Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Not an A4V Process -- A Substitute Process

By Anna Von Reitz

The A4V process was set up in the 1930's as part of The Great Fraud.  Its actual technical name is "Mutual Offset Credit Exchange".  What this involves is an exchange of debts --- you owe me ten dollars, but I owe you five, so we "swap debts" and at the end of the day, you only owe me five dollars. 

That system ended except by implied succession contract in 1999 with the settlement of the 1933 bankruptcy. 

That is, the organizations that acquired the underlying assets and stepped in to provide the services still got tagged to honor A4V processes because they had an implied responsibility to continue to provide the same deal as remedy, otherwise the whole situation is patently illegal and inequitable. 

So between 1999 and now, some A4V processes were accepted and worked on a quid pro quo basis, however, all that stopped when both the Municipal and Territorial organizations went bankrupt between 2015-2017 and the Bankruptcy Trustees appointed by the big banks refused to pay up and it all got dumped back on the IMF functioning as the "US Treasury".  

You can't bring an A4V against a bankrupt entity, even if they owe you and even if you owe them.  The bankruptcy locks down their assets including their credits and so far as the Bankruptcy Trustees are concerned, you are just a debtor not necessarily owed anything.  So when you bring forward a claim against the bankrupts, they say you are acting in contempt and asserting a fraudulent interest against a poor, little, old bankrupt entity that is owed all the protection of the court.

So even though there was sporadic success presenting A4V claims prior to the bankruptcies and somewhat still some success because of the need to provide remedy-or-face-criminal charges, what I have suggested and provided for is not and has never been an A4V process.  

It looks like one, but it is in fact an insurance claim process, not a Mutual Offset Credit Exchange. 

What we did is that we claimed all the assets of the bankrupt "States of States" organizations, including those assets that are being held in trust by these organizations, supposedly "for" us, and we exercised our guarantees under the Lieber Code and Hague Conventions that require that we are indemnified against loss or damage, by establishing a Private Registered Indemnity Bond to cover the actual States and People.  

Think of it as an insurance policy with an insurance policy number that is lodged in their system, and when you make a proper claim against it by "accepting" their Court Order (Bill) and signing off on it, they have to provide the insurance to cover the loss and balance the books. 

It's really pretty simple, though the process of getting to this point has been anything but simple or straight forward. 

In order to do this properly, the "person" making the claim must be operating as a "Natural Person" and have their ducks in order with a recorded claim to their birthright identity and political status and Testament of two Witnesses proving that they are "the" man or woman born in such and such a place to such and such parents, etc. 

A Lineage Treaty going back to before the Civil War establishes absolute "grandfathered in" status for the claimant, but anyone born on the land and soil of this country or properly Naturalized as a "US citizen" and then adopting State nationality, qualifies. 

It is my understanding that the rats have suspended "Equal Civil Rights" as part of the bankruptcy, which leaves federal employees and federal dependents and people of color in harm's way, but they won't want to admit that they have suspended equal rights provisions and I would suspect that if people claim their equal civil rights the Trustees will be hard-pressed not to honor their claims on the same quid pro quo basis that A4V exchanges were honored sporadically after 1999--- because these commercial pirates have to offer remedy for their crimes or be recognized as pirates. 

So -- the indemnity bond works despite the bankruptcy and hooks the underwriters instead of the bankrupt organizations, which clears up the whole conundrum created by their bankruptcies and gives people remedy that is simpler and easier to enforce. 

See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. Anna, when using your indemnity bond number in court it gets kicked back for many reasons such as: no bonding company name, no certificate, no proof of bonding, etc. How do we overcome this?

    1. And no evidence she filed it with US Treasury or the amount, just some religious stuff. Skip A4V, what about 12 USC 95a2, 50 USC 4305b2, 31 USC 3113a1B or Public Policy 73-10? Is the Bankruptcy over?

    2. Thank you FreeMan and dean for this exchange.

    3. Dean, yes there is delivery confirmation. Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001 RA393427640US as referenced in the article:
      USPS shows it deliver in Washington, DC on January 23, 2017

  2. Judge,

    I would like remedy and freedom frim the system. I am a man of color, and being who I am will these processes work for me? Or am I wasting my time? I have my papers drawn and notorized claiming my birthright. But, I have not proceeded with filing with the State yet. Please help me this is very confusing you can email me @ If you are able.

  3. I would like to know if it will work for me also.

    1. Mista, it will work for you to the extent that you work it. It's been working for me. I used this exact process to zero out a $121K tax bill.

  4. This whole indemnity thing is confusing to me; afterall its not ever been in any of our everyday ordinary calendars.
    So I understand indemnity is ''insurance' of sorts. But what boggles me is where does it comes from, who takes responsibility in it, who pays it, under what circumstances does it pay, what exactly does it pay, what circumstances does it pay, who exactly does it pay, etc.

    All we've seen here is the word 'indemnity' and little IF we all just naturally know what that even is. But at this point, it seems to me that it's for the purpose of enriching the culprits.......almost like paying them off to leave us alone.......sort of

  5. Do you realize or comprehend the word 'indemnify'?

    The People are the source of all the credit because the assets that have collateralised and borrowed against STILL show The People as the owners of the assets; i.e. beneficial owners of property being held "in trust for"...

    Everything is based upon a Lawful Claim.

    The Registered Indemnity Bond is a Lawful Claim to the assets by the owners.

    What bond company? Bonding companies are Registered by THEIR CORPORATE MASTERS granting a charter and Limited Liability.

    It's a Registered Claim made on behalf of The People... utilise after gathering all of one's paperwork in order and recorded on The Public record...

    robert: Family: carr
    Pennsylvania common wealth(state) (1776)

    1. Thanks, robert, for this knowledgeable comment!

  6. Thank you robert for clarification. Check out this frank o'collins video regarding the names...

  7. There isn't one sentence in that entire pile of newly manufactured male bovine excrement which is supported by credible, objective, verifiable source-referenced facts. Shameful to mislead, misdirect and pervert information.

  8. Ah, another US CORPORATION sheep ^

  9. Thank you Anna, for all you do!!

    With the respect to the two Witnesses, is there any reason why another family member could be a witness? I'm 60 years old, both parents are dead and I haven't been back to my hometown since I joined the Marines at 18. So finding someone outside my family (brother and sister) could be extremely difficult. Any suggestions or opinions?


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.