Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

An End to My Association with Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton


By Anna Von Reitz

I met Bruce Doucette when I invited him to a conference I held in Anchorage, Alaska, last May.  Bruce is a very personable guy, apparently well-intentioned, and eager to get things done. 

Unfortunately, what he wanted to get done had nothing to do with why the conference had been called, and he attempted to commandeer it for his purposes.  I had to repeatedly drag things back on track because he couldn't or wouldn't keep his own agenda to the sidelines.

The same thing is happening right now.  I have called for the restoration of the American Government of the people, by the people, for the people---- and he and Hamilton and a few others have launched off into to redefine the American Government however they see fit. 

It's not going to work.

Bruce has taken it into his head that he and a few other people on a conference call can just wave their hands and change the meaning and substance of the American Government (change the duties and authorities of the Grand Juries, for example) and bypass and ignore the jurisdictional limitations that have been set in stone for over two hundred years (put State Justices in charge of Continental Marshals, for example).


That is simply not true.  Restoration of a government doesn't imply redefining and twisting it into something else.

Every single one of us reclaiming our natural birthright status can occupy vacant offices in our own government and serve them faithfully, but we have no authority to change the meaning and nature of the offices we occupy. 

If what Bruce is thinking and teaching others to think were true and correct, there would quickly be as many different opinions about what Grand Juries are as there are Grand Juries.  Chaos and constant confusion and conflicts would reign supreme. 

There would be no agreement between Michigan and Georgia about what a "Grand Jury" is or how it functions, and in all the over 3000 counties, the situation would be the same. 

All valid American Government offices are strictly limited to prevent despotism.  Whatever office Bruce Doucette thinks he occupies----a land jurisdiction State Justice's office
doesn't have duties in international jurisdiction.  None. Zero.

Whatever anyone "thinks" ---Grand Juries don't have control of anything but the duties that Grand Juries are assigned within the American Common Law Courts under the Public Law.
Those who flout the same Public Law that they claim to derive their authority from, are acting in breach of their oaths and have no authority. 

And now Bruce and Mr. Hamilton and some others who have confused the functions of state militia with the functions of continental marshals have stumbled into international jurisdiction where they have no vested authority and they are ramming around causing trouble for the Continental Marshals program over --so far as the evidence goes so far --- truly petty misunderstandings and false assumptions.

I suspect ego problems are at the bottom of it all, and that having helped start the program and having handed over the baton for it, Bruce Doucette wants to continue to control and direct it even though his office is a land jurisdiction office and the offices of the continental marshals are all in international (sea) jurisdiction.

As for Michael R. Hamilton, I don't believe that he even has an office apart from the vacancy.  So far as I know there are no active counties in Louisiana and no jural assembles or Grand Juries, either.  So?  What is a justice without a constituency? 

Both these men may be well-intentioned.  I would vouch for Bruce that he is.  But, being well-intentioned only goes so far.  One must also respect the rules and observe the limitations built into the government and the offices you say you serve.

I wish to make it perfectly clear that I serve the American states and people and the government they established in 1776 and that I abide by the constitutional agreement they established and that I stand for the Public Law and for Due Process and that I exercise my office within the confines established for it by the Public Law and that I do not condone nor encourage any Grand Jury administrator or any State Justice operating outside their lawful jurisdiction.

Such actions are destructive to the aim of restoring our lawful government. 

That is not to say that after the restoration is complete, I don't have some issues with loopholes in The Constitution that need to be closed or think that our American Government is perfect "as is".    I don't.  But I also know that there are ways and means and processes established for the peaceful amendment and negotiation of whatever changes we wish  to make as a nation and that the lawful way and place to address those changes is not on a teleconference call.

I know that single counties don't make states and single states don't speak for the whole union of states and that we have rules and definitions, quorums and processes that have to be observed for actions to be valid.

Bruce and Mr. Hamilton have impugned my honor and suggested/inferred  that I am "just protecting Bella Haywood" and that I have some personal ax to grind for defending the limitations our offices, the Public Law, and the Rules of Evidence. 

What kind of Justice would I be, if I did not?

From what I have seen so far--- Chief Marshal Haywood deserves protection, because she is doing her job and observing her proper jurisdiction and nothing substantial has been proven against her.  It's that simple. 

On the other hand, both Bruce and Michael R. Hamilton have overstepped their
boundaries, asserted authorities they don't have under the Public Law, and what is even more damning, have taught others to do the same. 

Instead of acting as, and within the offices of State Justices, they've strayed far, far afield either in ignorance or in arrogance.  And they have refused to correct.

I have spent forty years in the trenches and I have to say that such behavior always, predictably--- and rightfully--- has consequences.  When you stand on the Law and respect your jurisdiction and respect the limitations of your office, you prosper.  

When you do otherwise-- you get shot down.

Water flows downhill.

If Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton continue to ignore the limits of their offices and the rightful jurisdiction their offices, they will sooner or later be arrested and prosecuted for it, because the only authority, right, or safety we have derives from the Public Law,  and depends on us knowing and obeying the Public Law, respecting the limits of our offices, and operating in our proper jurisdiction. 

I am separating myself from them and their actions and assertions because in my opinion what they are doing ----and what they are encouraging others to do ---- is outside the Public Law, outside their jurisdiction, and destructive to the cause of restoring our lawful government. 

Whatever it is that they are doing, it is not within the lawful office of State Justices to do.

From this time forward and until such time as a reconciliation may be reached let it be perfectly clear that I do not condone what Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton are doing or teaching, the assumptions they are making, the new powers they are assuming for themselves, nor the new and different duties they are trying to foist off onto the Grand Juries and Continental Marshals.

There is no precedent for such offices or jurisdictions as they are attempting to create, no Public Law in support of it, therefore no delegation of authority related to our already existing American Government (as opposed to US Government) in support of them or what they are doing. 

And so, in my view, there is no difference between the corruption that Bruce and Hamilton are introducing and the corruption that the de facto government has allowed; they are now trying to usurp powers never delegated to their offices from within in exactly the same way that the de facto government has usurped power from without.

I will have no part of it.


Always remember that rights and authorities go with limits and responsibilities.  If we expect the United States Government to play by the rules, the Government of the United States of America can do no less.

---------------------------------------
See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

8 comments:

  1. for education knowledge Grand comes from the masons such as Grand Marshal. Public Policy is running rampant as if it was related to public law. same goes for union vs Union Servant versus service and person being the people's representative I believe in my opinion clarification needs to be the number one issue to stop the misconception in false reporting. One and all must agree what color green is clarified agreed and final. All the said law if converted to vangsness who knows from day to day if the king changed it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am so glad you are aware of what they are doing and have made claim of such. It is sad that some people's egos get them in so much trouble if not now, later. Either that or it has been their plan all along. Anna you are extremely intelligent and steadfast with your energy. Thank you, God Bless You and your team.

    ReplyDelete
  3. After 200 years of complicide fraud, with everyone going along to get along, what do you expect...a peaceful exsit of highly paid public servents who hold no lawfully filled positions to simply give their resignations. There will never be a peaceful conversion from "public policy", back to "public law" and the constitution. All you have to do is look how the stubborn left is treating Trump. He is basically treated like Rodney Dangerfield..."I get no respect, no respect at all". I hope everyone is ready for another undeclared "civil war", because no one in govt. wants change....NO ONE...!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WE DO NOT need war. Through education the many will achieve peaceful non-compliance and the evil will wither. Stored labor and liberty are the greatest commodities and others are always lurking to find them unguarded. The persistence required to preserve it is equal to what is required to restore it. The process to restore is identical to the process of preserving it. The fact is we have it if we know how to preserve it/restore it. It is the responsibility of the elders to direct the young but the elders must first know before they can teach. War kills the followers of bad leaders and ignorant elders, what does that achieve?

      Delete
  4. Things set up a certain way, to be restored must be set up that way to function, especially when involving others who must mirror and fill those same things, or offices. Seems I know a few who think they now better ,almost always reject the correct way choosing their own due to ego and suffer regularly for it. Like was said above, once everything is delicately restored and is working then improvements will be entirely possible due to design being correctly followed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Again...well said Anna. I just found M.R. Hamilton's site a little while ago and found that a lot of his material was ill advised. I concur on the ego statement you made as well, and if that could be overcome, we would get a whole lot further.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i d like more clarification on the fact the continental marshal is in the international jurisdiction . I obviously wrongly concluded continental meant the land of the 48 geographic states maybe a paper of explanation on this at some point thank you

    ReplyDelete
  7. Posted by Paul, for Anna Von Reitz:

    Continental Marshals work FOR the American states and people, but they work IN the international jurisdiction.


    They defend the land jurisdiction and states and the retained and undelegated powers of the states and people, but they do it in the international jurisdiction.


    They are here to defend us against international crimes like piracy .


    I hope that explains better.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.