Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Cousin Bubba --- Call Out to All Serious Historical Researchers


By Anna Von Rietz

Cousin Bubba --- Call Out to Serious Historical Researchers
Yes, I have groups of serious historical researchers working with me from all over the world now, and that’s great--- but this morning we are all being called upon to consider a question of such gravity that it requires asking for even more help from more people, indeed, for everyone on the planet to get involved to whatever extent is practical.
Here is what has surfaced over the past few years of prodding and poking at the BEAST--- the Belgian Electronic Asset System.  To begin getting a handle on this, read the following reprint of a Lexology news blurb from three and a half years ago:
________________________________
Belgium June 6 2013
On Thursday 30 May, the Belgian Parliament approved the overhaul of the Belgian legislation on security interests in movable assets
Under the new legislation, an electronic National Pledge Register will be established so that a pledge on movable assets (tangible as well as intangible) could be created by a mere agreement of the parties without dispossession of the assets. Important are further, amongst others, the simplification of the enforcement rules (enforcement without prior court authorization), the facilitation of a pledge over a fluctuating pool of assets or a universality of assets and the possibility to create pledges in the name of a security trustee to the benefit of third parties as beneficiaries.
The final text can be found here. The law will enter into force through publication of a Royal Decree, and ultimately on 1 December 2014.
An assessment of the law’s impact on financing transactions will be provided upon publication of the Royal Decree in the Belgian State Gazette.
__________________________________
So what are these people talking about?  Pledges? “Without dispossession of assets”?  Moveable assets?
They are talking about you and your supposed “pledge” of all you are and have and own to the “government of the United States of America” as well as the same supposed “pledges” made by the Belgian people in support of their government.  It’s the same system.  It’s the same thing.  Without all the euphemisms, it all adds up to the same thing: feudalism.
Modern feudalism.  And you are the serfs.
According to the perpetrators of this “voluntary” enslavement--- you agreed to this status, knowingly and willingly, and pledged yourself, your labor, your land, your good name, your copyrights and patents and everything else “material and immaterial” to the benefit of your friendly local government services corporation in exchange for the Nanny State providing you with whatever level of “services and benefits” it is convenient for your Masters to provide.
Let’s look at some legal definitions---
Look up the word “pledge”--- originally the act of a serf pledging his allegiance to a king or local robber baron in exchange for protection.  That is what you have supposedly engaged in--- pledging.
And then recall the endless reiteration of “The Pledge of Allegiance” with a more jaundiced eye: “I pledge my allegiance to the flag of the United States of America…..and to the Republic for which it stands…..”
So what is a “flag” actually?  It is a symbol standing for a nation in international admiralty, like a visual logo or icon or trademark used to identify ships in commerce and war.   So you are pledging—giving yourself to an icon?  Really?  
And who or what or which “United States of America” owns the icon at this point? 
The bankrupted and long defunct religious non-profit corporation calling itself “The United States of America” or the similarly bankrupted commercial corporation calling itself “the United States of America” or the United States of America (Minor)--- a consortium of territorial Insular States plus the District of Columbia (calling itself the “State of New Columbia”) or the United States of America (Major)—a consortium of fifty-seven (57) incorporated “states of states” acting as an international commercial conglomerate? 
When the cat is away, the mice will play---- and boy, howdy, have they ever played fast and loose with your good name and your property interests!
Before we go onward, let’s ask another salient question about “The Pledge of Allegiance”---- since when did the Republic ever need any other organization to “stand for” or “represent” it?  Hmm?
Answer---- when the same rats responsible for this whole situation fraudulently involved the Republic in bankruptcy proceedings that had nothing to do with the Republic, and falsely claimed that the American people and their actual states of the Union were responsible for the debts of the perpetrators.  That placed the Republic in the clutches of the bankruptcy Trustees--- the “US Trustees” and the “Custodian of Alien Property” took control and title to you and all your assets.
Look up the definition of “moveable assets”.   You are a moveable asset.  So is your house.  Your car. Everything you own and the title to everything you have.  All “moveable assets”.
Fascinating. 
And how did they do this?
Via a process of “hypothecation”--- look that one up.  Basically, it’s another name for institutionalized fraud.  On the basis of whatever proof they can contrive, they can claim that they have permission to sign you up as a “surety” ---- read that, “collateral” backing their debts, and they can do it as the Belgian article says, “without dispossession of the asset”.
Imagine this situation: Reckless Cousin Bubba needs a car loan.  Fast Freddie needs to make a car sale.  But nobody in their right mind would give Cousin Bubba a car loan….. so what happens?
Cousin Bubba offers you and your good name and your assets as collateral for a car loan to Fast Freddie.  Fast Freddie readily agrees and very quietly, without you knowing it at all, he “hypothecates” a debt against your name and estate---- places a lien and “title” on it----and sells Cousin Bubba a car, backed by your supposed promise to pay if Cousin Bubba defaults.
Now just replace the name “Cousin Bubba” with “Government of the United States” --- whatever those five words really stand for---- and “Fast Freddie” with Bank of England or whatever other bank applies----and ask yourself, “What can go wrong?”
Well, having already purchased a car on your credit, Fast Freddie is anxious to sell Bubba a house, too--- and Bubba is eager to have a place of his own, so they just “hypothecate” another “loan” to Bubba for a house…. And then, of course, he needs new appliances and landscaping, a pool, a motor home, an F-35 fighter jet….
And it is all getting stacked up against you and your credit and you are never told a word about any of this.  Not a word.
Pretty soon, Cousin Bubba (represented by the members of the United States Congress) is panting from the effort of keeping up with all those loan payments.  He can’t even keep up with the interest owed on all those loans….. that’s what the Grace Commission reported to Ronald Reagan about “US Government debt” back in the 1980s.
So having maxxed out your credit and having given up a “title” on everything you own including the value of your labor over the course of your lifetime, what else does Bubba do?
Oh, he “volunteers” your unborn children into slavery and “hypothecates” debt against the value of everything they will ever inherit and all they will produce and the value of their labor, too. 
But in the end, Maggie Thatcher proves correct---- thirty years down the track, Cousin Bubba can’t borrow any more.  He has finally “run out of other people’s money” and Fast Freddie is so glutted he figures he doesn’t need any more sales.
So what is the key to this situation for you and for me?  It’s called the “Alien Masterfile Account” and “Alien Birth Certificate” ---- also an account. 
This account is very peculiar, because instead of using numbers, it uses your name written in “American Sign Language” (otherwise known as “Glossa”--- look it up in Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition) ---- to create a “sign” that appears to be your name only written in all capital letters: JOHN HENRY DOE.
It’s an “alien” account because you aren’t really a “United States Citizen” nor are you a “citizen of the United States”. Both these political statuses translate as either --- “federal corporation employee obligated to obey and serve the government” or as “slaved owned by government”.   As an American state national, you are “alien” with respect to the federal government and the federal corporation(s), including the “federated” State of State franchises.  So they routinely call you an “alien” in your own country.
Look up Title 26, the old IRS Code---- and what do you see referred to constantly?  “Non-resident aliens”.  That’s you, folks, in the language of fraud known as “Federalese”.
And where is the nexus of all this chicanery, falsehood, and fraud?   It’s the “PCT”---- the Public Charitable Trust, set up by Congress for the welfare relief of poor black plantation slaves displaced by the Civil War. 
Supposedly, you knowingly and willingly “pledged” away your land and your labor and everything you are and own, including the copyright to your given name, in order to receive “benefits” from the Public Charitable Trust and have your estate “insured” --- with the nearest government corporation “State of State” franchise named as your beneficiary, of course.
And where are the records of all this crappola kept for Fast Freddie’s convenience?  Well, in the BEAST catalog system, of course, and locally, on our shores, by the Depository Trust Corporation (DTC and DTTC). 
If you aren’t boiling mad, if you aren’t beside yourself, if you aren’t ready to stand up and do something about this situation, then, Good Joe, you certainly ought to be.  I am.  But following my dictum of “Keep Calm and Get Even”--- what I want you all to address your attention toward is this question: was there ever a Declaration of War at the onset of the American Civil War (aka War of Secession) and if so, who or what made it?
No corporation on Earth has the right to declare war.  The most they can do is declare a police action and pretend its war. 
I very much suspect that no actual, factual, lawful Declaration of War starting the American Civil War was ever made by any properly empowered government, just as no actual, factual Peace Treaty ending the Civil War exists.  I very much suspect that all that has gone on here has been purely criminal and private in nature, a matter of “warring” commercial corporations---- gangs of thieves overrunning everything---- the transplanted Dutch East India commercial corporation versus the British East India commercial corporation, for example---- just feeding off the people and assets of this country like two giant bloated tape worms, neither one of which have any honest claims or any right to be here.
Call it “Fast Freddie” and “Fast Eddie”---- the “United States of America” and the “United States” standing for the “Federal Reserve System” and the “International Monetary Fund” ---- both dishonest, both benefiting from what I shall term “Modern Commercial Feudalism” and all feeding off the fraudulent practice of “hypothecation of debt” against innocent and uninformed people who have been deliberately misled and systematically lied to and defrauded.
And the same “system” has been extrapolated worldwide--- Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, India….
I postulate that there was never any actual “war between the states”--- only a “war” between two foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing “governmental services”. 
Okay, researchers nationwide--- got your motors running?
I know that there is no Peace Treaty officially ending the American Civil War.
See if you can find me a valid Declaration of War starting it?
And ask me, why is this important? 
Well, folks, if there was no valid Declaration of War starting the American Civil War and no valid Peace Treaty ending it, then literally--- there was never such a war according to any agreed upon definition of what “war” is.
Every action undertaken by any of these governmental services corporations since then, including the vicious fraud schemes involving “pledging” and “hypothecation” and “liens on titles”--- which is all identity theft and theft of credit and surreptitious enslavement of “moveable assets”---- is nothing more or less than vast and entrenched international crime.  It is owed no political solution. It is owed nothing but determined worldwide prosecution. 
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

7 comments:

  1. All true , hypothacate assume your ok with using you as ccollateral . Hire mercenaries (homeland security ) and throw you in GITMO.as enemies of the state you got a anti American bumper sticker . End the fed

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another serious Historical research that came to front today when we hosted "JAMES MADISON" to do his skit. A local guy dresses up as James Madison and talks about money and banking to schools.

    so this corruption/deception was brought up.

    Seems that, in the days of the worthless continental Hamilton "suggested" to his speculator friends to buy up the worthless continental for .05. Since the Continental was worthless the poor soldiers and others who worked so hard for the Revolution easily were duped in getting .05 on the dollar. This was a CRIME that made many speculators very rich. Our banking system was formed on this corrupt/fraudulent/predatory ("successful") scheme. These speculators KNEW SOMETHING the soldiers didn't. The soldiers were unsophisticated and ignorant that Hamilton and his legislative buddies would make, in the near future, the Continental whole again by declaring redemption of the Continental by 100%.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder what Donald Trump would, or could do with this information, especially if what Anna is asking for was to prove out?

    M

    ReplyDelete
  4. On another note, I have a Black's fourth edition, and the term glossa is no where near what you say it is Anna. Glossa is an explanation or comment on a text. Perhaps you meant to say glossa viperina est que corrodit viscera textus which is a form of poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text??? I also have a Ballentine's third edition that agrees with the Black's. I'm all for checking out your statements, but this is a little far fetched and unexpected. If I'd posted your version, I'd expect to be blasted to kingdom come.

    M

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Posted by Paul for Anna Von Reitz:

      Yes, of course, we are talking about a "poisonous text"----- the mixing of a corrupt form of Ancient Latin with modern English so as to make the victim assume an incorrect meaning from a text that has been deliberately obscured.


      What appears to be my name written in all capital letters: ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER---- does not translate into anything in Ancient Latin. In Ancient Latin it means: ANNA. (period) MARIA. (period) RIEZINGER. (period). It is not a name of any kind. It is a sign, symbol, or as the rats have recently admitted, a label --- denoting a thing. Only things, and in this case, corporations and bank accounts, are labeled.


      So---- here you are, typical American, reading a text that says or appears to say, "ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER appeared to answer charges related to......"


      And that seems to mean that I actually came to a court and made answer to charges presented by someone, when in fact no such thing has happened and when what appears to be a sentence with meaning identifies nobody and means nothing at all.


      There is no joinder, no jurisdiction available in any document that uses terms in this way, embedding a foreign sign in an English text in a way calculated to mislead people. It is constructive fraud.

      Delete
  5. And that is exactly what is happening in court....construtive fraud. The judge is trying to assume the position of "beneficiary" while trying to get you to admit or believe that you arebthe "trustee" and the DA as the "Exectutor" and the court clerk as the "administrator" of the trust. But you are the actual "beneficiary" and he is the "trustee" under the cetsi que trust(public trust) and therefore should be ordered by you to administer the trust properly by settleing the account(your charges) in full as a set off and full closure and adjustment lawfully or he has breached his trust position agreement according to his oath and bond. Did I miss anything your honor????? Always end your statement with a question back to the judge to answer, so he takes the "liability", not you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very confusing to say the least for a average trusting
    American national. However the more I learn from this
    website the more I understand that many "people" on this planet are murderous thugs who should be brought up on charges and properly disposed of. Not so hard to prove, but could take forever to get it started in some court "or" eliminate the bad guys altogether.Elimination is the only way I see to get rid of them. One by one, then then they will start to cave and go against each other ..

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.