Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Wednesday, July 14, 2021

The Picture for Texas:

 By Anna Von Reitz

I have faith in the people of Texas.
The Federation of States has no desire or intention to shut The Texas Assembly down --- just need to shut down the activities and influences that have been trying to create an excuse to attack us and label a lot of innocent people "armed insurrectionists" and "extremists".
People don't realize that our enemies have a LOT to gain by painting us as insurrectionists and extremists, and this is exactly the scenario Eric Dingus was setting up. They have been preparing to kill their Priority Creditors for a long time, but in order to get away with it, they need a cover story. Making us look like the aggressors and law-breakers suits their interests to a T. They’d love to attack us and blame the victims, too.
Everyone is aware of what happened at Ruby Ridge, at Waco, and to LaVoy Finicum. Don't forget the Colorado Nine and the tragic story of young Schaeffer Cox, jailed for 26 years for a "thought crime". All these actions were promoted and executed by the FBI.
It does not take rocket science to figure out what the FBI is capable of ---and understand the need to keep an eye on them. They watch us. We watch them. As long as everyone stays in their lane, that's fine enough. But when they trespass, things get ugly.
Their bosses have motivations and business interests contrary to ours, and sometimes, things go sideways. They get uppity and start planning and hiring operatives (for big money) to "garner influence" and "spread confusion" and "compromise the organization". That's their lingo, not mine. Right off the page in front of my nose, on their letterhead.
Pretty soon, you've got a situation like we've got right now.
Eric Dingus has been presented to you all as an innocent Texan, wrongly accused, slandered, harmed by outsiders, the Big, Bad Federation. Your instinct to protect a fellow-Texan, your sense of justice and fair play, your well-established dislike and distrust of the Federal Government ---even though the Federation is resoundingly NOT the Federal Government, it is being deliberately confused with the Federal Government---all that, is being manipulated and used to fuel high emotions. But high emotions are not called for.
What is called for is cold analytical evaluation.
The FBI admits that Eric Dingus is an "asset" and that he has worked for them providing information (and selling that information to them) about the Texas Militias for over sixteen years and has also worked undercover for the DEA. When applying for the job as PKTF Director, he admitted the DEA connection, but not the FBI connection.
Why admit one and not the other? That's the first question.
When we ran a routine background check prior to him coming on board, it came back squeaky clean, so clean that both I and one of our security chiefs said, "It looks too clean. Looks like its been scrubbed." Then our contact on the ground came back from Amarillo and said, "This guy barely exists." None of these reports were definitive --- that is, we couldn't prove anything one way or the other, but it wasn’t a warm, fuzzy feeling.
When Eric started the job, we gave him the Mission Statements for both the PKTF and the Continental Marshals as a starting point. This is perfectly routine and there is no reason in the world that we didn't or wouldn't do this. There are multiple ways we can verify that we did. So he had cause to know what the PKTF was supposed to be doing from the get-go, and he also had cause to know the completely separate mission of The Continental Marshals Service.
Now he is claiming that we didn't give him that information. Why wouldn't we?
It's public information, used to define and organize both organizations, all of it discussed multiple times and in multiple ways in many emails. There's no way or reason that we would pay a man $2000 a month, plus project money, plus offer him use of a 37' motorhome and a car---- and not tell him what his job was.
He had those Mission Statements, but he ignored them and deliberately didn't share them around with the men and women involved. Why?
The most likely answer is that it's a lot easier to misdirect people if they don't know or aren't sure of what their mission really is.
Next question, what did he do?
He put himself in the middle, told the Marshals that he was in charge of them (and every single one of those men will affirm it) and proceeded to commandeer the Marshals Service---- something not even remotely related to the job of the PKTF Director. That's contrary to the Mission Statements of both organizations and contrary to any directive spoken or written ever given to him.
Then, there's the sequence of events---
Le Laroi introduces Eric Dingus as a likely candidate for PKTF Director.
Eric get his intro.
Eric threatens Le Laroi privately, three times, she “mysteriously” steps down from being Texas Coordinator.
Kim Reynolds is brought forward by Eric Dingus, vetted, and installed as Texas Coordinator.
Eric goes to Utah and gets embroiled in a child custody complaint --- having nothing to do with his job at all.
Eric stays in Utah.
During this same time, the FBI/State of Utah installs a gun bunker on the property of Jackie Smyth, the Utah Coordinator, attempting to frame her as a “violent insurrectionist” and give themselves an excuse to kill her and confiscate her property.
We foil their efforts, dissolve the Utah Assembly so there is no target for them there, and expose them to Interpol and other law enforcement groups. They recoil and move on.
Eric begins moving all over the western states, notably to Colorado and Oklahoma and Texas and Nevada. We track his movements. He makes many inexplicable side trips between Point A and Point B, and not to visit anyone associated with our Assemblies. We give him the benefit of the doubt and think at first that he is meeting with covert militia leaders, trying to get them to come in under the safety of the official and “well-regulated” State Assembly Militia. But no.
We still don’t know all that he was doing, but we do know that several of the places he visited are FBI Safehouses.
So, go figure. Didn’t admit FBI employment. Was present throughout the big Dust Up in Utah. Was visiting FBI Safehouses while purportedly on business trips for us.
Walks like a duck. Quacks like a duck.
Eric brings forward a proposal to contract with a Canadian company for our secure email and internal communications system. Canada is always the backdoor for the Brits to spy on us. We inquire about this aspect of the proposal and get a Shine On answer.
Eric starts negotiating with private corporations for funding, including corporations known to be shelf corporations for government agencies.
Fast forward, in rapid fire succession, Wayne Whomsley, California Coordinator, comes under fire for being irresponsible with petty cash. Scott Sanford, Colorado Coordinator, is threatened and a real estate Ponzi scheme gets “attached” to him without his knowledge or consent --- he is being set up for criminal charges and removal as Colorado Coordinator, in broad daylight.
We intervene and derail the real estate gambit they are trying to foist off on Scott. Again, we report them to Interpol and police corruption investigators.
At this point, I sent Eric a nasty note and told him enough is enough – get back in his box. I order re-investigation of what happened with Le Laroi and send a team to investigate Eric’s cover story on the ground in Amarillo. Comes back that Le was threatened and coerced to resign her post as Coordinator by Eric, after having befriended Eric and having recommended him in the first place. Investigation in Amarillo is inconclusive; has a house there, but no real presence.
Texas, Utah, California, and Colorado Coordinators, all successively attacked and targeted for removal and replacement --- the four most important states in the west from a military standpoint. Coincidence?
We get wind that Eric is pushing “something big” and a copy of correspondence in which he promotes forming a “unified” and “national” force ---- something roughly equivalent to the National Guard, financed by the private corporations mentioned before. The problem is that the National Guard is illegal as it is presently composed, and so would any such armed force promoted by the Assemblies. Creation of such an armed force extending beyond individual State borders would give the FBI and other Agencies all the excuse needed to crack down and go to war against all the “violent armed insurrectionists” Eric was trying to create out of thin air.
So we sacked him and not a moment too soon. Eric vows revenge and that there will be trouble.
We named his Co-Director, Susan Hauck, to replace him, and then had to replace her, too, because barely a week later, she moved to decommission The Continental Marshals Service --- an action that Eric had planned prior to his departure, and which she attempted to carry through, and which neither one of them had any authority to do.
Three weeks after sending Eric packing, all the simmering misbehavior in Michigan erupts, Kim Reynolds is warned to make tracks away from Eric and his agenda, but instead, she starts bad-mouthing me and the Federation and plotting an end-run around our authority, Wayne Whomsley is found in dishonor by a second independent investigation, and Josh Gandy, the now-former Hawaii Coordinator, has another “episode” in which he spews all sorts of gossipy nonsense and slanders Le Laroi and my Executive Officer.
So the way I read this, Texas, Utah, California, and Colorado were targeted and attacked, while Michigan and Hawaii and possibly Nebraska, had “sleeper cells” of people who had infiltrated and were undermining morale and progress in those States.
Someone said that I was cleaning house and I hope to do a good job of it.
Assembling a nation is a serious job and responsibility. There are a lot of Big Business interests that don’t want to see us succeed, and a lot of Federal Agencies that are armed to the teeth and do whatever they are told, no questions asked.
Every assembly and every assembly member has to be clued in and vigilant and has to know that these things happen. And it’s the Federation’s job to make sure things don’t go astray on the road to get where we are going.
If you think we were wrong about Eric Dingus --- look where you’d be without us.
First, you wouldn’t be assembling at all, You’d be cowered down in your homes, waiting to be “resettled” so as to expedite Chinese and Arab Creditors of the U.S. Corporation coming in and seizing your homes and businesses and moving you to nice internment camps. Or on the lam, fighting a guerrilla war with whatever gunpowder you had.
Second, you wouldn’t have any public records identifying you as Americans. You’d all be misidentified as Territorial Subjects of the Queen and Dual Federal Citizens, owned as property by the Roman Pontiff.
Third, the rest of the world wouldn’t have ever known what was going on in this country. No action in your favor would have been brought in the High International Courts. Nothing would have been said or proven and this entire country would have been deemed “vacated” and without a government operating in international jurisdiction.
Fourth, your Continental Marshal Service would have been decommissioned on paper, and there would be no international peacekeeping officers in your land jurisdiction, which would have allowed the UN an excuse to move their officers into your States and begin the “resettlement” described in the first item listed here.
Fifth, if Eric Dingus had had his way, you would be blamed for creating an illegal armed force and that illegal armed force would have been liberally described as a rabble of armed violent insurrectionists and extremists, and the various Agencies would have been let loose on you with the support of the National Guard, and this whole country would shortly look like the siege of the Branch Davidians in Waco.
Do you need the Federation to guide you through this and keep you safe?
You’d better know that you do.

Anna Maria

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

5 comments:

  1. WOW ! Anna I am surprised you have any hair left , dealing with such brats.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Insurrection brought in with the alien and sedition act .
    The Kentucky resolution pend by Jefferson saying we should resist overreach.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have been trying to describe this movement to people but I myself struggle with it somethimes.
    It is easy to manipulate the masses, when there is much confusion about the processes and the structure of how things shall be structured.
    I will be reaching out to Paul in a few days to see if I can get the 'For Dummies' version of this.
    'Justice for America'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Jural Assembly Handbook is awesome and virtually spells it out for the assemblies. Missouri is digesting it together on a weekly Zoom discussion. Meanwhile our secretaries are bringing people home as is our mission and getting them papered up to fill out Jury pools. We are getting two to three counties every week or two so I feel we are sailing smoothly. Anna has been writing about this almost daily an her materials are readily available. I always instruct the incoming to digest as much of it as they can and stick with her stuff, too mny cooks spoil the broth.

      Delete
  4. Anna, I am trying to wrap my mind around Susan being an infiltrator. I have been on soooo many Saturday and Wednesday calls with her and learned more from her than most other assembly members anywhere. I admit I could have been wrong about Eric, but I am just not buying into Susan being a part of that. She ALWAYS used your materials and seemed loyal as I have ever seen anyone be to another. She truly believes in this at the core. Perhaps she made a mistake. She was doing a lot and she was OVERWORKED and UNDERPAID. No one will ever convince me there is or was any malicious intent from that woman. I stand behind her 100 percent. Call me crazy, so what next? I am still with purpose for the first time in many years, one that benefits humanity as a whole, my grandchildren's future, I'm about out of here this round, so, so what. I have nothing to lose, a firm grasp on reality, and a wonderfully expensive education that groomed me for this role. So what!!!! Here's what. Goodbye High seas and hello land and soil. There's no turning back now. We're almost home! Susan held that attitude too 100%. Allow someone to make a mistake and correct it. I can honestly say I love that woman and have never met her face to face but have heart to heart.

    ReplyDelete