Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Sunday, September 20, 2020

Only Ignorance of the Public Law

 By Anna Von Reitz

If your local Sheriff knew that he was doing anything wrong by prosecuting you under private foreign law, he probably wouldn't do it.  The same for the highway patrolmen.  And the State Troopers.  And the Federal Agents. 

Whenever they know the actual Public Law, they tend to obey it--- but as they are not taught the Public Law and are not instructed to enforce the Public Law by their corporate bosses --- what can you expect? 

So far as they know, they are obeying and enforcing "the" law, that is, the only law they know.  It never occurs to them that there is more than one kind of law, and that they may be dealing with people who live under different forms of law than they do. 

We live and breathe and stand under the Public Law, not their private "law". 

It's your Public Duty to tell them --- and teach them.  

God knows that most of the "hired jurists" in this country are as ignorant as the Highway Patrol and are not capable of teaching anything but legal procedure and statutory law. 

So, if we are standing around waiting for the magistrates and attorneys to teach Law Enforcement Officers the actual Public Law of this country, we will be waiting a long, long while.  The Public Law isn't their baileywick and they don't wish to be held accountable to it, so of course, they don't study it or pay much attention to it. 

They merely presume that you are one of them, that you adopt their law, and that you are accountable to the now 80 million statutes, codes, and regulations that they are required to obey.  

Like the Wendy's employee running out on the street, grabbing me by the elbow, and demanding to know why I am not in uniform and flipping burgers---don't I know it's my shift?   

They are engaged in a self-serving delusion that we all stand under the same law they do.  That we have to be licensed, because they do.  That we have to do all the things and obey all the statutes, codes, and regulations---- that they have heaped upon themselves. 

Fortunately for us, that doesn't happen to be true.  It remains for us to bring the news home to our employees. 

Witness the discussion I had with one of them recently.  He insisted that I had to obey statutory law.  To which I replied: 

Man is not subject to statutory law and not within its “contemplation”.   

Statutory Law exists for the creations of Statute---- and not otherwise. That's why it is called "Statutory Law".  It applies to persons, not people.  Humans, not men.  It comes from the same Latin root word as State and Status.  

State is the level of government that controls the International Jurisdictions of Land and Sea.  This jurisdiction is inhabited entirely by persons--- Lawful Persons and Legal Persons.   Technically, no living, breathing man exists in these jurisdictions.   

I might have added ---- as I act exclusively as a Lawful Person and stand under the Public Law, I am owed protection and assistance on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, and at all times, my Constitutional Guarantees and natural exemptions apply.  I don't volunteer to waive any rights or adopt any offices of personhood. 

They can all read.  

Article VI.   Article IV.   Amendment X.  Amendment XI. 

He replied something to the effect that if I could show him any cases, statutes, etc., that agree with what I say, he'd accept my view.  So I sent him two bon mots ---- in addition to the Constitution.  

“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedures, absent contract.” See Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 US (19 How.) 393, or as the Supreme Court has succinctly said, “….every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen, without his consent.”  Cruden vs. Neale, 2 N.C. 238, 2 S.E. 70.

I am waiting for him to come back and say that he "can't find" these cases; since they don't speak to statutory law, they won't be found among the tomes he regularly consults.  

That itself will be quite a discovery, as he stumbles upon the records of land jurisdiction courts, for the simple and supreme Public Law has been well-buried beneath the weight of 80 million statutes, codes, and regulations and all the court cases attached to them, so much so that people are naturally mistaking all this foreign litigation as something that pertains to them ---- when, quite simply, it doesn't.  And never did. 

The burden of educating ourselves, and then teaching them, lies with us. 

The corporation they work for only insures itself against loss, and uses them as "expendable instruments" to enforce their will, both illegally and unlawfully, on the American Public.
----------------------------

See this article and over 2700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

7 comments:

  1. Concise, on point, clarifying, and well worth memorializing in my American State Nationals Notebook.

    Thanks, Anna

    Joel

    ReplyDelete
  2. im starting to think it all means nothing if there is no authorities to administer remedy. It matters not how right you are if none can be prosecuted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We do need volunteers to prosecute these folks! Any volunteers?

      Delete
  3. Correction re: Cruden vs. Neale, 2 N.C. 238, 2 S.E. 70.
    Should read: "Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70.”

    Copied:

    “Pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: ‘The State citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure.’ Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 19 How. 393. The Supreme
    Court has stated clearly: ‘...every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen [fellowman] without his
    consent.’ Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70.”

    In: “Writ of Habeas Corpus Order to Show Cause And Writ Certiorari” dated: December 31, 2015.:
    https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/15_12_31_hammond_hc_file.pdf

    Cited as: “CRUDEN V NEALE 2 N.C. 338, 2 S.E. 70” in:
    “Notice and Cognizance Required Universal Declaration of …”:
    scannedretina.files.wordpress.com › 2019/01”

    and as: “Cruden v. Neale , 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70.”:
    in: “Full text of ‘Shawna Cox Affidavit re: Bundy Ranch Standoff in Bunkerville, Nevada’”:
    https://archive.org/stream/bundyhc/bundyhc_djvu.txt
    -

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you so much for that education.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We are going to treat them exactly the same way they treat us! Let's see how they feel then!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.