Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Friday, December 9, 2022

District "Assemblies" v State Assemblies

 By Anna Von Reitz

If you see anything calling itself the "Continental Free Press" or "National assembly for the Government of The United States of America" or trying to pass itself off as "The Ohio State Republic" or "The New York State Republic", etc., know that it's being promoted by the thoroughly discredited Reign of the Heavens Society and run like an antelope away. 

There are three populations in this country. 

They are: (1) Americans adopting their birthright political status and living in original jurisdiction on the land and soil; (2) persons of various national origins working as British Territorial U.S. Citizens occupying Military Districts in Admiralty jurisdiction and adopting that foreign political status; I3) persons of various national origins working as Municipal citizens of the United States occupying Maritime Districts in Maritime (Commercial) Districts and adopting that foreign political status. 

Now, a mish-mash of confused people in the foreign political statuses, both Territorial and Municipal, are trying to form "assemblies" and are calling their organizations "assemblies" even though by definition, they can't form assemblies.  They can only form "associations" or "societies". 

This misrepresentation of who they are and what they are doing is resulting in confusion as they persist in calling themselves "assemblies" --- when they are not assemblies.  

The only people who can "assemble" are the Americans occupying the original land and soil jurisdiction, and they are contractually guaranteed the right to do so. 

Persons --- those operating in the foreign Admiralty and Maritime jurisdictions have no guaranteed rights at all, though they are generally allowed to meet together freely and "associate" with each other or form "societies" so long as they are not usurping or plotting against the actual government of this country.  

Most of this confusion is being caused by the erstwhile members of the thoroughly discredited Reign of the Heavens Society, which did at least admit that it was a "society" and not an assembly of any kind. 

Since it was forced to go underground and change its names this renegade Territorial organization which pretends to have authority based on the defunct Confederation of States, has spun off all sorts of fanciful names and titles and internet websites for itself, where it basically preaches anti-semitism and Nazi-like mindlessness and submission to their purported "authority". 

The States created three instrumentalities for their convenience to do business mutually  -- the Union formed in July 1776, the Federation in September 1776, and much later, 1781, the Confederation.  All three instrumentalities represent or, in the case of the Confederation, represented,  the States in different jurisdictions. 

The Union was conceived to hold the National Soil Jurisdiction sacred and apart from the hurly-burly and possible interferences of international affairs. 

Our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America was conceived to deal with International and Global business and from 1776 to 1781, it handled all external business affairs in air, land, and sea jurisdictions. 

Five years later, the unincorporated Confederation was adopted and began representing the States in global Maritime jurisdiction as "the States of America" as of March 1, 1781; in 1787, this Confederation of business organizations operating as States-of-States extended itself to operate the Federal Republic, under The Constitution for the united States of America. 

As anyone can see, the verbiage is consistent throughout.  The Confederation doing business as "the States of America" was the American Subcontractor awarded the original 1787 Federal Constitution Contract; and operating as "the Federal Republic" it assumed the enumerated powers and duties delegated under The Constitution for the united States of America in September of 1787. 

The Union continued to control and represent the National Soil Jurisdiction of the States and the unincorporated Federation continued to represent the States' international land, global air, and international Admiralty jurisdictions, as well as any undelegated powers in Maritime jurisdiction which remained with the States and/or people. 

Contrary to what some people have been misled to believe, the Confederation did not take over or supersede any of these other functions and authorities. The Federation of States simply split off some of its responsibilities and gave them to the Confederation to administer. 

All went well until the Southern members of the Confederation walked out and left the organization without a quorum to conduct business. This rendered the original Confederation formed under The Articles of Confederation inoperable, and that made the Federal Republic inoperable, too. 

By Operation of Law, the "powers" delegated under The Constitution for the united States of America automatically reverted to the Delegator, the Federation of States from which the "powers" were transferred. 

And there they remain, until the actual properly declared and populated State Assemblies reconstruct their State-of-State organizations and restore the Confederation which will then restore the Federal Republic --- if that's how the States now in Session decide to organize things. 

Meantime, the unincorporated Federation of States simply resumes the extra work as it did from 1776 to 1781.  

The only valid "State Assemblies" operate under names styled like this: "The Texas Assembly" and they are true assemblies populated by the people living in each State, acting in their capacity as people, not as foreign "persons" working for or dependent upon foreign corporations. 

Watch out for the fake look-alike-sound-alike "assemblies" being promoted by the renegade Liars still operating the Reign of the Heavens Society under new deceitful names like "The Wisconsin State Republic". 

Look at this name and think. What are the words?  What do they mean?  Is a "Republic" in any way related to the "republican state assemblies" that we are owed?  Where do we see the word "Republic" show up in our history?  What is a "Wisconsin State" as opposed to plain old "Wisconsin"? 

After the Civil War the British Territorial Perpetrators came in and seized upon all the property belonging to the States and People and put it all in a State Trust in each State of the Union.  They named these trusts "The Wisconsin State (Trust)" and "The Ohio State (Trust)" and so on. 
They then assumed a custodial role with respect to these trusts and the assets contained in them, which gave them an excuse to subjugate us under their Territorial rule. 

So now we know where the "Wisconsin State" part of "The Wisconsin State Republic" comes from, but what about "Republic"?   The only Republic in our history is a foreign Federal entity known as the Federal Republic which was at one time funded and operated by the failed Confederation.  As with all Federal entities, that Republic was foreign in jurisdiction and population.  And any phony State Trust Republics add up to our Territorial Employees trying to pull another Substitution Scheme on clueless Americans. 

Any State Trust Republic has nothing to do with our republican States of the Union, but it sure it trying to pass itself off as one of our States.  

Please note that a State Trust is not a State.  It's another legal fiction trying to bust the world on a wooden nickel.  Now that the actual States are back in Session and the properly declared and recorded population has returned to their lawful jurisdiction there is no reason for any State Trust to exist.  These State Trusts are supposed to be liquidated and returned to the States of the Union to which they belong. 

In other words, "The Wisconsin State (Trust)" needs to be dissolved and all assets returned to Wisconsin, the nation-state of the living population of Wisconsinites living within the physical boundaries of Wisconsin.  The land and everything else doesn't belong to any Republic.  It belongs to the State, Wisconsin, and the people living there. 

Most particularly, the Trust Assets don't belong to any British Territorial Employees thinking that they are going to pull off another Substitution Scheme against the actual Owners.  These irresponsible and illegal antics must come to an end, and so must the assumption of any right to interfere with or impersonate the actual State and the actual State Assembly.  

What I have said here applies to each and every State Trust and every State of the Union. 

The Western States that did not come into existence until after the Civil War entered into Territorial Statehood, not true Statehood, because the States were not in Session and could not vote to enroll them.  As of the first of October 2020, this long-delayed housekeeping was completed when all the State Assemblies that existed prior to the Civil War voted unanimously to enroll the Territorial "States" as full and complete States of the Union.  

So there is no reason for any Territorial U.S. Citizen to assume any custody of any of our State Assets anywhere in this country, much less any authority to gin up a "Republic" based on a State Trust that is owed to the people of each State, and call themselves an "Assembly" without properly disclosing who and what they really are.  They might legitimately style themselves as a "District Assembly" or a "Municipal Assembly", but trying to foist themselves off as a State Trust Assembly is simply whackjob. 

Those who are subjects of a foreign Trust have no right to assemble, and the Trustees of such a Trust have no right to assert any interest in the Assets of a State Trust which belongs already to a State of the Union. 

It should be obvious that a State Trust has no political character at all and is not a viable political subunit.  All these State Trusts have been operated as Wards of the British Crown, in purported safekeeping until the return of the lawful owners. 

Well, the actual owners have "returned from over the sea" and declared and recorded their presence here without the services of a clearinghouse.  Our British Territorial Employees are honor bound to release the State Trust Assets back to the lawful owners, not mess around and continue trying to assert custodial interests and ownership interests that do no belong to them, much less offer to set themselves up with their own "Republic" based on our State Trust Assets. 

More British Bunko being promoted by the Reign of the Heavens Society trying to hide behind new names and faces and internet websites. 

If you see anything calling itself the "Continental Free Press" or "National assembly for the Government of The United States of America" or trying to pass itself off as "The Ohio State Republic" or "The New York State Republic", etc., know that it's being promoted by the thoroughly discredited Reign of the Heavens Society and run like an antelope away. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

25 comments:

  1. Correct, Reign of Heavens society has been fully discredited, and so has THe AMerican states Assemblies and Liar Anna Von Reitz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Run like the wind from Esther too . . . too funny!

      Delete
    2. Esther you do not know the meaning of the word "Liar." It refers to an etymology from the bible as in "to lay in wait to ponce upon the unsuspecting."

      Esther your head seems on a swivel, you certainly aren't "unsuspecting." Don't get dizzy!

      Delete
    3. So there are three sovereigns when it comes to the body politic giving us a stable plane. The original union represented by the counties or "we the people", the States represented by the Federation and our Federal Government that is defunct and needs to be brought back on line. Have I got this right?

      Delete
    4. I will take a shot at answering, subject to my being corrected. And advising you plug the word "sovereign" into Anna's blog search box. And read through sufficient references to correct me.

      To be "Sovereign," a man/women can not be operating as an incorporated being, or on behalf of a chartered entity, to which it owes obligation. One cannot be, at time of claim of "sovereign" subject to an employer of be as a ward under some others custodian/guardian ship.


      "we the people" sovereign yes.
      "federation" a fiction, no not sovereign - Subject to "we the people
      "Federal Government", no not sovereign - Subject to we the people.

      Please correct my uncertainty.
      thanks

      Delete
    5. Bouvier's: SOVEREIGNTY. The union and exercise of all human power possessed in a state; it is a combination of all power; it is the power to do everything in a state without accountability; to make laws, to execute and to apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to make war or peace; to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations, and the like. Story on the Const. §207.

      2. Abstractedly, sovereignty resides in the body of the nation and belongs to the people. But these powers are generally exercised by delegation.

      3. When analysed, sovereignty is naturally divided into three great powers; namely, the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary; the first is the power to make new laws, and to correct and repeal the old; the second is the power to execute the laws both at home and abroad; and the last is the power to apply the laws to particular facts; to judge the disputes which arise among the citizens, and to punish crimes.

      4. Strictly speaking, in our republican forms of government, the absolute sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation; (q. v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each state, not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state. (q. v.) 2 Dall. 471; and vide, generally, 2 Dall. 433, 455; 3 Dall. 93; 1 Story, Const. §208; 1 Toull. n. 20 Merl. Reper. h. t.

      Delete
    6. What the heck makes you believe that Anna is a fraud? How did you prove that to yourself exactly?

      Delete
    7. Thank you Baldwin Templeton - This is helpful.

      May I continue?

      Thus Bouvier's - Address four (4) "sovereigns definitions, for four (4) audiences?

      How does that align with Pope Boniface, claiming to be Vicar for Jesus Christ(?) issuing an "express trust" circa 1302 AD. Which "trust"divided the world up into three (3) jurisdictions - Land - Air - Water?

      And how does it square with our founding, wherein our leadership divided our "government" into powers(?) of if People, or Family s of people, confederations, etc. for various jurisdictions?

      I believe Anna answers this well through 4000 blog postings, but I remain in the study and confirm mode.

      Delete
  2. Typo, The American States Assemblies, including any and all propaganda put out by Anna Von Reitz, etal, that includes all her alias, her Agents and affiliates. All verified as being a sham, Farce, enslavement all over again, Don't walk ,---- Run away from this deception, if you want to live and be free. YOU would be better off in an igloo in the Artic than to get tied up with these contracts here, and the Reign of the Heavens also , Anna is right about that one, all Shes been right about thus far, but its special interest to her because Reign of the Heavens is a direct threat to her pitch for profit. Sign up if you want to be surety and slave for another. Its what it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Run like a Cheetah and don't look back.

      Delete
    2. I want you to do a "reality check" Go bang your head against a wall and return and inform readership of how many times you had to hit the wall with your head before you determined - the wall is hard.

      Delete
    3. Esther, and Mike too? Let us readers know.

      Delete
  3. “That’s”nice:dear

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SUBSTITUTION SCHEMES, and THEIR JOVIAL MOCKING

      Music, catchy phrases, and clever lyrics, and -
      "The United Kingdoms' big belly laugh at us?
      You have a big laugh! And ask yourself, is this song simply and only a Roger Daltry creation?

      How did you answer yourself?

      Bet on the Tavistock Institute and bankers simultaneously hiding and putting in your face. For instance with this song since 1968 by "Who." Oh and listen to rest of the songs of that era, you may wake up?

      Roger Daltry "Who" song "Substitute."

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eswQl-hcvU0

      Nice melody! Yah? or Nah?

      Delete
    2. I wonder if songs such as this (and so much other B.S.) gave us the British slogan "...too clever by half."

      Delete
  4. Check this out…

    Alberta passes ‘Sovereignty Act’ despite backlash from leftists, mainstream media

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/alberta-passes-sovereignty-act-despite-backlash-from-leftists-mainstream-media/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nobody here recognizes tyranny if it bites them in the ass, let their eyes be darkened, wise mans eyes are in his head. Signing on with this institution you are going under tribute under oath that sells out your rights and your will. The oath make you subject, joseph too was sold into bondage by by his brothers, here you are selling yourself , same thing. If you do not get this or are too far gone to see the truth, then perhaps you belong on this pirate ship that will own a great portion of you and your blood that is your life. All this is is yet another Pirate ship on the take. What you think is for your benefit is a snare and Anna knows this and if you people don't see this you should be captured. I freely give this service as a free gift, the truth is all that matters to me and yes I love my neighbor and do not wish to see anyone end on enslaved but free. Let us be honest or nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know, I don't get it. Tyranny and Dictatorship is here and why is it not obvious to more people??

    ReplyDelete
  7. Forcing Vax on people, WTF is wrong with you all that think this is acceptable. Unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Maybe move to a country that tells all their citizens what to do. North Korea, China, these are just the most obvious ones. Go then, be gone with yourselves, the citizens that wish to be handled. The citizens of the states do not need you nor want you here. Be gone. You are the trouble, not the people who are trying to save us from the tyranny and dictatorship. Bye, Go. Please.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am asking simply of you "anti Anna" folks for proof of the fraud allegedly being perpetrated by Anna upon all of us American State Nationals. Songs and witch hunts or campfire confessions of doom, slaves and tyranny and general bad mouthing does not suffice as evidence, or even as information worthy of a grownups time when a grownup has asked you a specific question to validate your claims. We have the major news corporations for mindless babble and unsupported false claims and evil propaganda. Show me the facts. Show me the tangible material. Show exactly how, what, why, where, when the fraud happened, and who has proven Anna a fraud ? so that the rest of us awakening Americans can correct these wrongs and move on forward like we are doing with our country.
    Sincerely, Lisandro

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First off if you need someone else to use their, mind blood and wit to clear the shit from your eyes mind and ears instead of expecting someone else to do your due diligence, self determination, you are a perfect example of an easy target for enslavement, which tells me you have not the will to be free. If you cannot free your mind enough to find your own facts and evidence that this operation is a shit show leading you to Hell in a handbasket, then stay aboard , your a good fit, buy you need someone else to convince you of this too right. Get Real.

      Delete
    2. campfire confessions do suffice

      Delete
    3. lisandro,
      look up what "anna" publishes, search the topic out thoroughly, and see for yourself if you find it is true or not true.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.