By Anna Von Reitz
The banks have all been insolvent since the 1930's. There is nothing new here, ma'am. Just move along.
The banks have all had to borrow other people's assets -- gold, houses, land, etc., in order to have anything to base loans upon. So if a large number of banks declare themselves insolvent, the only thing that has changed or is changing, is their liquidity -- put simply, they don't have enough cash-on-hand to pay out in that form, or they don't have enough new assets and returns to keep their self-limiting Ponzi Scheme going.
Either condition can lead to lack of liquidity and lack of liquidity can cause a bank collapse.
As there is no lack of paper and ink, the dilemma is caused by political failure to provide the banks with enough cash and the bank's failure to generate enough new loans. That is, the mint has been stood down because the Federal Government is butting its head against its own debt ceiling, and the economy is shrinking because the banks are clawing around trying to save themselves at the cost of not making new loans.
If banks don't make new loans they can't increase their asset base and collect the interest that they need to survive, so it becomes a vicious fear-driven circle. The TARP payments were supposed to prevent this outcome but failed to do so, because the Congress issued these bail-outs without strings or enforcement.
Janet Yellen has been begging, pleading, beating both shoes on her desk for weeks now, to no effect. The edjits in Congress and the White House have held their Confederacy of Dunces Meetings and they are still two-blocked. By the time they agree, the cash shortage issue will take months if not years to repair.
That's what is so snarky about all of this. There would be no shortage of cash if they authorized printing it or even authorized using the cash that is already printed and sitting in warehouses waiting for an occasion like this--- so one can only conclude that Joe Biden and the members of the British Territorial Congress want a bank collapse.
They self-evidently desire the chaos and the misery that predictably ensues with bank collapses and they are deliberately causing a huge social and political drama that is totally avoidable.
The blame is on them and on their Principals. This time, we will hold them accountable.
When these banks advertise "home loans" they are soliciting for you to loan your home to them, so that they can use your assets and the mechanisms of "fractional reserve banking" --- otherwise known as gambling and betting on the come --- to issue seven to ten times the amount of credit as they have issued as a loan to you.
They then loan the extra credit created by this process to other people -- or they don't loan it, and add it to their "bank reserve".
When these huge banks were bailed out under TARP they were supposed to use the largesse to make new loans and stimulate the economy -- akin to giving it a laxative. Instead, to a man, they clamped down on making new loans and put the largesse into their bank reserves instead.
This is a safer move from the bank's perspective, but it also means that they are not raking in the profits from making loans at interest.
When the government through its own guile and ineptitude fails to produce enough cash for the banks, and the people suddenly start wanting their credit out of the banks in a more tangible form, it's called a "bank run".
Go watch the old Jimmy Stewart movie, "It's a Wonderful Life" for a picture perfect portrayal of a bank run, and a more than adequate explanation of the problem.
Both the government and the people are causing their own problem and the banks are crunched in the middle. Even all those bank reserves they socked away can't help them, because those reserves are not in the form of paper bank notes.
A bank run is all about the form of the funds.
Digits in a bank ledger are no longer good enough. People want something they can hold in their hands, and sock under their mattress, because they are scared.
So, all of a sudden, Aunt Betsy wants five thousand dollars that she can hold in her hands. It's her credit and she wants it in a form she can touch.
Who is responsible for issuing enough physical cash so that she and however many millions of people can do that?
The Federal Reserve Banks are technically responsible for keeping up with the day to day cash demands.
The Federal Reserve Banks say they can't do that until the politicians raise the "debt ceiling" and they groan and say that issuing the debt notes in paper form is so old-fashioned. They lose a tiny fraction of one percent of the seigniorage that way.
The politicians say that they want their cut, and around and around it goes; neither the Federal Reserve nor the politicians understand why the obstinate public wants something to hold in their hands. It's just a symbol anyway.
But it's a symbol of what? Their debt. Not yours, theirs.
Paper tends to be a tad bit more tangible and provable than a keystroke on a computer ledger; the public may be dumb, but the public understands that much and that's why people are demanding cash.
Picture a fat, red-faced banker on one side of the table and a skinny little pinch-faced commissioner on the other, both utterly clueless as to why the public is so upset and why people want paper instead of digital currency.
They also have difficulty with the concept that all this debt they've created out of thin air actually represents prepaid credit that is owed back to the public.
One man's debt is another man's credit, after all. It's just a matter of which side of the fence you are on.
They've kicked the debt can down the road for so long that they've forgotten the other side of the ledger, because the credit side of the ledger doesn't belong to them. It belongs to you.
So, they say, we're bankrupt. You can't get money out of a turnip.
We say, yes, you are bankrupt, but thanks to your own actions, you are not covered by the corporate veil.
This time, we'll take our assets and our prepaid credit.
See this article and over 4100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
HOW RIGHT YOU ARE!ReplyDelete
They pay me $285 per hour to work on a laptop. I had no clue it was possible, e but a close friend made $26,000 in four weeks working on this simple offer, and she convinced me to try it. For further information, please see.Delete
Details Are Here...... Daily Working Online
I just watched the whole video on this money making internet job. Sounds great until you have to pay for it. I understand that, but when you don't have an income to speak of then the $49.99 becomes a heardal you can't jump. . So how does one utilize this money making internet job if you don't have the $$ to get started in the first place. Just couscous. Another to good to be true for meDelete
You are so right! And after the $49 it's another $200 to get the bonus deal, the one which puts the $49 deal to shame....Delete
And when they hand over the U.N. uniforms, tanks and MRAPS they have stored all over America, to the fighting age Chinese men assembling in Panama, and God only knows who else, to cross our border, it will take them about 24 hrs. to LOCK DOWN America into a Soviet Gulag. There won't be ANY banks or anyone else to save us then. People better wake the hell up, real quick.ReplyDelete
better be praying too.Delete
for God to intervene and de-stupify the people....
so many seem already completely unable to do any Critical Thinking... not blaming the people who are dealing with poisoned food, water, air, dis-harmonious energies and frequencies, heavy metals, brainwashing, fear- mongering, mis- information, liars, but he can help people see clearly despite all this. they have to want to though.
When are people going to realize the government does not serve the people. You can not govern and serve at the same time. We do not need government. Government and banks are the very ones causing the crimes and discourse. Doingng away with middle class is create only poor and the rich. That is what they are after. They think the poor are easier to control. Even poor people have guns. Enough of this fake shit.ReplyDelete
Are the credit unions that show up on the search engine (which are attached to various articles) immune to runs?ReplyDelete
When is the pre paid credit going to start for Americans? The system is ready? The new LRS is ready? Where's the pre-paid credit?ReplyDelete
Don't lecture, idiot.ReplyDelete
I want their heads on a pike and all that they have stolen from us with interest.ReplyDelete
Quote "the credit belongs to you", that's right... and we are the beneficiary of the credit side of the ledger:(Trust Accounting) set up with our weight in gold (at birth) being the original collateral of value for the creating of our cest the que account/ (trusts).ReplyDelete
We WANT A BANK RUN!!
lets get this show over already and get our global family bank rolling already.
And all of you trust haters. Someone has to be the beneficiary of your cest de que trust and if you think its evil to be the beneficiary then please don't give the credit to the satanist child slayers.
Be responsible and grow up.
Take control of what is yours and do good.
Good word, Rebecca!Delete
Can anyone help? I'm being sued by a guy who was helping me, or so I was lead to believe, as my friend. Two years later after I turned down several marriage proposals he served my son with a lawsuit (I was in ICU with pneumonia) saying I signed two (manufactured and forged) contracts agreeing to pay him $614,000 for loans and his services. It's all fraud but how do I prove it? His word against mine and my two properties will go into court and state that on the record, but we are at the mercy of a male Los Angeles Superior Court Judge. Anyone know of someone who can argue alleged contract law? I sent the "contracts" to a forensic document examiner and was told the document quality is so poor they can not determine if the signatures were lifted from another document or were computer generated. I requested wet signature documents but was told he doesn't have to produce them? Is there a law someplace that states he does have to produce wet signatures - especially for a contract of this size? He is claiming his lending company Lakeshore Investments, LLC. does not have to provide the reports for the years that the supposed, "loans," were made? I would think that is key evidence because wouldn't those reports have to include the original "loan" documents? I asked for a certified audit of the debt but was told he doesn't have to produce it. WHY is he allowed to not be required to produce key evidence? The Case discovery period was closed and trial was set for June 6th and discovery isn't even complete. I'm just shaking my head. Do my kids and I even have a chance to fight this guy? Will I be provided any justice? I'm praying someone will be able to help us. Thanks and thanks for all you are doing - but I whole heartedly agree - WHEN will we ALL be provided Justice for the FRAUD that has been committed against ALL of us since birth?Delete
@Anomyous May 7, 2023 at 7:12AMDelete
There are no ifs ands or buts about it, they absolutely need to produce the "original contract" with "wet ink signature" !!!
He doesn't have a leg to stand on without it !
It also sounds to i as though the results of the forensics analysts should all together indicate that the 'document' the butt hurt crook provided you with is as bogus as one could possibly be.
i would "NOTICE" him, in writing, that if he does not respond to your requirement for him to produce and show the "original, with wet ink signature" document, within a lawfully prescribed period of time, and "by any means", continues to harrass you, that such actions will constitute an ongoing harassment attempt on his part to commit fraud against you and that such actions will also constitute his admission to the attempted fraud and as a result, his "agreement" that in compensation for the harm that his actions have caused you, he will pay to you the total sum that he was attempting to defraud you for, to wit: $614,000.00, to be paid within 30 days of his failure to respond to your "notarized" NOTICE.