be spun out into a major catastrophy (that necessitates their subjective "adjudication" of it-- that then OF COURSE requires payment by us for their (unnecessary, unuseful, unasked for) "services".)


      just simply, dont hurt your neighbor; and if you accidently do, FIX IT = American common law. OUR law.

  2. This is the teeth weapon we should all be experts in the doing.

    Keep it up and More; No Weapon, No protection.
    We also need 1) "Do Not Detain List", and deal with police-tow-traffic-court upfront without having to go to court..2)..

    3) Property tax fraud to de-list from their tax roll.
    4) IRS Income Tax fraud without going to Bankcruptcy court.

  3. And how many times has the judge interrupted trying to trip you up? It seems it would not be as easy as the article suggests.