Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Wednesday, May 26, 2021

What We Need to Communicate

 By Anna Von Reitz

When this whole Mess began there was a far greater understanding of the circumstance, at least on the parts of the Federal Military and Federal Civil Service Employees, than there is today.
The nature and purpose of the Carpetbagger Courts was pretty simple. The victorious North and their British Allies were intent on collecting money from the Southerners to pay for their own war debts. This process began immediately after Lee's Surrender and the courts tasked to act as debt collectors were formed in May of 1865.
Ten new Military Districts --- established under the Territorial District Government residing in the District of Columbia --- were set up under the auspices of the Territorial U.S. Army. Each such District was overseen by a Military General of at least Brigadier rank, and it was his duty to appoint Judges loyal to the North and the Territorial Government to the benches of these courts. The courts were then set up as private bill collection agencies to extort war reparations and profits.
Nothing has changed, except that over the years, more Military Districts have been formed across the entire length and breadth of this country, the Carpetbagger Court System has become an institution mistaken for our Lawful Court System, and it has continued to be used as means to pillage and plunder under color of law, using False Legal Presumptions, Impersonation, and Barratry to extort payment from Americans who have nothing to do with any of this graft and criminality at all.
What we, Americans who have declared and recorded our political status, need to communicate to these courts is the same today as it was in 1865.
We are Americans.
We are peaceful law-abiding non-combatant civilians.
We stand under the Public Law and The Law of Peace.
We are owed all protections and guarantees.
We are not Municipal citizens of the United States.
We claim all exemptions.
We are owed permanent, mandatory, protective injunctions.
Our State Assembly is in Session and our State is enrolled as a State of the Union.
There can be no Presumption of a Public Trust Interest.
We have not subjected ourselves to any foreign law.
We have not granted any Power of Attorney.
We request and require Full Disclosure of the Case-Claim.
There is no lack of ignorance at all levels of the current bureaucracy, including within the Carpetbagger Courts which have been in continuous operation since 1865, collecting war reparations from people who were never involved in any war and never owed any reparations.
The Military District Courts actually think (or try to bluff) that they are Article III Courts, but that is literally impossible. Why? Because the Article III Courts were formed under the auspices of the Federal Republic in 1787, under the original Federal Constitution granted to the States of America, and the Federal Republic ceased to function in 1860.
Neither the Territorial U.S. Government nor the Municipal Government of the United States operating as incorporated instrumentalities are competent to function as Article III Courts --- but they can front Military (also known as "Federal") District (Carpetbagger) Courts operating under Maritime and Admiralty Law, or Municipal COURTS to oversee Municipal FRANCHISES --- and collect money from their own respective citizenries to their heart's delight.
That's why they have accidentally-on-purpose-misidentified and impersonated all of us Americans as members of their citizenries instead of counting us for who we are --- Americans.
This information has been "compartmentalized" so as to assure that the right hand has, generally speaking, not known what the left hand was doing. Clerks of the Court only know the Clerk's part. Judges only know the Judge's part. Attorneys only know the Attorney's part.

So it remains for us to tell them what they are engaged in and the nature of the courts they are working for and foisting off on others. And most important, it remains for us to tell them who we are in no uncertain terms.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

28 comments:

  1. I have gain my political status, without the aid of Anna and David E Robinson, the start out journey would have been totally impossible, I am a paralegal with my on practice, my firm now assist so many people nation wide to innerstand what the government has and is doing to us. My gratitude for these souls mentioned is undescribable. My entire practice is credited to their knowledge, hard work and tenacious attitude.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You did read the introduction to this website---right? "Unknown"?

      Delete
    2. Paul - we have an name of Unknown

      Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
      DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE Anonymous or unknown; YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.

      Delete
    3. Mr. UNKNOWN how is it that you can make a statement like that and sign as unknown, why are bragging and not IDing yourself I suggest you remove yourself your comment mean nothing.
      Frank Martinez (there is my name)

      Delete
  2. THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS AT ALL TIMES.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A paralegal that can't form a proper sentence is suspect

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A one who does not innerstand "Dog Latin" aka, "legalese" should not throw stones... as for certain spelling errors,,
      he may just have a stickie or poorly responsive keyboard,,

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://operationdisclosureofficial.com/2021/05/22/reader-e-gobsmacked-in-canada/ can anyone verify this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .
      This site contains harmful programs
      We have detected a variety of malicious items on aloha-news.net that might attempt to install harmful programs on your computer that can modify and delete your files, change your browser settings, steal information (i.e. photos, passwords, messages, credit cards). Learn more about "what is malware and how it works"
      .....
      .....

      Delete
  7. Our top attorney on far right he operates under article 3 .
    I knew that was wrong but couldn’t counter takes a clear vision of construction of government..
    1781 articles of confederation
    Created the United States of America an instrumentality of federal Republic.
    So now the constitution of 1787 lays out the court system article 3 .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .
      The CONstitution was rewritten and r changed (words) on or about 1871 with the law of necessity (Dam BAR) title 12 sec. 319 (among other dacite by the BAR and attorneys)

      The U.S. was and is :

      The articles of confederation, (q. v.) were finally adopted on the 15th of November, 1777, and with the exception of Maryland, which, however, afterwards also agreed to them, were speedily adopted by the union of States, and by which they were formed into a federal body, and went into force on the first day of March, 1781; [and so remained until the adoption of the then bankruptcy constitution] which acquired the force of the supreme law of the land on the first Wednesday of March, 1789. - 5 Wheat. R. 420. Vide Articles of Confederation. - Bouvier's Law Revised, 6th Edition
      The free Confederate Government went bankrupt eight years after its creation, then restructured under its then new bankruptcy compact "the Constitution for the United States of America."
      Constituere. To appoint, constitute, establish, ordain, or undertake. Used principally in ancient powers of attorney, and now supplanted by the English word "constitute." - Black's Law Dictionary, 1st Edition 1891
      Constitute, contract. To empower, to authorize. In the common form of letters of attorney, these words occur, I nominate, constitute and appoint. - Bouvier's Law Revised, 6th Edition
      Constitution, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as the written constitution of a debt. 1 Bell’s Com. 332, 5th ed. - Bouvier's Law Revised, 6th Edition
      Constitutor. In civil law. One who, by a simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. - Black's Law Dictionary, 1st Edition 1891
      People. A State; as, the people of the State of New York; a nation in its collective and political capacity. 4 T.R. 783. See 6 Pet. S. C. Rep. 467. - Bouvier's Law Revised, 6th Edition and Black's Law Dictionary, 1st Edition 1891
      "We the People" means we the states, which are, or were Nations in the Republic. It does not include the living men or women, State citizens, U.S. citizens, non-resident aliens, etc. as will be demonstrated below.
      Names & Dates of the Four U.S. Bankruptcy Constitutions
      1789-1793 CONFEDERATE GOVERNMENT FILES CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY #1 VIA
      "The Constitution *for* the united States of America"
      1859-1863 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FILES CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY #2 VIA
      "The Constitution *of* the United States of America"
      1929-1933 US GOVERNMENT FILES CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY #3 VIA
      "The Constitution *of* the United States"
      1999-2003 US GOVERNMENT FILES CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY #4 VIA
      "The United States Constitution"
      1789-1793 Confederate Government Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy #1 Via "The Constitution *for* the united States of America"

      Delete
    2. Janmarie as I copy Anna’s work
      Soil The United States =Union of States
      Land The United States of America =states of Union.
      Notice the reversal Union of States soil becomes States of Union land

      Soil =Union of States more closer to home as States .
      We’re as land is more business like States of Union .
      These soil/land physically define the place.
      So these are proper names for lawful documents.


      the United States (1787 -1860 )
      Is American Federal Republic an instrumentally
      of the Conferation of States
      This is what’s been missing
      the United States .
      Small t keynote adjective modifying
      We the people Assembled
      the United States

      Delete
  8. Highly recommend both kirks law corner and Christopher James channel a warrior calls .
    Both are councilors both lay out thair cases .
    The stiff opposition from the man or woman Posen as judges .
    The exchange is intense intimidation even innocent take plea deals out of pure fear..Christopher shut up the lawyer ask the judge who is this man or woman if the don’t have first hand knowledge they can’t speak unless it’s about the inner action between his her client..
    As Christopher says we start winning it will be a brush fire .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. .
      Hunt seek and find - hand over fist learning - always the hard way

      How about a location if you want us to go somewhere

      Delete
    2. Y tube , kirks law corner , also A warrior calls .

      Delete
  9. First laws in the New America" was Admiralty as that who brought the people to the country [aside from Native American Laws / Gods Laws]

    Later it was turned over to Vice Admiralty law and courts

    Remember Anna what the Informer - BigAl researched and proved !!
    Maybe not …..to bad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. [aside from Native American Laws / Gods Laws]
      --------
      citation needed. which "God's Laws" were those?

      Declaration of Independence is nature's god and nature's law.

      no bible stuff. no baptism, no trinity, no christ. no circumcisions. no old test. no new test.

      so which "God's Laws" were those?

      Isn't in the bible. The bible has rules for both old and new test.

      Delete
    2. should be noted, nature's law and nature's god

      a) doesn't circumcise anyone (old test)
      b) doesn't baptize anyone (new test)

      so we know nature's god and nature's laws are neither old nor new testament, based on that alone. such is self-evident.

      Delete
    3. we also know jefferson's claim for independence, and invoking of rights of americans in british america, went back to time immemorial, based on english common law, before england was "christianized"

      which also rules out both old and new testament and any bible stories.

      the only "God's Law" in the declaration of independence, is the laws of nature and nature's God.

      Delete
    4. likewise, King James and George et. al. already declared no independence was possible, because the bible says so.

      further evidence "the bible" has no sanction whatsoever in american independence.

      so which supposed "God's Law" is supposedly "American" ?

      it isn't old testament, it isn't new, what "God" could it be?

      america declared nature's god and nature's laws. there are no other "God's laws" ever "ordained" -- unless there is some other secret hidden declaration of independence.

      Delete
  10. .
    UnknownMay 26, 2021 at 11:08 PM
    I have gain my political status, without the aid of Anna and David E Robinson, the start out journey would have been totally impossible, I am a paralegal with my on practice, my firm now assist so many people nation wide to innerstand what the government has and is doing to us. My gratitude for these souls mentioned is undescribable. My entire practice is credited to their knowledge, hard work and tenacious attitude

    Please contact me as I would like to learn of this simple process.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  11. What a mess. As a new member, with my very limited comprehension of legal jargon I tend to get somewhat lost and often need more simplicity. Basically, the courts are nothing more than bill collecting agencies and still function as such today. Many working for the courts only see their part of it and not the big picture; therefore, they think what they are doing is a legitimate process.

    ReplyDelete
  12. UnknownMay 26, 2021 at 11:08 PM

    Please contact me as I would like to learn of this simple process.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I told every sheriff, actor-judge, magistrate, DA my political status and they railroaded and followed through with their assimilated legal processes and convicted me without trial and due process of law, without consent, without probable cause, without 1st hand witnesses and all under color of law. These Career criminals do not care to hear what you have to say, you are presumed to be a walking BOND. Dragged into their courts after challenging jurisdiction and without proof, I was merely visiting a friend in another state, and am a non-resident alien/State National, THEY DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAY!!!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE Anonymous or unknown; YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.