Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Monday, February 19, 2018

An Education on the Birth Certificate from Frank O'Collins


From Anna Von Reitz

I am constantly receiving questions about Birth Certificates.  The essence of a BC is that it proves that a live man or woman was born on the actual birth day, as opposed to the "filing date" or "birthdate" which marks the creation of the THING named after you. 

A Birth Certificate does not positively identify you, but it admits that a living being with your name came into this world, touched down, and there is no actual, viable proof of your death--- only a presumption of death based on the fact that the Vital Statistics people haven't heard from you since you left the hospital.  No doubt it is time we all gave them and the Deputy Clerks of the Probate Courts across America a big, fat "Hulloooo!"  

A BC does not function as a valid recording of your Common Law copyright to your own Name and Estate, rather, it is a false claim against your Name and Estate which has to be corrected---- but in a negative way, the proof that it provides does preserve "a" public record of an event which you can prove and invoke by private means and from other public records to reclaim your interest in your Name and estate.  So it is a means you should employ in building your claims. 

What follows was taken directly from the old Ucadia website, which Frank subsequently removed from the internet because unscrupulous people were attempting to piggy-back upon and thwart and misrepresent and misuse Frank's work. This particular section is of so much public benefit I pray he will forgive me for re-printing with full credit given and an injunction to my Readers to honor the man and his work and always give him credit for anything you quote and also be sure to tell anyone you send it to that they are not allowed to change, edit, or amend one word of it.  You may not plagiarize or edit anything that appears here:

7.14 Corruption of Law
Article 325 - Settlement (Birth) Certificate
Canon 3348  (link)
Settlement Certificate, also known as a “Birth Certificate” since the formation of Central Records and Registers in 1836 (6&7Will.4 c.86) is an official document, possessing multiple legal functions and "states" under the central presumption that those against whom such instruments are issued are a form of “property” and bonded servant (slave), to Western-Roman and private Banking interests, regardless of status of family or history.
Canon 3349  (link)
Under Statutes and Policies promulgated from Westminster and other bodies, a Birth Certificate, fulfills multiple and distinct functions and states, depending upon its recognition and activity at hand, including but not limited to:
(i) Certificate of Title to Cestui Que Use of Person being recognition that the State claims ownership by virtue of the Certificate itself and all the information contained on it, therefore proving a Cestui Que Vie Trust in place and that the man or woman or new born to whom the Certificate applies only has “beneficial use” of the name; and
(ii) Certificate of Title to Property being the recognition of the fact of a Birth Certificate being a certificate, that the name is property and therefore the man or woman or new born is now treated as property and no longer as a living man or woman, subject to the Rule of Law; and
(iii) Certificate of Deposit and Bailment (Custody) being the recognition through the terms used to describe the father and mother that a transaction has taken place and the new born is no longer “owned” by the parents but is in the custody of the State, with the new born now a Thing, subject to the Jurisdiction of the Courts, having being registered (enrolled); and
(iv) Certificate of Second Class Citizenship under Cestui Que Use of Person being that the Certificaterecognizes a new born not being a Citizen, but a “second class” citizen not having full control over their body, or mind, or name, or spirit all claimed through the morally repugnant, profane, sacrilegious and deceptive conduct of public officials; and
(v) Certificate of Bondage as Slave being the certificate as recognition of a man or woman or new born as a member of the poor, the paupers, the infants, the idiots and lunatics, the “horned cattle”, the beasts, the creatures, the humans, the dispossessed, the insolvent debtors and criminals and enemies of those who have created wholly mythical religious and legal texts to justify their exclusive positions as masters of a “planet of slaves”.
Canon 3350  (link)
The term Birth is a synonym of the Admiralty term Berth from the late early 1600’s meaning “a fixed address; or position on a ship; or room in which the ship’s company mess resides; or a space for a vessel to moor (settle)”. 
Canon 3351  (link)
In terms of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities:
(i) In 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”. By 1539 (31Hen.8 c.13) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”. Then in 1545 (37Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and
(ii) In 1547 (1Ed.6 c.3) , Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated. The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3&4Ed.6 c.16). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and
(iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. In 1589 (31El c. 7) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and
(iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”. Thus the Apprentiship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the Non-Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and
(v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However from the age of 7 upward the childcould have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and
(vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”. If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and
(vii) In 1667 (19Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England. This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and
(viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and
(ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and
(x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and
(xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve. Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religioninvented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity. The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and
(xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and
(xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and
(xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive. Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”.
(xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”. Thus the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and
(xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and
(xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109), English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Companyof Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company Red Army. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and
(xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefitunless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act). Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and
(xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and
(xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and
(xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws. However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Canon 3352  (link)
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Canon 3353  (link)
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificatewithin present Western Roman Systems:
(i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and
(ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and
(iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.
Canon 3354  (link)
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns:
(i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and
(ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s. However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41).
Canon 3355  (link)
In respect of Birth Certificates clearly being derived and dependent upon the history of acts concerning SettlementCertificates of the Poor and the commercial control of Admiralty:
(i) Any argument, claim, judgment, edict, statement, affidavit that denies the overwhelming prima facie evidence that Birth Certificates are descended from and a variation of Settlement Certificates is therefore irrational, unreasonable and in error and null and void from the beginning; and
(ii) Any public official, or occupant of public office that denies Birth Certificates are derived from SettlementCertificates and the Poor Laws therein is culpable of gross deceptive and misleading conduct.
Canon 3356  (link)
The surrender, return, rejection of a Birth Certificate by definition of the Poor Laws that remain in effect and including the law of Admiralty and Settlement Certificates actually places the individual in greater moral danger, without any sensible advantage:
(i) A man or woman who has perfected their own Will and Testament through the prescribed model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum is able to demonstrate a far superior claim and position than any official or enforcement officer under the Birth Certificate Regime; and
(ii) Under the model of Voluntatem Et Testamentum, the Birth Certificate is irrelevant as all persons are registered within the proper Rolls of the Estate as property of the Estate; and
(iii) It could be reasonably argued that a man or woman who surrenders their Birth Certificate, demonstrates an act of complete stupidity and incompetence and therefore subjects themselves to greater control as wards, idiots and lunatics.
Canon 3357  (link)
Under the limited terms of relief of those who possess Settlement Certificates, the holder of a Birth Certificate in past periods was able, in limited circumstances, to use the Birth Certificate as evidence of a right to maintenance and direction to discharge debts against the Cestui Que Vie accounts, otherwise denied. In other words, the extremely limited circumstances by which a Birth Certificate is converted into a bond by the authorised holder in Cestui Que Use:
(i) Whilst the holder of a Birth Certificate possesses only Cestui Que Use of the Person, they hold sufficient legal authority to endorse the back of a valid and certified copy of the Birth Certificate, thus creating a legitimate Bond; and
(ii) The endorsement on the back of a valid Birth Certificate is always at 90 degrees – (Never at 45 degrees) to the main direction of the writing on the front side of the Certificate. A Birth Certificate never has its face changed by the holder as this renders the instrument defective and useless; and
(iii) The words to be included with the signature and the word Endorsement or Endorsed are “Pay to the holderwithout recourse for all debts, duties, fines and legacies concerning account number (account number being the account listing the debt)”; and
(iv) No amount is ever listed as part of the set-off and effective discharge. If an amount of money is listed, then such an endorsement is void and may be construed as a deliberately false act with deeper consequences; and
(v) The acceptance of such a bond was extremely limited to certain cases in relation to public debts (such as hospitals, taxes and court fines). However, it is unclear in the collapse of any resemblance of law if any such remedy remains permitted by the wholly corporate model of broken government.
Canon 3358  (link)
The existence of a Birth Certificate is prima facie evidence of the existence of one or more Cestui Que Vie Trust. Therefore, any argument, or denial of such fact is gross deceptive and misleading conduct at best, or incompetence and stupidity at worst.
Canon 3359  (link)
The existence of Birth Certificates and the statutes that created them from Settlement Certificates to Admiralty based Birth Certificates is overwhelming and irrefutable evidence of organized and systematic slavery, in complete contradiction to all laws claiming the abolition of slavery and servitude.
Canon 3360  (link)
A fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Certificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents remains the fact that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certificate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affidavit of Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.
Canon 3361  (link)
As Settlement Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being "paupers", the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.
Canon 3362  (link)
As Birth Certificates and their use are a deliberate corruption of all forms of law, philosophy of law and application of law, the system is reprobate, forbidden and never permitted to be revived.
Canon 3363  (link)
The system of Live Borne Records which recognize the full rights of all men and women as equal and higher order beings possessing sacred and immutable rights which can never be abrogated is a superior system to Birth Certificates and can never be compared to the slavery system of Birth Certificates and Settlement Certificates.

 ----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

32 comments:

  1. i have a whole new appreciation for Donald J Trumps The Apprentice

    ReplyDelete
  2. Studied Frank O'Collins' work for several years including donating money to assist his work. It came as a great shock to me that ll his work ha been removed from the internet cutting off my genuine studies into our circumstances.

    It demonstrated the unethical and incredible disgusting audacity of some people who were piggy-backing Frank's work plagiarizing it in an attempt to profit off this remarkable work. Have not been in touch with Frank or his work since it was taken off the internet much to my disappointment. I still have some of the original documents including my numbered Live Birth Record issued to me by Ucadia.

    Thank you for providing even this small amount of material done by Frank. Greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was fortunate to archive quite a bit including all the Canons, and many audios are on Youtube still and I think the majority of Talkshoes are still available might be a couple of hundred hrs possible.

      Delete
    2. UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation is alive and well and currently being run by your's truly in the U.S. Drop the sovereign citizen bull and redeem your membership if you are still interested. I have no tolerance for extremists and anarchists. Feel free to join if you are willing to drop the extreme nonsense.
      http://kerubale-getachew-abegaz-estate.org/application_for_redemption.html

      Delete
  3. Franks research and understanding is second to none and miles ahead, I was fortunate to find the Informers works and Franks not long after, I revisit some of Franks audios and they are so dense with knowledge and understanding I smack my head for not picking up on certain points earlier.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Canon Law, money and the courts - Part 1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQMwcFiXGj0

    Canon Law, money and the courts - Part 2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4kFP2eaIgE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks mike, it is amazing how you pick up certain points at different future rehashes of material...

      Delete
    2. Mike V-
      thanks for youtube links. Do you have a link to the talkshoe site?

      Delete
    3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DruyheOfweg

      another good one

      Delete
    4. Penny thanks I focus on important points and concepts I try not to get lost in all the details where the devil resides.

      http://www.talkshoe.com/talksh/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=90342&cmd=tc

      https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC21A6A7CB01A32E3

      Delete
  5. i am sick and tired of this bullshit. Great prosperity is coming and most of you will fall for it. Most of you will believe that it's a blessing from God. May God have mercy on your souls.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Would putting a link to this page to be used in one of their court cases, or printing out a copy of this page, be considered plagiarism?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No if you give credit to the author and not using for personal gain

      Delete
  7. Man, maybe Lincoln's "civil war" was the beginning of the end in the modern world, but clearly this does indeed go all the way back to Christ and Roman Civil Law...!! It really seems that the Church and the Crown go way back...."bluebloods"!! All they have done throughout history is treat everyone as slaves...Yes, Trump indeed has an almost insurmountable problem that is going to take God's help at some point...!! I never realized how thoroughly entrenched this system is..!! No wonder why that judge told a patriot who won his case that "you will never know all of it"..!! I'd hate to be involved with the CHURCH (the Vatican) when judgement time comes..!! The think we are stupid , because they tricked the masses (press-ganged them) into slavery, but when the time comes, they will truely look like the stupid ones thinking they could get away with all this , and probably shocked when they find out that the Bible really was true this whole time. We believed and they didnt..!! Their own arrogance will be their undoing , even to the point of thinking they are GOD'S above all other Gods...!! Only a criminal mind could conceive of such deception. How many of us would think this way...!! I sure hope it was worth it to them...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, to me it is no surprise at all; the answer to this is also right in the bible. Its called 'having a seared conscience'. It means people who can do all manner of evil and it does not bother them.

      Delete
    2. DC is the second coming of Christ, the State is the new supreme religion and Deity , Rome did not fall overnight it spent centuries transforming from the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire now the system is moving full circle back to just a military empire.
      LOL the area that is now DC was once called Rome , NOT just a coincidence that Jesus is from the Virgin Mary and the birth of DC is from Virgin-ia and Mary-land. 9/11 was right at the 2000 years mark from Jesus birth and was a ritual sacrifice as Jesus was sacrificed, some researcher way before 2001 in a book determined Jesus true birth was on 9/11. We have also entered the age of Aquarius/ water/ sea the new 2000 year cycle.

      ALL civil law is Roman Civil Law and commercial statutory law, all cities have historically served one main function as a center of commerce, the original Roman citizen was pretty much exclusive to attorneys/lawyers they were the original citizens, attorneys and agents are one in the same so all citizens are agents acting in agency or an employee of your principle/sovereign.
      The biggest catch with Roman civil law is the quasi-contract basically benefits given for allegiance, implied contracts AKA invisible contracts that bind , which put you in a trust relationship with the State/Rome your a child needing care/benefits from daddy/trustor. The birth certificate is a big issue, but what benefit did you accept from the State through the State agent Dr that delivered your child at the hospital, realize you did not deliver your own child you needed the help of Caesar, now Caesar has a beneficial interest in your child for without his help your child might not have lived, the term Caesarian Operation can be found in older law dictionaries and essentially it is any operation where the DR helped deliver your child "ANY" not the modern definition, so a benefit was given and there was actually a relinquishment of property rights in that child and in cases where the mother died her property would pass through the child to the state.

      Delete
    3. Sorry should qualify what I meant by "ANY" as in any operation NOT what you think in medical terms as a C-Section But any work performed by a State agent in the benefit given in assisting in the birth of your child, operation can be legally construed to be any type of work performed either by the Dr or staff all of which are agents qualified by the State. Also when the Dr or staff fills out the forms is this a medical operation or an operation in law simply put a basic procedure, we are talking legal-ease here and how they can manipulate what you believe to be true.
      Also Child = an "issue" as in a bond is issued and considered born into a legal world, I've seen old state statute which made a clear distinction between a Legal Child and a Lawful Descendant so which is noticed by a Birth certificate and regardless was your natural child a product of a Caesarian Operation which an allegiance is due to Caesar ?
      This is Civil Law they can presume whatever they want if you don't understand it makes no different the subject is expected to do what it is told, Equal Civil Rights can mean ZERO rights if everyone also has ZERO.

      Delete
  8. The foundling child is a pauper being solely dependent on action taken on its behalf. Sign by the X.

    ReplyDelete
  9. wow. I think I am gonna be sick after reading this! The depth and breadth is shocking. What kind of mind creates this? It's so hard for me to function normally when I am of two minds...day to day living with everyone else who have no knowledge or want any...and then here in these forums, where I see truth and wish it was not. When you have been shown the facts you can never again say you didn't know and therefore are responsible for what you know. The internal struggle to define your life as you move forward knowing all this is hard to define...taking action scares me to death, if I don't do it correctly, I get eaten by the wolves.So I am in limbo...my ship is floating with a dead engine. I try to compile a step by step plan but I read the comments and find little tips and BIG tips from some of these very smart and experienced contributors and it scares me even more that I can't just follow udge Anna's articles as they are presented because all the info isn't there and some of these tips are critical for success! Especially with the IRS and employers. This all needs to be spelled out exactly in all its detail so no one goes to jail while trying to exit from the matrix!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doonstr - while we aren't expert researchers, ok, our poking around on how we became cargo, lost at sea, etc came from Benjamin Disraeli under UKQ Victoria era. Perhaps someone knows more & will share. Yes, you ask, 'what kind of mind creates this', - one which hates our freedoms, nor can they exist w/o destroying, controlling such freedoms. Without their enslavement of others, they have no job & seemingly, no other purpose great enough. Thanks.

      Delete
    2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DruyheOfweg

      Delete
  10. Doonstr please consider the "source" of your fears and the "sources" you are choosing to allow and feed to/add to your fears to give them any validity in YOUR MIND'S Story you are creating right now. Only YOU can choose too SEE, be and do what is True and Right for You NOW that you Know this Truth to BE True and factual. There is NO WRONG WAY to simply record or publish YOUR Living status for and on the land record, in your own words.
    Those that choose to think, behave, and act belligerently AGAINST false ACTORS, Playing their assumed ROLES in this false story are the ones that choose to learn lessons the HARD WAY(lashing out in ANGER and FEAR) and that IS THEIR CHOICE. Learn FROM THEM and CHOOSE to SEE How they THINK and BEHAVE and CHOOSE NOT TO BE OR DO THE SAME and you WILL be choosing peaceful, responsible thoughts and behaviors that WILL have the intended results you desire. There is NO LAW that claims you are not allowed to SAY NO and correct any assumptions or presumptions otherwise that are causing you harm. Choosing to SEE these false programmed FEARS for what they are and accepting, acknowledging them for EVER giving them ANY validity in your mind IS your FIRST Responsibility to Freeing yourself of this deceitful programming "System" of BONDAGE and no one can do this for you, but you. See this clearly first and foremost and all else will fall into place with much more clarity, and confidence to move forward and live the life you truly intend to live.
    For me, I see this as one big huge lesson from our Creator to Choose a different path. Learn from our past mistakes that we made unconsciously, mindlessly and NOW make mindful, intentional choices and decisions that Serve our higher purposes and add to the greater good of ALL Now. Open your Heart and Mind and SEE what YOU need specifically to Learn from YOUR own past thoughts, choices and experiences to Truly Learn the valuable lessons they were intended to BE for you. That IS the only way to get "unstuck" from where you find yourself NOW, and to be able to move freely forward in a more enlightened path intended for you.
    Much Love & Peace

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow this is some great research. All this Canon law basically stating that people who were born on the land which the state or king or church claimed to own, automatically became the property of said owner. They claim them as citizens, or second-class citizens, in the same category as cattle or sheep.
    But let's take a look at the 14th amendment. This is the supposed amendment that gave freedom to slaves after the civil war. It begins by saying, "All persons BORN or NATURALIZED in the United States of America are CITIZENS of the United States of America". So knowing that we believe that we understand the meaning of words that we have used our entire lives, I once looked up in I believe Bouviers Law dictionary the meaning of the word CITIZEN. There were several, but the last and oldest, which I'm sure is the one used in this old Canon law is, "One who owes an ALLEGIANCE to a SOVEREIGN STATE". Well since the time we were all small children they have taught us to put our hand on our heart and declare "I pledge ALLEGIANCE.." So again, knowing that probably not 1 in 100,000 thousand (or more) Americans could give tell you the definition of the word allegiance, I looked that up as well. It said " A DEBT owed by a FEUDAL SERF to a VASSAL LORD". Pretty much the same thought process as used in all this canon law.
    So what they were basically stating in the 14th amendment is because your mother was in a geographical location they call the United States when you came out of her womb, that you were automatically their DEBTOR, OR SLAVE. How does this differ from any of these canon laws written back in the 14, 15, or 16th centuries? If my dog has puppies in my backyard, well yes I suppose that those are now my puppies, at least they are now my responsibility. But these people who have become so adulterated and demented in their minds because of the positions of power and wealth they had, believed human beings to be no more than beasts. BTW, the 14th amendment was NEVER Lawfully ratified by the 2/3 rds vote required. Maybe bc folks back then still had an understanding of the meaning of the words being used to enslave them. We however, have been so dumbed down by their education system, that we just "think" we "know" what we "think" we "know". Kind of like "having a FORM of Godliness, but denying the power thereof.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Clarification request on Canon 3357
    "(ii) The endorsement on the back of a valid Birth Certificate is always at 90 degrees – (Never at 45 degrees) to the main direction of the writing on the front side of the Certificate. A Birth Certificate never has its face changed by the holder as this renders the instrument defective and useless; and '
    In surrendering authenticated Birth Certificates to Mnuchin writing at a 45 degree angle was instructed. Did we use an incorrect angle, rather than a 90 degree angle? Angles apparently have their own language. Any contributions are welcome. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, E.T. thank you! Perfectly stated and Your ending is the most valuable, powerful piece for all to choose and deeply consider!!
    Much Love & Peace

    ReplyDelete
  14. Frank is an info machine. I'll bet he has a VERY comfortable chair.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The KJV in Genesis 2 confirms that if Adam and Eve eat of the forbidden tree they will, in the eyes of God, have died or also known as become a "Person". Deuteronomy 1:17 calls on those in judgement to not respect "persons" and in the eyes of the Lord to be a Person is to be a sinner, so we need to administrate the Office of Person and not fall into the trap of being the person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://truth-now.net/if-a-person-is-a-legal-entity-whats-your-real-identity/

      you may find that site interesting. wycliffe was a common lawyer, had a bible translation too.

      "excellence of the common law" mentions him briefly IIRC. (see below)

      kjv came later. that site claims kjv opened up the doorway to "persons" by allowing them, i.e. we should treat them as "equals" by not showing "favouritism" but not yet mandating their use.

      from EOTCL it depends which king, and even which king james, whether they were:

      1) only king because people let them be (can be seen as common law viewpoint)
      2) only king because pope/vatican lets them be (civil law viewpoint)
      3) wannted independence from pope/vatican, but wants to do own civil law above common law (napoleon/hitler/stalin viewpoint perhaps. roman civil law, but want to be emperor for own purposes, without rome)

      so, the king james during that kjv time period i believe was 3), i.e. he was not fond of rome having power over england, but he still wanted "roman civil law" for his own purposes. that would possibly explain the switcheroo, assuming it was deliberate.

      Delete
    2. my understanding is it "by their fruits ye will know them" is along the same lines.

      i.e. ignore people's titles/personas/masks/corporations/etc ...instead, see what they actually do, the actual results.

      although, of course, "the ends justifies the means" does not justify "be satanic on purpose to make god appear" as some claim various groups try to do, as if they can "speed up the inevitable process". i believe that is "satanic" whatever one's "intentions" are.

      Delete
  16. There is no requirement in any statute, regulation or rule for any 'AMERICAN STATE NATIONAL" to use a birth certificate. Nor is it required that any 'AMERICAN STATE NATIONAL' apply for or use SS#. Everything statute, code, rule or regulation is only applicable by signature on a form, with applicant claiming to be U.S. Citizen. please take note of this https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6724 and https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1.pdf and why can't you use the following http://www.ittc.ku.edu/bioinformatics/BIBM09/P_1Form.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  17. HELLO Everyone, I Have been researching this for over 15 years now. Here is my white Paper and research if anyone is interested. Here is the link. Please let me know what you think.
    https://mega.nz/#!a00DALQA!j3D7G7xeVKdOqn4DYgIICdwq6eEoJUmV7YCchMotXgg

    ReplyDelete
  18. The Registration Laws in the Colonies of Massachusetts Bay and New Plymouth - from 1639

    https://archive.org/stream/jstor-2276444/2276444#page/n1/mode/2up

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
Do not comment using the handle "Anonymous". Your comment will be deleted.