Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Monday, December 16, 2024

International Public Notice: Common Sources of Misunderstanding, e.g., Ron Vrooman

 By Anna Von Reitz

Number One:  

The original Confederation --- which is an action (verb) as well as a result (a new group of associated entities) was between the Union States and the States of the Union and it was described as a "perpetual union" --- correctly.  

This is because the land and the soil are forever and inescapably conjoined, as the soil is part of the land, and the land is part of the soil.  The soil is defined as the top six inches of the land, and no matter how you may dig and scrape, a soil layer remains and the connection of land and soil remains as a physical perpetual union. 

Thus, it is proper to speak of a perpetual union between soil jurisdiction Union States and the international land jurisdiction States of the Union. 

However, this same language "perpetual union" was retained in later confederation actions, as between the States of the Union and the States of America, which sought to confederate business interests ---and mere business interests do not have the ability to guarantee a perpetual union.  

It was precisely this inability to guarantee a perpetual union contract among the members of the original States of America Confederation that was the stumbling block that led to the Mercenary Conflict we call the American Civil War. 

We are called to remember that our ability to contract is limited by the realm of Natural Law. 

Number Two

In the 18th and early 19th century it was commonplace for English to "borrow" Latin naming conventions, especially in legal documents. 

As a result, the "free, sovereign and independent states" referenced in passing in the Treaty of Paris (1783) -- what we call the Union States --are constantly indicated by the use of a small "s" and references to these Union States consistently appear as "states" from the 1770's to the 1850's.  

Indeed, we see references to virginia and vermont and georgia, which looks very strange to modern eyes and is definitely not proper in English--- but would have been proper style and nomenclature for sovereign nation-states in Latin. 

Similarly, the "international States" which we call the States of the Union (i.e. States belonging to the Union States) are consistently indicated by the use of a capital "S" and references to these States consistently appear as "States" in Proper English and Latin, too. 

Finally, businesses created by States to act for them as vendors of routine government services are consistently called "States of States".  In English, these are rendered as, for example, State of New Jersey; in Latin, they appear as STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 

This leads to pernicious confusion because the official language of our government is English, and one of our Federal Subcontractors continues to use Latin style conventions applied to English.  

This results in a slang language being used in the District of Columbia and bleeding over into use all over the country; this is because the Municipal Government was allowed to piggy-back along with the British Territorial Government and establish "Municipal Districts" in tandem with Territorial (Military) Districts, as a result of the 1937 collusion known as The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States.

The combination of English names and words using Latin grammar and style conventions results in gibberish, and much confusion overall.  This inappropriate abuse of both languages is called "Dog Latin".  The most obvious tokens of its use is shown when our States are named in all small letters, for example -- "georgia" -- or all large letters, GEORGIA.  The first style, "georgia" references the sovereign nation-state and the second, "GEORGIA", is referencing a Municipal Corporation, but Americans and others are never taught any of this, which lends these conventions to constructive fraud schemes, personage crimes, and evasions of accountability.   

Number Three: 

For the first few decades, we used Latinized conventions to indicate what kind of "state" we were referencing.  In the 1840s, an explosion of incorporation occurred and the situation became even more confusing as our European Federal Subcontractors rushed to create companies and incorporated entities named after our governmental  instrumentalities.  

Suddenly, in addition to the Union States doing business as "the United States" we had British Crown and Roman Municipal Corporations doing business as "the United States, Inc." and "The United States, Inc." and "the United States of America, Inc." and "The United States of America, Inc." and even "the States of America, Inc." and "The States of America, Inc." 

The resulting mayhem was so bad that numerous Acts of Congress in this time period sought to sort it out with legislation like the Dictionary Act  and Acts addressing legal style conventions, respect for English as the Official Language, and even such topics as the Proper Name, in English, of our country --- for the curious, the name of our country agreed upon, officially, is: The United States. 

Early on, there was no law obligating incorporated companies to identify themselves as such, and they notoriously "just neglected" to inform their readers and others of the fact that they were commercial British Crown or Holy Roman Empire municipal corporations named after the unincorporated instrumentalities of our government. 

This created an opportunity for grifters and con men to deliberately confuse foreign-registered commercial and municipal corporations with our unincorporated government instrumentalities, simply by omitting any mention of or making any distinction between their incorporated entities and our unincorporated business names. 

It was ultimately this practice that allowed a Scottish commercial corporation merely calling itself "The United States of America" --- and neglecting to add, "Incorporated" --- to steal the identity of our Federation of States and hack our credit.

Unwary patriots among us, like Ron Vrooman, are forever running across documents that pertain to these "similarly named" foreign corporations and their business dealings and are lured into thinking that these documents are about the unincorporated  American Government instead, or, alternatively, finding information that pertains to our American Government, and misapplying it to our Federal Subcontractors and to their very similarly named foreign corporations.  

People also often fail to see that Federation-Confederation is a relationship between different kinds of member-states operating in different jurisdictions of the law.  

The first such paired relationship was between the Union States and the States of the Union, representing the perpetual union of the soil and land.  

The second more famous Federation-Confederation pairing was between the States of the Union and the States of America, one membership organization of States operating in the international jurisdiction of the land and sea (United States of America) and another membership organization operating as States of States in the jurisdiction of the air (States of America) respectively.  This second Federation-Confederation pairing is the one that attempted to invoke a "perpetual union" and failed. 

Please note that this second Confederation was defaulted from the start, because the entities could not guarantee a condition of the contract --- "perpetual union".  Please also note that the State Members on the Federation side of this pairing did not declare War and didn't approve the actions of the members of the Confederation (States of States) that seceded. 

The whole Mercenary Conflict we have been conned into calling 
"The American Civil War" was patently illegal and the resulting occupation of our country by British Territorial mercenary forces is still illegal and unlawful.  

Identifying the names, natures, and relationships of our American Government entities has been made difficult by this criminal process of "mirroring" our Government's "doing-business-as" names, and using them as the names of foreign corporations instead.  

Plainly, the doing-business-as names adopted by the American Government have been deliberately mirrored and impersonated by foreign corporations ginned up by our Federal Subcontractors for a reason --- and that reason is basically a National-level Identity Theft Scheme, in which the Perpetrators have attempted to replace our people with their persons.   

The Federal Subcontractors and their foreign commercial and municipal corporations named ---after us, after our States, after our States of States, and after our unincorporated government instrumentalities-- have used semantic deceit and non-disclosure to impersonate us and gain access to our money, our credit, our resources. 

They have done this in Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of their Service Contracts -- and they have already received Due Process and been convicted of it.  

This complex, inter-jurisdictional fraud scheme, has also created gross confusion throughout the rest of the world. Many nations have similarly been deceived, misrepresented, defrauded, and had their identity stolen by these British Territorial criminals. 

For example, people routinely claim that our country is "bankrupt" because they confuse the bankruptcy of a very similarly named foreign corporation for us  --- when if anyone stopped to think of it, none of the American Government entities are incorporated and none are eligible for public bankruptcy protection as a result.  

Multiple countries (Costa Rica and India, for example) and some States of States (State of Delaware and  State of Texas so far) have allowed the incorporation of business entities calling themselves "United States of America" and "United States" in flagrant violation of our international and global trademarks.  

The Central Banks have colluded with all this nonsense and so has the United Nations Organization. 

The central banks have pretended (based on purloined, undisclosed and unconscionable foreign citizen registrations)  that we no longer exist or have "waived" our interest in our own gold, silver, land, and other resources and they have then gratuitously extended our credit to the look-alike, sound-alike foreign corporations that have stolen our identity like any credit card hacker.  

The United Nations, upon examination, is an organization that doesn't actually represent any nation --- and instead represents the interests of commercial corporations that are masquerading as "nations" composed of legal fiction persons, not people.  

All these failed, duplicitous, corrupt institutions need to be replaced, but not with even more deceptive, cruel, and corrupt mega-corporation cartels fronting initiatives like the Quantum Financial System and BRICS as alternatives to this criminality --- while in fact expanding upon the same criminality and the same coercive control and the same dishonest dealings. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 

December 15th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 5100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.