Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Monday, December 28, 2020

Let’s Make This Really Simple

 By Anna Von Reitz

The Constitutions implement the various Treaty Agreements ending The War of Independence.

All three Constitutions, Federal, Territorial and Municipal are all power-sharing service contracts.

The process of implementation begins in 1787 with The Constitution for the united States of America—- which created the Federal Republic operated by our American Confederation which was established in 1781.  The Article III Federal Courts are part of the Federal Republic structure.  They have not operated since the Civil War and won’t operate until and unless both the Confederation and the Federal Republic are restored.

Two years later, in 1789, the Territorial United States Constitution known as The Constitution of the United States of America was adopted. It was immediately amended to allow Admiralty and Maritime Courts by the Judiciary Act of 1790.

A year later the Municipal Constitution called The Constitution of the United States was adopted.  It’s only judicial powers extend to the Article II Administrative Courts.

So it is supposed to go like this:

Federal Republic operates Article III Courts

The Territorial Government operates Admiralty and Maritime and —“Special Admiralty” Courts.

The Municipal United States operates the bulk of Administrative Courts, with the Territorial United States operating a few of its own.

You can now all see that as the Federal Republic and the Confederation that is supposed to operate it, have never been Reconstructed, there is no access to Article III Courts.  There hasn’t been for decades.

At the current time the only Federal Courts in operation are “district courts”— Admiralty, Maritime, Special Admiralty, and Article II Administrative Courts— together with their Appellate Courts and their Supreme Court.

They are all foreign with respect to Americans and are meant to be.

So for all those Americans who are appalled by the cheating that went on in the recent corporation elections—- none of these Federal Courts have subject matter jurisdiction and technically, neither do their franchises operating as State of State and STATE OF STATE COURTS.

The only way to punish Joe Biden for what he has done and what his co-conspirators have done is for shareholders in these corporations to bring a criminal complaint for malfeasance and material harm — and that is difficult to prove before a man takes office, and also it’s difficult to find anyone with standing to field such a complaint.

The Voters pass their Proxies to their elected Representatives and by doing that divest themselves of any standing.

So the only people who COULD field such a complaint are eligible Voters who didn’t vote in the election—- and the courts will say, but you had your remedy, you could have voted....unless they were actually denied their voting “privilege”.

And they would still have to find a court of competent jurisdiction to hear them. It has to be an international Court with applicable subject matter jurisdiction over the actions of foreign corporations.

Long story short— none of these courts can address the cheating per se, but some of them can address corporations indulging in unlawful activities in their States— which would include Election Fraud.

So you are looking for eligible Voters who didn’t vote or were somehow precluded from voting —who were harmed,  and then you would need to bring a cross complaint against the corporation itself, for example, a complaint in the Public Interest brought against the State of Wisconsin, Incorporated, by The People of Wisconsin for engaging in unlawful election processes and procedures on Wisconsin soil.

Corporations are formed for lawful purposes— not legal purposes, and that is where
The Rub lies.  The People of a State can enter a complaint against any corporation operating in their State that engages in any unlawful practice at all.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

11 comments:

  1. .
    Hi anna

    your getting close, but leaving out important items and some correction.
    What let the Banksters(FRS)in was the 1783 treaty a Lawyer signed with out authority. Actually several other items that go back further.
    But whos counting
    Whereas the sheeple vote (LOL) themself s free stuff - at the expense of others.

    “When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken
    or cease to be honest." ~ Frederick Douglass

    Let see if this comment remains where the public can see it

    Graduate - We Bleed Red White and Blue


    The sheep want to remain willfully ignorant as thats what the govt agency's and NEWS media have done for centuries.


    ReplyDelete
  2. As I understand this it is the united States District Court that has original jurisdiction, as long as it is a diversity case using " saving to suitors" clause and demandind an article 3 Court..!! However, there curently isnt any united States District Courts but only " DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES"..! This makes it very difficult to get remedy..
    I told someone to go to one of these courts and label it as a united States District Court demanding and article 3 Court..but as usual they went back and deliberated for awhile and came back with his papers changing uS District Court to DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES and denied his request..!!
    This is what we are dealing with...traitors everwhere we turn. Its almost impossible to get remedy under these circumstances..!! Does anyone have an answer to this...!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Provide a sample claim. Language, format & so on. Is it a claim or a complaint?
    Make a claim, rather than complain?

    Complaining to the anal clots puts them in over-standing control, does it not? Making a claim, with substantiation, would be the proper standing, yes or no?

    Provide an example with substantiation. thanks & stay sane

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ask yourselves, what would Dirty Harry do when faced with an obvious situation of corruption?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ummm...well would he not say "Go ahead...make my day" and then the director would yell CUT. And that would be the end of it?

      Delete
    2. Alternatively he might say..."Did he fire 6 shots or only 5" and again the director would yell CUT.

      Delete
  5. Continental congress in Philadelphia after the attack on the archives and the university press went into overdrive erasing them .
    Probably threats and assault seemed it was forced underground.
    And the British congress that was in NYC Wall Street took over reigns..
    And probably for awhile congress wore two hats passing resolutions prefix HR or H bills now no one has a clue they just do as told by lobbyists usually from some George Sorros ocean society.
    Totally f up.

    ReplyDelete


  6. 🇿 ohar proselytes of DEAD COvertrotsKy🦈 19🏧 17 Babylon 🍊 revolutionARIES💂♀
    45🇶 oronaCONanon's CORPORATION of
    Baby SCAM🦹♀ mer😷 s
    Tribe of Dan/donALD🦆The 🇰 abal 🎋 treeIST🙃 defence producKtion ACT🎠 ors cyrus grate scofield Revvis🕍 WARPsped🐍 ing Ein Sof🙈 Canaanite🚀
    Same shortIES🕍 Script🎬
    depends on what definition of ALL CAPS COVid isis🧛♀
    Same HOMies🕍 WHO^WTO Tactics🦹♀
    Temple🕍 of reSET 🇰 abbalah🐽 FLU science🏧 ISM🙃 WALL/WAR street boreD of faKe SEAL🦅 walKingFED💍 eral Reserve🧛♀ goverNOIR📽 s
    DC🇰 abbbalah📺 70 A.D. street talMudwood💤 theater😷
    Same printNplay🤖 ers /BONDS™ CONtract's🤒 FRAUDEMIC Reprise
    h1n1 emergency measures🚧 over 💲 20 BILLion Fiat Notes
    buy GOYim🐄 stocK💉 PILE🦸♂ then fenced🎅 dangerous stash
    Trump Proves He’s Been Part of the Swamp All Along – Do NOT Go to D.C. on Jan. 6th! https://medicalkidnap.com/2020/12/28/trump-proves-hes-been-part-of-the-swamp-all-along-do-not-go-to-d-c-on-jan-6th/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not going to try and decifer this had enough of fake Q cointell.
    Becoming apparent the world operates under Rothschild Banksters and thair Army the BAR .
    Small hat agents embedded in immigration,state department opeanly fly Israeli flags in thair office.
    Foreign agents but they own our so called legal system.
    One hero who fought for decades said its aken to playing Russian Rulette with a loaded gun.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Texas has got running (one) common law court previously the attack on our court was a constant barrage of FBI advertisements basically same ploy law firms use you get advertisements you know your being looked at.
    Anyhow it’s off and running with the pushing by our old devout patriots who have been in the fight for half s century.

    ReplyDelete
  9. All now here gathered for sharing.

    This will probably answer a lot of your questions & perhaps give you more insight or questions.

    Kurtis Kallenbach, Letter to the President pdf:
    http://nojellyfish.xyz/images/presidentletter/p-letter.pdf

    Zoom Austin Meeting Group with Special Guest Kurtis Kallenbach:
    https://zoom.us/rec/play/_yB0IA0IkiI6pGSd7VamqzGsd5Bxf4uSkC64nFr2OlZyeMSOZxltYx3a6-z2tyub0QTZQU4zV3OJnCke.dC-m2U0Y-dzCvk2i?continueMode=true

    An important case along with the shared above info:
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-71_qol1.pdf


    :kurtis kallenbach:

    Please consider supporting kurtis by joining his private membership website
    http://NoJellyfish.xyz

    You can get more information about membership here:
    http://NoJellyfish.xyz/membershipinfo.html

    And the Austin Meeting Group who brought Kurtis Kallenbach as their Special Guest, on a Zoom call, wherein he goes over the letter with the people. If the zoom link above doesn't work, they also have a download that you can request to listen to the 4 hour edification, if you contact them: http://austinmeetinggroup.com/

    Thank you for Being. Remember your fertilization Moment of Alpha.
    ra string

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.