By Anna Von Reitz
We have recently received correspondence from numerous parties concerning admissions of the facts concerning the nature of Donald Trump's "Presidency" of the United States of America, Inc -- a British Territorial Corporation, and alleging various authorities for the "military" based on the idea that "the military came first" and was active in 1775.
We have a number of observations and objections to relay concerning these public announcements.
First, we agree and know that Donald Trump is still "President" of the United States of America, Incorporated, also known as the USA, Inc. or otherwise indicated by the acronym USA.
As the USA is a foreign and private corporation, we have nothing to say, other than to note that this is the kind of corporate "presidency" Donald Trump holds, and that this does not imply that he or Joe Biden, who has similarly functioned as the "President" of a foreign corporation, is The President nor occupying the Presidential Office owed to the American Government and People.
One can be the "President" of a foreign corporation or the "President" of a domestic corporation, or, as in our case, President of an unincorporated domestic company.
Suffice it to say that Donald Trump and Joseph Biden have both functioned as the "Presidents" of foreign corporations named after The United States of America and The United States, respectively, and that these corporations have at least claimed or implied that they are the Successors to Contract inherited from two of our original Federal Government Subcontractors.
Those service contracts are The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States, respectively, though each of these "Presidents" have erroneously claimed to have the power to suspend their own service contracts and to have various empowerments never vouchsafed to their corporations.
We say that they either have a contract and must perform upon it, or they don't have a contract, and are merely renegade foreign corporations operating on our shores with no further right to be here nor any purpose or authority related to us.
Which condition is true can best be judged by their adherence to their historical contracts, including their respect for the limitations that those venerable agreements established.
Second, we have observed that, to our knowledge, no "military" is present nor has there been any military here since 1861, with the possible exception of the U.S. Navy.
This is because our military was unlawfully converted into mercenary service by Abraham Lincoln, and has operated as a commercial mercenary service employed by foreign corporations ever since.
This has also resulted in all "wars" declared or undeclared since 1861 being defined as Mercenary Conflicts, instead.
There is no evidence that "our" military was ever lawfully converted back into a national military service.
The current paymaster is a British Municipal Corporation doing business as SERCO, INC., and it may be assumed that this is the organization responsible for contracting out the services of what merely appears to be our national military.
So, under conditions of fraud, substitution, and deceit, the only "military" our country has, is vested in the unincorporated Assembly Militias. Neither the so-called "National Guard, Inc." nor the Armed Forces run by the US, INC. or the USA, INC., or their associated franchises are military forces.
They are mercenary forces run by corporations, not the national government.
The U.S. Navy may be properly organized to serve as part of the national military of Puerto Rico, a British Commonwealth nation. We are not privy to the necessary information needed to resolve this question. If so, it would be the only organized military entity with any direct connection to our national government, and that would be in service in the United States Territories and Possessions.
This circumstance is evidenced by the nature of the "Presidencies", the identity of the Paymaster, the effort recently made by the U.S. Navy to deputize all the other branches of the various services, and the fact that these "Presidents" such as George H.W. Bush and these "Generals" such as Norman Schwarzkopf, have accepted knighthoods from the British Monarchy, even though this is prohibited to any Officer or Official of the American Government.
Finally, we object to any suppositions, such as those recently evidenced by Larry Martin, to the effect that the "military came first":
In fact, the military derived expressly from the people who populated this country for more than 165 years prior to the onset of the military effort that began in 1775, and the military organization arose from and was populated by the people of this country.
The word "people" is a synonym for "militia" and it was our militia functioning as a national military that won the day and established this country.
This country was not established via the efforts of any bought and paid for professional standing army of foreign mercenaries.
Our people acting as our national military won this country by force of arms, fair and square. There were volunteers, like LaFayette, who fought by our sides, but we did not hire any mercenaries nor did we allow our own people to act as mercenaries for hire.
The people giving rise to the military are the ultimate owners and this is reflected in our reasonable and customary demand that our military, including any military-for-hire, serves and takes its direction from us, and not from a foreign corporation or its "President" operating a commercial mercenary force "in our names".
This is just another example of British Substitution Fraud against their American Employers, another example of unlawful conversion resulting in Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of their Service Contracts, another example of the British Monarchs and Roman Popes acting in collusion and mutual self-interest to bilk the people and obtain unlawful and illegal coercive powers that were never granted to them by our American Government.
We note that the Brits maintain their silence in our presence, but the Officers of the Holy Roman Empire are very familiar with the existence of the original Federal Constitution issued in 1787 to our Confederation, and resulting in the Federal Republic being organized.
We are not "talking through our hats" about any of this; there are many foreign governments including the HRE and the governments of Russia, Morocco, Iran and others worldwide, that know our history and know who we are.
We maintain that the people of this country are the owners of this country and no attempt to "redefine" the American people as British Territorial U.S. Citizens via undisclosed and unconscionable "birth registrations" will suffice to vitiate our claims.
More British Bunko is not the answer. The answer is for our British Territorial Employees to get back in step and for the mercenary forces to be lawfully converted back into national military forces.
And as for these various "Presidents" of foreign corporations named after The United States and The United States of America, it's time for them to come home and face actual public elections.
We note, in passing, that certain officers have recently created a new corporation calling itself the "American Government, Incorporated" --- apparently, a new twist on their old game of impersonating their targeted victims; we, however, are the actual American Government, and we are not amenable to being impersonated or substituted.
The delegated powers that we entrusted to our federal subcontractors are limited powers; they don't include any "emergency powers" nor do they grant "war powers" to our foreign subcontractors to wage war in our names, nor do they include any provision allowing any "Commander in Chief" to suspend the Constitution under which he is obligated to operate.
This should be immediately apparent to anyone with even a cursory familiarity with our Constitutions.
We suspect that these foreign Subcontractors have gotten away with claiming to have extra non-enumerated emergency powers, war powers, and even the ability to suspend the Constitutions, for lack of public objection from our American Government -- so here it is--- Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agents:
We, the American Government -- unincorporated, object to the presumptions of our foreign federal Subcontractors pretending to have additional non-enumerated powers, such as Emergency Powers, War Powers, and the ability to suspend both the Constitutions and such basic principles of law as Habeas Corpus. We insist that our erstwhile employees, including any mercenaries hired "for" us in our purported absence, resume their customary duties, including their duty to maintain our collective borders, and we otherwise demand that they observe the limitations of their contracts.
The military did not come first; but even if it had, our military is vested in our State Assembly Militias.
All fifty State Assemblies are populated and now in Session.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 6th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
