Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Hot Topics -- Q and A

 By Anna Von Reitz

Topic 1:
Article 61 Magna Carta 1215 invoked in 2001?
The Magna Carta is often pointed at as the ultimate source of both British and American private property and sovereignty claims, but this is a mistake akin to thinking that your Natural and Unalienable Rights come from the Constitution, when in fact, all the constitutional guarantees do is to guarantee rights you already have. In the same way, the Magna Carta is a reaffirmation of sovereignty rights that resulted from The Settlement of the Norman Conquest 128 years prior to the Magna Carta. It was at that point that the Norman Barons became "sovereigns in their own right" on the lands that William ceded to them in England. And it was through them, ultimately, that the average people of both England and America claimed individual sovereignty. It's a long story, and told elsewhere, but briefly, it was that beachhead into destroying "the" Monarchy in England that led to the Norman in England operating as sovereigns, and five centuries later, it was that same thread that led to those born on American soil being "granted" their sovereignty in the same way that the Norman Barons received their sovereignty from William the Conqueror.
Question 1:What if anything does this have to do with everything. Someone said to us that We do not need to correct our status due to this. Personally I personally do not perceive that to be the case whatsoever. Interested in your explanation.
We have been misidentified on an individual basis by our Public Employees. We were initially identified as wards of the U.S. Army and the British Territorial Government and "deemed to be" U.S. Citizens via the Live Birth Registration Process, and after 1933, were additionally saddled with the Municipal citizenship as "citizens of the United States" too. If anyone is still foolish enough to believe that they can act as Americans and enjoy the freedoms and constitutional guarantees owed to Americans without bothering to correct those registrations, they are not to be believed or followed.
This is the same path (not correcting status) that the Colorado Nine and numerous other patriots have followed straight into District Government jails.
Anyone who tells you otherwise is either: (1) ignorant or (2) deliberately enslaving you.
Topic 2: Article III Courts?
There are no functioning Article III Courts --- only Article I Courts. This has been affirmed numerous times by Federal Judges. The actual United States Courts created by Article III were operated by the Federal Republic, which has been "out to lunch" since 1861. What remains are the Article I Administrative Courts set up the Territorial and Municipal "Congresses" ---- I have tried to explain this to Knothead Ron in Oregon on several occasions, but he persists in believing that Article III Courts MUST exist somewhere, even long after I have told him why they are not available at this time and won't be until after we get our act together and finish the long-delayed Reconstruction.
Question 2:A Man who goes by KL who has apparently worked with you at some point said that you do not consider or recognize Article III Courts. Is this the case and if so what do you consider the Land or Common Law Courts to be identified as?
The courts that the American people are searching for are American courts, functioning under American Common Law.
Unfortunately, we haven't, generally speaking, been providing ourselves with such courts since the 1960's and it is our responsibility to do so.
Article III Courts arise under the Federal Constitution, therefore are international courts and don't have a thing to do with the living people. All Federal Courts are "courts of strictly limited jurisdiction" and as I have also told everyone dozens of times, there are no living people in international jurisdiction. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
There are only "persons" in international jurisdiction, whether on the land or at sea. Everyone functioning in international jurisdiction is "dead" --- and functioning as a business or corporation or as an officer thereof and occupying an "office of personhood". No people at all. Even on the Land Jurisdiction, you are functioning as a "Lawful Person".
So this entire Snipe Hunt searching for Article III Courts is in my view, pointless. What is it that all these people wish to settle in these Article III Courts? Beer licenses? Disputes over Federal Right of Ways? You see, people think that these Article III Courts (which haven't functioned in 160 years) are the Missing Piece that is needed for them to bring forward their complaints against the Federal Government, but that simply is not true.
Article III Courts are just as strictly limited as all other Federal Courts are strictly limited. No. The Missing Piece that people need --- their access to justice, lies in our own American Courts, which are supposed to be in operation, but which have mostly been vacated since the 1960's.
I will tell you very bluntly what I told the Colorado Nine. All those courts that you see in operation are foreign courts. Foreign. They should not be addressing us at all, and they are only doing so by registering us as foreign Federal citizens and using unconscionable contracts to do so.
The only American Courts in operation at this time are: (1) individual Courts of Record; (2) a few County Courts, sporadically invoked, (4) a few State Trust Courts that have been inhabited since 1998. We desperately need to train our people to operate their own courts and understand their own Public Law.
The Public Law consists of the Four Organic Laws, United States Statutes-at-Large (Unrevised), and the Ten Commandments. Period. That's it. It's not a huge compendium of law, but it covers all the bases.
Question 2a:
Are we assembling to re-establish the Article III Courts?
That is one goal among many.
Topic 3:The Declarations according to T-ROH.https://youtu.be/TUpMnkdFBCg
There are actually three (3) "Declarations of Independence". They have different names and apply to different jurisdictions. So what? What T-ROH is bringing forward is more misunderstood detritus from the corporations.
These people have no real grasp of law or history, so they are constantly misinterpreting everything they see.
They are dealing with "District Government" "as if" it were ever the States of the Union, and it's not. Never was. They are misinterpreting the meaning of the 1864 change in the definition of "state" as if it affected our States of the Union, but those actions self-evidently apply to the Municipal "states" ---- note the use of Roman Civil Law naming conventions? This is one of the keys to their basic misunderstandings.
And the fact that they are not being recognized and not being taken seriously by anyone who knows law and history, is the result of their constant misinterpretation of both law and history.
It's not that I disagree with their stated desire to restore the Confederation --- but how can they do that if they are so completely ignorant that they don't even realize and admit that the "States of the Confederation" or, as they are known, "the Confederate States" ---- are in fact American States-of-States operated by the States of America, and are not the States of the Union and are not under the auspices (except by delegation) of our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America?
I have been all over the world. I have "treated" with the highest courts on Earth. I have discussed all these matters ad infinitum with the greatest among the great historians. I have bearded the Pope in his den. I have absolutely no reason to see T-ROH as legitimate and nobody else who knows anything much does either. And it is because these people are ignorant. They lack the skill and insight to be able to sort apples from oranges, States from states and States of States.
And meanwhile, we have already done what they are trying to do at this late date. Our effort began in 1998, a full eighteen years before they did anything to assemble the States of the Union. We have overcome the registration of the American People, developed the correct legal and lawful processes to re-instate them as Americans, invoked the remaining competent Summoning Authority, assembled the properly declared people into their State Assemblies, and have all fifty States in operation. This is the necessary starting point to begin the process of Reconstruction that will restore the Confederate State of State organizations and the Federal Republic.
T-ROH like many other "patriot organizations" -- or at least many of the rank and file members of the T-ROH -- appear to mean well, but they simply don't know what they are doing.
As another example, they don't see any reason to for people who have been misidentified and registered as Territorial U.S. Citizens and as Municipal citizens of the United States, both, to take any corrective action to declare and record their birthright political status BEFORE they assemble.
As a result, their would-be Assemblies are disqualified from being considered valid State Assemblies from the get-go. They can work and plan and claim and be damned, because no matter what you do, straw is still straw, sticks are still sticks, and bricks are still bricks ---- and the results of building with each material has a unique result. By qualifying all our Assembly Members as people who have declared and recorded their political status as Americans, we have already built the "House of Bricks" in this scenario and have established the State Assemblies.
Any other organization coming along behind us, like T-ROH, trying to front an organization of mish-mashed Federal Citizens "as" a State Assembly representing a State of the Union, is going to be laughed at, at best---- and at worst, all their members could be considered "rebels" and "insurrectionists" and be arrested as such.
For all these reasons, I continue to urge people to correct their political status records so that they are recognizable as Americans, and I continue to tell them to join their properly defined and organized State Assembly --- available by going to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net.
All this work is far too important to bungle it.
Finally, if all the things that T-ROH believed were true, then it would be T-ROH accomplishing all the things that our American State Assemblies have already accomplished. It would be T-ROH enabled to lawfully enroll the Western States as members of the Union --- which we already did. It would be T-ROH in receipt of all the Labor Bonds issued on Americans since 1921. It would be T-ROH receiving the gold and silver back, instead of our organization.
And the reason that T-ROH has never and will never be able to do any of this, is not because we have some "insider pull". I can assure you that the Vatican didn't want to give up all the American bonds. I can assure you that DTCC didn't want to yield the records. I can assure you that it was a long, tough, ugly fight for five years to nail down and receive back our gold, silver, and other precious metal assets.
The reason that T-ROH has not been able to do this, or even aware enough to do this, is because the people involved in the leadership of T-ROH can't even read and rightly interpret the meaning of the records and documents that they are depending upon.
Question 3:Your thoughts on this video?
You more than likely have seen this and know more than what is on here; however, I wanted to share it.. I thought it was really well done. Is there anything important you see that could be missing in this detailed PDF.
Many of the comments made about T-ROH above also apply to Lee Brobst's work. He was correct that our actual government was largely vacated, but then, he mistook various iterations of incorporated versions of "U.S.A." as the actual government. You have to learn the whole history, all the way back, and learn how to identify all the Interested Parties, and learn how the names of things are styled and so much more before you are truly competent to sort this whole mess out, that many early efforts like Lee's were ham-strung for lack of that kind of knowledge.
While bringing forward important --- and in his case, very important --- insights, those insights had yet to be put into proper context, and it is only by putting things into their proper context that you can finally perceive the truth.
All these many years since Lee first penned this work, we have continued to make progress and piece together the rest of the story and all the other puzzle pieces, a process that has required great patience and great integrity on the part of many people both in America and worldwide.
Our desire isn't to get into a "psssing match" with any of the other organizations, we don't like name-calling or gossip, or any fighting at all. We are peaceable and honorable --- but at the end of the day, someone is always right and someone has always missed the mark, and the proof is in the pudding.
We did our homework and Notices and Due Process for eighteen years before T-ROH even got started. That is why our Assemblies are valid and theirs are not. That's why we are garnering the recognition and they are not. Our claims pre-date theirs, and that is another reason for our success. It just goes on and on.
Everyone concerned including the members of T-ROH would be better off, just admitting what is actually true, and coming home---- declaring and recording their status as Americans, joining their State Assembly, and restoring the broken part of our government and court system.

We need every American to come home, do the drill to correct their political status, and inherit their country back after 158 years of chaos. That includes the members of T-ROH and all the other Americans who are wandering around still "lost at sea" and trying frantically to hop down all the rabbit holes and make sense of it all.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

35 comments:

  1. Kirk posted his confrontation with admiralty court judge they played the old bar card racket .
    Continually sites (code) as authority,
    Kirk counters code is not law might be legal not for men .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Constitution has little concerning the people more for operating gov.
    Bill of rights quote Madison 9 amendment or article
    Have rights not enumerated that shall not be denied no despairaged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not in- dependence ! Its non- dependence. A lot of word trickery.

      Delete
  3. X-Factor Winner Reveals World's Secret Religion
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ4NTdSK5ac&t=0s

    Henry Makow@hmakow
    Go to 3.15 The Beatles were Satanists (Freemasons)
    youtube.com/watch?v=Y7G5CKX0je0&t=3s

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you, Anna Maria, only sad that there will still be this structure for awhile, as it was feudal for last thousant, where "born on American soil" implies existance of jurisdictions... It might have been veey different social structure long time ago... That bothers me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Robert Steel is a mixed bag bad he is anti white don’t like whites in apparent positions of power .
    Is ignorant on the corporate style NWO gov.
    Has a over inflated ego.
    Good he understands the Jewish lobby and the Israeli global corruption.
    Has deep knowledge on military intelligence.
    I would say thats good enough .

    ReplyDelete
  6. This encounter with tyrannical judge typifies the interface of government vs the steeple I mean people. .
    The Jewish controlled Masonic Rothschild is with his council of 5 in command.
    Of course education, media, entertainment,courts,financial,and all spook agencies.
    Would say we’re F
    Big cities are kill zones nuked with 5G poisioned food and drug administration.
    Wild mobs in Chicago the black super gang signed a peace treaty with chief of police .let us self regulate we won’t kill you.
    They want waconda and will use guns .
    The old modern day Phoenician Jewish merchant of Venice overwhelm through racketeering.
    Can’t tolerate the idea of super criminals controlling the super weapons our nation possess.
    So we cannot back down they will do a nuke job that 9/11 would look like a walk in the park.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The deep state protects violent Criminals through the attorney generals that control the law enforcement in states.
    Sorros .dumps a couple million of pocket change on local elections and the most radical communist .our top lawyers on far right report .
    In Dallas the AG won’t prosecute for crime under 750 dollars .
    Look at 6 Jan crisis actors pull off fake take over of capitol and framed all trump supporters as criminals.little digging reveals that’s all ways been the case bring in experts to evaluate a war crime only to have 99% of media say you did it .
    Collin Fllarty author “white girl bleed a lot “
    Says it’s epidemic black on white black on Asian crime is vastly under reported.
    George Floyd riots cops kill whites all the time no riots had a black try and hit me with a brick walking through Lowe’s parking lot.day before yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Seems like most are clueless huh. In the first half of this paragraph she says the constitutions don't give you rights, they reaffirm pre-existing rights, and then in the same paragraph she goes on to say the normandy twats GAVE us sovereign rights... how dumb are ya? If constitutions can't give rights, how can some other individual give any rights either? The Rights Exist, what does not exist is proper understanding of them and how to Apply them practically to rebut the neverending legalities and statutes that these asshats want to use to mold "civiLIEzation" to their own forms. Get a damn clue.

    "The Magna Carta is often pointed at as the ultimate source of both British and American private property and sovereignty claims, but this is a mistake akin to thinking that your Natural and Unalienable Rights come from the Constitution, when in fact, all the constitutional guarantees do is to guarantee rights you already have. In the same way, the Magna Carta is a reaffirmation of sovereignty rights that resulted from The Settlement of the Norman Conquest 128 years prior to the Magna Carta. It was at that point that the Norman Barons became "sovereigns in their own right" on the lands that William ceded to them in England. And it was through them, ultimately, that the average people of both England and America claimed individual sovereignty. It's a long story, and told elsewhere, but briefly, it was that beachhead into destroying "the" Monarchy in England that led to the Norman in England operating as sovereigns, and five centuries later, it was that same thread that led to those born on American soil being "granted" their sovereignty in the same way that the Norman Barons received their sovereignty from William the Conqueror. "

    QFA Idiots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People point to source documents but in reality that’skinda a rabbit trail .
      Point she’s making if I may be so bold is we have inalienable no lien can be placed on them .
      To quote Judge Andrew Napolitino write out a list of what you think your right are and I will add 30 or 40 more .
      The Norman conquest I’m not enthusiastic about lot of evil thing happening. Pope telling William to come get the land ,the improper thieft and people couldn’t own land previously could .
      The establishment of the city of London and cozy relationship with merchants of Venice.
      But on rights think she’s dead on the constitution gave us nothin other than restraining the hired help.


      Delete
    2. If you read thoroughly what was presented by Anna, you would deduce as follows:

      Neither the Constitution, nor the Magna Carta, granted anyone rights - they only reaffirmed what was already true and placed restrictions on those who hold ANY Lawful government office from trespassing upon those rights.

      "...the Magna Carta is a reaffirmation of sovereignty rights that resulted from The Settlement of the Norman Conquest 128 years prior to the Magna Carta. It was at that point that the Norman Barons became "sovereigns in their own right" on the lands that William ceded to them in England."

      1) "sovereigns in their own right"
      2) William the Conqueror ceded the land

      To cede is to give up. When you give up, no authority exists over those that remain. Nothing was "granted" - land was ceded. Therefore, last man standing is "sovereign in his own right".

      "... it was that same thread that led to those born on American soil being "granted" their sovereignty in the same way that the Norman Barons received their sovereignty from William the Conqueror."

      Notice the word "granted" Anna uses is in quotes. That means she is distinguishing between an actual grant and the way others are misusing the word "grant" or "granted" to describe what happened and why.

      In actuality, William the Conqueror did not grant anything to anyone as it relates to the Norman Barons or those born on American soil.

      If Americans gained their sovereignty “in the same way” as the Norman Barons, then said sovereignty exists by way of ceded land.

      Delete
    3. You reaffirming the Norman conquest angel that’s rubbish law of nations that founding father knew very well as its natural law applied to nations.
      We fought for independence and as Patrick Henry best orator of his day said”you guys are giving away your hard earned freedom”.

      Delete
    4. Not reaffirming the Norman Conquest - please read carefully. Americans gained their sovereignty "in the same way" as the Normans; by having land ceded after the fight for independence. American's won, the British lost. Result: American's have "sovereigns in their own right".

      Delete
    5. Edit:

      American's are "sovereigns in their own right".

      Delete
    6. Nowhere did anyone suggest that one man granted another man his sovereignty. You obviously cannot read very well and are even less capable of comprehending a simple concept.

      Delete
    7. Wrong again, and as usual.

      To give up, to abandon, to surrender, to yield, to relinquish - these actions do not come from a position of authority. These actions are the result of being the losing party in a conflict/war. This renders to the victor(s)land(s) and sovereignty in their own right.

      There is a reason why some words have multiple definitions - it is assumed the reader can utilize context to determine which would apply.

      You have neither the ability to read carefully nor to understand context.

      Nice try though... you lose again.

      Delete
    8. And your point is?

      Land is ceded (surrendered, yielded, abandoned, relinquished) by loser.

      Winner claims land, and therefore sovereignty, in his own right.

      No "GRANT" is involved in this scenario.

      You need to refresh your reading skills - it's becoming laughable now.

      Delete
  9. Why haven't the state assemblies Forced halting of all REGISTRATION of birth certs which is still ongoing to traffick individuals from the unincorporated jurisdiction into the incorporated jurisdictions of the municipal and territorial governments to be taken advantage of and be presumed upon?

    "We have been misidentified on an individual basis by our Public Employees. We were initially identified as wards of the U.S. Army and the British Territorial Government and "deemed to be" U.S. Citizens via the Live Birth Registration Process, and after 1933, were additionally saddled with the Municipal citizenship as "citizens of the United States" too. If anyone is still foolish enough to believe that they can act as Americans and enjoy the freedoms and constitutional guarantees owed to Americans without bothering to correct those registrations, they are not to be believed or followed."

    QFA.... if the state assemblies don't halt the Automated REGISTRATION process that is ILLEGALLY moving people into incorporated jurisdictions, how is the state assembly any better than the existing fed gov? Just looking to get the ones that self pick over everyone else to step into positions to be self serving while pretending to care about those under that authority positions charter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Below is the interplay between “Carpenter” and myself that was posted on Anna’s article; Hot Topics -- Q and A on April 5, 2021 at 4:25 PM
      http://www.paulstramer.net/2021/05/hot-topics-q-and-a.html#comment-form
      I have edited it slightly and added more at the end for this posting;

      That's right Carpenter, the "Peace Corps.(e) is a front. The ex Health Commissioner for SUMMIT COUNTY "retired" and was "sent" to Mongolia to do work at a major Mongolian Hospital for 3 years. More than likely was setting up the "Birth Certificate Person" scam.
      Came back rich. Strange how our Creator gave me the inside scoop on this info. Now it is known to all. That's right nothing from now on will be hidden.
      
Mongolia has some of the richest deposits of Mineral wealth that is waiting to be mined, and the CCP is chomping at the bit to get at it. The only thing holding them back is the Mongolian people. So they are coming through the back door with the "Birth Certificated Person". When I've said for ten years that the "Birth Certificate" is "their" Foundation Stone, and "their" whole system is built on it I meant it. Eliminate the foundation and the structure collapses immediately. Like right now. Period.
      
Let me reiterate; A newly retired Summit County(Ohio) Health Commissioner goes to Mongolia with the "Peace(Piece)Corps.(Corpse). To “help” with the Administration of a "Mongolian Hospital" for 3 years. Whose climate is so brutal especially in the winter that would make a Canadian freeze. The people there have a well known, long standing historical right to the land that no one could ever dispute on paper, unless they were unknowingly goaded into having their rights usurped by being collectively pooled into the Birth Certificate Scheme. This is done through the use of a "Non Profit Foundling Hospital". By taking advantage of the total ignorance of every local Mongolian population, coupled with the total lack of "Christian" teachings it becomes a slam dunk for the usurpers ie., the "CCP" to waltz right in through the back door unnoticed, and take over this whole Country "Legally" without having to fire a single shot. Thus owning all of this Countries vast mineral wealth. All this was done with the help from an unobtrusive 60+ year "old man" that came from “COUNTY of SUMMIT, STATE of OHIO”. Does everyone now see how this scheme is initiated? Does everyone now see how a "Nation" is slowly usurped, and eventually ruled by a "Foreign Power" that can buy, sell, and create large insurance policies on these "Bonds" legally. The "Foreign Nation" now legally has all the "Rights" and the original folk now have none. When this scheme is implemented, and carried through, and the good folk don't have Biblical Law there can be no redress of any grievances. No Local, State, or World Court can make any rulings. Sound familiar? Do we all see now why all Communistic Factions world wide have had the motive to kill off all of a populations "Christians" as priority one. I don’t have the ability to make this any clearer. If my above Posts caused “Carpenter” to be sent down the wrong lane(in which even took me by surprise) how would one relate this knowledge, and all the intricacies of this Birth Certificate Scheme to those whom are totally unawares? When I say priority one is to collapse the Birth Certificate now, I meant it.

      Delete
    2. New posting;
      This Birth Certificate Scam was brought to Anna’s attention years ago. It was solidified by what Kurt Kallenbach, among other great researchers were able to expose. We have the exact dates when this was disseminated to the “Public”, and the Corps(e)s. “They” all know that “Their Foundation” of “Their whole system” which is predicated on this has now been exposed. I believe this is why all of what has been transpiring presently world wide is the cause of this exposure. There is no excuse for the continual registration process to continue, and yet it is still prevailing as I have shown above. This in my mind is inexcusable to have continued for so many years after what I, and a few others have done to shed light on this “Issue”.
      How patient should one be? I have waited for over 5 years…
      P.S.
      I have also stated in a prior post that after I was given the opportunity to have several meetings with the Summit County Registrar in order to correct this she was removed, and placed into “Enviromental”. Whereas she informed me that she was instructed to never talk to me again.
      This "Issue" is no joke folks.

      Delete
    3. As with any Corp.(se) "their" proprietary ingredients never have to be divulged.
      Especially when "their" National Security-ie. BIRTH CERTIFICATED PERSON/CHILD is involved.

      Delete
  10. Republic of Texas dejour top attorney common law
    Tells don’t give any extra info don’t let opposition any piece of info.
    Counter everything with quantify exactly and then respond that’s ambiguous multiple possible answers.
    He was in grand jury for 9 hours Cary walked they couldn’t nail him on anything. Now he teach everyone. On multiple corporate violations.
    The point is as I think Ann’s saying don’t confine your argument to a doc make them explain everything and show harm.

    ReplyDelete
  11. WW1 the communist and Cecil Rhodes ,Rothschild agent , decided to take down Germany as it was the industry leader of the world as he did
    Against the Dutch Farmers to steal the minerals fo Jewish Debeirs diamond merchants.
    Against all Rothschild forces Germany offered a no concessions end but the (((BLACK nobility offered a deal for Palestine. And the tool for ZOG Wilson did everything his masters wanted .
    WW2 essentially a repeat .
    But the communist Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather the whole zionest mind controld has had the curtain yanked back .exposeing Rothschild and co.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You would hold originals of any paper, documents, declarations, deeds, etc. To record documents, and other papers you deem important, by utilizing an outside source, provides security in the form of Certified Copies in case your originals are lost, burnt, stolen, etc.

    So why the incessant harping about "digital" and BLOCKCHAIN? If you prefer, seal an envelope with your lawful documents inside and mail them to your own mailing location.

    Anna suggests this as a viable and lawful option. You then become the Recorder and the Original Record Keeper... happy now?

    ReplyDelete
  13. You going for the record for being wrong I guess.

    document (n.)
    early 15c., "a doctrine;" late 15c., "teaching, instruction" (senses now obsolete), from Old French document (13c.) "lesson, written evidence" and directly from Latin documentum "example, proof, lesson," in Medieval Latin "official written instrument, authoritative paper," from docere "to show, teach, cause to know," originally "make to appear right," causative of decere "be seemly, fitting," from PIE root *dek- "to take, accept."

    https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=document&ref=searchbar_searchhint

    deed (n.)
    "that which is done, acted, or performed, whether good or bad, great or small," Old English dæd "a doing, act, action; transaction, event," from Proto-Germanic *dethi- (source also of Old Saxon dad, Old Norse dað, Old Frisian dede, Middle Dutch daet, Dutch daad, Old High German tat, German Tat "deed, thing done," Gothic gadeþs "a putting, placing"), from PIE *dheti- "thing laid down or done; law; deed" (source also of Lithuanian dėtis "load, burden," Greek thesis "a placing, setting"), suffixed form of root *dhe- "to set, place, put" (compare do).

    In law, "written document authenticated by seal of the person whose will it declares, especially for the purpose of conveying real estate" is from early 14c. As a verb, "convey or transfer by deed," 1806, American English. Related: Deeded; deeding.

    There is nothing inherently "legal" about these terms or their use. You are woefully ignorant and at the same time extremely confident in yourself. That is the result of being taught "self-esteem" regardless of any success or accomplishment. Perhaps that is why your reading skills are still lacking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. good boots is correct. legal refers to form, lawful spirit, who is in the right.

      legal is the clothes, formality, lawful is formal or not.

      things can be any combination of the 2.

      good boots is correct on this matter, antjraf is projecting.

      https://law.jrank.org/pages/8110/Lawful.html
      The terms lawful and legal differ in that the former contemplates the substance of law, whereas the latter alludes to the form of law
      A legal act is performed in accordance with the forms and usages of law, or in a technical manner.
      The latter merely denotes compliance with technical or formal rules, whereas the former usually signifies a moral substance or ethical permissibility.

      https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/lawfully
      -------------
      "There is nothing inherently "legal" about these terms or their use"

      no, that is literally the definition of legal -- form, terms, writing, formalities.

      that's also why the 10 commandments are and were unlawful. and was the whole point of the new testament. same thing -- spirit versus outward appearances. body/form versus substance.

      all writing is legal/formal. may or may not have actual law behind it (spirit, substance).

      anyone who does not understand this split, is not qualified to be doing any type of law at all in any capacity.

      Delete
    2. should be noted legal has zero ethics, zero morals -- it is what costume you or your documents or your words wear -- appearances, skin deep.

      lawful is entirely about ethics and morality, who is in the right, regardless of form. regardless of what words you use, what forms you fill out, your appearance, etc.

      all words are "legal" as are all documents. scripture is an exception, and a mixture. because it claims one can derive the spirit with enough study.

      really, one should be seeking what "spirit" is behind any words and all documents. this again, is the whole "we deal not with flesh" thing.

      if someone cannot tell the difference, they are not qualified to be reading anything.

      the devil, is pure formality. this split is necessary to prevent hell on earth.

      Delete
    3. regardless of any success or accomplishment.
      ---
      pride goeth before a fall. new test says you have no success or accomplishment and not to love the world, not to listen to braggarts, etc.

      yet another damned zombie.

      Delete
    4. I do not agree with your opinions, assessments or definitions relating to spirituality, the 10 Commandments or the inherent meanings/connotations behind the words discussed.

      I have never paid much attention to your writings nor did I ever have the need to reply.

      We are on a different path - I do not follow your path.

      Delete
  14. https://web.archive.org/web/20101031165251/http://jewsnotzionists.org/tenquestions.htm

    if we seek to end the exile with force, G-d will catch us, as our sages have forewarned, and our sentence becomes longer and more difficult.

    If we wish our exile-sentence commuted, we must appeal through repentance; and through total physical and spiritual observance of the Sabbath, laws of family purity, and study of Torah.
    ---------------

    this is what happens when what clearly are non-jewish "state assemblies" try to force 10 commandments on everyone.

    https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-19.htm
    what happens if you "bind" 10 commandments "the lord" on everyone? hell on earth.

    for both jews and non-jews.
    ----------
    actual jews don't do this to anyone -- why do the state assemblies think they have the power?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. my post apparently disappeared. if someone disagrees with me, post a rebuttal. this issue has been brought up many times, and gives little hope the state assemblies have any clue what they are doing. (unless they are purposely trying to create hell on earth)

      https://web.archive.org/web/20101031165251/http://jewsnotzionists.org/

      readinng quotes, believe it was an interview, you will see the "exile" is from the "king of kings"

      there is no "jewish state" not in america or anywhere else. worldly israel is what is preventing it.

      there is no authority under the new testament or the old, for forcing the 10 commandments of "the lord" on anyone in any nation anywhere.

      it not possible to observe "the lord" and christ simultaneously -- they are opposite. it is considered the devil for new testament. and there is no authority under the old testament.

      for new testament, christ has freed people from "the law"

      for old testament, zionism is anti-judaism.

      it is quite irrelevant if the state assemblies think america is "israel" it is still zionism and quasi-judaism i.e. has zero authority from any "god", old or new test.

      Delete
    2. Don’t see how the testaments are an issue ,
      What’s the focus of assembly is re establishing the actual body that created the government.
      And by design to beat us senseless and steal our wallets. Via the army of Rothschild the BAR.

      Delete
  15. Observing Karl Luntz knock off Christopher James out of Ontario.
    Defend people like Kirk in Idaho.
    One thing different in thair style is Christopher doesn’t use the deep state BAR forms because that’s a gimme jurisdiction.
    Uses a common law trespass
    Seeks out the justice of the peace because that’s the common law go to .
    We’re as Kirk used thair forms
    And goes at them asking for were do you get your authority?
    And knows code is not law what they refer to as smu. Shi made up .
    Created during WW2 when we were fighting for NWO against the heroes who were fighting communist defending Spanish priest and nuns were the communist snooked mother superior out of convent to keep from getting blood on the building they wanted
    .

    ReplyDelete
  16. The((( international syndicate))) SERCO. and BAR
    are as Menachem Begin accuse of creating terroism in Middle East begin corrected interviewer
    The World .
    The Bar created Code out of thin Air and patented it were not supposed to use it but they dare not press patent infringement.
    The creation of all the alphabet gangs that can act as judge jury and executioner under color of law.
    When economist know for a cultur to flourish the people must have trust in its currency.
    That also applies to our other forms of government.
    All in the name of terrorism like the ocean prison called Gaza high tech bombing midnight Bolshevik inductions.
    The plan of the NWO is to erase the white race through immigration 1965 atrocity and total supplanting of all immigration enforcement.
    It’s another list of war crimes .
    Monetary ,freedom of speech,Mossad 9/11 ,corporate/military breach of common law nation,
    Using us as a mercenaries, chattel human trafficking in multiple forms.
    And we get dumb ass RDS ,and all his CIA buddies. Union Rep Sheriff Mac who in cahoots with NRA treasonous will buckle to any infringement.
    But the grass roots David Straight,Kirk, Christopher,Cary. Super hero’s are kicking ass !







    ReplyDelete
  17. Awesome Article. Summarizes importance of correcting your status.

    ReplyDelete