Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Pernicious Confusion About Milligan Ex Parte


By Anna Von reitz

Pernicious Confusion About Milligan Ex Parte

The Supreme Court decided Milligan Ex Parte in 1866, a year after the creation of quasi-military courts in ten military districts covering eleven Southern States in May of 1865.

These courts were formed by the Rump Congress immediately following Lee's surrender at Appomattox, Virginia, in April of 1865.

Basically, a General "of at least the rank of a Brigadier" was put in charge of appointing civilians loyal to the North to act as Judges in Southern Courts: carpetbaggers.

These people were all either transported to serve as judges in these new quasi-military courts or they were hated members of their own communities --- Yankee Sympathizers --- who were given plenary power over their defeated neighbors, to rape, pillage, and plunder whatever property was left in the South.

It caused such an outcry that Milligan Ex Parte was rushed through the United States Supreme Court for remedy just a year later. The Court clearly stated that when civilian courts resumed operations in the military districts, the quasi-military tribunals were to shut down.

Instead, by a process of fraud based on similar names deceit and usurpation, the civilian courts were surreptitiously replaced by these same quasi-military tribunals operating throughout the nation.

That's where we find ourselves today, still cluelessly wrestling with the unresolved detritus of the so-called Civil War, still putting up with quasi-military courts --- which we could replace simply by operating our own civilian courts and invoking Milligan Ex Parte.

Recently, people unaware of this history, have brought forward Milligan Ex Parte and attempted to use this as an argument against President Trump's proposed use of military tribunals to try civilian criminals ---- however this reasoning is based on false assumptions that derive from ignorance about which courts Milligan Ex Parte is talking about, and assumes that it is addressing military courts in general.

As you can see, instead, it is only addressing the quasi-military civilian tribunals created in May 1865, not the actual military courts at all.

In my opinion, President Trump is acting correctly and Milligan Ex Parte has nothing to do with it. The vast majority of the criminals he is dealing with are US Territorial or Municipal citizens and they are subject to military courts as a result.

As for the rest of us, it is long overdue for us to stir our stumps, get our own political status records corrected, form our Jural Assemblies, and shut down the quasi-military courts operated by the Territorial United States using Milligan Ex Parte in its correct place and interpretation to do so.


----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

5 comments:

  1. Hot topic in republic of Texas Tuesday night . Rogue corperate courts and city councils want to exercise power .
    we need a how to cheet sheet common law courts for dummies .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No we dont..!! What we need is ordinary common "people" with no law degree at all to sit on at least half of all the courts on the LAND...if we aren't going to get rid of the BAR, then every court needs to be Equally yoked with your average mom or pa with any degree, no matter what it is, so they can rule strictly with their conscious, separate from the BAR rules, but every bit as powerful as any BAR made case law....!! Let's start a "discrimination "charge against these bastards...that seems to be the only way to get our foot in the door to these tribunals in order for real justice for the common people to take place. There only has to be two requirements for this to happen....the individual needs to know the difference between MONEY and CURRENCY and how that relates to law...and that they can only be paid with "lawful money" and not "fiat currency" especially if it's a "private central bank"...!!! They can't be answerable to foreign interest whatsoever...!! It won't take long to know who to be judged by.....!!! There are no game playing in a court headed by someone not part of the banking system....either there is a "real party of interest" or there isnt...in other words, in no one is injured, there is no crime and he can even order that the DA trying to bring charges be brought up on charges herself for FRAUD.....a death sentence..!!

      Delete
    2. "so they can rule strictly with their conscious" they would have to have a conscious that has been grounded in truth and righteousness. That is not very common any more.
      And, how many know that this country was founded on Protestant Christian principles? I don't know about this last SC justice but there hasn't beeen a Protestant on the SC for many years. Why is that do you think?

      Delete
  2. Sent US bankruptcy court papers showing reclaimed name. They returned all my paperwork with a sheet on court letterhead saying;
    1:what I sent did not comply with the federal rules of civil procedure

    2:local rules of this court and the filing fee or In Forma Pauperis Application not included with the document

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.