Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Get It Right Or Stop Talking

By Anna Von Reitz

England is not owned by the Pope because of any agreement between King John and Pope Innocent III in 1213 or at any other time.  That is a total misreading of what went on there.  

“King” John was a King in France but not in England.  In England neither he nor his immediate forebears had any land, which is a requirement of sovereignty. He had no special rank over the Norman Barons who were set free and made sovereigns in their own right as part of the Norman Settlement.  That’s why they were able to force the issue of the Magna Carta and lawfully make it stick for a thousand years. 

Americans need to learn their own history before they go stumbling around trying to interpret British history—- as this present example shows.  

What happened between John and the Pope was a role reversal.  Prior to that the Church managed the Commonwealth land for the King. After that, the King managed the Commonwealth land for them.  

And what is “Commonwealth” land? 

Originally is was scrub and wasteland and gravel and swamp that the kings donated to the Church and which the church utilized for the support of the sick and poor and indigent. 

After 1213 King John became the Church’s steward and to this day, Elizabeth II acts in that same capacity with respect to the Commonwealth.  

If we are talking about Commonwealth property, she works for the Pope and gets paid by the Pope to administer it.  

This, it turns out, is very important to know, because in America, our Territorial Government is a British Commonwealth (belongs to the Pope, but administered by the Queen), and the Municipal United States Government is directly operated by the Church.  Thus both the remaining Federal Government Subcontractors belong to the Pope—- which precludes any notion of any Civil War developing here on our shores  The Pope can’t fight against himself and maintain any logic or credibility. 

Another often repeated American Know It All mistake is the idea that the Act of 1871 seeking to create a Municipal Corporation for the District of Columbia was “the” cause of all the evil we have seen since that time. 

The Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874.

The Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874. 

The Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874....

Repeat as often as necessary! 

Part of the intent of the original Act was implemented in 1878, and in itself, this was no big whoop in that it was a change in business structure for the foreign Federal District Government and should not have had any effect on us at all. 

Shouldn’t have. 

In reality, the corporation this created and authorized became a vehicle for improper hypothecation of debt and bankruptcy fraud.  It didn’t have to be that way, but crooked men in government offices and positions of public trust abused the new corporation to function in ways never contemplated by the framers of our actual factual government.  

So the Act of 1871 was repealed. 

And the Act of 1878 that partially reinstated it didn’t have to be anything bad or wrong.  It was the members of Congress that bent and twisted it and used it for evil purposes and to the detriment of the Public Good. 

Now please spread the word— England is not owned by the Pope because of any deal with King John in 1213. And the Act of 1871 was repealed and the replacement Act of 1878 was no big deal in and of itself. 

Everyone got that? 

The real problem arises out of the Birth Registration Act and all the other oppression coming from that. 


See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. I got it right. I've been teaching the vermin's Fraudulent Utilities and Insurance Corp. that they committed Great Fraud, in HIGH Treason, by double, triple charging people in office in secret. Whenever they sent us bill in DOG Latin (All-Cap), they meant to inform the IRS that they billed the STRAWMAN (fictitious) CORPORATION in our Names. for our HJR192 credits. They were supposed to send us their 1099A form and/or the OID? with how much $$$ they charged. But no, they never did. I called them up and asked for these forms with data. They already felt guilty, and attempted to give me a run-around, by telling me go to their website..bla...bla.. I said to them, NO, I need the forms with Data of charges.
    Likewise, the Insurers are a group of BIG LIARS, extracting our HJR192 Credits. Here is my message to Allstate Insurance scam:

    Act of 1871 has been Repealed in 1874. Wikipedia and other media continue/d to lie that Act 1871 repealed portion-ally, Wiki said: Act 1871 repealed only the Charter portion. my say: That's BS. People don't use the term "Repeal" for Amendment action, if Wiki was true. Wiki manipulated histories of many countries, to control people belief system. Further more, the crooks still violate their charter anyhow endlessly.

    False Insurers, you are a group of Big liars, fraudsters. You never paid claim!! Railroadings, using foreign codes to get away is what you did/do best. Your BAR attorneys and BAR courts had 98% committed High Treason. Act of 1871 has been repealed. So how corrupt the media, the Wiki, etc.. are. All 800+ corporations are Thieves like you.

    Using Similar Naming Deceits to defraud all walks of life. Like they are authorities, they are actually the Devil Capricorn(in revs'd). All fire signs cannot be trusted.

    -------------------- TO ALLSTATE INSURANCE CROOKS --------------
    FROM: Allstate
    SENT: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 6:03 AM
    SUBJECT: Did you know plants can keep your home safer?

    Learn the secret powers of common household plants.
    [1] CALL 425-889-8500

    Dear (Victim),
    Check out[3] these hardworking houseplants that do a lot more than just look good.

    Any way folks, I don't mean to tell you to do the same thing like I did here. My email can send out, if they reply, it would reject their reply. I don't care what they have to reply. The crooks will always be the crooks. It's the negative energies in their DNA folks, visible if you have the right tools to inspect their soul and components. It's hard to change people, not just them, perhaps some could be changed. People had been brainwashed too long.

    Further more, Teamslaw adds a confusion to act of 1871 bla...also, I am glad that Teamslaw is not part of Anna, and glad Anna is not part of them. I have a nice original Act 1871, if any one wants a copy, please post your email. Later...

    1. This [TO ALLSTATE INSURANCE CROOKS] should be:

    2. Carpenter, Yes please share with me the Act of 1871, I have looked at the WEB version but would like to see what changes or differences there may with the web version and what you say you have. Any other pointers yu may be willing to offer I also appreciate. The myriad of caveats and re-defined terms throughout the Act I have seen makes it a daunting read and piece of very user unfriendly writing. Is there a guide you know for diciphering the Act that cuts to the chase and gives the parts which pertain to normal people and the parts of the Act that Anna has often referred to in her criticisms of the Act?
      Thank You.

    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    4. Joel: here is the image of Act 1871. There is something weird, the images series reveal a mismatching sequence.

      Image of page 428 (after you input 428 in the box): You can tell by the original dates (top left/right), IF true, that Act 1871 was amended, it should placed on a new date. Not on Act 1871 original. Here is where to look up.

      It should be repealed 4 years later. IF TRUE. Not immediately on year 1871. It doesn't make sense!! This is something for you to decipher, or search back. I did, and I couldn't find any older copy, to validate the alleged copies. I have to go, later.

    5. Here is the altered version, page 428, left column where it said: Washington George Town, Charter repealed.

      Joel: here is the image of Act 1871. There is something weird, the images series reveal a mismatching sequence, with the input box.

      Image of page 428 (after you input 428 in the box): You can tell by the original dates (top left/right), IF true, that Act 1871 was amended, it should placed on a new date. Not on Act 1871 original. Here is where to look up.

      It should be repealed 4 years later. IF TRUE. Not immediately on year 1871. It doesn't make sense!! This is something for you to decipher, or search back. I did, and I couldn't find any older copy, to validate the alleged copies.

      You can scan through easily by fixing this ending parameter: &recNum=471 to lower or upper #.

      I have to go, later.

  2. Did it work to keep your utilities on?
    I would like. Copy of you letter to copy?

    1. Interesting question. Here you go:

      Steve Mason August 10, 2018 at 10:28 PM
      We need to get this message to Mike Adams of NaturalNews who’s being censored by YouTube and Google and Facebook. He has real
      Now. We could put all Anna‘s videos more videos on his channel that’s not being censored by the vermin swamp Butt holes.
      Anyone know how to get a hold him directly ?
      Jon Martin August 10, 2018 at 10:30 PM
      WOW, Anna, your a Pitbull to there Poodle. Yea it barks a lot but you will win hands down. It's gotten to the point that what I hear and what I read in the newspaper and online that I can't trust a word. They say that every lie has some truth in it. We have to learn how to find the truth. Your blog is the answer. Thank you. I hope you get a lot of donations. Any amount will help Anna and the work she does. We are blessed to have such a wonderful person willing to help us leave a better world to our children. Please donate every month. She is there for us. Let's be there for her too.
      Anna August 10, 2018 at 10:38 PM
      Absolutely true. One of my best friends attacked me early on and I mean, she flew at me like a Mama Bird protecting her nest and she practically screamed, "That can't be true!" and she was really, really mad. She didn't want to believe that "her" beloved country was in such a deep quagmire, that her government could be so messed up.

      But the rest of the story is that she was really very scared.

      Anger and fear are two emotions that go together like carrots and peas.

      She took the copy of my book that I offered and she stomped away. I honestly didn't know if I would ever see her or be able to talk to her again.

      It was months before I heard from her again.

      Thankfully, she may not have understood it all or believed it all, but she caught enough of it to know that "something was wrong" and she had enough faith in me to come back and say that she loved me and believe me even if she didn't get it all.

      There are moments in life when someone just knocks you flat. You just shake your head and feel so humbled.

      My friend is a Great-Grandma like I am. She is not the same kind of person I am. Not intellectual. Not academic. She's "just" a really good woman--- better than I am. Devoted to her family and her country and as kind and compassionate as anyone could ever be, always thinking about and helping others---- not in the airy-fairy realms of international intrigues and politics and commercial law --- but day by day and close to home.

      Somehow, through the years of our friendship, I passed the test.

      And I am grateful. And I am aware that not everyone gets this happy ending. Many relationships have been destroyed and never mended because of this information. Families have been destroyed. Marriages and friendships ended. I was just lucky and blessed that somehow, enough water had passed over our bridges so that my best friend no longer had to "understand" it all. She could just hold my hand.

  3. .
    I am confounded

    “History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.” – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)

    Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984
    The 13th Amendment: Slavery is still legal under one condition

    What is says is repealed ...etc.

    Does that mean that the District of Columbia is no more; therefore all the CODES are invalid?

    Does that mane it is now a STATE?

    Did they also repeal the war power's act of 1871 and the law of necessity and 12 USC 319 ?

    Did the Pope nullify the Magna Carta because it was done under duress?

    Was HJR 192 repealed; all parts? That would mean they revoked the other supporting laws- codes - executive orders?

    Boy this law - lies really is a grand illusion for the people to contemplate their existence ?

    Question What does BAR really mean ? Who created the "TERM" ?

    Gratitude - keep moving forward

  4. .
    The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions
    (POPEYE) Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.
    In 1871 the Congress changed the name of the original Constitution by changing ONE WORD — and that was very significant as you will read.
    Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.
    1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.
    With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
    The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America.
    Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.
    The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.
    It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not!
    Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans.
    What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution.
    Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed.
    By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution.

    The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.


    1. Maximus, great explanation. Thanks
      So we should we looking at the Act of 1878 as the culprit now?


  5. A lost memory; a reality; a falsehood?

    “History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.” – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)

    Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

  6. This comment has been removed by the author.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.