By Anna Von Reitz
For starters, legal titles are foreign to America. They simply are not part of our system at all.
Legal titles come into the lives of Americans when a man or woman signs the dotted line and joins the U.S. Military. They knowingly or unknowingly, form a contract for service with the British Territorial Government and accept the foreign status of a U.S. Citizen. This British Territorial Citizen cannot own land in this country and is technically a subject of the Queen for the duration of their Tour of Duty.
Not only does our own sovereignty preclude U.S. Citizens from owning land in this country, but the British System that they are entering "voluntarily" when they enroll in the military service, doesn't allow them to own land at all.
In the British System all land belongs to the Queen and is part of the National Trust. Brits only receive a "privilege" from the Queen called a "title" that allows them the right to live on and develop a parcel of land as a tenant living on real ("real" is a synonym for "royal") estate, so long as they pay the Queen's property taxes, obey all regulations, and generally kow-tow to the Queen.
This is exactly what the rest of us fought The War of Independence to be rid of.
We, Americans, own our land and soil by survey (metes and bounds, landmarks, cornerstones) and by either land grant or United States Patent.
We don't accept land "titles" except to pay off whatever valid interest the title holder has, and then, we revert them to grants and patents, thus removing the land and soil from the British Territorial United States National Trust.
An American member of the U.S. Military upon leaving the service is eligible to reclaim their birthright political status as an American and recoup both their Constitutional Guarantees and their land and soil interests, but since WWII, they must serve Notice of their "return" to their natural birthright political status to their Branch Commander and as a separate action, republish their land grant or land patent to remove their property from the Queen's Title System.
The second legitimate way that an American gets entangled in the legal title system is by being born in a "foreign enclave" or "insular state" such as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the [British Territorial] State of Ohio [instead of Ohio] or the District of Columbia, for example.
Most of us have been entrapped by a Territorial "state of state" when we were babies in our cradle. These foreign organizations have claimed, falsely, that we are all British Territorial U.S. Citizens "residing" in British Territorial State-of-States, when in fact, we are Americans living in our native States, which have physical borders and are substantive.
Like the requirement that we give Notice to our Branch Commander when we leave the service, we are required to declare our identity as Americans and publish our return to our actual States of the Union, or the Queen's Government continues to "presume" that we are British Territorial United States Citizens, with all the duties, limitations, and obligations that status implies.
Like her claim to own all land and to hold all land in trust for British and Commonwealth/Territorial Citizens, the Queen also claims to own your Proper Name as a "Legal Title" --- IF you are: (1) a British Territorial Citizen or (2) an American on the High Seas or Navigable Inland Waterways.
The question is --- are you knowingly and voluntarily and under conditions of full disclosure choosing to live your life as a British Territorial Citizen? Yes or no? And if you are an American, are you on the High Seas or Navigable Inland Waterways? Yes or no?
If you agree to give up your supremely beneficial status as an American, the Queen gets to boss you around, claim "title" to you and everything you own, and act as your "benevolent dictator". There have always been Tories among us who prefer this subjugation.
The rest of us have other options that we have fought and bled for.
So what is a "legal title" --- it's a privilege conferred by a foreign government on foreign citizens living in our country on a temporary basis. Both the Proper Names and the Property belonging to these foreign U.S. Citizens are held in trust and titles are issued to them as tenants (their land and soil holdings) or as "Authorized Representatives" of the Queen, mostly British Merchant Marine Warrant Officers known as "Taxpayers".
"Taxpayer" actually means that you are a volunteer employee collecting taxes for and paying taxes to the Queen.
When Americans get entrapped in this British System, the actual landlords of this country get reduced to the status of being tenants of the Queen, and unless they reclaim and republish their land grants and land patents, they lose actual ownership and control of their lands and homes. If they fail to also declare their political status on the Public Record, they are additionally victimized by the Queen's "presumption" that they are British Territorial Citizens until proven otherwise.
Being a British Territorial Citizen is the exact same status as being a Colonist, only under a different name. British Territorial Citizens are obligated to know and obey millions of Federal Codes, they own nothing, not even their own names. The Constitutional Guarantees do not apply to them.
Would you rather have a privilege, or a right?
Americans claim back their rights when they record and publish their correct political status and reclaim their land and soil patents and grants. Until they do, the Queen's Government will continue to "latch onto" them and falsely claim that they are chattel property franchises of the British Crown, tenants, and "volunteers" serving as "Taxpayers".
This grotesque crime is ongoing and only individual Americans can stop it by taking action to correct their own political status records and joining their own State Assembly in support of the actual American Government.
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get started on the road home today.
See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
"Political Status" is being used as a SUBSTITUTION for your naturalborn, creator-gifted *state:being man* just the same as "Money" is being used as a substitution for your portion of earths land, your labor, and what either of them produces. (looks like this is where the "LaborBonds" and the "LandBonds" "annavoncom" says "she" has "possession" of come from?)ReplyDelete
both "Political Status" and "Money" are man-Constructed, not creator-created. They are mere FICTIONS/Stories/ Characters... are not "real"/actual and therefore no man is required to participate in either, but may if he chooses to do so, as long as it does no harm to him. if it causes him harm, he is free to leave: the law common to all man being: do no harm to man.
and no man can be forced to Act-Out as some Character in a Fiction/"Story" some other man made up, especially a Character that harms him!
-- all American common law!
i:woman return the harm theyve created back to them all, unaccepted.
That's funny. Looks like the people who set up the death cult now realize they may become the victims of the participants. They got used to killing their own kids, so why shouldn't they kill the people who allowed it in the first place? No difference, just more 'post-birth' abortion.Delete
You could send a letter to your bank. Ask them if the information is correct, and the promissory note you signed actually funded the check used to "buy" the property? A promissory note is a negotiable instrument, legal tender, iou, aka currency. Just like the ones you hand a clerk and carry off your milk. The "promise to pay" IS the "money!" In a debt system of obligations! When you signed the promissory note, you signed the check, and the bank accepted the funds and deposited them, paid in full. Enjoy your new property! The milk man never rings twice; doesnt expect you to pay him again for the same milk. Why does the bank want you to pay twice? As for it affecting your "credit" (being recognized in truth and law for what you are, and "treated" accordingly) as an American national, I have heard that some courts will actually look at bank records to see if any "special" endorsement exists. It is presumed that if you use the federal reserve script you endorse the "system." It is easily remedied by expressing your will, amending signature card w 12usc411, and including such a statement on all docs, proving your will to "come out from among them, and be ye separate!" (Now you get to enjoy a bit of make-believe for real; Bet you can't tell which dollars are lawful money, and which are only legal tender?) But, since iou's are legal tender for all debts public and private, the mortgage (promise to pay) was paid in full the moment it was signed. Property taxes are simple to if you remove the legaleze. "Placing ink to parchment gives a deed permanence." See? The problem? What is the "deed" in the first place? It is the act of exchange, two parties holding property made a deal, trade, agreement to accept a lot for a sum, and sum for lot. So much for so much? Agreed. Exchange is made. Deed is done. the "act" of transfer of property and rights is open and closed, final. But, there is no written record? No manifest proof of the act, deed. So, they write down the agreement, as a record of the deed. Then, they agreed to call that piece of paper "Deed," as if the record of the deed is the deed itself?! Once BAR liars get you focused on a piece of paper, you might wanna get away and refocus on the elementary things you may be missing, overlooked. A two-party transaction, equal exchange of value, unencumbered asset property for unencumbered asset property, is private, and no profit or increase, but even exchange. Same as trading hours for dollars- no profit-no income- no taxable event. Take away the CORPSes ability to communicate with you, thru the imaginary, intermediary "organization(s)" it created for you, and ITS right to use THE NAME Or The Name of the deceased organization in attempt to gain joinder with a living child of God having no desire to contract for THEIR "services." Somewhere around registry of deeds, prob came something close enough to THEM to consider joinder, that with full knowledge and consent, upon full disclosure of all terms and conditions, on this day, ONE CLUELESS IDIOT did freely donate Their Land to the TOWN OF, COUNTY OF, STATE OF... At least that's what THEY can prove in THEIR own courts; JEWDICIARY FOR STATE OF. Read NH HB 638! Ten thousand times ten thousand times! It is ALL "simulation of legal process!" THERE is the great "Simulation." They use untraceable, usps ist class, junk mail "solicitations/marketing/advertising for biz/contract" in place of sheriff as "process server," because no crime occurred or law was broken. THEY tell us in every way possible, what is already in us from our knowledge of God, and the Bible, participation in their system is completely voluntary. Can two walk together except they be agreed? "Show me the Agreement!" IOU or EWE take my homestead? Which I acquired by private exchange of unencumbered property, no 3rd parties involved?! You gotta lotta nerve, mistah.ReplyDelete
Ive asked before, but will try again, given the Article topic. regarding the "brits" ongoing presumptuous claims, and liberties taken from us as result, by what right? by what mechanism/instrument? exactly? I notice we hear little about the muni side anymore, all bout the "brits." the 'territorial.' My suspicion is authenticated birth cert dealt w the MUNICIPAL PERSON, and noticing the sudden change to Proper Case Persons, (as found on cert of live birth?!) leads me to believe THEY are now 'addressing' the Territorial A. Person? Was the British Territorial Subject created by certificate of live birth? there is identical process for authenticating both, meaning you come out with 2 distinct titles, to 2 distinct entities? Did THEY only tell us to seize ONE, so the Other could serve as trojan horse when THEY flee the MUNI? Like "crypt-o" serving the "bail-out" of/from the dollar. simple question; why do we not authenticate both?ReplyDelete
there are actually more than that, there are at least three.
[plus i think there is even another one where (i hear) they imprint the newly-borns footprints on paper/ papyrus, so that his/her foot does not touch the land first, but touches the Pharoahs papyrus first which is then used to show that the son or daughter is not "free" and "of the land", but is the Pharoahs property/slave.... kind of like how you described the paper Deeds being used as a sustituted for the actual Act of agreement about an exchange.]
theres the one you get from the county/hospital:
there end up being two of that one: the one the County sends to be Regis-tered (with the Registration Number space empty) and then one that comes back with the Regis-tration Number on it.
Regis - i believe is "Royal", so that, to me, would be the British one.
i take it that those two, the un-Registered and the Regis-tered ones, RE-present the two sides of the Fabricated British Citizen/Persons/Trusts "Ac-count".
The unRegis-tered one re-presenting the "Credit side".
i believe this may be true. im surmising this only because it stands to reason but that doesnt make anything true. maybe someone has verifiable references they can share about something like this going on.
Thank you, i did not realize how many such there may be. do see people promoting both bc and clb auth proc, but both saying forget the other. Seize em all. demand the rest. give nothing back.Delete
fortunately, i do have the testimony that the drunken fella charged with 'catching' me, acting as doctor, failed from preventing me from immediately contacting the ground, on my head. I reckon i was born upside down to this world, and it upside down to me. And, i'm still the one standing, right side up! PeaceDelete