Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, March 4, 2019

Red Alert - Which Came First?

By Anna Von Reitz

The Michigan General Jural Assembly and Destry Payne have claimed that you can retain "US Citizenship" and be a member of a State Jural Assembly. 

I called them out on it and basically said ----no, you have to be an American State Citizen to operate an American State Assembly.

Go figure, right?

To date, they haven't come up with a single shred of evidence in support of their position: no evidence that any State of the Union ever accepted Dual Citizenship.

This issue is too important both for your own safety and for the validity of all your work on an Assembly to bypass and leave to hand-waving. 

If it were "no big deal" I wouldn't be objecting.

Now that their claims that I was responsible for what happened to the Colorado Nine have also been thoroughly debunked, and it has been proven that instead, I gave the Colorado Nine good advice that they ignored ---just like I am giving you now--- it's time to further consider the facts. 

"US Citizens" are Federal Employees or Dependents by definition.  The condition of "US Citizenship" arises from Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2 and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 of the Federal Constitutions.  A very complete discussion of these issues appears in the United States Supreme Court Case Hooven and Allison v. Evatt. 

US Citizens have no "constitutional rights or guarantees" because they are subjects defined by the Constitutions and they are adopting a political status created by the Constitutions, so logically, they are not Parties to the Constitutions, never were and cannot be.   

That's why "Equal Civil Rights" exist and what the whole Civil Rights Movement was about.  US Citizens have no recognizable "Natural and Unalienable Rights" and never have had. 

The Municipal Congress was forced to give them privileges known as "Civil Rights" to make up for this -- but they remain only privileges, something the Master gives and the Master can take away.

We, the People, Lawful Persons living in the actual States of the Union, are Parties to the Constitutions via the participation of our States and enjoy a completely different status and stand in a completely different jurisdiction.

Once we expatriate from any Territorial or Municipal citizenship obligation-- a status that was merely "conferred" and "presumed" upon us without our knowledge or consent, we are free to operate as American State Nationals or as American State Citizens.   Not until.

US Citizens can be arrested for doing what we are doing, so it is an urgent matter of concern that people be given the facts up front and be given the tools to extract themselves from US Citizenship presumptions.

I will also point out that it makes no sense whatsoever to retain any tie to such a political status as a "US Citizen"  if you are not currently a Federal Employee or Dependent. 

Federal Service is a condition of "voluntary servitude", as in indentured servitude. You sign a labor contract that requires you to function as a "US Citizen" for a period of years.

Once you retire or leave the US Military or Federal Civilian Service, you are no longer required to function in that capacity---and why would you, considering that it obligates you to many unpleasant duties, including paying Federal Income Tax on every penny you earn? 

Loss of your private property rights? 

Loss of your Constitutional guarantees? 

Why would anyone in their right mind claim such a foreign and subservient political status, if they didn't have to as a condition of employment? 

The vast majority of us don't have to, and for the work at hand --- actually assembling the States of the Union --- we can't.  We have to come home and dig our own ditches. 

We cannot remain "at sea" in Federal jurisdiction and accomplish work on the land---- and vice versa.

So if you do NOT want to stumble into the same jurisdictional trap as the Colorado Nine and quite possibly suffer the same fate, look at the logic and the facts and lead the stampede to get your paperwork done.

Retirees from Federal Services and those who have earned their Social Security Benefits and Military Retirement benefits from Federal Employment are still welcome and able to return home to the land and soil jurisdiction.
They may still have to pay federal income tax on the portion of their retirement that is based on federal income, but they are otherwise free to collect -- have their pensions and their freedom, too. 


See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. Just the clarity that is needed Anna! Thanks for being so well informed and for giving this life and freedom preserving information to your readers.

    It seems incredible that so many American people have no clue about the damaging effect on their freedom that allowing any presumption of U.S. Citizen status to appear on any public record has on them.

    This includes voter registrations and juror registrations. Which makes sense, because if you can legally act as a statutory juror to find someone guilty or not guilty under United States Congressional or State of State statutory law, you had better be one of those who were created by the Constitution (14th Amendment) and therefore such "persons" are created corporations have no rights under the Constitution. Much wiser to have renounced any presumption of your being a U.S. Citizen and move yourself politically from the secret entrapment and feudal serf class Congress created.

    American Nationals on the other hand do have the right and the expectation of freedom from tyrannical and secretive jurisdictional assumptions of these two corporate "court" systems. But I would bet not one in a thousand comprehend that the summons to jury service they receive routinely is intended for U.S. Citizens ONLY, and to state that you are one on of these U.S. Citizens on one of these juror service forms means you can be prosecuted for impersonating a U.S. Citizen, because you must sign the juror form "under penalty of perjury", which is just one more of the international jurisdiction trickery to lay on to people who have not taken the trouble to become informed. The current system of Congress and the State Legislatures are perhaps the most diabolical systems ever invented, causing every American who remains uninformed to place their entire life work, their fruit of their labor, their children, their political liberty, directly in the path of the great Reaper of "the DEAD". Could anyone man have dreamed up a more diabolical system than that? No! Only Satan himself could have inspired these so called Congressional legislator "representatives" to think up such evil.

    1. Joel, remember this WILLFUL INTENT must be proven, before a prosecution against you can win. The burden of proof of WILLFUL INTENT has to be proven on and for the record.

  2. Why would anyone need to file what ever paperwork to get out of something they never opted to get into to begin with? What ever the gov tried to impose on us without our knowledge is fraud, unacceptable and void. Please explain. thanks

    1. Sorry, Carol, maybe you did not but your mother sure did when she registered your birth and signed an SS-5 form on your behalf which SSN you now use every day. You need to correct your mom's mistake or forever hold your peace that you agree by your use to have accepted it as valid.

    2. Annie Oakleys SisterMarch 4, 2019 at 6:56 PM

      Carol, if you found out someone stole your identity would you just assume that its going to remedy all by its self? Here we have found our Names have been stolen, turned into a CORPORATRION... THey have made in many case maybe almost all cases--- Millions by using what rightfully yours while in many cases we the people struggle to survive in the land of milk and honey. They altered your birth record by by getting your mother to unknowingly consent volunteer" her infants to be used as Collateral Damage and much much much more.... You have to set the Facts straight = the enemy is not going to reverse their crimes against you for you ...Ok?? the enemy will not admit to the crimes or sign a confession..Why would anyone need to file paperwork? you need not do anything that is unless you want to remain in slavery...…. God ( If you follow him) wants us to be and live in the truth-- If you do not stand up and correct your Identity now that you know the truth ---you are giving the enemy consent to control and deceive and OWN YOU. you are basically saying your ok with being their property with out any human rights. Your God given rights are your inheritance- you can choose to claim them -in this case re-claim them or you can continue to be a lame duck "Pardon my expression" like the many who just want to go with the flow. On a different level---You see Satan will not stop until you are his.. It is my view Taking ownership of your Identity is KEY-- The enemy don't mess with those they already have... My point is Claiming your Identity is your decision - don't make it tooo complicated- You were made in Gods Image right? well the enemy has stolen your birthright - You can let them keep it or you can Stand For Truth for Christ and Seize it back--- Or you can do nothing. May you be filled with the power of the holy spirit!

    3. CAROL...let me make it very simple...using a MAXIM OF LAW...
      'ACQUIESCE BY SILENCE is agreement!' Your silence on the subject is agreement and it is not fraud. Unless you make a choice for yourself and give them have consented to their jurisdiction and you have no standing to testify otherwise in their courts.
      U.S. CITZENS have no rights.
      Now, here is the issue for you, once you know the truth and then you continue in your current situation, without dispute, then do not go to any court demanding rights, they will lock you up. Do not fight that system. you are its subject, because you are in agreement with it by your silent consent.
      Inner-stand the 13th Amendment: slavery and UN-voluntary servitude is illegal in America and the United States of America. What does that mean? You have the right to live free or to volunteer to servitude. And you volunteer by silence, without dispute and/or objection. SILENCE IS AGREEMENT!

    4. ps. Everyone, it is well established in law...we are required to be a belligerent claimant. What does that mean...OBJECT, OBJECT, OBJECT, OBJECT SOME MORE. Get those objects on the record.
      I watched a court case, where the respondent made an objection about the court claiming jurisdiction. The judge said, 'WE ARE NOT GOING TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE RIGHT NOW, HERE IS WHAT I AM GOING TO DO!' The respondent allowed the court to continue without another objection. But, no only that...court procedure is the judge has to rule on each objection, either overruled or sustained. She did neither, so she acted on the consent of the respondent to move forward. This is process. The respondent gave silent consent by act of no further objection and not requiring the judge to follow court process. The judge had no right to overrule the respondent and she couldn't agree with him by what did she do? She took a different path, by obtaining his silent consent!

    5. So true, C. The respondent acquiesced to the judge forfeiting their jurisdictional challenge. They should have said: "No, your honor, I object. We cannot proceed until this court proves on the record that it has jurisdiction or otherwise it must dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under FRCP 12(b)6. On and for the record, I challenge this court to prove on the record that it has jurisdiction over me (and my property)." Any further guff from the judge could have been overcome with "Your honor, the Supreme Court of the United States has well established the precedent that when jurisdiction is challenged, all proceedings must stop until the court has proven on the record that it has jurisdiction. Is the court prepared at this time to prove its jurisdiction over me (and my property)?" If the judge refuses to budge or tries to say the same thing that "We are not going to address that at this time, bla, bla, bls, etc.", you must move the court: "Your honor, it is apparent that the court at this time is not prepared to prove it has jurisdiction to be able to prosecute this case. On and for the record, I move for an adjournment to give the court ample time and opportunity to prove its jurisdiction on the record or, if it please the court, to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and eliminate the record." Keep objecting and repeating your demand until the judge relents which he has to do or you have just established your right to appeal.

    6. Here's another part of court process..when you court you are asked do you under-stand! You must ask your own self..stand under what? Remember is you are a subject to something you stand under are its subordinate! All U.S. CITIZENS are subjects to the jurisdiction of the U.S. American are not those subjects. So when you say...I under-stand in just consented to agree to jurisdiction. Inner-standing means you are standing within the inner kingdom of the Creator and only men and women can do that as the creator did not create any legal fictions known as persons. My only authority is my creator and as the 1611 KJV says: "Get thee behinde me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him onely shalt thou serue.” Because of that, I personally never under-stand anything. I have a rights to under-stand God 'ONLY' and freedom of that religion and to remain silent![No legal fiction can make that claim in court as legal fictions are not LIVING SOULS.] Because I am fully aware anything I say can and WILL be used against me in a court of law. Amish live with their right of freedom of religion everyday..they serve their Creator and not the U.S. It is their right to do so on the land/soil of America.

    7. 1freeman if that is the way you want to do it. I would simply object to the judge not ruling on my first objection. Because if the the court isn't going to follow its own rules, then it is fraudulent. As you stated with the statute: court procedures requires the judge to rule on objects. Think about it. If you objected for lack of jurisdiction and the judge says I am not going to rule on that today, this is what I am going to do.Do you allow her to get by with not ruling on the objection? Isn't not ruling a violation of procedure? If she's not going to follow procedure..isn't that a violation of fair trial and due process? Does violation of rights=unfit for her to rule at all? Does that mean she is denying you equal protection under the laws? Are not all laws, rules, regs= administrative procedures? can we not then consider she is violating standing administrative law? See these are things that must be considered and taken into our hearts and souls! See all these statements=trouble! Big trouble in most cases! Remember anything you say,can and WILL be used against you in a court of law! Remember who ever is talking loses! don't feel free to always be confused by their process. Be down right ignorant if you so desire! But, I personally choose to never blah, blah, blah with statements and words that can and will be used against me! And believe me every statement, they will contort and manipulate and destroy you with it. That's how the game is played. This is why attorneys in court are not allowed to make statements. Are they a witness? are they testifying? If you are making statements in are a witness...that's it..plain and simple! If you are a witness you are a subject of the court and they can make use of your testimony! The issue is, if you came to court by a summons, then you have to decide what you are going to do once you get there. How are you going to get yourself out of their ASSUMED jurisdiction? Do you fully understand: YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT AND THAT ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN AND MOST CERTAINTY WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN A COURT OF LAW? The judge is not bound by your statements, the judge is bound by the law: administrative procedures [statutes, codes, rules or regulations]. Your statements mean nothing! Your statements is your opinion and there are no court procedures saying the judge has to respond to your opinion. She can simply ignore it and go on and most of them do exactly that and move on with their agenda. But, what they are required to do is rule on an objection! Everything is process and procedures and agreement and objections..people lose in court all the time because that is what they don't inner-stand! You absolutely have a right to object and receive a ruling on that objection. Why is getting that ruling so important? Can you tell me?

    8. Also, a presumption unrebutted stands as fact. It's the same as with an affidavit. Rebutting their presumption that you are a US citizen must be made in the public.

    9. Jack...that's right...SILENCE IS CONSENT!

    10. We use the word 'understand' all the time. It is built into slavespeak which we have learned in school and at home. I prefer overstand because it is simple. I overstand that or if working to correct from understand to overstand I will say 'I get it.' I get it - is without agreement, simply acknowledgement of something. I overstand as a son of God of whatever belief I adhere to - Hindu, Buddhist, Christian or Muslim is accurate for me.

      As to any judicial proceeding in US courts there are only two parties with an issue to resolve - the 'judge' or 'administrator' lacks any cause other than a neutral party (supposedly). The innocent party is pushed to accept a servant of the court and to avoid standing for him/her self and then becomes a defender/ant. The attacking party is called, prosecutor.

      What if the first statement uttered by the innocent party is to the judge and is a question - may I ask a question your honor? Do you UNDERstand that I am a living, breathing, blood in my veins man/woman here? Ask him/her if he is standing under your position? Proceed from there and always refer to yourself - as the innocent party whenever you refer to yourself. Ask questions.

    11. Listens...very good! questions, questions and more questions...because you are ignorant of their law language because the law language is fraud anyway.

    12. 1FreeMan, I do not know how to do that. How long would it take as I do not have long I do not believe. Is it expensive? thanks for explaining. tc

    13. Annie Oakleys Sister thank you for your response. Yes Ive know of this for many years but never knew what steps to take to remedy the situation. I also do not know what it is they control on MY behalf. When I have filed court papers seeking remedy, which eludes us all, I ALWAYS let them know I am not a sheep, chattle, or subject. I was successful on one case, wherein JPM tried to steal my home. I WON! CASE CLOSED.

    14. Carol, if you would share how you won your foreclosure, I'll be happy to share how to correct your status.

    15. Hello again everyone, here's what I'm up against. I filed a case in the united States District Court, they judge rendered me informa pauperis on my motion for said status, he then took 5 or 6 months if memory serves me to block my access TO THE TRIAL BY JURY, helping out the corporation I was suing along with several employee's for stalking, false imprisonment, dereliction of duty, malfeasance, threatening me, rico racketeering, coercion with my doctor's, it was something like 54 counts/charges. The judge had his attorney's locate an unconstitutional in my view, law that congress had passed in 1915 I believe it was, stating prisoners could not use the informa pauperis, I AM NOT A PRISONER IN THE SYSTEM, however I have been imprisoned in my home by this insurance company for NINETEEN YEARS! So this usurper of his oath in office judge, barred me from getting remedy. Now the plot thickens, the insurance claims man ASKED me for the paperwork I filed, (since the judge would not forward it OR the subpoena's). I complied with his request and sent it via email (which is recognized by the Supreme court as LEGAL NOTICE) of which I have had numerous email transactions with this company. I forwarded it all to him. Talking with a friend of mine, who I told I had sent the file, he asked me if he responded. OMG! It hits me, I now had him on a Default Judgment. So, I filed that with the Supreme Court, the CLERK however just sent my file back because IT WAS NOT IN THE FORMAT THEY ARE ACCUSTOM TO. I blew up, because its another front, to prevent my being able to attain JUSTICE. My friend then told me of the Unanimous Declaration of the 13 States, stating that it is still viable and I should now use THAT. I have not had time to read it in its entirety. I am ill, can't sit up for very long due to my severe spinal pain. I do NOT know what to do at this point because I am of the belief, justice does not exist in America, never did, and all I've done in my attempts for NINETEEN YEARS doing this, I've not as yet gained my FREEDOM FROM MY HOME. I have given up hope, and my dream of it ever happening. What say you all?

    16. Carol, I am so saddened by your story and so grieved, but this kind of stuff is exactly why, I try to teach the truth.

      I am going to tell you straight up, what has happened and it is going to be painful, to read, but it is exactly what Anna fights daily to prevent.

      Your status! Your status, was and is currently the status of a U.S. CITIZEN. I have said it before and will here again...U.S. CITIZENS have no rights! I am so sorry, but that is what has occurred in this issue. You can't win, in those courts. If you do, it will cost you everything.
      Why? Jurisdiction over your status is why! Its called Personam jurisdiction is the court's authority to determine personal rights and liabilities of the parties before it.

      Under personam jurisdiction the court has the power to decide matters of a particular defendant (in personam jurisdiction) or an item of property (in rem jurisdiction). Please read that definition closely and pay close attention to who has the power. Not you!
      Carol, as I write this my heart is breaking for you, because I can see the suffering at the hands of these monsters. They are ruthless over their U.S. CITIZENS/PERSONS.
      This is why I say, you can't play in legal. If you are in legal, get an attorney. In legal, the deck is absolutely stacked against you. The more you argue with them the more monstrous they become, it is THEIR JURISDICTION.
      Jurisdiction: the 'OFFICIAL POWER' to make 'LEGAL' decisions and judgments.
      If you are in LEGAL, you are not the OFFICIAL POWER! This entire matter was in LEGAL! That judge, used his official power of legal, in full force against you and there is nothing you can do as a U.S. CITIZEN/SUBJECT.
      I have to repeat, again, what has been said so many times by Anna...U.S.CITIZENS HAVE NO RIGHTS! U.S. Citizens can't make claims for justice at all, why, justice is determined by what the judge decides justice is, in every matter.
      As I am writing this Carol, my stomach is churning over your situation and the things I am having to write...but, for the sake YOU and of all, I must continue.
      When I have asked so many times in comments on this forum: 'HOW DID THEY GET JURISDICTION OVER YOU" this is why I asked that question.
      If you are ARGUING IN COURT, FOR ANY REASON, THEY HAVE JURISDICTION SOMEHOW and you are in LEGAL ARGUMENTS! In other words you are arguing with legal! If you argue [which is also making statements verbally in court, by the way] with legal, you will absolutely lose! Why? Because they have already obtained PERSONAM JURISDICTION, JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON!
      cont. below...

    17. The lynch pin to everything is JURISDICTION! Once they have it, you are dog poop, under their shoes and they will wipe the carpet with you. That's what they did, Carol. If you are in, their jurisdiction, then its their way or the highway. Once you are in their jurisdiction, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS, TO DO ANYTHING BUT WHAT THEY TELL YOU. YOU CAN'T WIN IN THEIR SYSTEM, YOU WILL LOSE EVERYTHING. THE DECK IS STACKED AGAINST YOU, IN THEIR SYSTEM. IF YOU WERE, AND YOU WERE, ARGUING IN THEIR COURT, YOU WERE IN THEIR TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND IN THAT JURISDICTION THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY THE BOSS AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS!
      Carol, I am so, so sorry for having to write this comment. It has been painful for me, and I can't even imagine the painfulness to you.
      Can you now redeem this situation by reclaiming your nationality as an American State Citizen? Or do you just move forward? No one can answer that but you, but for certain, it sounds like LEGAL has a pretty significant grasp on everything and are you up to the fight of releasing the grasp they have on the situation. Your health sounds like its in pretty bad shape, do you want to continue this particular fight? Only you can weigh the cost! Carol, you asked...what say you all? My dear, its really time for you...what say you Carol? I hope somehow, what I have said in this comment, will shine some light on the path, that you need to take for your life, so you can see more clearly.
      I pray, Father, you know what lays ahead for Carol, and you know what needs to be done for true justice to prevail. I ask you now, to make this way straight for Carol and clear. I ask you to bring Peace into her soul and to deliver her from this situation. And give her peaceful rest tonight. In Jesus name, Amen.

    18. thank you for your honest but brutal and truthful response, so it is done. I shall simply die now. I have already given up hope, and what few dreams I had on my life ever being better than this prison. I have already commended my soul to Him, and I want to go. I HATE this world, for it has been nothing but hell for me. tc and may He bless all those who are awakening to the truth. Thank you also Anna. See you at the pearly gate one day. :)

    19. Carol, God bless you and keep you and make his face to shine upon you and give you PEACE! In my heart and prayers, Connie

    20. Lastly, so you're saying they just GAVE me my house when I fought them over it for 12 yrs? When they had no right to come at me for it to begin with? They had no contract with me. That was concluded in 2015. Also, the Post office is waiting for my paperwork concerning that bank that pursued me. So is that all b/s too? They told me what they did was extortion and fraud, and there is no statute of limitations on that. They have their own marshals and their own court system. So is that all fake too? thanks

    21. Carol, I am saying, the court took jurisdiction and they sided with their corporations, because they took personam jurisdiction over you. Personam jurisdiction makes you their LEGAL SUBJECT. Now, I can think of plenty of ways that you might fight this, fight. But, it will be a fight, requiring lots of energy and fortitude. Why? Because of the tentacles, LEGAL has done to wrap and interwine ITS self in this situation. You would need to be instructed in a lot of things, more than just what your friend told you about the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.
      There is no a doubt in my justice was served to you. But, wisdom in your particular situation must dictate, what you do from here. Again that depends on you judging your own situation and circumstances.
      When something is this deep, already in LEGAL, you need to consider to fight it LEGALLY. The best way to do that is with a LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE. It sounds like foreclosure fraud. Many attorneys are now dealing with this, because of the 2008 foreclosure crisis.
      But, for you to attempt to handle this by lawful means at this point, you would need some heavy duty instruction and fortitude.

      That is the wisdom, that I can share with you. What you do with that is truly up to you. I tell you these things...because this is truly a mega, LEGAL [NON-LAWFUL] mess. You could turn it into a LAWFUL dispute, but do you have what it takes and the time to learn what you need to learn to do it? You are the one who must answer these questions.
      I think, what is happening here is you are trying to figure a way how to mix this legal issue, with what you have learned about the lawful. You are attempting to merge the two. There is no merging of the two, they don't overlap at all. They are separate and distinct jurisdictions.
      I have nothing to share on how to maneuver LEGAL, as I teach others how to stay out of it and exit the building with Elvis. There are those who are very adapt at the EQUITY SYSTEM. I am not one of them. That is not my forte. I hope God to be with you, in whatever you decide to do!

    22. This case is not about the house. I WON that case, my home is FREE from what they never had the right to pursue it. As for the case at hand, I want compensation for having been imprisoned in my home for nineteen years, medical neglect, threats, stalking, coercion with my medical doctors, I have proof of it all right out of the horses mouth so to speak. Fortitude, :) I live on total disability, so they have me on that one. Attorney's, well to me they are all whores for the crown. I am smart enough to know, I would NOT need a mouth piece to do my talking for me, however IF and I seriously doubt, one would be my assistant, I have tried more years than I can count, no one will do it. So once again, I'm screwed. Thanks ever so much for your input. It is a most EVIL world, but afterall satan was thrown down to it, eh? lol I am ready to go HOME! tc THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN AN UNJUST WORLD.

    23. btw, I'm just a dead women barely walking, they killed me years ago! I haven't had a life, THEY STOLE IT!

    24. Carol that's the real issue...they stole you life...they did that at your nativity. You just didn't know it. I agree with you about attorneys, but sometimes situations are so deep in LEGAL. The only thing people can do is deal with those devils.
      Here's something...if you have 99 attorneys at the bottom of the ocean, what does that mean? NOT ENOUGH!

    25. not a good enough START lol

    26. Carol LOL! And you made my day! Take Care!

  3. It is diabolical, and just exactly opposite to what most people have been indoctrinated to assume.

  4. So apply for a non-US citizen, State Citizen passport and be done with it. Just found the ruling that you don't even have to pay for it if your last passport was issued in error. Here it is:
    22 CFR § 51.54 - Replacement passports without payment of applicable fees, which states:
    A passport issuing office may issue a replacement passport for the following reasons without payment of applicable fees:
    (a) To correct an error or rectify a mistake of the Department;
    Of course you would want to pay the extra fee for the card if you did not get one yet. This card is a must have and gets you out of all traffic tickets. We have many testimonies of this including my own.

    1. Hint: all US citizen passports are issued in error. If they claim it must be their error for them to waive the fee, then rub their nose in the first part of the statute which implies any error since the first part is separated from the second part by the word "or" which cannot join the 2 parts. Or, if you like a challenge, rub their nose in the fact that it is their error for not making the proper citizenship status available on their DS-11 application. Either way, no need to submit with a fee just to get your passport corrected. FYI: The LLF can now assist you with this process.

    2. PS: this can also be done by "naturalized" US citizens since you too were issued the wrong passport. Once issued, you have no more need for your citizenship certificate since you are no longer a US citizen and can now surrender the citizenship certificate to the treasury to surrender the fed person. For Resident Aliens with a green card, the easiest way to get the NCSN passport is to first apply for US citizenship (keep your fingers crossed when you take the oath! Not valid anyway because you cannot swear allegiance to or be a citizen of a corporation) and then apply for the correct passport.

  5. Replies
    1. ussesssta...UCADIA is back...he always poses as UNKNOWN...that's his cover! Don't worry Paul will take him down!

    "Harcourt v. Gaillard,
    25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 523, 526, 527 (1827), where the Supreme Court stated:
    "There was no territory within the United States that was claimed in any other right than that of some one of the confederated states; therefore, there could be no acquisition of territory made by the United States distinct from, or independent of some one of the states.
    "Each declared itself sovereign and independent, according to the limits of its territory.'[T]he soil and sovereignty within their acknowledged limits were as much theirs at the declaration of independence as at this hour'."
    To believe you can be a sovereign People of a sovereign several State, while maintaining your U.S. CITIZENSHIP, you are in great error. As this court case states, the several States and the U.S. are distinctly different. You can be an American State, National...but you can not remain a U.S.CITIZEN/Person and expect within the courts to have immunity from prosecution by the U.S. As a U.S. CITIZEN you are ITS subject!


  8. C. Johnson, Out of curiosity What did you mean I could lose everything? My life? My house which I already won? What exactly. IF my life, well theyve already taken that. I'm merely breathing in and breathing out. ha ha I have nothing left to lose.

    1. Carol what I mean, is weigh the cost. What have you already lost? Do you believe and have faith you can win? If you do, then continue your fight, learn the things you need to learn and change this to a lawful non-legal fight! But, you have to learn how to fight lawfully, because right now you are absolutely engaging this situation by legal means and your chances of winning legally is almost non-existent. So you have to weigh the cost, what is it going to cost you emotionally, spiritually, mentally, physically? This is the issue for us all to weigh in the balances! What's the cost? Is it worth the fight, in your own personal situation! I don't know the fullness of your situation. Only you do! And no one on this forum will be able to tell you it is worth the sacrifice, that you might be required to make, in your efforts, in the intense 19 year LEGAL ordeal.
      Again, I will say to you, you are deep legally into this and there will be no magic wand to zap that away. There will be a cost and that cost will probably be high and its going to include monetary, too, just because of where situation is legally.
      You are right now coming from a defensive stand against legal. They have you pinned in a corner and finances and your energy is sapped. How do you get out of the corner? That's the problem in being in a defensive instead of an offense position. You are not currently positioned offensively.
      I am by no means trying to discourage you from the fight, I am simply pointing out, the things you need to see. Follow to the comment below....

    2. Let me, explain a very critical point in this issue: the court's ruling "In Forma Pauperis". That ruling is on the record and proves you are a LEGAL PERSON, within the jurisdiction of LEGAL and without LAWFUL RIGHTS.
      I don't know how you got that ruling, but most probably by application with your signature. [BE MINDFUL, I AM NOT ACKNOWLEDGING THAT'S HOW IT HAPPENED, BECAUSE IN YOUR SITUATION, IT IS NOT DISCLOSED TO ME!].
      However, an administrative judge cannot make a ruling, without jurisdiction. [As I posted, all courts are now ADMINISTRATIVE, NON-LAW COURTS]. That ruling without your OBJECTION, is the court's standing, over the LEGAL PERSON, by personam jurisdiction. If you go to the ROD CLASS VS U.S. win. You will see personam jurisdiction, by agreement, applied in the ruling.
      Even though the ruling was favorable to Rod, it was also favorable to the lower court. Why? Because of the agreement ROD made with the lower court. He made an agreement to plea! So he VOLUNTARILY surrendered his RIGHTS.
      Again,13th is not a law violation to VOLUNTEER OUR SELVES INTO SERVITUDE and SURRENDER OUR RIGHTS, by AGREEMENT [CONTRACT]. We have an un-a-lien-able right to contract. Rod's plea contract [agreement] did not include, the agreement to forfeit the right to appeal. So the court ruled, ROD could appeal, because it wasn't part of the plea agreement. The Court ruled, straight Constitution.
      Many times on this forum, I have stated: everything is contracts, learn to make great contracts [AGREEMENTS].
      Here's a key...know who the party is to whom you are agreeing! That agreement is contract. That contract does not have to be by signature, it can be by actions. One of those actions can be silence! Silence is agreement [contract]!
      Once you are in the contract, can you stand on your rights? Rod Class found out the answer! “NO’!.... on the part he agreed to voluntarily give away in the plea agreement [contract].
      So, for you to fight this LAWFULLY, again as I always say: YOU PERSONALLY, would need to find out how they got jurisdiction over you!
      Here is what I see: you have made 2 commercial contracts, that the United States has the right to have jurisdiction over, because of the INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION. Those two contracts are: 1 with the court [ In Forma Pauperis] and 1 with the insurance corporation and you most likely made those contracts using a public identifier like a driver's license, issued to you by your social security card. But, now you want to claim, your lawful rights! The court is denying you, because the court knows how all this works. So for you to now turn this all around from legal jurisdiction to lawful jurisdiction will be a fight. This as I have said: it is deep into the LEGAL.
      Carol, what I am truthfully saying to you is, you need to weigh the cost [not just monetarily]. But, this for absolute certainty, where this situation is, it is going to take much more than the answers you can obtain on this forum. The key is and always has been offensive posture instead of defensive. Once they have you in defensive, escape is extremely difficult. continued below...

    3. What Anna is doing with these writings, is to help people to get into the offensive standing, before they get themselves into a defensive back against the wall, like you currently are within.
      Carol, I know you want resolution, I know you seek an easier remedy, than now confronts you. But, in your situation, there just is not one.
      In your case, it is absolutely going to take tremendous energy, effort and money, win, if you do! At your point, it is not certain, you will be able to break all the LEGAL TENTACLES off this situation and if you do, it may not be the resolution you want to achieve.
      What you want is the insurance corporation to pay, but you are making demand, of a corporation, in which you have a LEGAL contract. That LEGAL CORPORATION, is A LEGAL PERSON, and it has LEGAL RIGHTS, include being heard in a LEGAL COURT. Just that one sentence alone is a very heavy situation in which you find yourself. I can guarantee you, the court is looking at your LEGAL AGREEMENT in your status as a LEGAL PERSON, and is refusing to release you from your LEGAL AGREEMENT with ANOTHER LEGAL PERSON. WHY? because the U.S. has jurisdiction over all LEGAL PERSONS. Example: if you go into the court and make claim, you are not a legal person, do you expect to win? In said claim, then you are claiming you committed fraud when you signed, because you are claiming you were never the legal person. if you claim the contract was issued under duress, threat or coercion, can you prove it in court. if you prove it. The contract becomes null and void from its inception. If the contract is null and void from its inception, then you have no right to make claim against the LEGAL PERSON-insurance company other than the money you paid in premiums, because if a contract is null and void from its inception then payment of services was never due. You my dear are in a CATCH-22. Is it fair? Is it justice? Is it what you want? Will it ever be what you want? Only you can weigh the cost!
      Decisions, decisions, decisions! We all have, to make them! EASY? Heck no! But, mandatory! These are our lives! They are being stolen by a system, in which we had no clue and most still don't! This is why, I don't teach procedures to anyone. I teach what happened, what is happening and what is going to happen! We all must see the big picture and have full clarity. This system is a really is and when we contract with it and in it, we pay the ultimate price! It can cost us everything! We think we are just buying insurance…but are we? AGAIN I SAY TO EVERYONE WHO READS THIS COMMENT: LEARN TO MAKE GREAT CONTRACTS,THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS AGREEMENTS [CONTRACTS] and you bind yourself to them and other LEGAL PERSONS when you make them by you signature or by your actions. Carol, this is absolutely the clearest picture I can paint for you! God bless!

    4. I thank you tremendously for all the info, WOW thanks for taking the time. I don't know where to go from here. Just a bit of background on this particular case.
      Yes I filed in united States District Court, Yes I filed for informa pauperis status and got it. When he rendered his decision on the law that didn't apply to ME, he took that away, but did state if memory serves me, I could appeal it.
      I was asked for the FILE and Subpoenas from the Insurance company of whom I sued for numerous USC codes that had been broken, 18USC 241 and 242 as well as many others. When I sent it all to him, they failed to respond. My friend said I had them on a Default Judgment because of that. So doesn't the court have to abide what THEY are mandated to do under THEIR laws?
      Per the contract with the insurance company, I never signed anything to my knowledge to give them roughshod over me. It was provided by my employer, workers compensation coverage. But I did not sue as a result of workers comp, I sued under the federal laws of which they are mandated to provide a service for people and of whom had been paid by the employer the premiums on all workers behalf.
      Further, I put in my paperwork when I filed, I was not a subject, cattle,sheep, GUESS LOL THAT DID NO GOOD EH? LOL
      Per the drivers license, mine has UCC 1-308 beneath the printed name. Doesn't that matter or not?
      IF nothing of what I've done carries any weight, then what process do I have to go through then, please point me in the direction, and please SOMEONE if not you, tell me exactly what I have to do to attain THE JUSTICE AND COMPENSATION FOR MY LIFE HAVING BEEN STOLEN, IMPRISONED, ABUSED, STALKED, THREATENED, AND THEN SOME. THANKS SO MUCH

    5. BTW, I may as well fight til my end, as I have nothing else to do, I'm TRAPPED HERE, WITH NOTHING BUT TIME ON MY HANDS.

    6. Carol, you are missing a lot of what I am telling you. You are dealing with corporate entities. If you don't get that you won't comprehend this: corporate entities are regulated by who? THE UNITED STATES. In this situation: you too are a corporate entity. When you got the job so you could get workman's comp [a govt. mandated program] you used a ss#. You're attempting to get workman's comp. you are using what? an ss#. You are IN LEGAL! You in this issue are functioning in LEGAL. THE ENTIRE SITUATION IS LEGAL...ITS A LEGAL COURT, LEGAL PERSONS, LEGAL PROGRAMS! You are trying to make a claim and force them into paying obviously, but it's not lawful. You are dealing with CORPORATE STATUTES. Who handles CORPORATE [COMMERCIAL LAW] disputes? the United States Courts.
      I told you, you are trying to mix law with legal. It can't be done. You can not make a banana into a grape. This issue is legal. You are looking for lawful answers to solve a legal issue! How? How do you make an apple into an orange. You don't. Your answers for this issue will not be found, by what is being shared on this forum. This is not a legal forum and no legal solutions are available here. This forum is all about coming out of legal.
      Sure you can come out of legal, for this issue, but if you do, what valid claim can you make against the legal insurance company. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, it sounds like the judge, is conducting court legally and you are failing to see why. The judge has the right to legally act in this action. Because the judge is dealing with 2 legal parties, in a legal dispute. It is the legal jurisdiction for this matter. So with time on your hands, either get the attorney, which we both despise or get someone who can help you with equity law. Again, that's not my forte. Nor do I think you will find that help on this forum. You truly do need someone who knows and can maneuver equity. Sorry my dear, you struck out!

    7. ok well thanks anyway. Yes I get it.

    8. Carol, I'm so glad! Now, go get'um!