Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Proven Right Again

By Anna Von Reitz

Anyone who has been following the split between The American States Assembly and the Michigan General Jural Assembly has heard their Big Talk about "the Hague" this and "the Hague" that.   

And some other parties and other would-be "State Assemblies" have been spouting about "the Hague" too --- but our actual States of the Union don't stand under the Hague Conventions. 

Just this afternoon I had it thrown in my face, "I guess we will see you at the Hague!" ---- no, I thought, grimly, you won't.  

Our actual States of the Union don't stand under the Hague Conventions. That's the hub for the Territorial Military Governments.  

The Lieber Code, also known as General Order 100, morphed into the Hague Conventions.  The Hague has less than zero to do with our States, and everything to do with British-controlled States of States. 

So all those people running around talking excitedly about the Hague, the Hague, the Hague ---- are United States Citizens, Tories, Subjects of the Queen, intent on building "States of States" and just deceitfully calling them "States" instead.   

Either that, or they are very confused Americans.  

Buyer beware and innocent Americans take heed.  Hague = Territorial Government = Military Government.   Nothing to do with our actual States. 

Those listening to Destry et alia have also heard plenty about how they "are working with DOD".   

No doubt you will all be interested to know that the DOD is part of the nasty old bankrupt Municipal Corporation and that the DOD is the organization that purloined and cashiered all the credit owed to the American States and People and used that as a Slush Fund to promote military operations worldwide instead of giving the credit we are owed back to us.  

They don't want us to succeed, because if we do, all that credit has to be released back to us, to pay off mortgages that should have never been loaded onto our backs, to pay off college loans that we never legitimately owed, to pay off medical bills we don't actually owe, either.  

It's our credit, not theirs, and everyone knows it, but they are still in the running to keep it as "abandoned assets"--- if they can derail us and taint our efforts and  keep us from assembling our States of the Union. 

The only thing a sane American wants to hear about the DOD is that it is paying back all the credit it stole from us and all we want to do with DOD is make sure that happens.  

Finally, remember I told you all that the modus operandi of the Evil Ones is always the same?  That they accuse the Opposition of doing the things that they are doing themselves?  

Yes, just like Hillary and Harry Reid accusing Trump of "Russian Collusion" after setting up a backdoor deal to sell 20% of our Uranium to the Russians.  

And, as it turns out, just like "Sun-Tzu" who --- after claiming to be Jesus Christ --- went on to explain that he went to a Jesuit school and his favorite teacher was a Jesuit priest.  

This is the same guy that went on a rampage claiming that I was a "Vatican Agent".  LOL. 

The Pot always calls the Kettle black in their world.  Whatever they are doing, is what they claim against others.  Whatever they are, is what they project on those who oppose them.  

So shine up your Shinola Sensors good and bright.  Check the batteries.  And remember the fine points: 

1. Our States have nothing to do with the Hague and don't function under the Hague Conventions; 
2. DOD is competing with us and trying to keep $21 trillion-worth of National Credit that is owed to the American States and People by tainting and derailing our efforts to assemble our actual States; 
3. I didn't go to a Jesuit school.  I went to a Lutheran college. 


See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. In January you wrote that you told Trump that all 50 States were assembled and ready....
    How many are there now ?

    You have a funny way of alienating and repeling. Whats up with that ?
    Do you actually want to unite and get this Union of States reconstructed ? If so then how do you expect to do this if you keep "eating your own" ? Why are so many questioning you ? Why can`t you answer questions ( like the correct way to fill out form 56 ? )
    Time for a break and a good soul searching. Put down tne pen and take a break. Get answers to questions asked.delegate someone else with better people skills to help the errant ones. Maybe think about giving up the position of Fuerer.

    1. What about the Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation Anna Issued, Copying the the World Court Hague? If the Hague has nothing to do with us then why Anna are you Appealing to them? And who exactly caused Big Lake Alaska to have an Earth-Quake? The President or Mother Nature? Who do you Appeal to next ? Cezar.. ? Are you a Roman Citizen or what ?

    2. Playing Checkers in a Serious Chess Match is like taking a knife to a Gunfight. Not Smart.

    3. about you do some research on your own instead of having everything presented to you. All of your questions have already been answered. So, why would Anna spend any more time on repeating herself just because you are incapable or unwilling to take the time and learn.

      Here is a link how to fill out form 56.

      When you get your birth certificate authenticated you need to pick a country that is not a member of the Hague convention that needs to be put on Form DS 4194.

      This process is not done within a few weeks, it takes years of educating yourself. So, start reading.

    4. Patriot58...did you miss the 20 or so posts mentioning
      It doesn't get any easier. Conference calls every Monday night. Don't miss it.

    5. I have never posted here and really I never post anywhere, but yes Angela you got it right, just following Anna's advice and search for yourself, Anna has plenty of information on this blog, and all you have to do is research and study it, just like she has been doing, don't take anybody's word for anything research for yourself.

    6. @Angela I have a question for you. Why do you believe the steps outlined in the page you to which you linked, which are, to summarize, authenticating the birth certificate at state and federal levels, and then endorsing as "Accepted by drawee." and then surrendering to the Sec. of the Treasury and appointing that office as fiduciary via Form 56, is preferable to, for example, the process advocated by others, whereby after authentication at state and federal levels, one opens a name change case in a county probate court and then enters the authenticated birth certificate into evidence and then makes an ownership claim on all assets recorded in the name on that authenticated birth certificate? A "drawee" is the entity that is expected to pay a draft or a bill? How does a baby become obligated to pay whatever is purportedly owed by an authenticated Certificate of Live Birth? I'm not asking to be contentious. I really want to know.

    7. From Anna Von Reitz:

      They are unlawfully converting the identity and political status of the baby by coercing the Mother to sign undisclosed paperwork at the hospital.

      That paperwork identifies the Mother as an "Informant"-- not even the biological Mother. An informant is a witness to a crime. So by signing that paperwork she is appearing as a Third Party Witness to a crime and surrendering an Unknown Person-- her own baby--to the "official" custody of the State of State.

      This then makes the baby a Ward of the British Territorial State of State which then seizes control of his/her name and estate as chattel property, lists and copyrights the baby's name as that of a "presumed to be" British Territorial United States Citizen, and the Brits promptly then hand off this new property to the Municipal United States Government DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE which creates as Cestui Que Vie trust in the baby's name.

      This then generates the STRAWMAN trust which the colluding criminals split between themselves, with the British Territorial State of State keeping the Beneficial Title and the Municipal STATE OF STATE keeping the Legal Title to the Baby's ESTATE.

      So whichever "side" of the Trust is bringing action, their partner in crime is holding the other side of the string--- for example, if action is brought against the Municipal Government title-- the STRAWMAN-- the Clerk of Court is acting as the Beneficial Interest Holder on the Trust in behalf of the State of State.

      If the charge is brought against the Territorial "Citizen" and the Beneficial title holder-- the Upper and Lower Case Name --the CLERK OF COURT is acting as the Legal Title Holder on the TRUST in behalf of the STATE OF STATE.

      The actual owner of the trust is left standing there with no clue what is going on while these criminals slap each other on the back and decide among themselves what they are going to do with his name and estate.

      Thus the actual owner is bypassed and helpless and rendered "incompetent" as a result of their deliberate disservice and Breach of Trust.

      There are a number of points to be made here--

      1. There is no excuse for this and their entire rationale for doing any of this is based on False Claims to the effect that our lawful government is "in abeyance" just because the Federal States of States (called Confederate States) ceased to function in the wake of the Civil War.

    8. continued:

      That is like saying that because the Queen's Official Beekeeper went bankrupt, the Queen went bankrupt and the bees and hives now belong to the Beekeeper's Creditors.

      It is sheer balmy self-serving nonsense and there has never been any excuse for it nor any process such as I have described.

      Our States have never been bankrupt and were never involved in the filthy mercenary Civil War and both the Queen and the Pope have good cause to know it, but they have been here secretively pillaging and plundering and "conscripting" (land) and "press-ganging" (sea) our babies in their cradles right under our noses.

      2. This is grossly against international law, against their commercial obligations, a total gross betrayal of trust, violation of our treaties with them, violation of the Constitutions-- nothing but gross criminality.

      3. Your actual States are being summoned to Assemble and address this Mess, but before you can take action, you must protest the fraud and illegal seizure of your Person and take action to correct the records--which is what our Paperwork is designed to do.

      4. Our Paperwork is not the ONLY way that this same end can be reached-- but it is relatively simple and cost effective and freely available and sufficient to "get the job done". It does not require court cases and expenses and together with the BC and Witnesses proves that fraud has been committed and that remedy and relief is due.

      5. At this point, virtually all courts in America should be regarded as "Dens of Thieves" bent on criminal trespass against us, and should be regarded as such, avoided when possible, and held to Account when necessary.

      6. As we reclaim our birthright political status and assemble our States of the Union we will also address all this in a systemic fashion.

      Americans will be given a choice once and for all time if they wish to live as free people or as slaves to the Queen and the Pope.

  2. I think it being Sunday, this is a good time to open up Matthew 10.
    Can I get an AMEN? These twelve Jesus sent out and commanded them, saying: “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans.6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7 And as you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ 8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons. Freely you have received, freely give. 9 Provide neither gold nor silver nor copper in your money belts, 10 nor bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staffs; for a worker is worthy of his food.
    11 “Now whatever city or town you enter, inquire who in it is worthy, and stay there till you go out. 12 And when you go into a household, greet it.13 If the household is worthy, let your peace come upon it. But if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you. 14 And whoever will not receive you nor hear your words, when you depart from that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet. 15 Assuredly, I say to you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city!
    16 “Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. 17 But beware of men, for they will deliver you up to councils and scourge you in their synagogues.18 You will be brought before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles. 19 But when they deliver you up, do not worry about how or what you should speak. For it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak; 20 for it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.
    21 “Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death. 22 And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved. 23 When they persecute you in this city, flee to another. For assuredly, I say to you, you will not have gone through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes.
    24 “A disciple is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master.25 It is enough for a disciple that he be like his teacher, and a servant like his master. If they have called the master of the house [g]Beelzebub, how much more will they call those of his household! 26 Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known. “Whatever I tell you in the dark, speak in the light; and what you hear in the ear, preach on the housetops. 28 And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in [h]hell. 29 Are not two sparrows sold for a copper coin? And not one of them falls to the ground apart from your Father’s will. 30 But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. 31 Do not fear therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows.
    32 “Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. 33 But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.
    34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to ‘set[ a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’


    1. re: anna's comments, people accusing her of being a "jesuit" etc.

      the truth is america is closely modelled in luther's "two kingdoms" (secular, and "conscience" for "religious" matters).

      bible christ: "noone goes to the father except through me"
      the lord: i am the lord thy god, no gods before me, vengeance belongs to me, i am a jealous god, i am "secular", etc.

      declaration of independence: appeal to "the creator" for natural rights. (going outside of christ, appealing to "father in heaven" directly)

      the truth is christianity and catholicism is not and never was compatible with the "american" system, which inherently goes outside of christ and tries to cut separate deals with "God" for "natural rights" "independence" etc.

      the truth is, you wont find any genuine "christians" or "catholics" in america, certainly not defending the "constitution" or promoting common law/etc. "america" was built on the masonic/illuminist model. "officially" there are only masonic/illuminist "churches"

      accusing people of being "jesuits" is known "illuminist" tactic, to imply they are masonic-infiltrated. see "memoirs illustrating the history of jacobonism"

      nowadays, it is likely "true", but again, you are very unlikely to find any genuine "jesuits" in "america".

      it is also very unlikely "rome" has time to plot to overthrow "america"; masonic/illuminist/UN "vatican II" perhaps, but not genuine "jesuits". "rome" has never recovered from the french revolution.

      any genuine pope would not have told anna "maybe americans should stop asking for so much government services" and instead would have said "maybe you should appeal to christ instead of "the creator" and cutting deals outside of christ" "maybe you should not follow excommunicated luthers ideas" etc.

      anna is spot on on "american" matters, but "america" is inherently based on heresy/luciferianism. i dont see that changing. do you want a theocracy? she is no more full of heresy than anyone preaching the "american" religion.

      she is no "jesuit" by a long shot.

      literally 1-5 miles from me is "st john the baptist catholic church". the catholic bible says ( "johns baptism insufficient" (holy ghost/christ had not yet arrived, it is motivational/meaningless, in "water" only)

      (non-catholic bibles left out the "side notes" in the "margins")

      anyone worried about "jesuits" is likely clueless. whatever "plots" they might have, they have enough "internal revolution" on their hands to be plotting takeover of "america"

      much more likely to be masons/illuminists impersonating "catholics" with novus ordo seclorum / vatican II.

      actual "catholics" are unlikely to trust modern "jesuits" either.

    2. part of the reason for "jesuit" slur is:

      1) one pope cryptically dissolved them without really explaining why they were "Allowed" in the first place (paraphrase) they can no longer fulfill/the reason they were created no longer exists. (reason not stated)

      2) one of the napoleons demanded they be brought back

      3) in "memoirs illustrating the history of jacobonism" the author, a jesuit IIRC, knew there were already "fake priests" and accusing people of being a "jesuit" was a way for the "illuminists" to take attention off themselves, point it at "masons" (who they had infiltrated) and claim the jesuits were all "masons" (half truth)

      thus, it was formerly a way for illuminists to hide

      nowadays it is still a way for illuminists to hide, (while it is likely nowadays they and their mason buddies have in fact broadly infiltrated the novus ordo modern "jesuits")

    3. there is enough "satan" to go around, it makes no sense any genuine "jesuit" would try to target "america". there are millions of fake non-catholic bibles floating around. "america" is the least of their "worries"

      quite the opposite is occuring: use of non-catholic bibles to justify all kinds of "new world order" things.

      modern vatican II catholic "churches" advocating sola scriptura "bible study" classes. are they using the latin vulgate or olde english catholic bibles? unlikely.

      is the lincoln bible trump swore on a "catholic" bible?

      the "vatican" is likely under the yoke of the same conspirators as "america" is. i really dont see them being "at liberty" for any "jesuit plots against america".

      that ship has sailed. after 1790s france, the vatican/pope eventually said "you can be good democrats [under napoleon] and good catholics at the same time"

      from what I see, any genuine "jesuits" are still reeling/on the defensive.

      it is like accusing the horse and buggy people of pushing electric cars that are deliberately underpowered in an effort to overthrow automobiles.

    4. google "cavanaugh catholic" and you will see his vatican II "church". follow the links and

      i dont see any "jesuit" conspiracy. i see demon-possessed "holy spirit" marked on the forehead fake "catholics"

      I LIKE BEER!

      would any genuine "jesuit" ever want to step foot in DC, land of greek/roman/mason emblems/imagery/etc. ? that is the "belly of the beast" to them too, just as much as any state national or state citizen. -- how to spot fake nuns/vatican II possessed "marked on the forehead" fake "catholics" and fake "jesuits" and fake vatican II "churches"

      always with the false 2nd coming. known british fabian socialist "Tactic" (see "the union jack" book)

      any "jesuits" are on the receiving end of any "plots"
      Social Concerns Pat Kavanaugh

      you know, "social concerns" like, i dunno, the mark of the beast on your forehead? they dont seem very "concerned" to me :/

      side note: in an emergency, you CAN do a valid baptism using beer.

      i dont think anyone could find a genuine "jesuit" if they tried. you will probably have to un/re-baptize them first.

    5. Much of what you are saying is true, but what you are not saying is even more important so I will bring some links to further the conversation. Drawing the line at the Vatican II bogus council is about right as far as true Popes vs new (anti) popes.


      The Society of Jesus (Jesuits)

      Catholic Devotion to Mary:

      The only real Bible:

      Two studies on the Illuminati with history from the Catholic Encyclopedia:

      Differences between the Vatican II (Novus Ordo) church and the real Catholic (Universal) Church the Jesus Christ founded.

  3. I am compiling my paperwork to file.

    Yet, I am still unclear about social security payments.
    At 73 years of age, I rely heavily on those payments to pay my mortgage.

    It was my original understanding from Anna's writings that social security payments are like insurance annuities and can't be taken from anyone claiming the political status of American State National, an American on land and soil jurisdiction.

    Yet, recently I have been reading that there is an ongoing clarification on this issue and that there may be a problem?

    I cannot take the chance that changing my political status to American State National will cause my social security payments to stop.

    Please, can someone clarify this for me.

    I am ready to file my paperwork but need to know what will happen, if anything, to my social security payments.
    Obviously, I do not choose to live my life in a cardboard box on a street corner somewhere if social security payments / dividends stop . . . especially since I have paid into social security for over 40 years.

    Thank you for any insight and truth on this issue.

    1. A good question.
      Come to the call tonight and perhaps someone can shed light on it.

      605 313 4198
      8pm eastern time

    2. @TruthSeeker I will share the experience of a man I have assisted who receives Social Security payments. He formally expatriated about one year ago. He noticed the U.S. Dept. of State, the U.S. Attorney General, and the Secretary of State for the State of Georgia. He also sent a notice to one state agency regarding a license he holds under duress. Some years ago before that, he filed a Revocation of Election with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue affirming that his status has always been that of "nonresident alien." None of this impacted the Social Security payments he receives. I believe the SSA views such payments as an obligation owed pursuant to a trust indenture. The SSA follows the directives it is given by Congress. (As a side note, I wish to point out that, logically, the payments could not be arising due to contract because Congress sometimes unilaterally changes the terms under which Social Security participants may claim benefits, and this could not be done under a contract.)

  4. Thank you, Kevin. I'll be there.
    I'm on east coast time, so will be joining you at 8 pm.
    Thank you.