Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, March 4, 2016

ALERT TO ALL IRS CASES IRS Lufkin Case proving no Jurisdiction outside of DC 02-23-16

This case completely destroys the idea that the Feds have any jurisdiction whatsoever within the several states.
All the kangaroo so called "federal" courts are fraud.  They are nothing but a big lie.  They are nothing but corporate tribunals which only have jurisdiction over their own employees, people who get a paycheck from their government services corporation. They have absolutely NO jurisdiction over free, living Americans living within the boundaries of the states.
Does that sound off the wall?  It's NOT. It's absolutely true and the documents of the current case below prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.


I challenge ANYONE to prove this wrong. It can't be done.

Paul Stramer


19 comments:

  1. most excellent. the beast has been killed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not yet. Not until it's roasting over an open flame...

      Delete
  2. Thank you Paul for all your efforts in getting this out to all of us. I really appreciate it very much.
    Blessing to you and your family.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow! It is amazing the extent of the ongoing fraud by United States (Inc), which is documented and presented by Judge Anna von Reitz (aka Anna Maria Riezinger), for the benefit of all us “Joint Tenants in the Sovereignty” (aka We the People). Though i read the entire 36 pdf pages and somewhat understand the legal jargon (a new word for me--"recondite" comes to mind), the fraud is amazingly complex.

    My eternal gratitude is to Anna von Reitz for her extensive research to discover the fraud, how it continues to be perpetrated, and for showing whoever is interested how to expose the fraud in defense of their person and property.

    Kudos are also in order for Paul Stramer, who publishes Judge Anna's informative articles on this (his) website, as well as maintaining the website at www.annavonreitz.com.

    Love and Light,

    frank-urban: farmer

    ReplyDelete
  4. North Americans are deceived by fuzzy words claiming euthanasia is the way to exit this world, insinuating if they don't vote for Death with Dignity, they'll die in excruciating pain. It's a scam from hell, once it's made law it gives hospitals the right to choose who lives or dies, especially if they make a mistake you'll surely take a turn for the worse.

    I have prima facie evidence a catholic hospital in washington state murdered my wife Gloria Jean Brown, August 8, 2012. I cannot obtain a lawyer or 501 group defending life to represent me, tells me their allegiances. Had to pursue it pro se, it's at the washington supreme court, I'm appealing a superior court dismissal for lack of standing for failure to state a cause, set for March 29, 2016. Our constitutional right is to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, it cannot be taken away without due process, you cannot be euthanized if they haven't secured informed consent from you, even with involuntary statutes in force, otherwise it's involuntary euthanasia and that's murder, yet state authorities won't investigate and cant be found guilty of violating 18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy for delaying the execution of any law of the United States. I should make a declaration that I am a freeman, alive and standing on land jurisdiction and challenge them to step down if they won't give me a remedy so a common law judge can be seated in a land jurisdiction court where I would have standing.

    Case has the potential to destroy the euthansia movement, even the state court can revoke the death statutes which would devastate the DWD crowd and get them packing, the whole plowing of the fields starting at the top to stop roman double effect philosophy as an excuse for murdering people, just like nuremburg, they'll all say they were only doing their jobs, which didn't stop them from being hung over the excuse that some good comes out doing some bad.

    We have a chance not to have to relive another holocaust and set caselaw on the sanctity of life, by bringing us hope for that new world Jesus told us about, and our founders dreamed of, a republic and people without a pope acting as the chairman of the board of U.S STATES OF AMERICA INC. Pope Francis needs to take care of his flock, but stay out of our jurisdiction and business forever. we need to take back our gold hidden in Swiss banks and the Vatican, give it to every poor person in the world so there will be no more hunger, no more wars, we can make comemerative pins celebrating the day we all became free. Thank you so much Judge Anna.
    Sincerely,
    Bobby Brown
    Talk Platelets

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am very sorry you lost your wife, and in the manner in which you did. I will pray for you, and your endeavours. What you are doing affects every living man or woman who trusts these hospitals with their loved one'S lives

      Delete
  5. There is a huge problem with this. If one court decides that it is right all people in US jails and prisons will have to be released.

    That will never happened.

    Sometimes the truth is meaningless in application.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Think smaller, how about the Adjutant General in the Texas State? Or the CEO of Texas? Just a thought?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hello Paul,
    I read a fair share of the documents presented here and I must say, I do not see what is proven here. Other than John T. is brilliant! It certainly appears as though he has called all the actors and anyone else concerned out onto the carpet. But, Is there something that I am not seeing?
    It seems to me that this case or docket is still in progress and not completely finished or closed at this time. While it may be significant forward progress, it also seems like something still may or may not happen. I don't see where the "Government" acquiesced or withdrew or any damages awarded, etc. Did something happen on the 23rd Feb? Has the "Supreme Court" taken the case?
    Is John's property secure now? Will a criminal case in some jurisdiction proceed or continue now? What is the expected or predicted outcome? Has the desired outcome already been achieved?
    All The Best,
    Dave S, mgr.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The case is over. Trowbridge lost. The court seized his property, sold it at auction and gave the proceeds to the IRS.

      He is attempting to appeal but all have been rejected.

      Delete
    2. the COURT that permitted the IRS seizure, auction sale & proceeds to IRS clearly has/had no lawful jurisdiction to do so, rendering the unlawful taking null & void. Possession being "nine-tenths of the law", Trowbridge need only stand his ground, continuing his efforts to protest, appeal (whatever his heart leads)lawfully & peacefully. Both he & his land remain outside & beyond the jurisdiction of dead corp[se] COURTs & IRS, a foreclosed foreign corp[se] debt collector.
      I envision & am co-creating freedom from tyranny of this slavery system empowered by people's ignorance of Truth that sets one free, when KNOWN & acted upon from Heart, mind & soul in unity with Source of all blessing.

      Delete
  9. "I challenge ANYONE to prove this wrong. It can't be done."

    The proof that it is wrong is that no one has ever won a case using these methods. They all lose in the end. You cannot question the legitimacy of the court. They will not allow this to happen because doing so destroys all their previous decisions. It would cause chaos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Chaos" is what has reigned entirely too long via corrupted corp[se] system. One does NOT lose until one abandons one's land and or rights. Abandonment is how one gives over to their tyranny & they eventually "win" by threat, duress & coercion- all based on fraud, which destroys validity of all done thereby. Standing one's ground peacefully & lawfully is in deed a sound defense, which can become basis of a winning offense against the people who perpetrate trespass upon one's rights/property.

      Delete
  10. I just offer this for the future to anyone who wants to challenge first the Territorial jurisdiction of the United States court beyond their actual territory. Here is an important lesson about territorial composition for written law.
    Surprise, the English common law is found, no, hidden, in the English language. Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being and a jury tries a murder case. The meanings of all the words used in the English common law are found in any Standard English dictionary. Contrast the simplicity of the English common law with government law.

    Before the Constitution of September 17, 1787 was ratified by nine States and established between those States, the idea of a county was as a subdivision of anyone of one those States of the original Union. After ratification, those counties remained subdivisions of those States of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777; however the new element of a law superior to the English common law was introduced into the common law county.

    The Judiciary Act of 1789 redefined the county by redefining the States of the United States of America that had ratified the Constitution of September 17, 1787. Section 2 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 divided the United States into thirteen districts. At the time, no one realized that including the Districts of Maine and Kentucky reduced the other districts to whatever territory belonging to the United States of America was found or might be found in the future.

    The current definition of a federal county in Title 1 of United States Code Section 2 is this: “The word “county” includes a parish, or any other equivalent subdivision of a State or Territory of the United States,” confirms that all federal counties will consist of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. Any subdivision of the United States will be federal territory because all the term “United States” means after the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 is the Constitution of the United States.

    The United States as a place or places within the United States of America,
    which are subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States in
    Congress assembled begin to emerge in the Northwest Ordinance of July 13,
    1787.


    Thereafter, confusion reigns as to which "United States" is being used,
    because any truthful explanation would immediately shrink the federal
    government to the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and the
    territory owned or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United
    States in Congress assembled.



    The sentence: "Sections 81 - 131 of this chapter show the territorial
    composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945,"
    was added by the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of
    Representatives, so Title 28 of the United States Code would conform to
    Statute Law, the mark of positive law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, in other words, there is nothing to be done?

      Delete
    2. there is NEVER "nothing to be done" unless one gives up, abandoning one's rights, property & or cause. One can choose to be "The Last Man Standing"- he who leaves the battlefield first loses.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.