Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Reply to Sun-Tzu's "Von Reitz's Cock Block Road Block" -Poppycock


By Anna Von Reitz

Jeff Dougherty of Portland, Oregon, also known as Sun-Tzu ---- a man with no training at all in any of this, claims that there is an entity called "the united states of America" and that this is the "de jour" government of this country.  

Folks, over the past forty years I have read probably five million pages of government gobbledygook and only God knows how many historical documents and books --- and I have NEVER run across any reference to any entity styling itself as "the united states of America".   It doesn't exist.  It never has.  And I challenge Dougherty and his pals to come up with even one (1) credible historical document that shows the use of "the united states of America" to stand for this country or its government. 

The United States of America is the name of this country for international purposes and it is not the same as something calling itself "the united states of America."   

They are blowing steam and a lot of it 

Our American Government is vested in the living people of this country.  Not in commercial corporations. 

And I have already shown everyone how it works: 

The people give rise to the state republics that govern the national soil jurisdiction of this country and together the state republics form a Union of states called The United States.  This is an unincorporated Union of states and a completely different entity from any commercial corporation calling itself "the" United States, Inc. 

Notice the details.  "The United States" is not the same as "the" United States, Inc.  Use your eyes. 

At the next level up, the people of the state republics agree to act as State Jurors, which gives rise to the People of each State, who then "assemble" their State General Assembly, State Jural Assembly, and elect their State Officials to conduct their business.  The State represents the international  jurisdiction of each State of the Union.  These States then formed their own "union" --- The United States of America, which is also unincorporated. 

Again, notice the details:  "The United States of America" is not the same as "The United States of America, Inc."

As long as there are people occupying the land and soil jurisdiction of this country and claiming their birthright political status, our lawful American Government does not cease to exist or function.  It has been severely depopulated by efforts to overcome us by guile and disinformation over the years, but it still exists ---- and as I defiantly told members of the UN Security Council, as long as one American claims their birthright political status, our government is still standing by definition.  

That's how our Forefathers set it up.  So that even if 350 million people become absolutely stupid and reduced to running around like chickens in a barnyard, as long as there is one American left, our country is preserved. 

Those of us who claim our State Citizenship are owed every tittle and jot of the Constitutions and the Treaties, because we are the progeny of the "People" then and we constitute the "People" now.  Simple as that. 

So all these clueless claims and assumptions about the status of our actual government---- and which Sun-Tzu and friends are peddling as truth --is in fact poppycock.  

The de facto Territorial and Municipal Branches of the Federal Government have jobs to do and we can limit their overreaching just so long as we do ours. 

Sun-Tzu and Friends are also very mistaken about the effects of the "expatriation" I am talking about and spreading disinformation about that, too.  

There are some fools who go to U.S. Embassies and renounce "United States Citizenship" without stipulating which "United States" they expatriating from. 

You don't expatriate from your native and natural estate as a man or woman of the soil of this country represented by the union of states called The United States, do you?   No.  You don't expatriate from your State of the Union, do you?  No. 

You expatriate from Territorial United States Citizenship and Municipal United States Citizenship.  

Read the words on the paper.   

Don't make stupid assumptions of your own and then go blaming me for it. 

Every month or two, I get a desperate letter or phone call from someone who rushed down to the nearest Embassy and expatriated the wrong way with the wrong words and now find themselves trapped in a foreign hell hole unable to come home.  

I lead them through the steps to issue their own Passport as an American State Citizen and that's how they get home. 

There are three unions of states that make up the actual American Government and they are all states that literally belong to you.  Read it.  Understand it.  Remember it.  Tattoo it on your backsides, if necessary: 

The United States = state republics = people = (e)states = soil jurisdiction = national jurisdiction.  

The United States of America = States = People = international jurisdiction of land and sea. 

States of America = Federal States of States also called Confederate States because they operated under The Articles of Confederation = commercial corporations chartered by the States doing business as, for example, The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, etc. designed to do work for our States in the global jurisdiction of the air --- commerce.  These are the "States" that are missing. 

And that we need to reconstruct. 

(1) You are in control of your destiny and the destiny of your country; and (2) You earn your rights by accepting your duty to serve your actual American Government and failing that, you have no rights; (3) You haven't been taught this in public school so you have to listen up and learn fast, because my generation is passing--- and then its all up to you. 

God help us! 

Armchair pundits and "Patriots" without real knowledge are almost as bad as Undeclared Federal Agents, and maybe worse.  

If you want to help, get off your duffs and read and think and act like full grown men.  

If a little old lady can use her real name --- all of it, all versions of it --- and take responsibility for her words, so can you.  If a little old lady can learn this stuff, so can you.  If a Great-Grandma can stand off the Feds and reclaim her country, so can you!  

So stop spreading a bunch of confusion and rot, and knuckle down and do what needs doing.  Get yourself disentangled from these European con artists.  Get your State Assemblies up and running. Mind your own store.  And learn how to be responsible, straight forward, honest men again.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

29 comments:

  1. As soon as Sun-Tzu began posting his comments, I could smell a rat right away. Why would anybody, who was a Patriot in America, pick a [user name], from an other country, especially China. And besides that, he has this bossy, know-it-attitude that completely turned me off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It took me a while to put each jurisdiction in its place and now have perfect clarity.

    What is the main issue that has caused the problem here, with these guys that were former students? I get people are irritated they have to correct the record when they were not responsible for the deception, but it has to be done by the first of us till the deceit is exposed for all to see. Are these guys starting a new 'INC' under the USA INC like others out there playing in LEGAL FICTIONLAND or is it just a dispute over the capitalization/spelling of the name? Seems it would be simple to prove that question by publishing a link to the document with that name describing the Organic Government.

    We need everyone to come together on the process or it will be he said/she said just like throwing scripture at something which has nothing to do with scripture.

    I am working on a plan to contact people locally and this argument is not helpful. I believe Anna is correct on this process. Why would anyone want to have something to do with the entity that has enslaved them? New people are going to come here and look at this argument and think I'm nuts for presenting the process.

    Any suggestions?

    Peace!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am interested in what your plan is. How " local" are you Annie?

      Delete
    2. Annie....yes, the answer is so simple a caveman can do it.....get rid of, or stop quoting the Constitution, because it has absouluty nothing to do with us and never did...I challenge anyone to prove me wrong...!!

      Contracts do not last for 200 years...ask any attorney...!!
      It's void for vagueness....!! But keep arguing over it because that's exactly what the "deep state" wants you to do.....Im sorry but because of their superior intellect, they absouluty do have the RIGHT to make us slaves
      ...get over it.....!!!

      Delete
  3. Yes. Note on re-surveying one's land to real, per Richard McDonald's YouTube reco of Anna: west of San Bernardino mts., The survey has to be redone with THE SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN!. East of those mts.,redo surveys FROM THE WASHINGTON,DC MERIDIAN. The surveys done based off the Greenwich meridian are the jurisdiction of paper, not real take in your hand land/soil. Thanks for that link, Anna.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did he really write "de jour", as in soup? :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. MrGumm,
    "april fools day" chuckle, yet it is becoming more sad than funny.
    me thinks grandma has big teeth, what say you?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Grassroots “Day Of Mourning” Sold Out, Spreads To Twenty More Cities And Rising!
    February 19, 2019
    “History has proven that societies which kill their children will not last long. We are not only killing our babies, we are celebrating their deaths. Therefore, we are ripe for a catastrophic judgment, the kind of fall that destroyed the seemingly undefeatable Roman Empire.”

    https://activistmommy.com/grassroots-day-of-mourning-sold-out-spreads-to-twenty-more-cities-and-rising/
    Organizers are asking Americans to do four things:

    1.Wear black
    2.Don’t shop
    3.Close your businesses
    4.Repent for the sin of abortion

    The Day Of Mourning organizer, Elizabeth Johnston, aka The Activist Mommy, says the response to the Day Of Mourning has been overwhelming and extremely encouraging and “evidence that Americans want to see an end to the bloodshed and child abuse called abortion.”
    Remember, we also can and are to go to our prayer closets.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Correct your status accordimg to Anna's method.
    We ignore the detractors.
    Participant Instructions
    Call your dial-in number: (605) 313-4198
    Enter the access code: 443602
    Sundays at 8pm est


    ReplyDelete
  8. Participant Instructions
    Call your dial-in number: (605) 313-4198
    Enter the access code: 443602

    Status correction help
    Sunday evenings 8pm est

    Thanks everyone for your support and reaching out
    We use Anna's method supported by people who have done the process and many others going through it now, like myself. Anna challenged me personally on articles 519 and 520

    I am dedicated to this and to helping as many as possible with the intention of forming our Jural Assemblies, State Jural Assemblies and participation in the Reconstruction.

    Please join us

    CM Kevin Cote'
    Patriotfarmer58@protonmail.com
    845 987 0084

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anna that's because of this: disinformation agents are everywhere, on all social media websites. They are out in droves! You are right about the united states of America. Nowhere is it found in history of law, so it has no validity in either.

    Anyway just had an epiphany and wanted to share it. The difference between the united States and the UNITED STATES. The States united are to be republics where the people own everything and have private rights to everything. The UNITED STATES is a SOCIALISTIC democracy. As all socialistic organizations the govt owns everything. Isn't that what that democracy has been doing since its inception? Its been taking away all private property and making it into property that is owned by the Public? Every American who ever says or claims in writing to be a U.S. citizen is claiming they have no rights to PRIVATE anything. Americans only have PRIVATE rights...all our rights come from the right to privacy. But the UNITED STATES...the socialistic democracy is working diligently to take all private rights away. Obama a socialist made a statement: "The end of the republic never looked so good". He was talking about the George Bush new world order of socialism...which is one step away from communism. Everytime we get traffic tickets for making use of our private automobiles, we are submitting to socialism and have betrayed our freedoms.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. @ C. Johnson

      I sure wish I were smart enough to fight those traffic tickets. I drive a commercial vehicle, and due to having to make a living, I am unable to spend the time require to fully understand what is going on here because I am gone all the time. Traveling from State to State compounds my problems.

      To bad I can not find a site that focuses on just that issue of the problem (traffic).

      Delete
    3. MrPhilerD...commercial is commercial...public jurisdiction. It is under the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES. If you have traffic tickets for driving a commercial motor vehicle...pay the tickets...because they have jurisdiction. Private automobiles for non-commercial purposes is something entirely different...another jurisdiction. The thing to understand there exist many jurisdictions....some can legally claim jurisdiction, others claim jurisdiction illegal...which is a crime under color of law. If you want to understand learn jurisdictions.

      Delete
  10. C Johnson...so what are you doing about it...!!
    Forget paperwork, and stare right into the eyes of the judge when you speak from a position of authority, instead of acting like a slave who is about to be punished...!!!

    The very first thing to remember is that you are not in court to answer questions, you are there to ask and interrogate the judge....dont ever forget that and make it clear from the very beginning...!!

    Try this one....the judge calls your name, and you walk up to the podium...
    Immediately the judge will start asking you questions...But you will have paperwork or folder (It doesn't matter what's in it because it is only a prop), and keep looking down at it like you don't hear a word he is saying....wait for it awhile, until he gets peturbed and just shouts out your name to get your attention.....then finally, look at him and say, "I'm sorry sir, are you talking to me"...Yes, I am...!! You just won your case...He was the first one to answer a question making you the head and him the tail. Now it's your court, not his....thank you your honor for recognizing my authority in this court as the highest and paramount "holder" of the instraments filed in this case and as the trustee of my account, I order you to adjust the account to reflect full settlement and closure of this case, as I'm the beneficiary of this account....always refer to any case as an "account", because that's all it is...In fact that's all that exsist in this monitary system, is accounts....all accounts...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. jAMES...have you tried this?? Did it work?

      Delete
    2. James so glad you asked and let me repeat what I have stated in other posts in the past...'Judge, how did this court get jurisdiction over me?" The difference between you and I James is you go into court attempting to make 'ARGUMENT'. Any one who has to make 'ARGUMENT' in a court, is under the jurisdiction of the court! You see James, I am not under the jurisdiction of the court, unless they CAN PROVE ON THE RECORD jurisdiction exists. You see James, that one challenge, ends their scam, if you know EVEN ONE REASON why they don't have jurisdiction. Now James, the reasons they don't have jurisdiction are endless, but you only need one reason! But, you have to know that reason for yourself. So I never ever go to MAKE ARGUMENT in a court. I simply ask one question: "WHERE DO YOU GET JURISDICTION OVER ME?" Then I watch the prosecutor start lieing and babbling and turning red faced and saying all kinds of things. But, what he can never do is show any law that show he has jurisdiction over me a PRIVATE, NON-REGISTERED UNINCORPORATED WOMAN.

      James what you really need to learn, which I have been trying in my comments to teach is...1.)private vs. public 2.) men/women vs. persons 3.)record vs registration. James do you know who has to REGISTER?

      Maybe this post, I posted about 30 mins ago on the NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FORUM will help you: https://forums.national-assembly.net/viewtopic.php?f=102&t=1402&p=2474#p2474

      So answering your question about what I am doing about socialism...I just did it. Still trying to wake up the masses of sleeping Americans. If the masses wake up...socialism will be gone!

      Delete
    3. Ps. James, I would never do what you stated in your comment to do and I can't innerstand why or how it would work! Here's why, you are still trying to get the court to RECOGNIZE YOU! Why? I don't need the court to recognize me...I know who I am! Them recognizing me is not the issue before the court. The issue before the court is this: do they have the right to have you there in the first place. Why all the shenigans? Why do you want to play games in the court? Why are you there to play games to begin with? Do you not know once jurisdiction is challenged it has to be proven on and for the record before anything can move forward and the proof has to exist within fact:in law? Do you not know that fact: in law can not presented by attorneys in the court? Why? Because attorneys do not deal with facts: in law only men and women do! Only mean and women can present facts: in law. Do you know there is no truth in the practice of law within the UNITED STATES? Do you not know, it is all fiction? Do you not know even the persons who are summoned to court are fictious entities? Why would you try to get a court full of fictious entities to recognize you...a MAN? That's ludicrous don't you think? James stop playing games with the court!

      Delete
    4. C.Johnson! Glad to have you back! I've really missed your thorough and insightful information.

      I copy and pasted the link to your article in my search engine and did not find your article. As I've expressed before, I'm a tech-tard. Would you please give me instructions so I can access your article? Thank you. genevieve

      Delete
    5. Genevieve....Paul Stamer has put it on this site...here's the link
      http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/02/from-national-assembly-forums.html

      Delete
    6. genevieve...because I appreciate your comment...here is something maybe you can use:

      In the Bill of rights, WE THE PEOPLE are not to be brought to court..unless a warrant is issued by a grand jury, based upon probable cause of a crime. That is a guaranteed and protected right...secured within the context of the Constitution. Now, put on your thinking cap for just a moment! When a routine traffic stop occurs, what is the legal document that is issued to you by the police? summons, right? Is that lawful? NO! from where did they get the jurisdiction to issue a summons to you a WOMAN, FLESH AND BLOOD, LIVING SOUL? Think...always jurisdiction! Challenge jurisdiction! Be a belligerent claimant of your rights! You have the right to claim those rights...do not ever allow them to claim you are a legal person..a fiction...you are a woman...a woman always. Can they prove they have jurisdiction to issue you a summons? how? what would you have done to give them that jurisdiction? reverse whatever you have done, right now and take the authority back and then challenge jurisdiction of their alleged right to issue summons. This is for all CRIMINAL situations. All traffic summons are criminal in equity courts...and it doesn't matter how they want to play the game. Because if it's not criminal...then it has to be civil, right? If it is civil, then where is the contract between you and each person in that court, that are claiming you breached the contract with them? What your accusers not in the court? oh the accuser is a fictious person names THE STATE? impossible THE STATE fiction can only conduct commerce with other commercial legal persons...it can not conduct business with you a woman, right?If the contract between you vs police officer, or you vs prosecutor, or you vs judge can not be produced...then how did they get jurisdiction to issue you a summons? Who the crappola is suing you as the claimant? Don't you a woman have a right to review all evidence used against you/ Wouldn't that evidence be presentment of the contract between you and another man or woman? Who was injured by your alleged breach? Where's you accuser of the breach? Genevieve everything is jurisdiction...find out in your own life if they have it...if they do, right now reverse it...and then demand they show proof of jurisdiction over you! Your signature gave them jurisdiction, how you signed their papers in the past gave them jurisdiction. However, they can't enforce those papers you signed by acts of threat, coercion and duress. Here's why...the 13th amendment abolished slavery and IN-voluntary servitude. Voluntary servitude is lawful and legal. Did you ever voluntarily sign anything..for the purposes of giving them jurisdiction over you? Think about your own life...how did they get jurisdiction over you...do they have it? Can they prove it in court by witnesses and evidence?

      I asked that question...how did they get jurisdiction... on this forum several times...no one on this forum ever responded! There are so many ways they don't have jurisdiction...find the one that works for you and your life and challenge jurisdiction! God bless you in your endeavors to live free!

      Delete
    7. Ps. BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT: The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. It’s benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person. McAlister vd. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S. CT. 385, 50 L. ED. 671; Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 3 Cush. 594, 50 AM. Dec. 813; Orum vs. State 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection….he must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.
      -------------------------
      SUMMONS: [digest every thing the following is saying..get a great grasp on it especially the part about taking action on a summons. remember always who is being summoned to court...you, the man or woman or a legal fiction.A summons is only a claim...that's all it is they have to prove validity of the claim they make..they only have jurisdiction if their claim is valid and is not based on fabrication, fraud, falsehoods, threat, duress or coercion]...

      Black’s Law 8th Edition
      APPEARANCE: Expert Commentary.
      “The English courts did not, until modern times, CLAIM, jurisdiction over the person of the defendant merely by service of SUMMONS upon him. It was deemed necessary to resort to further process by attachment of his property and arrest of his person to compel ‘appearance,’ which is not mere presence in court, but some act by which a person who is sued submits himself to the authority and jurisdiction of the court. ANY STEPS in the action, such as giving bail upon arrest, OPERATED AS AN APPEARANCE OR SUBMISSION. Benjamin J. Shipman, Handbook of Com-mon-Law Pleading statute 5, at 24 (Henry Winthroup Ballantine ed., 3d ed. 1923).

      Delete
    8. C. Johnson: Here's my very belated "Thank you!" I'm playing catch-up right now and enjoying your posts immensely. You go, Girl!

      Delete
    9. genevieve...thank you...for hear and seeing and for coming with me in the STAND!

      Delete
  11. I'm still waiting for the reference to the organic law that names the entity Anna calls "The United States."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GOOGLE: ORGANIC CONSTITUTION 1787 and read it. Have you never read the Constitution? Our organic constitution on record with the NATIONAL ARCHIVES? here let me help you out https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs Maybe what you need to do, is take what you FIND OUT HERE and go research it SO YOU WILL KNOW the same truth, Anna knows. You are obviously a grow man who can read and write, so stop looking to be spoon fed!Go research! PS. the inorganic Constitution was written by Congress 1871. So let's compare the 2...the organic one was written by the People and used to create Congress. the inorganic was created by act of congress and not the People. See and know the difference. Not being rude, but trying to assist you from being weak in your STANDING!

      Delete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The courts ruled...there is no contention in this fact....the United States is foreign to a State [of the Union]:

    The case of In re Merriam’s Estate, which was affirmed in the Supreme Court in United States v. Perkins, lays down a solid foundation for something far more ominous that the mere fact that the United States is a corporation:

    “It is suggested that the United States is to be regarded as a domestic corporation, [*485] so far as the State of New York is concerned. We think this contention has no support in reason or authority. A domestic corporation is the creature of this state created by its legislature, or located here and created by or under the laws of the United States. (Code of Civil Pro., § 3343, sub. 18.) The United States is a government and body politic and corporate, ordained and established by the American people acting through the sovereignty of all the states.”

    -- In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894).

    In Volume 19, CJS (Corpus Juris Sec.) § 883 one finds the statement that “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State.” The above case is cited as the authority. That the United States is a foreign corporation is exactly what the court held. By affirming the decision, the United States Supreme Court concurred in U.S. v. Perkins, 163 U.S. 625 (1896).

    The United States is a foreign corporation. In fact, if one reads Title 28 USCS § 297, the “compact states” of subsection (a) are clearly defined as “countries” in subsection (b). So if the United States is a foreign corporation in relation to a group of “countries,” then what are the ramifications to those who have dual citizenship, especially when the foreign corporation formally enters into bankruptcy and becomes pledged to a third party creditor?

    We the People, non-citizen Nationals are not U.S. CITIZENS. We are Nationals of our States of the Union of States, known as the United States for America [unincorporated]. We owe no debt to or for the U.S., Inc. as it is foreign to us and the States in which we homestead. If you study the CFR; ITS debt is put off on you because you made no objection on the record and you have no standing in court when IT comes after you to pay IT's debt. You registered as one of IT'S CITIZENS and you are subject to pay IT'S debts, even with you life, if IT calls you to do it. In United States code...IT has defined us as Nationals and we are to be known by IT and ITS officials as Texans, South Carolinians, Tennesseans, Ohians pursuant to law. We are only to be known as U.S. CITIZENS when we are involved in commerce as officers of REGISTERED CORPORATIONS.

    It doesn't get any simpler than this!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anyone familiar with Turner's Act of State I recorded over ten years ago? It is similar to the name doc that Anna has posted.

    ReplyDelete