Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Did You Go to Law School or Legal School?


By Anna Von Reitz

If you went to Law School you learned that Law is an outgrowth of religion and ethics. 

If you went to Law School you learned the complete History of Law in the Western World from the time of the Ancient Babylonians and Hellenistic Greeks to the present day. 

If you went to Law School you learned all the various kinds of "Common Law" and the verbiage associated with them. 

If you went to Law School you learned about Lord Mansfield and the pollution of the British Common Law with Admiralty Law in the 1750's.

If you went to Law School you also learned how that development triggered violent debate and was one of the causes of the American Revolution.

If you went to Law School you learned how this corrupt form of British Common Law now practiced as Equity Law turned judges into proxies for the British King, allowing them to arbitrarily take the property of the British People (provided the King gets his cut, of course) and give it to the King's Cronies, including themselves under Color of Law.

And that is where "Law" separates from "Legal". 

If you went to Legal School this corrupt form of "Common Law" now practiced as "Equity Law" is what you were taught. 

If you went to Legal School this system making the Judges mini-sovereigns and reducing everyone else to serfs or slaves is all you were taught.

If you went to Legal School great emphasis was placed on finding supportive case law to excuse injustice and on procedure which could be used as another excuse to the same ends.

If you went to Legal School what you learned was how to corrupt and pervert actual Law and Justice so as to better serve the economic greed and political agendas of your masters.

If you went to Legal School as 95% of you did, while paying to go to Law School, you've been cheated. 

If you went to Legal School, you are only competent to "practice" Law. 

If you went to Legal School, something less then two percent (2%) of you ever receive a Certificate to execute actual Law, and then only in Admiralty Courts.

Actual Admiralty Courts.

If you went to Legal School you know virtually nothing about your own purported profession and less about the history of the world.  You've paid thousands of dollars for an education you didn't receive.

In fact, what you've been trained to do like donkeys in a treadmill, is to act as British Shipping Clerks.  That's what journeyman "non-certificated" attorneys are.  And all the supposedly great Law Schools in this country?  Subverted to that end by British Sympathizers who glutted at the King's Table on American bread and butter.

Harvard? Useless, politicized to a point of stupor.  Yale? Even worse, the home of economic barbarism practiced as a fine art and believed in without question. Stanford?  Shall I show you how many Stanford alumni have their names blazoned across Patent Applications that do nothing but destroy this planet and the people on it? 

The very basis of Law is Ethics, yet you have been taught none.  That has been the very furthest thing from your basic curriculum.

Your minds have been honed in self-interest and tricks and sneaky ways of doing things, semantic deceits, sophistry and its brand of logic, oh, all these things you have been taught ---- and not a thing about the actual Public Law or Justice. 

And all because the Kings and Queens of England wanted you to grow up and be little cogs in their version of Commercial Feudalism. 

How does it feel to be so completely, utterly duped?  Left so pathetically ignorant after spending what? -- $300,000.00 for a "Law" School education?

Even more to the point if you are an American --- how does it feel to be part of a gang of privateers pillaging and plundering public trusts, robbing your own people for the aggrandizement and unjust enrichment of foreign governments and evil Monarchs---living your lives as traitors to America and to Justice? 

Stealing "title" to babies? 

Have you no shame, no decency at all?  Not even a regard for your own necks?  

Wake up.  Sober up.  Realize just how far behind the curve you really are.  And also realize that there are penalties for ignorance of the Law -- that is, the actual Public Law. 

If you are acting as members of the Bar Associations, if you are participating as Officers of these Courts, you had better carefully check the facts and become familiar with the American Common Law, because that is the form of Law that the people of this country are owed. 

And you have no right in Heaven or on Earth to apply any other kind of law to them.  Not Statutory Law.  Not Talmudic Law.  Not Equity Law.  None of it.

Despite falsification of the Public Records to better grease the wheels of what amounts to a National Identity Theft and a mercenary crime of genocide on paper-- there are millions of us fed up with your ignorance and your activities on our soil. You are nothing but pirates acting in violation of our Treaty with Westminster and in violation of every principle of Justice.

The fact that you are nearly all too ignorant to realize it doesn't change a thing.

The penalty for inland piracy is death by firing squad, hanging, guillotine, or lethal injection.

Are you sure you wish to continue your membership in the Bar Associations?

If not, there remains one honorable option. 

You can tear up your Bar Cards and act as Counselors at Law and you can assist the millions of Americans who have been mis-addressed by the so-called Equity Courts operating under Color of Law--- and you can do your actual duty to Justice and to America by putting these other courts out of business.   

You can realize that just as other Americans have been defrauded, so have you been the victim of this same pernicious British Bunko.  Oh, yes, Bar Association Members, this fraud scheme is so mammoth it includes you, too.

You can learn how to re-establish your own standing as an American and help others re-establish their natural political status in the public records of these fifty nation-states as people and as American Persons, not as presumed-to-be British Territorial slaves.

Start by reading Brent Winter's The Excellence of the Common Law. That will start you on the Long Road Home to sanity and justice and the country you call home.

When you look back at how arrogant and stupid you were, thinking yourself and your fellow attorneys as so superior to everyone else, you may have cause to be embarrassed, but at least you will be an honest man or woman again. You will not be living in the shadow of the gallows or mindlessly betraying your countrymen for the sake of European greed.  

And considering the penalties involved otherwise, that is not a small recompense. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

44 comments:

  1. Beautiful, Anna. I am sending this to two ignorant BAR attorneys I know who need a real education!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chris, while you are in ''sending mode'' I suggest you also send it to your local public Defenders Office. And your local BAR Assn. And to your State Atty General.
      Since attorneys are not licensed or certified, I would think that anyone who wants to learn 'how to be a common law Justice'' should be able to do that. Why not. It should be an isolated Trade, just like an auto mechanic, etc. Specialize in one thing, or two.

      Delete
    2. Chris....I know some too I am going to send too...She really thinks in her pathetic mind she is so much better than the rest of us because she owns property and a whole lot of toys that came at someone's expense.....never hers....

      Delete
  2. I engage with attorneys on the air it's a blood bath thair favorite line "what are you talking about " I ask them do you know our country has turned into a big corperation ? And it's a blood bath.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Update on Form 843's: So I sent a few 843's to the IRS to the Office where I would ordinarily send a 1040. I did this back on the first week of July. It was just last week they finally responded saying ''they received them but needed an extra 60 days''.
    Then yesterday, I receive another single letter from them saying they had to send them to Utah because they were better able to handle my 843's.
    And that I should be hearing from THEM, (utah office) within another 60 days.
    So this now takes it from early July to early December. Then I bet they will send me some ''dear john letter''.....to which I will have to get out my ''hatchet'' and start a little fire under their butts, Lol.

    Now all that time frame does not include the couple of months or so that it took to gather the preliminaries from the Tax Court as attachments with the 843's.
    So if you all can't see how this stuff can take up your whole life IF you let it and that they just play with us, and that this is just all a delay tactic, then you need to think again, lol.

    So 1FREEMan, there's my ''test run'' for you.........IF you aren't in jail or something, where ya at? Just wondering.

    And so where are all you folks with your 843 stories?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "More Evidence that America’s Law Schools and Governments Ignore or Dismiss Organic Law".

    "Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) joined a rally on the grounds of the Capitol on Wednesday staged by MoveOn.org, Planned Parenthood, and other left-wing groups to oppose Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the United States Supreme Court and said the nominee does not believe constitutional rights apply to women.
    'He believes that your constitutional rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness is not enumerated in the Constitution if you’re a woman,' Gillibrand said. 'That you do not have access to reproductive care when you need it.' The phrase hails, in fact, from the Declaration of Independence."

    Professor Ed Rivera of the Organic Laws Institute writes: "Senator Gillibrand received her Juris Doctor Degree from the School of Law of the University of California at Los Angeles in 1991. After successfully passing the written bar examination of the State Bar Examiners, she was admitted to the State Bar of California in the same year. The Organic Laws of the United States of America were not a part of the curriculum during the time I attended UCLA Law School (1968 through 1971 when I graduated). The Organic Laws were, also, not subjects of the extensive bar examination.

    Sen. Gillibrand has shown by her remarks that the Organic Laws have remained absent at UCLA Law School. Her years in government service have not served to acquaint her with the contents of the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of September 17, 1787. ...

    The education to be had at Harvard, Yale or UCLA Law Schools will fail the person seeking complete truth and all the law, because those institutions do not teach the Organic Laws of the United States of America. Only the Organic Laws Institute presents the evidence that proves the Organic Laws to be the basis of government and law in America. That evidence is found in the curriculum of the Basic Course in Law and Government." -
    Links Noted here:
    https://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2265823
    -

    -

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Organic Laws are the basis of government and law in America for a number of reasons one of which is the fact that all law in government must be in written form. If the Organic Laws aren't taught at Law Schools (not to mention public High Schools - although I'd like that to be disproven) then is it not logical for each individual American to make learning this "basis of government and law in America" a priority? .........
      -

      Delete
  5. C.Johnson et al, question:
    as a independent contractor/non-US citizen private tradesman being requested to submit a certified W9 to a US Corp business, any thoughts you care to share to help myself and I'm sure many others, to complete this form without it creating any assumption of citizenship or being rejected by the company?
    Creating a new "lifestyle" vs making a living as a "subject" under US presumed authority and obligation is Where many of us are right now in our learning process, and I for one would love some insight from those that are working independently to shed more light on this topic. Anyone with personal knowledge and experience on this topic would be helpful dialog for many and would be a greatly appreciated and much needed learning experience, Thank you๐Ÿ˜€

    Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be Now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Consider that the statutes [bylaws of a corporation in contradistinction to Statutes at Large] relate or apply only to 'person(s) and not to man. I presume it would be important to notice the company of that fact and that you are a man or private person, not a person in legal terminology, also sending a copy to IRS if you think that may be advisable. Check Black's Law Dictionary to dicover the distinction: see 'person' and 'private person'. Silence or filling out the form would likely exhibit a presumption you are a taxpayer, particularly if you have ever filed a 1040 in the past. There are two lives people live, one as a man and the other, due to ignorance, as a security for an entity, a fiction not in existence except in the mind of man, and there only by consent and agreement. I worked as a tradesman and independent entrepreneur from October, 1960 until my retirement.

      Delete
    2. Thank you Robert :)
      Using the statutory "person" and assigned "TIN" as our commercial "game piece" (and using our by line restricted sig) and any LLC's already registered in US created by our "person" once we've corrected the public record and taken control of ALL property and accounts accordingly, can be quite a juggling act. I'm personally leaning towards creating a few different private Trusts just to keep assets, property separated and protected. I've been my own boss for over 20 years with multiple streams of cashflow from multiple sources, public and private.
      Any additional insights or suggestions from personal experience for better protecting our in-come's and assets is greatly appreciated!

      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be Now

      Delete
    3. Kelli Miller:
      I was told years ago (by someone who helped others create foundations) that a foundation was an even better way to go, so you might want to check that out.

      Disclaimer: I know very little about trusts or foundations.

      Best wishes!

      Delete
    4. Yes, thank you Genevieve!! Definetly a wonderful alternative to consider and worth looking into/learning more about indeed!!

      Agreed E.T.Tishbite, and thank you too๐Ÿ˜Ž
      It is so time Now to unite & Empower each other to start creating our lives and lifestyles on a higher playing field from Now on! No more playing small. Time to Go Big Now and Win this "game of life" because we can!!!
      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be Now for All

      Delete
    5. The 990 comments so far in this video suggest u may be mistaken on the legality of income taxes CJ.

      Not that I would so foolish yet to not give it to their private credit scheme...

      Irs Commandant says income taxes voluntary in 2013 with 283k views
      https://youtu.be/XNICz9CZOgw

      From one comment therein^

      https://givemeliberty.org/features/taxes/notratified.htm

      Delete
    6. Orherwise absolutely LOVE the 3 identities above discourse CJ๐Ÿ’“

      Delete
    7. I agree CJ๐Ÿ’“ in general.

      However, since I am quite a fan of the original 13th amendment....I get the immense fraud - before & since then since I am quite a fan of Frank O'Connor as well & read his history lessons throughly. Of course u have pointed out more directions to pursue via the 3 identities listed @ least if one's current body is born on American soil.

      Since ultimately I am Soul, I will grow in understanding how to use that 3 identities information to my benefit as I move fwd while still on earth๐ŸŽถ

      Delete
    8. BRILLIANT ๐Ÿ’“☇♩๐ŸŽค

      Delete
    9. Actually CF - I knew about those boundaries stones years ago & those were once favorite posts of mine to repost on Facebook in my 3 different name accounts therein for years. I still have those accounts, but not visited them since Trump & I had a falling out in Q chat room/board therein (via dream over my continuous exposures of ISRAEL/Mossad & u can probably guess the other๐Ÿ•†) So I quit Facebook for now...probably forever & focused more on this fascinating topic to me anyway of our 3 identities๐ŸŽท

      Thank u, though, for taking the time to further our education as I will as well in my strong areas♩

      God is love๐Ÿ’“

      1757: VIRGINIA. That impeccably honest lover of democracy, George Washington, begins a great American tradition, buying elections. Running for election to the Virginia House of Burgesses, Washington buys off every one of the 390 electors in his district with one and a half quarts of liquor.  http://mtwsfh.blogspot.com/

      Delete
  6. I found the "Organic Laws" hiding at the very beginning of The United States. The Declaration of Independence for the united States of America, The Articles of Confederation, The Northwest Ordinance, and the Constitution. After that it is Acts and the Organic Laws are real hard to find or were a couple years ago. Brent Winters book, Excellence of the Common Law should be read most likely the first thing in any law school or or that matter any school period. What is documented there answered many questions for me and the bigger picture becomes much clearer once one knows. I did not go to high school but did attend a college when older and learned to research but did find they do not teach any of the truths in high school that should be primary in any student of life. Without a good foundation structures mental or otherwise tend to fall of center eventually even break altogether.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great question Kelli. Many need this exact info. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  8. C. Johnson, you say you have changed your status w/everyone you could think of. How do you know "they" actually recognize what you have sent "them"? Did you get some form of notification that "they" made the required changes in "their" system? How does one know if "their" system/records have been changed/updated to your correct status? This is so important to us all. Thank you for your response.

    ReplyDelete
  9. C Johnson, the issue for us all seems to be how to "properly" give notice of our status to the U.S. Inc. it agencies and agents that they will actually recognize and change our status throughout "their" entire system(s). Anna has provided one way she says works to correct our status, but I cannot find anyone that can say her process actually works. Would you share your method w/us? Is there a approved method of proper notification of status correction provided in American Jurisprudence? We all need to find a way to correct our status that actually works. We could use your help. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank You, Thank you, thank you C.Johnson!!!! You and your insightful explanations have been truly missed!! ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ’–You have a beautiful gift of expressing and no-nonsense way of thoroughly getting to the meat of this vital life/mind changing topic and your input IS priceless for so many Now!! I realize you have shared much of this before.. But This writing IS amazing and should Be saved on everyone's computers or phone downloads to fall back on in times of "cognitive dissonance" moments taking over, as it does and to tap back into for much needed grounding!! The struggle and juggle IS real as we continue to evolve and become more In balance within and in our world. You, and many others that do and have contributed in service to All on this and other blocks, comment sections are a priceless and necessary gift for All, Thank you๐Ÿ˜ many wonderful insight filled contributors are always needed Now to inspire and help empower each other towards our individual and unified collective desires of True Peace, Love and harmony Now๐Ÿ˜™
    This writing is now saved safely! Thank you again for your time and patience in explaining once again.

    Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be for All Now

    ReplyDelete
  11. C. Johnson: I agree wholeheartedly with Kelli Miller that "you have a beautiful gift of expressing and no-nonsense way of thoroughly getting to the meat...and your input IS priceless." Thank you for showing up here again. (And again? [I ask hopefully].)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Staying True to ourselves and True to our Now corrected public/private Records IS our own responsibility to maintain and keep any New records we create IN complete alignment With our Now Corrected Records/Standing. Nothing more, nothing less. Mind our own Creations accordingly, respectfully at all times Now and moving forward. Its All Good!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. AND IT IS ONLY THRU JC that CJ suggests (& anyone ELSE) can there be light๐Ÿ•†

    Of course, that is not so whatsoever, but CJ u r awesome๐Ÿ–’

    ReplyDelete
  14. DEAR CJ, 'I am sorry for u where ๐Ÿ•‡ is concerned '๐Ÿ˜…

    https://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Sixteen-Crucified-Saviors-Christianity/dp/1585090182

    Free in pdf, too, & written in 1876 with almost 400 pages of research to plow thru if interested ๐ŸŽถ

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you CJ for stopping in again and depositing your all-ways precious, elucidating comments. Keeping up with your youtube channel, too. Thank you. Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  16. C. Johnson, I tried to find you on YouTube. What is your YouTube channel called if you don't mind sharing. An thank you for your input on correcting the record. I guess I am not sure how much needs to be said to the record holders, the paper system guys? Do I write letters saying "Hey take note, I am not a U.S. citizen". I have never been one. Any and all of your records that have me listed as one are in error. Any and all "alleged" contracts you think you have were induced through fraud and are voidable and I hereby void them all. Please correct your record to show that I am a state Citizen and have nothing to do with the U.S. Inc. Something like that or does it need to be vastly more detailed? Your input is greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No marriage proposals from me today CJ๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ’“๐ŸŽถ

    ReplyDelete
  18. Great stuff C.Johnson, thank you! Saved and filed๐Ÿ˜Ž I Love it, Go get em!!!
    Much Gratitude, Love and Peace

    ReplyDelete
  19. THANKS SO MUCH CJ for sharing your 2 video above with us here๐ŸŒˆ

    I have fwd the second 5 minutes long one on American state national to interested parties๐ŸŽฅ

    https://youtu.be/qQL1IsLk6wg CJ on American state national


    ReplyDelete
  20. Well I hope the other members of this forum appreciate me asking my questions. We all benefited from C. Johnson's responses. I completely comprehend your discussion C. Johnson. I am not a citizen of anything, anywhere. I see so many people out there trying to get a "state citizen" passport or non-U.S. citizen passport. That is why I used that description for someone that is not part or within the United States. It seems to me that if all "their" alleged contracts were induced through fraud, those alleged contracts are voidable and therefore void if I say they are void. If I could ask you one more question, how do we belligerents get into a common law court to bring a claim for damages against cops, city officials, IRS, state revenue departments and the rest of the defacto farce? How many people are sitting in jail this very moment that just need to know how to get into an Article III/common law court. Is the answer in American Jurisprudence? Is there a template for filing a suit in common law? These are the things we all need to know. If I know who I am and know I am a belligerent or certainly not in "their" jurisdiction, how does giving notice of status change anything? Your description above of "HOW DID YOU GET JURISDICTION OVER ME?" would seem to be the only thing we need to say, over and over, if they drag us into "their" Article I courts. I too wish to thank you for your explanations on the real issues involved in who we are. Others have thanked you C. Johnson, I just wanted to thank you too, and thank you for any other enlightenment you would like to share.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Interesting ๐ŸŽถ

    Found this the other day...

    "Practical Application 
    Section 7203 of the Internal Revenue Code (tax code of the Infernal Revenue Stealers) starts with the words, "Any person required under this title to pay any estimated tax or tax, or required by this title or by regulations made under authority thereof to make a return, keep any records, or supply any information..." So who is a "person required?" This article appeared in the August 1991 issue of The Connector:

    "Patriot, Tom Hauert - charged with five counts of 7203 willful failure to file returns in March 1990 - put the prosecuting U.S. Attorney on the spot in Federal District Court, Chicago. Ill. At a hearing before the court on October 1st, 1990, Tom stated that he did not understand the charges. Tom read from the Internal Revenue Code the first three words of Section 7203, "Any person required." Then he asked, "How is it established in this section that I am one of those persons required?" The judge read and reread that section, and finally admitted that he understood that Tom was asking for the statute that creates the determination of who is required. The judge said, "Mr. Prosecutor, you can provide a copy of that statute, can't you?" At that point the prosecuting attorney started stammering and stuttering, and said he wasn't familiar with that part of the Code, and the judge told him to find someone to help find it. Well, it's now May 1991... and the government has not provided the information. For ten years Tom wrote many letters to the IRS, asking what statute made him liable? Neither the IRS, nor the government attorney has ever told him or shown him the statute that made/makes him liable. Could it be there is none? That's correct, there isn't any statute that makes a citizen within the fifty states liable. That's why Congress said, "Our tax system is based on voluntary self-assessment." So don't gripe about high taxes if you voluntarily assess yourself."

    Most people living in the so-called "USA" automatically take it for granted that they are referents of the term "person required." Tom Hauert didn't. In a criminal case the judge has to ask the accused if he or she understands the charges. Mr. Hauert effectively said, "No. I don't understand the charges because I don't see how they could possibly apply to me. For the charges to apply to me, the prosecution will have to show that I am a "person required."" It so happens that there's nothing in the tax code that establishes that Mr. Hauert is a referent of the term (symbol) "person required." End of court case.

    I don't recommend that anyone conduct their affairs so as to end up in court. Before such a court case the Infernal Revenue Stealers usually send letters. If these letters are appropriately responded to the Infernal Revenue Stealers will soon give up. Because of the quotas their officers have to meet and because there are so many "easy marks" they soon drop their efforts against informed citizens in order to pursue the "easy pickings."

    Mr. Hauert's defense has a drawback. The Infernal Revenue Stealers can "lean" on the judge. If the judge doesn't toe the line he or she can easily be put away on a trumped up tax charge, as happened to a Las Vegas judge a few years ago who was "too easy" on "tax protestors." So the crooked judge's answer to Mr. Hauert's defense is to commit the accused for psychiatric observation - if he can't understand the charges he must be insane. "

    http://www.mind-trek.com/reports/tl50a.htm

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.