Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

The Other Side of The Law

By Anna Von Reitz

There has to be hard, logical, provable evidence present to back a conviction. 

People are tried in courts of law, not in the tabloids. 

Responsible members of society stand for these and other basic principles that help to guarantee justice for everyone. 

We do not marginalize actual rape victims by calling groping without penetration "rape". 

We don't hold witnesses to real crimes guiltless when they fail to report. 

People who don't report crimes at the time they happen are accomplices to them. 

Anyone who admits to willingly and repeatedly going to ten rape parties is either a willing participant or an accomplice -- and either way, I in no way, shape or form consider such people "victims". 

I consider them accomplice criminals and perverters of justice who grossly failed their most basic social responsibility to report crime--if any crime actually exists.  And if it doesn't, what are we wasting time for? 

These women disgust me and I would not entertain any complaints from them in my Court for more than ten minutes.  Tell that to Chuck Schumer. 

These irresponsible women either (a) stood by and let other women be date raped and gang raped and otherwise abused and said and did nothing to prevent it or (b) nothing actually happened amounting to a crime or non-consensual under age sex, in which case they are doing nothing but telling Big, Fat, Grossly Irresponsible Lies. 

Take your pick. 

I would have them and their lawyers for breakfast and Chuck and Diane for afternoon lunch in my courtroom. They'd all get a lecture they would not likely forget.  And this nonsense would end right smart quick. 

Send me to Washington and see how fast all this bleeding heart nonsense lasts and how many of these actual criminals get moddle-coddled as "victims".  

I will take their lawyers to task and rub all their noses in actual crimes and show them what actual rape looks like and when I am done I will kick these sorry excuses so hard to the curb they might for once in their lives have actual bruises. 

Wah-wah-wah-wah and a wah-wah to all these useless, mindless, self-absorbed irresponsible "victims" who either (a) didn't care enough about themselves or anyone else to report the crimes 30 years ago or (b) are just callously making up politically motivated hokum to harm a good man who doesn't share their political ideology and his wife and his family. 

I think we DO need to get to the bottom of this.  REALLY get to the bottom of it.  As a nation we owe it to ourselves to prosecute these women for failure to report -- because if there is anything to it, they stood by and let a lot of innocent girls suffer, and if there isn't anything to it, they are guilty of libel and slander and false accusations and should be brought to task for that, too, 

Hard?  You bet I am. All my logic circuits still function.  Too bad that the members of the Territorial United States Congress can't say the same. 


See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. I agree whole heartedly. Since this was being tried in the tabloids, it should be tried in the courts and be publicly witnessed by the tabloids. It sure smells fishy, but I don't have any facts. It appears there is no evidence other than a politically motivated manouvre and why this so called government hasn't put a lid on it for what it is gives rise to the child-like maturity it owns. I think Chuck and Dianne should be on the warrants as well as these so-called victims for complicit actions.

    1. Dan, what do you think of Kavanaugh bringing a defamation of character law suit against Blasey? Wouldnt that serve to set a precedence to curtail this kind of crap being done by some of these women? And wouldn't it also serve to force those who lie, to prove their case in courts?
      Might give those who lie, second thoughts before stirring up this kind of stuff.
      You can't unring a bell, and as he said his life is permanently scarred now. That spells ''defamation' for sure.
      Im just trying to bring forth some way to put a stop to all such frivolity.



  3. This is one of the main problems with our judicial system....All of sudden, all it takes when it comes to sexual abuse these days is a mere "accusation" that some thing occurred, and the person's life is changed it doesn t matter if what Dr Ford said is true or not...his reputation will never be the same....!! There needs to be a law , ordering any criminal court that if anyone....a victim, the police, or anyone else charges someone with a crime, the courts "MUST" automatically be ordered to file a mandatory "counterclaim" for the defendant without even asking the defendant, except to the extent that he may alter or given the opportunity to make up his own a matter of Equity and fairness , so both parties have to answer to their claims or face jail time also...!! No more just charging just one defendant and trying to prove a negative, while the accussing party gets a free pass without criminal liability being involved...!! The defendant shouldn't have to know enough about law to know that a mandatory counterclaim is absolutely necessary to provide equal justice under the law to both parties...
    I have yet to see the doctrine of "clean hands" and "good faith" that the courts are so proud to point out they have...!! How can you have "clean hands" and "good faith" while at the same time promoting the insidious doctrine of "silent judicial notice" behind the defendants back...!! Those two doctrines are mutually exclusive...!! Simply said , the justice system has abandoned the "Rule of Law" in exchange of political correctness....and unjust enrichment at someone's else's expense...!! With no remorse for the accused and no "liability" for anyone involved for being part of a lynch mob that finds out later the defendant wasn't guilty of the crime after doing 27 years in jail...then have the courts audacity to simply say "opps" we are really sorry for taking half your life away, but it happens..You have the right to bring a "civil suit" against the city at your expense of course but as you know most of us have immunity from prosecution and a civil suit will take time and more money....!! When what they should do on their own is reimburse him immediately for pain and suffering for millions...!!

    If there is one good thing that came out on this Kavanaugh hearing is that he finally got to witness first hand his role in contributing to a system based on fraud and deception....maybe he will start to realize what he has done to other people's lives who never had even a victim other than the STATE..!! How many people's lives have been ruined over a small bag of coke or meth......its sick...!! The police come off as if your the biggest our society , but completely ignore any claim of "fraud" made by someone who may have lost his whole lives savings by a con man....!! That's civil sir..!! Thanks Mr nice police officer for all your help....!!
    There is no way of returning to a lawful court system...It has to be totally scraped and start completely over, with a new and updated constitution, clearing up points in it that are totally weak in their explanation, like the amendment the states.." no one can interfere from people contracting with each other"..!!

    That is intentionally should read.." no one can interfere with contracts, unless they are unconscionable, with intentional deceit written into the contract, which is a felony of the highest degree with no statue of limitations for being charged once it is discovered...!! Now I'm not even an attorney and I wrote up a better worded amendment than supposedly the best legal minds at that time...!! Pretty sad , dont you think....and this time the people themselves will have to either vote on it or tell them to go back to the drawing room and get it right..!!

    1. Clue, Ford claimed that right after the incident she called her friends on her cell phone. There were no cell phones at that time.

  4. Right on.
    This is how the left works.
    If the left politicians were actually put to task like this, when entering politic life with the same standards, there would likely be far fewer democrat/socialists in office.

    Perhaps each member of congress especially the left's backgrounds be evalauted.

  5. Who needs evidence these days? Mere accusations carry the day as proven by 9-11 and many other assorted lies sanctioned by the US government! If a man spoke as directly and honestly as you did, Anna, he'd be attacked as a chauvinist pig and a mysogenist! Wonderful article from a REAL WOMAN!

  6. Hearsay evidence is the Elephant in the room. All Reserve bank Nations are insisting on hearsay evidence as part of the implementation of the Unidroit Treaty which is all coming under the Holy See.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.