By Anna Von Reitz
For my Facebook readers -- you can't see this text in color, but perhaps it can be posted in color on the websites. It is apparent that many people don't know that the British Commonwealth/Territorial System is under the thumb and forefinger of the Pope, and so is the Municipal Government System.
Read that: King John was King of the Commonwealth, and so his heirs inherit that role. They operate the Commonwealth for the Pope.
And the Roman Pontiff has operated the City of Rome, aka, Urban Trust, and the whole Municipal Government System worldwide, since 753 BC.
So now you can see that both these offices --- Pope and Pontiff --- have been vested in one man for centuries.
And both these seemingly disparate operations, the British Commonwealth and the worldwide Municipal Government, have in fact been two pockets in the same set of pants. Or clerical robes.
For brevity I am replying in blue and red. And for sanity, I am starting a new thread. The questions and statements coming back from the Flag Officers appear in black.
How could the Declaration of Independence be a founding doc if the King was given control of the Money and Banking as Arch-treasurer and had control of the States Body Politic as Prince Elector of the United States of America. It does not state the United States.
Anna Replies: It [The Treaty of Paris, 1783] is talking --- plainly--- about "the" United States of America, which I have told you--- at least ten times--- is the British Territorial United States of America, and NOT our unincorporated Federation of States known as The United States of America.
[Anna Continued] Can't you literally see the difference between the Proper Name: The United States of America, and the doppleganger operating "in our name" as "the" United States of America?
[Anna Continued] Once you realize that they are talking about the King in his role as the King of the Commonwealth and his rights and duties with respect to the British Territorial United States of America, it makes perfect sense that he would be the "Prince Elector and blah, blah, blah" of a British Territorial --- that is, Commonwealth --- entity.
[From Flags]: This is the founding doc whether you agree or not. And is also why none that claim to represent us are allowed to take an oath to "the Constitution for the United States of America" repeating the words written as the title stated in the Preamble.
I[Anna Replies:] It's the Founding Document --- one of them --- of "the" United States of America, but certainly not the Founding Document of The United States of America. And pray tell, exactly why a British Subject ever would be allowed to take an Oath to an American Constitution, when they have their own Constitution --- The Constitution of the United States of America --- to uphold? You see? The language and the "styles" used are completely consistent throughout. And so is the logic.
[Continued:] There is the Federal Constitution for the States of America (the original Confederation of States formed under The Articles of Confederation in 1781). That one is called "The Constitution for the States of America"
There is the British Territorial Constitution for "the" United States of America called, logically enough, "The Constitution of the United States of America".
[Continued:] There is the Municipal Constitution for "the" United States, and it is called --- logically and consistently throughout our history: "The Constitution of the United States".
[Continued:] It is all right there in front of your face. You are men who can tunnel their way through an infinity of numbers and complex schematic diagrams. Why is it necessary to demonstrate this by making little color charts before you notice the different names involved here? And come to the brilliant conclusion that everything you have brought up proves what I have been telling you all along?
[Flags:] Why did the first use of the Emergency and War Power Act by George Washington actually do in 1791. Washington used the "Emergency Power" portion of the Act at Hamilton’s insistence, to use an existing private bank, controlled by the Crown through its British Board of Trade, to become the first bank of the United States. So what did Lincoln and Roosevelt do with the War Power Act and why was it allowed.
[Anna Replies:] So, let's decode this situation with the clear understanding that "the" United States refers to what? The Municipal Government authorized at Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.
[Continued:] The passage above translates as --- George Washington used a Crown Bank to become the first bank of "the" United States --- that is, the Municipal Government. And so what?
[Continued;] Why wouldn't he use a British Crown bank as the bank for the Municipal Government? They are both under the thumb of and working for the benefit of the Pope--- one directly, and one indirectly. Both pockets flow to Rome.
[Continued:] Remember that just before the Magna Carta was enacted, King John had had a little dust up with Pope Innocent. As a result, there was a role reversal. Instead of John being the Grantor of the Commonwealth lands to the Church and the Church working for the King, he agreed to be the Pope's Servant and to act as the Church's Overseer of the Commonwealth lands.
[Continued;] Read that as: the King of the British Commonwealth works for the Pope, and so do his descendants down to the present day. George Washington was a descent of King John and all but two "Presidents of the United States" have been descendants of King John. That is why they hate Trump so much. He's not a descendant of King John. From their perspective, he's a "common" Dutch Interloper.
[Continued:] Also remember that the British Commonwealth equals the British Territories.
[Continued:] So George Washington, a descendant of King John, was working for the Pope as Comptroller of the Municipal United States Government, and the British Crown was working for the Pope, too. So why on Earth wouldn't George Washington do business with a British Crown bank?
[Continued:] They-- the British Commonwealth and the Pope's Municipal Government--aka, City of Rome Government, aka, Holy Roman Empire (HRE) worked together hand-in-glove for five hundred years before the American War of Independence. They continued to work together during Washington's Administration, and during the Lincoln Administration, and during the Roosevelt Administration ---and they still do, and religion --- at least any Christian religion --- has nothing to do with it at all.
See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Off topic but read an article this morning that California will now start putting the homeless in prison - hmm I wonder if that would be their 800 FEMA camps which they have pegged as for profit prisons?ReplyDelete
Just passing on information
4 Corrupt Families Of California ~ Newsom, Brown, Pelosi & FeinsteinReplyDelete
Banking Crisis In India: 900,000 Depositors Are In TroubleReplyDelete
Does your bank/credit union dabble in derivatives - better find out
Remember the BRICS dealDelete
India has been busy biometrically marking all of thier 'citizens' for the implementation of the ADHR (I think that is what it's called) initiatives which is you get no 'benefits' unless you comply with their requirements
Iris scans, fingerprints, dna, etc etc etc - this is their system of marking their chattel property, IMO
Now mind you they have impoverished the 'citizens' of India for decades and they will do just about anything to feed their families
Some are selling their hair to feed their families, some are selling their kidneys or other things like their bodies to get 'money' to feed their families
Just sick what they are doing all over the world and the military is part of it IMO
I cannot stress enough that the commander of the UNNORTH Command is part of the vaticano
Go look up pictures of who he is
As they have copywrited the photo so moving that photo may result in issues for the person passing it along
I listened to the video from last nightReplyDelete
I have concerns that the 130,000 arrest that Anna spoke about may be arrest of innocent 'citizens' and not of any high profile subject?
The video from last night
Again I post this map
Their world military map
I agree with what Anna is saying but everyone must remember that Trump was a registered Democrat before he ran for CEO office
I heard Trump was onboard with them until they threatened to harm his children. After that, he left their "club" and went rogue. That's why they brought out the fake "impeachment" show. They're all corrupt and rotten to the core, virtually every single so called "representative".ReplyDelete
Greg Rubini @GregRubini 2h2 hours ago
Greg Rubini Retweeted Patrick Howley
also Nancy Pelosi son did business WITH UKRAINE ?
Patrick Howley @HowleyReporter
BOOM: Nancy Pelosi's son Paul Pelosi Jr. (who went to Ukraine in 2017) was a board member of Viscoil and executive at its related company NRGLab, which DID ENERGY Business in UKRAINE! And Nancy Pelosi appeared in a promotional video for the company
Field McConnell is telling everyone to go sign this Peace Treaty 2020 document????ReplyDelete
I don't watch him at all but hopped over because some other commenter said he was advising everyone to go sign this thing.
Here is the video he has done about this Hudok guyDelete
Claiming it is victory??
I made a comment on his page but it has been removed??
Interesting that this Hudok 2020 Peace whatever, you must opt in by 11/1???? Same deadline that the brits have?ReplyDelete
Anna, these words "Prince Elector" and "Archtreasurer" that people obsess about so much refer to George's title as Prince Elector of Hannover (not the USA)and Archtreasurer of the (German)Holy Roman Empire (not the USA. Another of the Prince Electors was "Archchamberlain", another one "Archchcupbearer", etc. The Prince Electors of Hanover, Saxony, Brandenburg, Bohemia, Bavaria,Palatinate, Cologne, Mainz and Treben were the ones who were in charge of electing the Holy Roman Emperor. Knowing your ancestral roots, I imagine you are familiar with German history?ReplyDelete