April 22, 2023 Crime and Guns, News and Opinions
Should the actions of a handful of criminals be used as an excuse to take away the rights of millions of innocent people? Any reasonable person would say no, but when it comes to gun related violence the standards of logic tend to go out the window. There are many government officials that view each major shooting as a gift – They believe that tragedies are political capital, a tool for leveraging away our freedoms.
In many cases of mass murder in the US the first inclination of the corporate media and the political left has been to rush to conclusions. They immediately blame conservative political motivations for the attacks, while also blaming our 2nd Amendment rights in general. If the shooter turns out to be anti-conservative or doesn’t fit the racial mold, they simply stop reporting the story. The agenda is obvious – To paint conservative men as a dangerous monolith plaguing the rest of society.
Why do they pursue this particular narrative, though?
Perhaps because, statistically speaking, conservative (and libertarian) men are the predominant group keeping authoritarians at bay. The government attacks us because they are afraid of us, and they are afraid of us for a reason. It’s not about what we are doing, it’s about what we could do if they cross the line into accelerated tyranny, and this is on the verge of happening.
We came within a razor’s edge of war during the covid mandates. If Biden had got what he wanted with his vaccine passport executive order, the country would have erupted into conflict. Many Americans have no clue how close we were. Understand that no country, including the US, is immune to rebellion, and such events tend to escalate quickly.
Leftists often envision their own rebellion as a sort of modern French Revolution in which mobs march the streets and rule the day as heads roll in the town square. They believe their “righteousness” is a shield from harm. But this kind of mob intimidation only works within societies that still respect the rule of law. Leftist insurgencies use a nation’s freedoms and laws against them by saying “You can’t touch us because your principles prevent you…”
US patriots have no such delusions. We know that when it comes to corrupt governments, principles and the rule of law go out the window very quickly if their power is legitimately threatened. Leftists can exploit mob actions, invade government buildings and burn cities to the ground because the government ALLOWS them to. When we do the same thing? Well…how many years now have we heard the word “insurrection” over a single protest on January 6th 2021?
The strategies of the leftists cannot be our strategies because government protections apply to them and not to us. This double standard is leaving constitutional Americans with few options, and the hypocrisy is getting worse by the day. As I write this, Joe Biden is calling for an “assault weapons” ban over a shooting perpetrated by a transgender lunatic acting on her political motivations. We used to call that terrorism. Instead, the White House is throwing their full support behind trans activist movements and blaming firearms for the deaths instead of the shooter’s twisted beliefs.
Numerous mass murder events have been perpetrated by people indoctrinated into the leftist fold. I would usually be the first to look at the psychological triggers for a shooter, rather than pure political motivation. But, more and more, it appears that the political left is creating the very monsters we now see targeting specific groups. And in each scenario, the media argues that these tragedies were STILL caused by conservative policies. For example:
1) On November 21st 2021, Darrell Brooks jumped into his SUV and deliberately drove it through a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, killing six and injuring 60 other people, including children and the elderly. He is cited on numerous social media posts supporting BLM related arguments and anti-white arguments. Some BLM activists took to social media to defend Brooks’ actions, and suggested that his act of mass murder was the “beginning of a revolution.”
At first, the media denied any race related motives or political motives for the attack. When Brooks’ comments were made public, they went silent. Suddenly, no one in the media was talking about the Waukesha Massacre anymore, and those that did talk about it argued that it was actually the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse (a young man who acted in self defense against an attacking mob) that justified the actions of Brooks.
2) On November 19th 2022, Anderson Aldrich entered a gay club in Colorado Springs called ‘Club Q’ and opened fire, killing 5 and injuring dozens of others. The immediate response by the media and the political left was to accuse conservatives of encouraging the crime and encouraging “hatred against the LGBT community.” Yet, when details finally emerged it became clear that the shooter identified as “non-binary” and had been a regular visitor to the club.
Once again, the media went utterly silent and the deaths at Club Q disappeared from the radar. When a mass murder event is not useful for leftists to push their agenda, they no longer care.
3) Then there was the recent mass shooting in Nashville at The Covenant school, a private Christian institution. Audrey Hale, a biological female trans activist, entered the school with a Keltec rifle that fires pistol rounds and killed 6 people, including 3 children. Hale reportedly left behind a “manifesto” which authorities have yet to release (Gee, I wonder why?), but going by her social media activity it is likely that she was politically motivated by Tennessee’s legislation against gender bending surgeries for children as well as bans against sexualized drag shows for minors.
Leftists and the media have aggressively tried to spin Hale’s attack as a gun control issue rather than what it is – Political terrorism.
4) Finally, we have the attack in Louisville, Kentucky at Old National Bank by a man named Connor Sturgeon, an employee of the bank that was about to be laid off who killed five colleagues while livestreaming the incident. Sturgeon has the look that the media likes (tall, young white man) but not the proper politics. Sturgeon’s social media history including his Reddit posts indicate he was a rabid leftist.
Using the pronouns He/Him, Sturgeon posted numerous anti-Trump and anti-NRA memes and rants, as well as pro-covid lockdown comments. There has in fact been a widespread effort by many platforms to scrub his comments from their pages as quickly as possible. In one group chat message, Sturgeon reportedly sent photos that included the statement “They won’t listen to words or protests, let’s see if they hear this…”
Media discussion on the Old National Bank shooting evaporated within a couple days, the fastest I think I have ever seen a story get buried. I could list may other ideologically inclined attacks by verified leftists, but I think you get the idea. Are there shooters with anti-leftist views? A few, but they don’t receive protection from the media and the government like leftist attackers do.
Beyond the issue of directed attacks there is also the issue of overall violence in America. The vast majority of violent crime in the US occurs in Democrat run cities. This is a fact. Data shows that 27 of the top 30 most violent cities in America are run by Democrat governments, including the cities with the most homicides. Fourteen of those cities also have Soros-backed prosecutors. This trend has been ongoing for years.
The problem is not guns, nor is it conservatives. Conservative towns are some of the safest places in America for the exact reason that there are guns everywhere in the hands of law abiding citizens. What the stats show is a trend that directly relates to a particular ideology – The leftist ideology (and by extension Globalism). Without leftists and leftist policies crime would plummet in the US. The more leftist extremism and globalism spreads the worse things get from generation to generation.
The inevitable outcome is war.
To be sure, there are peaceful means to delay conflict, such as separation or “national divorce.” This is already happening. Millions of Americans tired of leftist policies, taxes, mandates, bureaucracy, crime and cultism have left blue cities and blue states, and many millions more who have the means will leave in the near future.
There will come a point, however, when leftists and establishment elites will try to stop this separation from continuing. If they let people leave they then have to admit their ideology is failing, and that’s not an option for them. They will extort Americans into the society THEY want. History shows us that when a population is disarmed the worst atrocities unfold. The Soviet purge of millions of citizens through gun confiscation and then food confiscation is just one example that people should study before joining any anti-gun bandwagon.
One can easily see where this is going. The establishment will try to use force to make us submit to their system and we will not let them. That’s when the shooting starts. If we consider the problem from this perspective it makes perfect sense that these people are rabidly chasing after gun bans today. They know a war is about to happen because they know they are about to start one. And, they know there is a chance they will lose the fight should Americans remain armed. They’re afraid for a reason; they’re afraid of losing.
Jim Stone seems to think that the American people will not act promptly enoughReplyDelete
http://184.108.40.206/318.html through http://www.voterig.com/iran6.html are his most recent.
Having the State Militias in place would be reassuring. We don't.
I wonder whether the State of Arizona has the authority to revitalize the Arizona Militia (caps?) . Wrong jurisdiction?
Also, the apparent claim of this article
needs to be answered.
I am not sure what the term "common-law right of self-defense" means.
I have read some of Vieira's writings but not yet his big book on the Militia nor his big one on money.
The war isn't coming . . . its already here, and the casualties are stacking up on one side only . . . ours. It is PAST TIME to do something about it, if we have any hope of survival.ReplyDelete
We may not know who is hiding behind the puppets committing genocide. However, we do know its being carried out by the corporations.
Let's not wait until they finish exterminating us, or wait forever while the Pope stalls and the Federation continues to write letters "wishing" for the evil to stop.
The current plan of action isn't fixing the half of a million people a day are becoming deathly sick and dying rapidly. It isn't just the jabbed who are included in the body count now. The the dirty little secret that no one dares to utter is that we've all been infected by shedding.
Waiting for the lone efforts of the Federation isn't going to resolve the issues of supply-chain shortages, because of all the people who can't or won't work. We DON'T have forever to wait with more hopium, because our lives are being cut-short by this global criminal network.
I propose at least 3 things to turn the tide of this war against mankind:
1) Immediately boycott the major corporations. Eventually, they may be involuntarily liquidated, but don't count your life on that hopium.
It may be naive to think that withholding our money will make a difference -- but, our choice to abandon criminals does make a moral difference.
2) Get busy to make it ourselves. Whatever is lacking because of fake or real supply-chain shortages, we need to figure out how to supply it to our own households, and to our communities.
Most of the crappy from China products we have been buying, we can do without. What is really needed are things like whole-nutritious foods, grown without any pesticides. We need people who can immediately start purifying our water supply, air and remove the industrial & nuclear wastes out of our soil. We need people who can build gas-free cars. We need healers. We need people to grow biodynamic organic cotton and mass produce simple garments that energize and cloth us. We need the basics to maintain life. Let's stop relying on the corporations to supply us, and start supplying ourselves!!!
3) Since the our criminal captors operate globally, there is no way to escape from them.
Currently, all major corporations are owned by just 2 major corporations that are dictating the Great Reset ideology to all the corporations. So, the immense harm being done can only stop by removing the corporations.
Some CEOs saw the "hand-writing on the wall" and smartly stepped down. We must force all of them to "step-down".
It is clear from Revelations 18:9 - 11, that soon no one will buy their merchandise. How that judgment comes on the merchants and kings of the earth is not spelled out in Scripture. But, since it is certain to come to pass soon, because we are at the brink of extinction, then, let's help make it so.
Get together with your assemblies and issue letters to your local Diocese demanding that they return to D.C., and get out of your counties within the next 30 days, or their buildings will be confiscated. Do the same to all of the pharmaceutical companies, medical doctors, grocers, county courthouses, bar attorneys, sheriff and especially local police who have been infiltrated by Nazi agents, county agencies such as mosquito control, code enforcement, zoning, property appraiser, et. al.
At the end of 30 days, if they remain, we systemically walk in, together with a hired armed security forces, arrest them and confiscate the buildings, changing the locks.
Consult the Declaration of Independence for all the authority we need to carry out this Operation Save Mankind. We can't wait for our turn to be brutalized, our home and life savings unlawfully, illegally confiscated, and die at the hands of criminals. We must devise a solid plan of immediate action, and stop waiting for the Federation's "wishes" to come true.
The whole shedding farce is just that. A farce. It is a false tale. A red herring. A distraction from the fact that the earth, air, water, pharmaceuticals and food supply have already been contaminated by GMO/nano tech.Delete
I work in the health care industry. I can verify that vaccine shedding is a reality, both for humans and animals.Delete
The fact that vaccines shed is why your vet may be honest enough to instruct you not to allow your puppy that is "under-vaccinated" to walk where others dogs urinate and defecate. However, this is true no matter the age of your dog, when they walk in the vicinity where another dog has that recently vaccinated.Delete
For example, another dog who has recently been vaccinated for leptospirosis can infect other dogs or your puppy who walks, sniffs, where the vaccinated dog has recently urinated or defecated. Certain Canine diseases such as Rabies and Leptospirosis are zoonotic, so when your puppy then licks your face or shares your bed or you clean up after a potty mistake, you can also be infected.
Not all Canine diseases infect humans.
It works in the reverse too, so if you are infected with Rabies, you can shed it to your dog. I have witnessed over the course of the pandemic, young, healthy dogs being infected with covid-like adverse symptoms after their owners were vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines, and subsequently became ill and died within a short time.Delete
Vaccines do shed. We have been lied to about vaccines -- they are dangerous and potentially lethal, and they do not protect against any disease. There is never a good reason to get vaccinated -- EVER!
I guess the author has never researched false flags or The Hegelian Dialect, huh? All by design.ReplyDelete
Or he is goading people into fighting one another. Don't overlook that possibility.Delete
I say again. BS on the shedding. You cannot verify this and are full of shit if you say you can. I don't care if you're a vet or a doctor. That is just a theory. To say you have proof if shedding and can verify it because you are a vet is neither proof nor scientific. You get a fail.ReplyDelete
All the food supply has been contaminated with GMO's. This includes pet/animal feed. GMO's interact with 5G EM radiation. This is what you are confusing with shedding. To actually prove what you are saying about shedding would take real controlled studies that most certainly have not taken place. Saying you're a vet and can verify shedding is just hearsay. That's not a scientific conclusion. That's just your opinion/belief.Delete
And another oneReplyDelete
Jack of all trades
who would have thunk it
M-CAM INTERNATIONAL - HERITABLE INTERNATIONAL TRUST
He's been on the international stage and payroll for some time now