Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Monday, July 30, 2018

America's First Lutheran Jesuit?


By Anna Von Reitz

I am tired of all this nonsense about me being a Jesuit and an "Agent" of the Vatican.
If anyone wants to know --- I mean, really wants to know --- you can ask my home church in Black River Falls, Wisconsin -- Evangelical Lutheran. You can ask my Alma Mater -- St. Olaf College, in Northfield, Minnesota (oh, and that's a Norwegian Saint, and a Lutheran College for all the complete numbnutz out there).


My detractors keep posting pages from my book, Disclosure 101, as "proof" for their lies and other claims.
If anyone wants to know, everything about those pages and my unpaid "job" as a Notice-giver for Pope Benedict XVI is fully "exposed" for everyone including the gossip-mongers and other irresponsible ignorant and purposeful liars trolling the internet. Read the book. It's available on amazon.com.
Ditto, ditto, and ditto to "Decker Apfel" and "Decker Apel" and "Decker-Anything Else" , "Virgo Triad" and all the others winding their own saws.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

70 comments:

  1. Give them the riot act and rightfully so......Trolls go back and hide under those bridges!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown "The (paid) Troll" will likely chime in shortly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her only proof of not being a coajutor is her ability to infiltrate the Lutheran Church?! Lol

      For crying out loud, people. Read the Constitutions. She cannot be a Jesuit persay. But she surely can qualify as a coajutor.

      With all her so-called expertise why doesn't dawn upon her that you all are better off setting up your household churches and seek shelter under separation of church and state in stead of taking this secular extremist route?

      The reason why anna does not want you all to be religious heads of your own household is becaise that is in direct conflict with her authoritarian church and her religious convictions.

      She'd rather lead people who are not her lutheran congregants astray by encouraging that they conduct paper terrorism.

      Keep your friends closer than your enemies. The greatest trick that the devil ever pulled off was to convince the world that she didn't exist.

      Delete
  3. Keep on tellin' it like it is, Judge Anna! We love you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And keep on being a mindless cretin. Let her be your authority on any and everything.

      Delete
  4. Well, they are two different Organizations of Organized Religion which Jesus never established either of them anyhow. But the last I ever had occasion to be inside a lutheran 'church' building, the 'pastor' wore the same white 'dress' that the RCC ones do; and they were sprinkling a baby the same way the RCC does.
    So, as many of the Mainline 'churches' in america, the lutherans are just another offspring of the mother harlot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who is Virgo Triad?

    https://youtu.be/MV1s6U-cWbE

    She is not Kim possible or Kim Guguen. Get you facts straight Anna. Anna, you owe Kim Guguen, Kim Possible any apology for your accusations

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anna has to much to take care of?
    All these people you mentioned our causing tomuch time over who is who there all no good,

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is simply human nature for people to be lazy and relinquish all reason to some so-called expert.

    Add to the mix legal and financial problems and said human condition is excasperated by orders of magnitude. It is pointless to argue sense in most of you. It's like arguing with an exit sign. People should be so carefully managed like cattle that I trust that whatever purpose Anna has is but only a small part in the whole grand scheme of things. Carry on.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Unknown...so what is your solution to all our slave masters...just go along with all their fraud, and just let them steal and plunder to their hearts content...!! Good solution to staying out of jail I guess...!! You have never offered any solution to people unlawfully being foreclosed on or any other problems we are being increasing confronted with on a daily basis...No one on this site wants to constantly study law or fight the damn courts for the rest of their lives....your really delusional if you think that...!! But one thing is for sure....your method of giving in to our "secular" world is exactly why we are in this mess in the first place..!!! I offered the perfect solution....a special ID CARD for the 1% like me who is college educated, intelligent, and knows how the law should work, but doesn't because the the rest of the 99%ers are imbeciles!!! I want to be free from them and all the slave masters of the world...!!

    And there is only one way I can get it...through an ID that characterizes me as an "American non- Citizen National" with NO MASTERS over me!! Until and unless I actually damage someone...!! But as of date the only one that has ever been damaged is me, both by people and by an out of control demi-God Govt. For me their is only one God and it has nothing to do with govt. of the earth....!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. The solution is quite simple.

    Tell Anna to quit the diversionary tactics.

    Tell her to set up a religious association. Each of you can then transfer all your valuable property to that association as members of that association.

    In this world you cannot have your cake and eat it too.

    The reason why they can foreclose on you and lien property is because you are claiming it as personal property. But if that property does not belong to you, if that property is under your RELIGIOUS custody than not only can they not take it away from you but they also cannot tax you on income derived from that property (if and only if that income is meant to support your religious nonprofit mission).

    Why is it that you people can sit there and watch the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH do this and not do it yourself?

    Why is it that the Roman Catholic Church can set up Academic Institutions, Religious Houses, Own farms, rental property, etc., and you all just sit there idle?

    DO you not realize that you are giving these organizations validity by not imitating these religious organizations?

    Who the hell has the authority to dictate to you what your religious should or should not be?

    So, the solution is to light a match under Anna's wrinkly pimply senior citizen lutheran ass and demand that she quit playing games and distracting you all from REAL SOLUTIONS. If she does not capitulate, then cast her stupid ass aside and choose a competent leader amongst you.

    Then set up a religious association with a governing document and with governing structure. Allocate all membership's property to it. Assign Trusteeship roles to property in membership's ecclesiastical custody JUST LIKE THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH does in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    Why haven't this been done before? Why because people like ANNA are paid to put you all in a spell and make extremists out of you by confusing you about WHAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE AND WHAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE NOT while she attends her piece of shit Lutheran Church every sunday and posts instructions that are ENTIRELY irrelevant to her proposed solutions.


    I'm not even asking you to join my society. I'm not shilling. What I'm doing is suggesting that you people form your OWN and take whatever inspiration you can from what I am doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown ....i know people who are doing exactly what you are suggesting and they have had nothing but trouble with the courts, and corrupt judges...everyone wants a 501c (3) church for that reason...They are into that scheme...maybe you were lucky enough or one of the first to get one tthrough, but they are closing that door to....!! And trust me they are extremely smart people . I forgot the name of the church they started but they somehow got the "LAND" which is now private property, but the courts refuse to give them that license...!! I'll try and re-Tracy my steps and find out the site and the name of the church...!! I was really getting interested in their movement until the govt. roadblocked them completely...even changing their oaths of office to read "I do solemnly swear...yada, yada...but instead of ending it with "so help me God", changed it to "SO HELP ME GOD"...!! All caps...get the picture...!!

      Delete
    2. James, read section 508 of the IRC. That's where real churches are referenced. They are all exempt! 501 (c-3) organizations are NOT!

      Delete
    3. I'm not saying for you to do it individually. An Unincorporated Nonprofit Association should incorporate Corporation Soles which are simply Incorporated Religious Offices. The purpose of the INC religious offices is so that those offices can be passed down to whoever (in my case, I'd pass the title to one of my children).

      The point is that there is an association made up of many members. Anna has the social capital to make this happen.

      Delete
    4. Steven...i believe I have heard that before..I don't remember the exact section, but somewhere it does say that...I'll check again...thanks...!!

      Delete
    5. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf

      ^Covers how the IRS views exempt status of Churchs.

      Nonprofits can also undertake for profit endeavors for fund raising purposes. Completely tax free.

      I've taken a few Nonprofit Management courses in Graduate school and I already have the double accounting framework set up for it in GNUCash which is a free open source double entry accounting software.

      https://kerubale-getachew-abegaz-estate.org/onewebmedia/orgchart.jpg
      ^ The Orginization chart of the Religous Society.

      The key is to make everything religious and stay away from secular claims. If the Roman Catholic Church and other mainstream churches can do it then why can't anyone else?

      14th Amendment ensure equal application of the law for all citizens. Which is why I find the themes promoted by sovereigns very troubling.

      It seems that the themes are meant to alienate its followers from the 14th Amendment (the very thing required for courts to equaly apply the law to a citizen regardless of whether they are a ArchBishop of the Catholic Church or an Archbishop of any other denomination or religious head of some other religion).

      Anna is definitely not someone that you want to follow. Be very careful.

      Delete
    6. Anyone who believes in slavery, should adhere to the bs 14th amendment...

      http://www.balaams-ass.com/journal/prophecy/vatntine.htm

      "MULLINS: And the education monopoly! And they found "that" was the most important one of all, because, by training the children to accept these other monopolies [and] never question authority. [CN -- Also, the media monopoly, e.g. "The Media Monopoly" by Ben Bagdikian.] Don't forget, the 14th amendment said, "It's illegal to challenge the national debt!"
      TOM VALENTINE: Is that right!? The 14th amendment actually makes that statement? I gotta read that again.
      EUSTACE MULLINS: Oh yes. It says that it's a violation to question the validity of the national debt! In other words, you say, Tom Valentine says, "Well, they create this money out of nothing!" Well you've just committed a violation of the 14th amendment by saying that!"

      Delete
    7. 14th Amendment Layperson = Voluntary Slave

      14th Amendment Head of a Church = One who has acquired his or her birthright.

      I'll take it further. The key is to OWN NOTHING but CONTROL EVERYTHING.

      14th Amendment Laypersons are obsessed with owning things personally. When in reality the objects or concepts that are owned truly do not belong to the owner. It is the rights of use that is owned.

      14th Amendment Religious Authority figure is obsessed with controlling (rightfully so). This is what actualized human beings do. It is our birthright to control. God has granted us dominion over our household as well as the entire world (if we want it bad enough).

      You are seeing the 14th Amendment through the lens of a layperson.

      Delete
    8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqXnlDYvUI8

      Delete
    9. 501(c)3 is still subject to US jurisdiction. Why bother when any self professed church is already exempt under 501(a)&(d)?
      26 U.S. Code § 501 - Exemption from tax on corporations, certain trusts, etc.
      (a) Exemption from taxation
      An organization described in subsection (c) or (d) or section 401(a) shall be exempt from taxation under this subtitle unless such exemption is denied under section 502 or 503
      (d) Religious and apostolic organizations
      The following organizations are referred to in subsection (a): Religious or apostolic associations or corporations, if such associations or corporations have a common treasury or community treasury, even if such associations or corporations engage in business for the common benefit of the members, but only if the members thereof include (at the time of filing their returns) in their gross income their entire pro rata shares, whether distributed or not, of the taxable income of the association or corporation for such year. Any amount so included in the gross income of a member shall be treated as a dividend received.
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501

      Delete
    10. 1FreeMan, I have also read that..!! But then why do all churches want to file as 501c (3) tax exempt churches....attorneys and accountants , that's why..!!

      Delete
    11. James, what StevenCharles is saying above is absolutely correct. Every church is already tax exempt according to 501(a) of the code without having to apply for approval. The answer to your question is 1) hope of gain and 2) fear of loss. They hope to gain donations by touting to their congregation that they are a 501(c)3 recognized and approved by the IRS to win the confidence of their tax paying members to be able to deduct their donations. They fear to lose donations if they were to switch to a 501(a), or rather to be a non-IRS approved or contracted non-profit, because most members do not understand what a 501(a) is and would donate less or elsewhere where they can secure their tax deduction for their donations. IOW, they are bowing to the beast to get his stamp of approval on their enterprise. Many of them don't even realize what they are doing and have no clue other than that this is the only way to setup and run a church. If a man be ignorant, let him be ignorant still. On the other hand, a 501(a) is only for NCSN congregants who have surrendered their US citizenship, or at the very least the leaders of this church, to be able to defend themselves and their church from IRS attacks. The folks who mix these two are the ones who get into trouble. I have been educating a friend of mine who setup a 501(a) for his wife who runs a religious so called new age church and he assigns all his income to her church as donations making it tax free. It nearly scared him to death when I showed him that they could not run safely a 501(a) until and unless they expatriated their US citizenship which they are now in the process of doing.

      Delete
  10. ANNA's SOLE PURPOSE IS TO RENDER YOU ALL INEFFECTIVE. I don't what I can say to make you all realize this.

    SHE HAS BROUGHT FORWARD NO REAL SOLUTION.

    IF SHE REALLY WANTED TO SOLVE YOUR PROBLEMS THEN A RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION WOULD BE IT.

    Instead, she seeks to confuse and mislead you all into believing that you can form a secular national assembly and take power from the United States of America. She is luring you all into an extremist position. Instead of educating you all on separation of church and state and how it applies to trusteeship over property and what not.

    She then attends her Lutheran Masses and most likely winks at the Pastor and the few congregants who may be in the inner circle (know).

    Don't you think for once that with all this social capital that ANNA and the likes (e.g., Frank O'Collins' Irish mick ass, etc.) have that they would be able to affect real solutions by now? You guys need to use your brains sometimes. Realize that you are being played and that HER SOLE PURPOSE IS TO MAKE YOU PERPETUAL VICTIMS.

    By now should could have long have set up a RELIGIOUS SOCIETY and ORDAINED heads of RELIGIOUS HOUSEHOLDS under that Religious SOciety. TOTALLY protected by Church and State.

    But no. What she does is attend a fuck shit lutheran church on sundays and relegate the rest of her week misinforming you all and asking for donations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown...even if we were to do what you say, who is going to be honest enough to trust the head of your church from taking it all and running away with it all...when it comes to money, I know one thing, no one can be trusted, not even Anna and her husband with that much money and property...its to damn tempting...!! There has to be at least a 10 member board that it's untrusted to, so hopefully just one out of the ten will be honest enough to keep the others from stealing it...!!

      Delete
    2. But I do have a good idea about starting a non- profit association...called The " Law of the Gun", since a case was just recently upheld in the 9th Circuit Court for the State of Hawaii, in a case called "George Young v The STATE of Hawaii, giving people the right to "OPEN CARRY" in plain view, just like any cop and it's now law in all 50 states, under the equal footing doctrine, especially since this was a Federal issue...!!
      Once I get enough people to join THE SPECIAL ASSEMBLY FOR PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE, and trust me there are thousands of people that are itching to join an assembly like that, all packing a loading weapon...i wonder who will back down then...!! Cops are in essence all pussies, since they are relatively sure most people aren't carrying loaded weapons. But you can see how touchy they are if someone is even holding a cell phone... the only other thing we need is a good system for assembling members quickly , like ham radios, like they have so everyone can be alerted to a members involvement with law enforcement and surround them and arrest them....!! It's coming down to a civil war anyway...!! I wonder how many "blacks" would want to get involved...???

      Delete
  11. Fortunately I wasn't raised Christian this particular lifetime, so ALL this Christian nonsensical infighting is rather comical♩

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the surface it may be comical. For a minute. Then it is something else,
      i hope.
      Perpetual victims and the promise of money. The com mentor above does make a point.

      Delete
    2. Leland, just FYI, no one is raised Christian, as a noun. Yes, one can be raised Christian, as a verb by Christian parents (both verb and noun). However, it is a decision we all need to make for ourselves. No one can make it for you. That is why infant baptism makes no sense and will not save a child from going to hell as many believe, especially the RCC. Children are already saved until their age of accountability at which time they will either decide for or against being believers. I saw this with my own kids who all made that decision at their ages ranging from 5 to 8 as they became aware and who themselves then chose to be baptized. Baptism BTW does not save anyone. It is only an outward witness of the internal event of being born again of the word and of spirit as Jesus Himself describes in John 3:3&5. Glad to see that you are enjoying this and thought I would lend some clarification.

      Delete
    3. Some great clarifications on baptisms in general 1freeman! As for any Soul going to hell, perhaps Anna herself has already given the so necessary GREAT truth about that potentially so divisive terminology as well.

      Hell is just a subplane (some say its actual location is somewhere in the astral plane) for Soul's remedial education in the lower heavens of time, space, energy & matter ~ until perhaps Soul's next incarnation in its next physical life somewhere in a probable future timeframe usually.

      "First, and foremost, I love you all.  All.  Even the Bad Actors. Our Father has purposed that all will be saved and not one left behind.  Remember that.  Not one.
      Remember this, too--- that love is the most important thing you can give, and I give it freely to each and every one of you reading this today.  " Anna♩ 

      http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/10/my-testament-for-my-sons-and-daughters.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+http/paulstramerfeedburnercom+(http://www.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog)&m=1

      Delete
    4. Wel, Leland, I gues this would be where I would beg to differ with Anna's philosophy whoch is all it is because it is not supported by scripture. The word says on this subject that the Lord is not willing that any should perish, not that they will not perish. It even states that during the millennium, we will be able,to look upon those that have perished as an eternal example and warning of the cost of sin. Yes, hell is under the earth. Paradise used to be under the earth too but was divided from hell with a great chasm in between so none could cross over from one side to the other. When Jeus rose from the dead, He led captivity captive and took them to heaven after He preached to the spirits in prison on the other side. To be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord if you belong to Him. If not, you belong to the enemy by default. So no choice is choice already made. It is appointed unto men once to die and after this, the judgement. So the only reincarnation would be from this life to the next. Only your body dies. Your soul and spirit remain alive and will be rejoined or reincarnated into your glorified body at the rapture if you are a believer or at the great white throne judgement if you are not, to be cast into the lake of fire. It is really very simple and not as complicated as people like to make it. A child gets it. It takes religious grown ups to mess it up and miss the point entirely.

      Delete
    5. I assume u r unaware of this p.o.v 1freeman (FOR STARTERS♩ LOL)

      https://www.facts-are-facts.com/article/reincarnation-the-churchs-biggest-lie

      Delete
  12. Once again, Anna's back is against the wall. She's trapped by all the lies she's been spewing for how many years? Below is a cut and paste from one of her earliest postings. It was the first one i ever took note of. The first few paragraphs revealed enough of her true nature to hang her. That's why i immediately copied it and archived it for later use. Everything within the quotation marks below are her words, exactly as she wrote them, except for the triple asterisk, which simply means i omitted that sentence because it was not needed. As you can plainly see, she is a liar, convicted by her own words. I've pointed out several other lies she deliberately publishes, but most of you knuckleheads dismiss me as a troublemaker or a troll. My sons and i put our lives on the line for you in Montana in the spring of '96. We took up arms against this pagan whore called THE UNITED STATES corporation with the men known as the Montana freemen. Although Anna says many good things, i am here to clearly state for the record that she is a fucking liar! Read it in her own damn words! Emphasis added by me.

    RESPONSE:
    “My Dear Archbishop George,
    I, too, stand with the universal Catholic Church, founded by Christ. My blood seal stands upon the record of the Vatican Chancery Court in Witness of what I am going to show you tonight. I am from a family that has served the Catholic Church since the First Holy Roman Empire, Hereditary Grand Marshals of the Holy Roman Empire, Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. I have myself served as an International Services Agent and as a private attorney in service to his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and now, Pope Francis.
    ***
    The Canon Law of the Church stands above every other form of law, and the Roman Curia above all other courts.
    Even the Uniform Commercial Code which was developed by the Curia as a just means to resolve the many international disputes and claims arising from the 1930 bankruptcies of the G-5 nations is copyrighted by Unidroit, a subsidiary of the Vatican."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven, thanks for the repost. I just don't know what it takes to get it across to grown adults, that None of these organized 'churches' were EVER established or sanctioned by Christ.
      All of them have been set up by Man, and that includes (especially) the RCC, Rome, Vatican......whatever it is called. It is NOT 'The Church'.......but more like pagan headquarters.
      Anyone who actually knows the bible, could easily see that the 'catholic yoooniversal church' in no way lines up with the Word.
      And surely anyone knows it was NEVER mentioned in the bible, neither are any of these other mainline churches.

      Anyone who cannot understand this, is just simply lost and apparently does not really care.

      Delete
    2. Well, the bible is repeated history from even older history , so whatever...

      Delete
    3. Steven Charles,
      Thank you, and here is the link:
      https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2014/07/19/where-the-bear-went-and-where-we-are-by-anna-von-reitz/

      Delete
    4. I feel that by not imitating the governing structures that make up mainstream churches in the U.S., that many groups of people in the U.S. are unknowingly giving said mainstream churches validity.

      Every single Archbishop or Bishop of every single Catholic Archdiocese or Diocese in the United States is an Incorporated Nonprofit Ecclesiastical Office. As long as the corporate entities are not dissolved for some reason, they may simply perpetually exist. This is so that the religious title and control over property can be quickly passed down to successor's who are appointed to hold religious office.

      I have modified this in a number of ways. Instead of congregations being composed of a community, I consider a household unit (son, daughter, or legal dependent) as a whole congregation. The head of the religious household would be decided amongst the parents. It can either be the Mother or the Father who occupies the equivalent of an Archbishop office which will be incorporated as a nonprofit entity by an Unincorporated Nonprofit Association of Heads of Religious Households.

      The point is to transfer all private property to said Unincorporated Nonprofit Association in exchange for trusteeship rights of custodial use to said property under a religious title.

      In the U.S. Religious Communities are in fact, able to mediate matters involving their religious association instead of relegating mediation to U.S. Courts. They do this with Torah law, Catholic Canons, and Islamic Shariah Law.

      If an organizing document transparently details what disputes that should be mediated and how they should be mediated, then there should be no worries about the head of the association running off with property as that head would be able to be held accountable for his actions in law.

      Again, the whole point is to stay clear from making secular claims that threaten the U.S. Federal, State, or local government. Exactly the opposite of what Anna does with her work. This is because people risk being classified as extremists. People also risk guilt by association and offending secular authorities.

      People must think of the law as being applied equally to all citizens and legal permanent residents. If it seems like Catholic priests or other mainstream religious heads or pastors have a legal preference, then it is highly likely that there is more that meets the eyes and one has overlooked a few things.

      If a guru tells you that Catholic priests or other mainstream religious heads or pastors have a legal preference, then it is highly likely that that guru is a paid misinfo agent. By excepting such a baseless claim from a guru, you are in fact consenting to having legal preference be given to Catholic priests or other mainstream religious heads or pastors. You are essentially validating the religious authority claimed by such priests, heads, or pastors over you.

      Delete
    5. The object is to not attack people of other faiths. It is to play on an equal legal playing field as them.

      One can cuss out or denounce the catholic church all they want but this does nothing to elevate one on an equal legal playing field as an Archbishop.

      1st Amendment guarantees your right to exercise your religion (whatever that may entail) freely as long as it does not injure the rights of others.

      14th Amendment ensures that you are held to the same standard of law as a Mainstream religious head (if and only if you are claiming the same status which is a Religious Head).

      So, what is the point of bad mouthing a Catholic Church when you don't run a Church of your own? It is pointless and futile. It is a political attack. You might win a few minds with it but you are politically up against a multitude of Catholic Lay people, academic institutions, monasteries, etc. It will always be a losing battle.

      The goal is to operate on an equal level playing field as the Catholic Church. But people like Anna will always be there to distract you from this fundamental art of war. She will feed your mind with fantasies of overthrowing the secular government and say just about anything to prevent you from reclaiming your religious authority (which is your birth right). She will trick you into believing that you are tax exempt in your for-profit, secular, laymen, capacity. You will be her guinea pig and suffer huge consequences for it. Beware of Disinfo Agents like ANNA, Frank O'Collins, the people running the T-Roh (I think Keith is his first name). They are some of the world's most foul people. They are selling you all out for $$$$$.

      Delete
    6. 14th amendment is all about being a slave like unknown here...lol

      Old news...https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/14086227

      (Illegally) "
      Ratified at the end of the Civil War, the amendment abolished slavery, with one critical exception: Slavery and involuntary servitude actually remain lawful "as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." In other words, according to this so-called punishment clause, if you get pulled over with the wrong controlled substance in your trunk, there's nothing in the 13th Amendment to ensure you can't be considered a slave of the state.

      The punishment clause was taken directly from the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and reflected the belief of the time that hard work was essential to prisoners' moral rehabilitation. But the language was also ambiguous enough to be grossly abused. Soon, the clause was being used to reinstitute slavery under another guise."

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. to "a follower", et al.: I'm surprised she hasn't taken that down. I know a man who was in her inner circle several years ago when she was just getting started. He said she posted several documents for her little group proving her official connection to the Vatican's hierarchy, but when several in the group began to question her about it, she took them all down. I recommend as many of you as are able archive as much of her stuff as you can. Everything on Paul Stramer's site may be safe because i don't think he is knowingly in collusion with her perfidy. Either way: safe, not sorry. And whatever you do, tell your friends and neighbors what you are discovering about this woman and her husband, the wannabe king of the USA. They cannot be trusted!

      Delete
    9. Steven Charles,
      What i find alarming is no one seems to care. They will not go to the link and read it, or if they do, they say nothing?
      Again thanks for the info. Anna does seem to reveal some good info yet it is mixed with some spooky just plain wrong stuff.
      Her husband or nephew? Still haven't figured that one out.
      Does he speak?

      Delete
    10. James Clinton Belcher is his name. He is her husband and he claims to be the "Hereditary Head of the United States of America"! Read his absurd claims on her website in the document called "Declaration of the Flag" or something like that. In concert with his stupid claim, he declares Anna's favorite joke, "the civil flag of peace", to be his official flag! Now you know why Anna pushes that silly bullshit. If you accept the flag, you accept his ridiculous claims, and that makes YOU the subject of his phony kingdom! It also gives Anna a huge promotion from da judge to da queen! Where does the "divine right" of monarchs come from? The Vatican cult of Rome. Now you know the rest of the story.

      Delete
    11. Before everyone gets their panites tied up in a knot, wake up people, you need to read between the lines. Let me try to translate [in brackets] what Anna is really saying here (Anna, please feel free to chime in anytime):
      “My Dear [just a salutation as you would salute your local friendly IRS agent in a letter] Archbishop George,
      I, too, stand with the universal Catholic Church [the word catholic means universal and thus it is not the RCC but the universal church of Jesus Christ she is referring to as she clarifies with the next words], founded by Christ [RCC was not founded by Christ -- Peter (petros) was not the rock (petra) Jesus was referring to but rather the truth of the revelation he had received form the Father by the Holy Spirit upon which Jesus built His church -- literally the "out called" and thus the true believers and not a religious institution of any kind]. My blood seal stands upon the record of the Vatican Chancery Court [her letter with her blood seal which is a right thumbprint in red ink, which represents blood, on the page, perhaps even real blood for emphasis] in Witness of what I am going to show you tonight. I am from a family that has served the Catholic Church [again the universal church of Jesus Christ and not the RCC] since the First Holy Roman Empire, Hereditary Grand Marshals of the Holy Roman Empire, Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. I have myself served as an International Services Agent [an Ambassador of Christ] and as a private attorney [private attorney general representing the people] in service to [to and not of, to present him with the truth] his Holiness [just a title and not actual, like calling a judge your honor] Pope Benedict XVI and now, Pope Francis.
      ***
      The Canon Law of the Church stands above every other form of law, and the Roman Curia above all other courts [this is true in the natural world, as ecclesiastical law trumps all other forms of law in the world, but obviously not in the spiritual].
      Even the Uniform Commercial Code which was developed by the Curia as a just means to resolve the many international disputes and claims arising from the 1930 bankruptcies of the G-5 nations is copyrighted by Unidroit, a subsidiary of the Vatican [all true]."
      Now where is your problem with her appeal to the RCC PTB and standing in the gap for all mankind in the face of this evil? Just picture Paul appealing to Agrippa and Festus calling him "My king" and "Most Excellent Festus" to the point where they would have let him go if he had not appealed to Caesar. Anna was appealing to the PTB who are ruling this world on behalf of you and me. It is as simple as that. Nowhere does she proclaim or even hint at any loyalty to the RCC, the pope or his bishops. She is only recognizing them for the authority they are usurping and wielding in this world totally contrary to the law of God and of Jesus Christ and the authority He gave to all true believers and they will no doubt be held accountable at the Great White Throne Judgement.

      Delete
    12. Are you insane, or just really stupid? Or maybe you think we are that stupid. That is the biggest bunch of doublespeak horseshit i've ever seen! What exactly does the Holy Roman Empire have to do with the church established by Yahshua? If you actually believe the crap you just dumped on the page, just keep on walking, 'cause i got nothing more to say to you.

      Delete
    13. 1freeman seems to gets the legal bs far better than u Steven....just my observation so far - as a fellow Montana colleges ALUMNI ♩

      Delete
    14. What's a matter SC? Cat got your tongue? Got caught in your own perversion of the truth and have nothing to say? Neither Anna nor I have ever referred to the Holy Roman Empire having anything to do with the church established by Yahshua other than that they nailed Him to a cross at the Pharisees' insistence. So why the question unless you are getting caught in your own play on words? Please clarify yourself.

      Delete
    15. i guess i'm really dense, because i do not comprende what you mean at all. that idiot "1 freeMan" clearly doesn't understand anything!...and i have no idea what you mean by "a fellow Montana colleges ALUMNI".

      Delete
    16. I spent 5 years in your wonderful state of Montana....Beginning @ U of Montana in Missoula & eventually graduating with a pre law degree from Montana State University in Bozeman...Fortunately I saw thru that legal bs back then as well as Christian fanaticism in general while living in Montana.

      1freeman imo runs circles around most posters here with exception of C.Johnson perhaps & some others now & then.

      I make no claims of any expertise other than bs discernment☇

      Delete
    17. well, if you can't discern that load of crap, you're expertise has just taken a serious blow, but then what could be expected from someone whose brain has been exposed to 5 yrs. of "higher" learning?!

      Delete
    18. @ 1FreeMan August 2, 2018 at 1:05 PM: For the sake of clarity, (although i don't see how it could possibly be any clearer) first i will simply (once again) quote Anna's own words: "I am from a family that has served the Catholic Church since the First Holy Roman Empire, Hereditary Grand Marshals of the Holy Roman Empire, Knights of the Holy Sepulcher. I have myself served as an International Services Agent and as a private attorney in service to his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and now, Pope Francis."

      She has clearly stated that not only has she been "in service" to both of the latest Perverts in Chief, she bragged about her ancestors serving that same Roman whore since the days of the "First Holy Roman Empire"! Now, in this current piece, she tries to distance herself from the Vatican, claiming that was never the case. Where i come from, that's how you spell LIAR. And you are an imbecile if you think you can use Orwellian doublespeak to make everyone believe she is anything but a lying whore of Rome.

      Is that clear enough for you, dumbass?

      Delete
    19. SC, do I call you names? Lowering yourself to this level automatically denigrates your credibility. If you want people to respect your opinion, then you need to respect theirs. You need to go back and carefully read my translation again slowly or you will not grasp this. Anna is no way states that she is "in service" to the RCC. The first assemblies established by the early church fathers were at one time called the Catholic Church before the RCC even existed. Catholic means universal. Look it up. It means nothing more than the Universal Church of Jesus Christ and was not Roman in any way. I admit that I misunderstood the use of term First Holy Roman Empire and took it to be the Roman Empire that crucified Christ at the behest of the Pharisees. My apologies. Allow me to correct my statement. The First Holy Roman Empire was founded by Charlemagne in 800 so that is what Anna is referring to talking about her family heritage. Again, nowhere does she say that she and her family served the Roman Catholic Church but rather the Universal Church of Jesus Christ. Yes, she was appealing to the bishop's vanity and as he would read it through RCC glasses, just as you are doing here, it could lead him to believe that she meant the RCC. But she was very clever in her use of words to state the truth and yet make it appear as if she was on his side to win him over if that is how he wanted to interpret and perceive it. And apparently she did a good number on you too.

      Delete
    20. you are so full of shit, you don't even know you are constipated. your soothsaying has no effect on me. hopefully the others whose eyes you reach can see through your phony doublespeak. i don't know who you are and frankly don't care, but i'm done with you. be gone you snake.

      Delete
    21. Excuse me, but the first century church only used the names of their locations, such as Ephesus, Corinth, Galatia, etc. That is how the Apostle Paul addressed them. Nowhere was the early church (the first century church) ever called by one such name as 'catholic'. IMO, that is Man's idea.
      Neither does the bible refer to the word 'universe or universal' but only uses the word 'world'.
      Seems to me that this planet, earth, world, is ALL that God gave to us; the universe 'out there' is His business. I see NO words in the bible that even remotely refer to anything 'universal' and therefore I deduce that there is no such thing as ''catholic means universal'.

      Delete
    22. Abby, go read the early church fathers letters and you see that at that time they called it the universal church,which got translated to Catholic. But it had nothing to do with RCC other than that the Christian church in Rome was included. The RCC loves to use this as if it was the RCC they were referring to which they absolutely were not.

      Delete
    23. Ah, Steven, this is exactly what people do when they are caught in their own web, call people names and go on the defense instead of admitting they were wrong and apologoze instead. A real man admits when he is wrong. Yes, it would appear to be doublespeak as you call it, but you need to read it carefully and not jump to conclusions as to what you think it means. Anna was very clever in her use of words on purpose and she even fooled you. Come on, admit it.

      Delete
    24. Catholic (n.)
      "member of the Roman Catholic church," 1560s, from Catholic (adj.).
      catholic (adj.)
      mid-14c., "of the doctrines of the ancient Church" (before the East/West schism), literally "universally accepted," from French catholique, from Church Latin catholicus "universal, general," from Greek katholikos, from phrase kath' holou "on the whole, in general," from kata "about" + genitive of holos "whole" (from PIE root *sol- "whole, well-kept").
      Medieval Latin catholicus was practically synonymous with Christian and meant "constituting or conforming to the church, its faith and organization" (as opposed to local sects or heresies). With capital C-, applied by Protestants to the Church in Rome c. 1554, after the Reformation began. General sense of "embracing all, universal" in English is from 1550s. Meaning "not narrow-minded or bigoted" is from 1580s. The Latin word was rendered in Old English as eallgeleaflic.
      Source: https://www.etymonline.com/word/catholic

      Delete
    25. Thayer's Greek Lexicon
      STRONGS NT 2527: καθόλου
      καθόλου (i. e. καθ' ὅλου ( as it is written in authors before Aristotle (Liddell and Scott))), adverb, wholly, entirely, at all: Acts 4:18. ((Exodus 22:11); Ezekiel 13:3, 22; Amos 3:3, 4; Xenophon, Plato, Demosthenes, Aristotle, and following.)
      Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
      at all.
      From kata and holos; on the whole, i.e. Entirely -- at all.
      Source: https://biblehub.com/greek/2527.htm

      Delete
  13. Repent,
    His Kingdom is at hand.
    True to this day.
    And even though the Bible has been changed added to & taken away from,
    we can seek the Truth and with the Holy Spirit we can find the Truth. Use discernment, immerse yourselves in His word,(water.)
    We are not alone!
    We should seek to walk and speak as He would. we should seek to follow Him, we should seek to Love & forgive as He does, we should aspire to be a son, we should pray and give thanks for His gifts, His talents, we should share, we should pray for His peace in all things, all circumstances,His Freedom! we should pray for His patience.
    Yes, we should call people and groups out and offer a rebuke, in His way! keep in mind we too have been deceived and are also digging our way out.
    Love God,Yahuah'Alahim'(Elohim) and Love each other. This was the prime directive.
    We are not alone! Not because of Anna, nor Trump, not because of group.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol...Trump is potentially a FAR, FAR bigger player in the true history of this world than biblical nonsense, but whatever works for Christian fanatics ☇

      Delete
    2. a follower, the ''love ye one another' scripture is addressed to the Brethren; it is not intended for the brethren to go back and love the world again. But to ''come out from among them, and be ye separate'. That is a Command.
      'Rightly divide the word'.

      Delete
    3. The true 'WORD' being the audible DIVINE sound curent of the Lord☇♩

      Delete
  14. Abby,
    That is like saying the Bible is only addressed to the Brethren.
    How about this, Love God and each other or suffer the consequences.
    And no one said to love the world.
    If you love God and each other, How much more separate from the world would you be?
    Loving each other does not mean you roll over and play dead nor go along with the current.

    Leland,
    "Lol...Trump is potentially a FAR, FAR bigger player in the true history of this world than biblical nonsense, but whatever works for Christian fanatics ☇"
    Is he(Trump)? Do you even understand what it is you are saying?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a follower, we must always look to see exactly who is being addressed. If you receive a letter in the mail, and it say Dear A Follower, then it is only to you, and what it contains is not for me or anyone else who reads it. The bible is no different.

      King Jehosophat loved and helped the wicked, and God severely punished him for doing that. Did you realize that? Most likely not, because its another one of those things that is Never preached in any 'church'.

      Just like some sermons are only meant for the unsaved, and sermons that are for the saved folks are not meant for the unsaved. There is not a single scripture that I can recall that is speaking to everybody.
      It may sound harsh, but 'we aint all equal' and 'we aint all in the same bunch'. This is where is is necessary to 'rightly divide the word of God'. We must learn and accept the Separation Doctrine, because it is quite real.
      This is where personal study becomes quite valuable; it lays out the firm foundation from which all else is constructively built. This personal study is necessary because separation is not preached in churches for fear of ''offending the wimpy unsaved'; you know how they are about 'being discriminated against' Lol.

      It is the World that tries to indoctrinate us all with the ''unity crap' but we should not fall for that. God is a Divider, not a Uniter.

      Delete
    2. If Trump successfully exposes the ongoing secret space program - a follower - Onlybegottenisms will be in the dustbins of galactic history...

      Sample: https://spherebeingalliance.com/blog/transcript-cosmic-disclosure-reptilians-and-aquafarians.html

      Delete
    3. Abby, it's so true what you said...jesus did not come here to "unite", except maybe in the spiritual sense. He was sent here for the sole purpose of dividing us over the "Truth"..Thats why he said brother will be fighting brother, and separating families rather than uniting them under false Gods, and illusions...!! It's also a fact that even in heaven, not everyone will be equal...but then again anywhere in heaven is a universe away from the alyernative...!!

      Delete
  15. a follower, who is ''each other' that you are talking about?

    ReplyDelete
  16. “Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself.”
    Q

    ReplyDelete
  17. Leland...cheap shot, but it did make me laugh....!!!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.