Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Monday, April 25, 2022

Your Sheriff or My Sheriff?

 By Anna Von Reitz

There are two kinds of cops --- public peacekeepers and private law enforcement officers-- that is, private security personnel hired by corporations to protect their business interests. 

We call the first class of elected public officers peacekeepers. Their purpose is to keep the peace and protect the people and property of a community.   County Sheriffs are the most common public peacekeeping officers in this country, and their paid or volunteer assistants are known as Deputies. 

Unfortunately, as many County Governments  were quietly converted into commercial corporation franchises in the 1960's, the public offices of our honorable County Sheriffs were unlawfully converted into private corporate offices instead. 

Their offices went from being American public peacekeeping offices to being private law enforcement positions obligated to serve foreign corporations---not the American Public. 
The Sheriffs themselves went from being considered "Law Men" to being "Human Resources" and none of this was explained to any of them.  

This change from Marion County to Marion County, Incorporated, was virtually invisible and in most places, it went unnoticed, but it meant that the County Sheriffs went from being the highest ranking Officers of the Law in each County to being the lowest men on the totem pole in a private Law Enforcement hierarchy that was intent on enforcing  Statutes, Codes, Rules, and Regulations instead of the Public Law. 

This sudden sleight-of-hand conversion and the complete shift of duties and concerns away from the best interests of the public to the best interests of the corporations employing these newly redefined "Sheriffs" caused no end of consternation.  

The sudden and self-evident disrespect of Constitutional Guarantees drew attention and led to the landmark Supreme Court case Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. --- with USA, Inc., being the foreign parent corporation of the Plaintiff's redefined "County, Incorporated".

The upshot of Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. was that as the employer could not dictate away the Public Duty each man owed to his country and community, it would be left to the Sheriff's personal discretion whether or not to uphold the Constitutional Guarantees owed to the people in his community. Likewise it would be left to his discretion whether or not he would, for example, defend them from murderers or thieves. 

That was no longer his job as "Sheriff" according to the corporation employing him, no matter what the people on the street -- the ones actually paying for his services -- assumed.  Instead, his job was to make money for the corporation and protect the corporation's interests at the expense of the people actually paying his salary and benefits. 

You can well imagine the cognitive dissonance that this caused, both for the men who continued to call themselves "Sheriffs" though they had in fact been unlawfully converted into "Constables" and for the people in their communities, who could no longer count on "their" Sheriff being friendly, respectful, or willing to protect them. 

The United States Attorney General's Office shed some light on this confusion in a series of decisions published as  57 Opinions of the Attorney General 614 (1972), and 60 Opinions of the Attorney General 647, 652-653 (1975), in which it was clearly stated that "Under the common law the duty to attend the justices and magistrates courts lay with the constable rather than with the sheriff." 

In other words, all these "District Courts" whether Municipal Districts (Magistrate Courts) or Territorial Districts (State of State franchise courts) are supposed to receive their security and enforcement from a Constable.   

A Constable?  We don't have Constables in this country, or do we?  

Our Sheriff's Offices were unlawfully converted into foreign Constable offices when the County Governments incorporated themselves, but nobody told us and nobody told them.  So we have British Constables roaming our streets, but they are calling themselves "Sheriffs" just the same. 

This deceit keeps the American People in the dark, confused about why their expectations related to their Sheriffs are no longer being met by foreign corporation Constables masquerading as Sheriffs. 

Just recently I was treated to another tear in the web of deceit surrounding the nature of these foreign "Sheriffs" when one of them brutally attacked and evicted one of our people without cause or warning. This armed "Sheriff" came with no less than seven "Sheriff's Detectives" to man-handle a single elderly woman and her cat. 

Since when have we ever had "Sheriff's Detectives"?  No such office exists in our government, but.... there are Pinkerton Detectives.  Remember? The railroads and coal mines hired these British thugs to bust the Unions.  Nothing has changed. 

These corporate Pukes calling themselves "Sheriffs" aren't our Sheriffs.  They have no Public Office. By rights, they should be arrested for impersonating a Sheriff, but the rest of us have to get off the couch and accept our Public Duty to do that, and have enough people standing with us in the Public Interest to make it stick.  

Every time I think about these foreign corporate marauders swaggering around our streets with guns on their hips pretending to be our Law Officers, our Sheriffs, our Deputies that we pay to defend us and our property ---- I turn ten shades of red, and no, I am not blushing. 
I'm angry to the bone. 

I am angry with the politicians who allowed such a situation to ever develop.  

I am angry with the bovine stupidity and complacency of the people who have made careers as "Sheriffs" without caring that they are committing crimes. 

Most of these phony "Sheriffs" wouldn't know their Public Duty if it bit them in the buttocks, and even if it did, they wouldn't care. 

When these thugs who have no Public Office related to our country broke down my friend's door and started trashing her home, she told them to cease and desist.  She explained why they had no business trespassing on her land.  She told them that they were committing crimes.  

They laughed.  They thought it was a big joke.  Oh, ha-ha, we're going to throw this old woman out on the street and make a lot of money for the bank.  La-dee-dah.  We've got attorneys to protect us.  We're the gubmint.... 

No, they aren't.  They are for-hire commercial mercenaries without any American Public Office of any kind, and those attorneys they depend on are just more lawless hypocrites. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

15 comments:

  1. Anna, I hope to read a followup article soon that tells the story of these thugs losing their bonds, being unemployed and being prosecuted to the full extent of OUR law. As an elected peace official, this really burns my biscuits and I take it personally. My job is to protect people, not victimize them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I tried of hearing the problem. What is the solution ? What can everyday people do to reverse this? If it were me i'd terminate the bailment of the birth right to bailed to these thugs and demand return of your inheritance by physically presenting at the local court house to start an inheritance claim on your ancestors will. Nothing will change if good men to nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i think maybe "bailment" indicates that you would be making an inheritance claim in Admiralty, but i would be surprised if Admiralty had anything at all to do with "inheritances". maybe it does though, you know how they interweave thier FICTIONS.

      the idea of the "termination" of the "bailment" of the "birthright" does sound interesting though, in its principle.

      Delete
  3. What is getti g an inheritance do. If people arent will to stand together for what is right without a dangled carrot. Then they arent going to after they get the carrot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. I second the thought of sheriff Mack hes a Constitutional Sheriff. Im sure he has some ideas on how to address this situation. We need to do something about these policy enforcers..Imtired of being misidentified. What im doing is writing a warning notice to my county sheriff to stop the racial profiling and educate them self and the ones under him regarding the diffrence of nationals and citizens. if it dosent stop the next letter nill bring suit against them.

      Delete
  5. Just heard on the Dana Loesch(?) (e.g. Lash) radio show:

    hereby Paraphrased: Rhode Island State of State legislature introducing bill, whereby he who is not vaccinated has to pay 2x the established property tax rate.

    And to paraphrase Martin Short's humor in the Three Amigos "sew sew like the wind . . ." or

    "paper! paper! over their presumptive piracies, paper like the wind . . ."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hahaha... forwarded this one to the local Sheriff to see what he had to say about the claims. Most Counties in TEXAS are NOT incorporated, its the TOWNS that incorporate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Actually never considered that all sheriffs weren’t incorporated.
    They tried to force all local governments to adhere to 1940 state plan .
    All offices according to fed was to agree in all matters (collusion).
    And Anna pointed out by 1970 a full court press to get everyone to incorporate.
    However the system of color of law and using warehouse orders .

    ReplyDelete
  8. Offering the common law actually our only law on this land permitted.
    Declaration of Independence
    Your have brought Admiralty and vice Admiralty beyond it’s ancient limits .
    In other words bringing ships up rivers and holding court .
    That’s military style common law that’s UCMJ tailored after after code of Harabi.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Judge Dale page 97 great America adventure:these corporate laws and regulations are called statutes and their affect and controld over human beings is deceptively obtained by consent through civil contracts “.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Foot note in NIV Bible, in book of Revelation - "in ancient times people believed statutes talked to the."

      Definition of Merriam Webster Dictionary - "torries or "tory" some tribe in the realm of the Britian or Ireland (?) who pillaged the land and people, or some such?

      Interested surmises - Statue Tory, statutory - How to steal from people using "statues."

      Delete
    2. . . . I believe a "statue" may be talking/commanding to us several comments above?

      Delete
    3. bubba,
      that still leaves the *man* out of the picture though because (a) *man* cant enter into contract. only a dead entity can contract.
      so all "civil contracts" or so-called "social contracts" cannot be with (the) man...only with the CITIZEN / FICTIONAL ENTITY.
      AND man can never be forced to be in OR remain in an agreement that causes him harm. EVER!!!
      plus, he can leave just because he wants to leave, but will probably be required to pay for harm, if any, caused to the other man for breaking the agreement..
      boots

      Delete
    4. man/woman will do almost any foolish endeavor. So might monkeys.

      imagine a limited circumstance. e.g. two "monkeys" alone on a "deserted" food barren island - two monkeys need each one and other in order to acess a sole banna tree eternally fruited. monkey1 wants to contract, monkey2 wants merely to "agree" now both with heavy clubs in hand stand off in challenge. which monkey perishes by starvation?

      Delete