Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Tuesday, June 22, 2021

Lawful Persons, Legal Persons , LEGAL PERSONS -- Sign in America

 By Anna Von Reitz

See that spectrum moving left to right? From "Lawful Person" to "Legal Persons" to "LEGAL PERSONS" ?
They are all "persons" and they are all existing in international or global jurisdiction as dead "fictional" entities.
When you, as an American standing on the land and soil of an American State of the Union, go to Walmart and buy a bag of beans using a bank account full of funds denominated as lawful money, you are operating as a Lawful Person.
Only Lawful Persons can use lawful money.
When you, as an American have "gone to sea" and are "voluntarily" adopting British Territorial U.S. Citizenship, and go to Walmart to buy a bag of beans, you are obligated to act as a Legal Person and use a bank card or bank account funded by Federal Reserve Notes, and by definition you are acting as a Legal Person and U.S. Citizen.
When you, as an American Municipal PERSON and Municipal citizen of the United States, go to Walmart and buy a bag of beans, you are acting as a LEGAL PERSON and use a bank card or bank account funded by FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.
The Americans operating as Lawful Persons are entitled to "denominate" fiat currency as "lawful money" by Federal Law, PL 73-10 and 12 USC 411, as remedy to the theft of their silver in non-equitable exchange for Federal Reserve Notes -- that is, Promissory Notes, or more popularly, I.O.U.'s.
This inequitable forced exchange of silver for paper promises was legalized by these provisions of Federal Law and it has to be maintained or the members of Congress are revealed to be nothing but robbers in suits.
Please note that in order to exercise this guarantee, you must be an American and you must be adopting your birthright political status. You have to declare it and record it.
Please note that although a member in U.S. military service adopting U.S. Citizenship, and functioning as a Legal Person, may have a birthright guarantee, that birthright is extinguished while in the service and remains extinguished until he or she "returns" to their American political status and resigns any foreign commissions they hold.
Ditto members of the Federal Civil Service and their direct dependents. They may similarly have an American birthright, but until they leave Federal Service and adopt their birthright political status as Americans, they have no ability to denominate their private script as lawful money.
So, Lawful American Persons use Lawful Money. British Territorial Legal Persons use private Federal Reserve Notes. Municipal LEGAL PERSONS use commercial bank scripts.
So, you may think, this is very odd. Nobody ever explained this to me. What difference does it make? I am still going to buy a bag of beans.
It's the difference between being a Creditor and being a Debtor, the difference between using your own assets, and using someone else's assets. It's the difference between being owed and owing.
Are you the long-lost inheritor of the American National Credit, or the poor slug who is the inheritor of the US National Debt?
In truth and in fact, your identity as an American has been stolen and you have been impersonated as both a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and as a Municipal citizen of the United States to prevent you from claiming the remedies that you are owed.
All Americans are owed Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemptions from all Public Debts as part of the same published remedies.
I, for example, may owe the State of Alaska for some public service that their organization has rendered, or I may owe the Municipal STATE OF ALASKA for services. At the same time, they each owe me far more, as a result of their use and abuse of my Good Name, my labor, and my other assets. And this is in fact borne out by the Treasury and Clearinghouse Records.
They owe me $12 Billion, and I owe the Territorial Government $50 Million. In round numbers. Go figure.
I have requested the Secretary of the Treasury to "offset" this amount, so that their account bearing my name no longer owes the Territorial Government anything.
They will still be $11.5 Billion in debt, but who's counting?
Quite simply, when two people owe each other money, they can each pay it off with new money they earn, or they can "swap the debt". Bring it down to simple terms:
Your brother owes you $100, and you owe him $10. So in lieu of you paying him anything, you reduce his debt to you by $10, leaving him with a $90 debt.
That's what a Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemption is, and that is what we are talking about when we tell our Public Servants to "offset the debt".
Instead of making this remedy widely known and accessible, the Gubmint has hidden it away and made accessing it extremely difficult, even though they know that they owe it.
And as a result, their "National Debt" has grown wildly out of control, instead of being moderated and reduced by the application of American National Credit, which has burgeoned, too, for lack of offset.
When questioned about this, the snide perpetrators, who are not eligible to use this guarantee themselves, pretend that they can't read plain English and that they have never seen an eligible American in their lives.
Well, yoo-hoo! Here we are! Your friends and neighbors! Returned from being kidnapped by Undeclared Foreign Agents, depending on you to do the right and honorable thing.
There have been questions about the Sign In America Program that is open to State Assembly Members who have declared and recorded their birthright political status as Americans. People have accused us of being "daft" and of working some kind of con game or fraud.
Instead, we are just plain old Americans showing up at long last, and demanding remedy that we have been owed ever since the 1930's, and which our purported Trustees have failed to provide.

Hear that, Mr. Secretary of the Treasury? Hear that, Joint Chiefs of Staff?

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

20 comments:

  1. Apart from your website, Anna, where can we read about this in the code and more importantly, apply it. Don't leave us hanging with half-descriptions, like for example, the Z-tags. Evidence of this working? for anyone? Show me how to buy beans at Walmart in lawful money, examples, templates, testimonials. Don't treat me like I'm stupid when you brought it up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you haven't been following Christopher James(A Warrior Calls) he just had an interview With SGT Report "KNOWLEDGE, HONOR & COURAGE IS THE LIGHT" -- A Warrior Calls
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/rwqyTHhdI2Cj/

      Delete

    2. Care to share you accomplishments with other ?

      Publicly or privately

      Godspeed

      Delete
    3. HappyCamper-- ''Show me how to buy beans at Walmart in lawful money''---- Ummmm --- she just did.. read the article again,, then send a very short letter with your bank account number on it (or go to) to your banker and write or say "Redeem in Lawful Money per 12 USC 411" ..
      Special NOTE;;; Because these banks are operating with deliberate deception (imao) it would be prudent to send the letter via registered mail, return reciept requested,, Take a picture of the letter with registration lable attache and save the mailing reciept and the return receipt when that comes back to you in the mail..
      as for all the other proofs and proceedures you asked for ,,
      take some responsibility for you life and read.. I dont have time to answer this question 700 times and Neither does Anna...
      ALL your questions have been answered and you have already been directed to the answers .. go to annavonreitz.com .. type a few search words into the on site search box and make and effort to find what you are looking for.. another excellent source with help available is theamericanstatesassembly.net , ..
      You have choices remain ignorant and enslaved to the Fed ,irs, whatever STATE you live in, the local cops the dhs the cps, fema and all the other gubbmin agencys ,,OR.. be a Free man in America.. pretty brain dead simple choice to me.. do what i did ... read first ,, then do it..
      Oh and ps -- its a lot easier now than 2 years ago and there iare a lot more living people helping move the process along..

      Delete
    4. Good morning UNKNOWN, I was hoping that you could provide a little more info or detail on how to find David Straight? Upon searching I only came up with 1 video that had a David Straight as one of the two speakers. The initial speaker talks about People Trafficking. Thank you.

      Delete
    5. @Happy camper I have Z plates also, and the cops never bother me, ever since I put on my car. It's like magic, they just look and go about their business. At first I wanted them to bother me, so that I can explain myself and spout off my freshly known knowledge. But they refuse to bite, at first it upset me, but now I'm okay with it. Because they leave me alone, which is what I wanted in the first place.

      Delete
    6. UNKNOWN and Curtchrisdagod: Please provide needed info to the group. Were these Z plates authorized by your state OR are you referring to the ones purchased by members from the Assemblies by a Vendor?

      My sister has these Vendor Plates and was recently cited several violations by the county sheriffs, handcuffed and taken to jail. So... this will be a teaching moment for the "road pirates" and the county sheriff and the department.... for now. State is MICHIGAN...

      In addition to David Straight's info dealing with their courts, Alphonse Faggiolo in Pennsylvania will teach you how to beat them at their own game with PERSONAL LIABILITY via a non-judicial court judgment.... In other words, a good defense is a good offense... As stated above... become responsible for yourself and learn the information and actions to take.... PEACE..

      Delete
    7. @Fred if I did this they would look at me like I'm crazy. >>>then send a very short letter with your bank account number on it (or go to) to your banker and write or say "Redeem in Lawful Money per 12 USC 411 <<<

      Delete
    8. First and foremost thank you Anna ! Listen up if you want to Anna has just given you for free a recipe for success, if you are not able to find the ingredients, just keep eating the store bought poison foods, you probably have never even read the label, most foods have to much salt, to much sugar, and then they modify corn to become "high fructose corn syrup, ( try feeding your plant with that ). So stop crying and start studying and trying different methods until you can be of some little if any assistance, for others that have used our time and energy to help the likes of you cry babies, waiting to suck on a paper to get milk from.

      Delete
  2. .
    What is a fiction doing with a person or man - the illusion created by the oligarchy and the BAR Guild

    The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing a quality which is not natural to it, and consequently establishes, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribes or authorizes. It differs from presumption because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true.
    The law never feigns what is impossible. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it. It aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which does not exist; but it will never feign that what was impossible actually is.
    Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it under the pretence of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench.
    It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require.
    The law abounds in fictions. That an estate is in abeyance; the doctrine of remitter, by which a party who has been disseised of his freehold and afterwards acquires a defective title, is remitted to his former good title; that one thing done today, is considered as done at a preceding time by the doctrine of relation; that because one thing is proved, another shall be presumed to be true, which is the case in all presumptions; that the heir, executor, and administrator stand by representation in the place of the deceased are all fictions of law. "Our various introduction of John Doe and Richard Roe; our solemn process upon disseisin by Hugh Hunt; our casually losing and finding a ship (which never was in Europe) in the parish of St. Mary Le Bow, in the ward of Cheap; our trying the validity of a will by an imaginary wager of five pounds; our imagining and compassing the king's death, by giving information which may defeat an attack upon an enemy's settlement in the antipodes; our charge of picking a pocket or forging a bill with force and arms; of neglecting to repair a bridge, against the peace of the king, his crown and dignity are circumstances, which, looked at by themselves, would convey an impression of no very favorable nature, with respect to the wisdom of our jurisprudence."

    https://www.upcounsel.com/legal-def-fiction-of-law
    https://www.upcounsel.com/legal-def-precedent

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. eclesiastical law, law of the air, "heaven lies between the waters above and the waters below"is the highest form and all law comes from God , or the Gods of whatever Realm under discussion, but yet who is to prove that not to be a fiction let alone a legal fiction So is all Law Fiction in substance since are we all creations of a fiction .Our Father who art a Fiction? Is Faith a fiction?

      Delete
    2. that is not to say i beleive in fiction But its to question the legal ity of the Satan and His Church by rule of Law which is ,we are told the Popes prerogative morally .To query the fiction of Satanism .

      Delete
    3. kane: specify a testament first: old, new, or johns apocalypse

      for new testament a trinity is god, not "the lord" not "father in heaven" not "jesus (alone)"

      john's apocalypse is son of david as opposed to son of joseph.

      https://jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/issues-v15-n05/two-messiahs-in-judaism-ben-david-and-ben-joseph/

      that is conveniently left out of the bible. see the "sanhedrin" quote, it is also in at least one talmud. most people blindly "merge" them together. as you see that above site, author "merges" them together for apocalypse/revelation. no reason given. why did some "jews" change their tune?

      you should not trust answers here, because people never specify which testament they are doing, or which trinity, and routinely just "make it up as they go along"

      america never choose a testament or trinity, although in practice it is likely millenium/apocalypse 99% of the time. the illusion of freedom of religion must be maintained for masonry/illuminism. for bible things there is no such thing, it is always a lie that one can serve more than one master.

      names are not interchangable. people believe "secular" things are all manner of names, yet blindly think "ecclesiastical" things they can just mix carelessly. it is amazing to watch the cognitive dissonance.

      declaration of independence "creator" and "nature's god" is lower level demiurge. not christ, not even "the lord" necessarily. has nothing to do with "the bible" or any bible testament.

      new testament is all power in heaven and earth belongs to christ. a trinity. "the creator" "nature's god" means literally nothing and defaults to those people are damned. does not suffice for new testament, do not pass go, go straight to hell for rejecting christ.

      it is "leftist" secular humanism posing as "religious" that everyone has the same "father" and "creator" and all are "saved" and noone is "damned" and you don't have to do anything to be "saved"

      "the world" belongs to the devil. "earth" for new testament is worldly people, beastly, animals, cattle. they are damned.

      anna has a habit of pushing a make-believe "american" religion, so abomination of desolation she has her "american" version its the statue of liberty, and her "american" mark of the beast its a vaccine. we do not battle with flesh and blood. america is not a promised land. the bible is not about america. america is not god. like worldly israel, this is idolatry of the worst kind.

      anything not a proper baptism/trinity for a particular testament is a mark of the beast. which trinity is correct depends on which testament/god you think is correct.

      johns baptism is not the same as christ's, new testament people are supposed to be images of christ, not "the father" or "the lord" etc.

      for new testament, johns baptism is one such mark of the beast.

      either christ is returning or not. either the first was final, and no more, or there is another "christ" for johns apocalypse/revelation "their lord and his christ".

      depends on whether you use aristotlean or platonic logic whether such eastern "cycles" are allowed or not, whether "meek" inherit the earth or whether they are damned and they get "earth" because they lost out on heaven.

      this also is gnosticism -- things strive to return to their origins. normally this meant matter strove to return upwards to "heaven" from whence it came. saying someone returns to earth is saying they are damned/cursed.

      Delete
    4. kane:
      these things will never be resolved because america will never choose: a trinity, a baptism, a testament. for bible things this defaults to permanently damned.

      this is how masonic and illuminist goernments work, god is father in heaven and we are all brethren. everyone is "perfect" just as they are, noone needs saved, noone is damned.

      new testament does not work this way. neither does old. neither does johns apocalypse.


      whenever someone says "creator" "our creator" you need to ask: which trinity, which testament, which baptism do they mean. is that baptism john's or christ's or something else?

      people are not consistent on words, this is deliberate, however generally holy ghost is new testament (was, is, ever shall be) and holy spirit is the one who is coming (nowadays refers to johns apocalypse).

      you need to look at surrounding context (or lack thereof) to see what someone is talking about. many people have no clue and just mix and match.

      whenever somenoe says "our creator" "nature's god" none of those have anything to do with the bile.

      and "the lord" "father in heaven" all of these are meaningless unless they specify a testamant. who is "the lord"? is that deny christ, stick with old testament? is that "our lord" christ, a trinity? is that deny new testament and wait for "our lord and his christ" of johns apocalypse/revelation to show up?

      "the lords prayer" has at least 3 meanings. if people dont have answers to these questions, and have no idea what they are doing, then they are "marked" and "sealed in the forehead" -- whether literally or not.

      dont trust anything posted here regarding any "religion", americans are routinely clueless on religion, bible matters, baptisms. they never chose a testament, never chose a baptism, never chose a "creator". masonry and illuminism cannot ever choose these things, the illusion of "freedom of religion" must be maintained.

      Delete
    5. kane: when someone says "nature's god" "the creator" "our father in heaven" "the most high" "the lord" and even "jesus" and "christ" and even "jesus christ" these are all void for vagueness.

      questions to ask such people:

      which trinity, which baptism, which testament (or johns apocalypse/revelation, merge the old and new together). what time period (was, is, ever shall be, world without end? or some temporary cycle "coming any minute now"? is this a "return" of some entity, or first appearance?)

      for new testament or johns apocalypse revelation: son of joseph or son of david, or are they "merged" ? if someone is "merging" them, why "merge" them? where/who authorized this? when?

      any supposed "god" is either in the "bible" or not. the "bible" has requirements -- for all 3 testaments.

      this is ignoring the many many many other variants/gods of the bible.

      dont trust people posting here who do not specify these things -- they are all voiid for vagueness, and as far as "the bible" goes -- damned/marked by default. if they have no idea what they are doing, you should ignore anything they say on "religious" matters unless and until you see any sign of understanding.

      you will also have to see by surrounding context (or lack thereof) whether somone uses aristotlean logic versus platonic logic for literally anything they might claim. this very much applies to "religion" and everything else. if they dont know the difference, then do not believe them, they lack understanding and credibility and have no idea what they are doing.

      Delete
    6. should also be noted, "the bible" is full of "transfigurations" across the 3 "testaments" and many other things. if people dont specify whether something is "transfigured" or not, then they are also "marked" and have no idea what they are doing.

      Delete
    7. and the winner of the most meaningless phrase award: "in god we trust"

      completely meaningless. for new testament, do not pass go, go straight to hell for rejecting/not confessing christ. no trinity there. same old masonic "father in heaven" and "we are all brethren" at best.

      never trust masonic/illuminist governments on religion. america falls into this category.

      "creator" "nature's god" "in god we trust" -- anything but christ. anything but new testament. those people are all "marked" and will probably never snap out of their stupor. blinded by the luciferian light.

      "father in heaven" "the lords prayer" also requires specifying a trinity and a testament etc. for anyone to have any idea what they mean and which "god" they are talking about. if they dont specify these things or do not know, they are damned and "marked"

      there is not enough room here or time to cover all relevant issues, but all you have to do is ask people these questions, you will quickly see who is "marked" or not.

      Delete
    8. IMPORTANT

      "eclesiastical law, law of the air," none of that matters unless you are doing "alchemy", and even then, that is "earthly" -> straight to hell. spiritual death by sphinx.

      for new testament, christ has all power in heaven and earth. the end. nothing else to discuss. not negotiable. while the devil gets "the world" and "the earth" and everything "earthly" -- christ/god is ultimately above that.

      this is just separation of powers, christ/god gets heaven, the devil reigns in hell, but ultimately is under god.

      all these "jurisdictions" earth, water, air -- mean absolutely nothing regarding "the bible" or any of the 3 testaments (and many more perhaps too, johns apocalypse is just one additional "testament" itself having many "interpretations")

      again, you cannot trust anna or nearly every comment posting here about "religion" because odds are, they are posting masonic/illuminized/"american" make-believe "religion" at best.

      the fact alchemy and plato separated things into earth, water, air, fire (solid, liquid, gas, plasma, ether/quintessence above those too) is quite irrelevant to any religious matters.

      if christ is god, follow christ. makes no difference "earth" "water" "air" "fire" these are all secular/meaningless distractions.

      if "the lord" is god, follow "the lord". all this "earth" "water" "air" stuff is secular/meaningless nonsense.

      follow whichever trinity/testament/baptism/god you believe in.

      all this talk of "land jurisdiction" "sea" "air" is 100% meaningless. note anna never specifies a trinity, a baptism, a testament. this is on purpose -- all her religious comments can safely be ignored.

      we do not battle with flesh and blood. how many times must this be repeated? the 4 elements are the sphinx -- destroying angel, harpie, throttler, blinding and binding people into materiality/sensuality. like a prostitute. like adultery. like people drunk/stoned out of their minds. KILLS the spirit. like medusa - a beautiful serpent. a whited sepulchre. looks that kill.

      christ/god is above all those. quintessence. ether if you insist on sticking with the alchemy elements.

      in that sense, all of those 4 elements earth/water/air/fire are all damned. none of them are god. they are all imperfect. quintessence is above them all.

      merging the waters above and below is mercury/hermes/etc. , who is not god. representative of jupiter at best. this can be seen as water + air. he is a messenger for mother earth/nature's god at best.

      for actual god, you want quintessence, the so-called 5th element. (really, should be called the 0th or 1st, as it is higher-ranked than the other 4).

      if you want "alchemy" then quintessence beats all the other 4. plasma beats earth/water/air too.

      people need to do more research and not trust anna or most the comments here, anytime she says anything "religious"

      you want spiritual death by sphinx/medusa? then pick land, water, or air jurisdiction. you want death by fire? then pick whatever that element "translates" to.

      for alchemy "correspondences", christ/god is quintessence above those 4. the new adam. adam was perfect before the fall. above those 4 "earthly" elements.

      Delete
    9. anna routinely leads people straight to hell on all religious matters -- same for "alchemy"

      land, sea, air, fire == angel of death. materialism is considered death. "the dragon" if you prefer.

      god/christ/quintessence is above those.

      "blind god" of the gnostics aka the devil.

      those people are "mark of the beast"ed

      christ has conditions/requirements. does not directly involve alchemy elements.. genesis "lord(s)" and "lord of hosts" and such and other testaments is quite irrelevant for new testament.

      pick a testament/trinity/god first, otherwise "waters above and below" is 100% meaningless.

      the bible has to do with baptisms, which testament you choose, and which trinity. whether these correlate to alchemy elements or not is secondary and irrelevant.

      wandering off into alchemy elements is 100% irrelevvant. "god"/christ is ether/quintessence anyways -- above the other 4.

      for new testament you are supposed to be an image of christ. anything else is damnation/earthly/beastly/marked people.

      the 4 elements are the sphinx. binding people into pure materialism. this is spiritual death. aim higher.

      alive to christ, dead to the world. if you choose "land" "sea" or "air" or whatever "fire" jurisdiction is, those are all alive to the world aka dead to christ. those people are all damned. just more "marked" people. the walking dead. whited sepulchres.

      anna was pushing "lord of hosts" recently. tomorrow it will be some other meaningless nickname. do not trust anna or "americans" on any religious issues, including anything with alchemy elements. she only leads people straight to hell.

      Delete
  3. I believe that as we are created! I must and really look at why we want to challenge every word that is spoken and/or written! I on a daily basis try to help who ever I can, with what I have learned, and share that that I know! Maybe I am wrong in doing so, yet that is what I believe we are here for.

    ReplyDelete