By Anna Von Reitz
Debts have been "forgiven" because they were all fraudulent in the first place.
If you haven't been following along with me, you should go back and review the Great Fraud.
Mortgages, income taxes, property taxes, property titles held by State of State and County "of" governments, franchise taxes, etc., have been illegally imposed upon people who not only didn't owe any such obligations, but who were in fact the owners of all the assets --- the landlords.
The whole system proposed by David-Wynn:Miller is based on flawed principles ---- it is not, for example, mathematically reliable or as he used to say, "correct". We do have to pay more attention to grammar, but by that, we mean English Grammar. English is our Official Language, not PARSE.
Finally, if you research the use of "Anglicized Latin" --- which is what PARSE Syntax is --- you will find that it has been used since the reign of the Roman Emperor Justinian as "DOG LATIN" [also called "American Sign Language" by the felons who used it against us"] ---- a form of language fraud used to defraud and bring false claims against the ignorant.
This language fraud results in a "fraudulent conveyance" --- the impersonation of living people as corporations --- and is specifically called a "fictitious conveyance of language" which is forbidden under Territorial Federal Code in the international jurisdiction of the sea where it most often occurs.
There is a huge body of knowledge about the use and misuse of both Latin and English now available, including a tremendous expose of the Justinian Deception by Romley Stewart. Just look up his YouTubes and you will find out why Mark Christopher, like David-Wynn:Miller before him, is not able to gain any traction with his methods and ideas.
Those who are interested in supporting this major work by our Australian counterparts -- private researchers who have sacrificed years of hard work and taken supreme risks to stop institutionalized crime --- can obtain copies of the series of papers and videos and exposes about the Justinian Deception for $340.00 payment to wallace.entertainment.new@
This is the final word on the Justinian Deception and its modern day counterparts --- PARSE SYNTAX and "American Sign Language" --- and you don't have to take my word for it. All you have to do is view and listen to Romley Stewart's research and listen to his videos.
You will readily recognize the scam going forward, whenever it is presented and however it is presented.
Hopefully, you will also recognize that this fictitious conveyance of language is part of the larger fraud involved in False Registrations and mis-characterization and impersonation of people as "persons".
----------------------------
See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Romely and Rohan deserve great, great praise for their work on The Justinian Deception. Go research. They are hero's as is Anna et al...
ReplyDeleteI was waiting for Anna to endorse the Justinian Deception Channel. As I comprehend it all documents that have this non English Dog Latin text is just a trick. And has no lawful standing . Counterfeit from its very inception.
ReplyDeleteGreetings,
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone know if there is a direct link to a web site that wallace.entertainment.new makes use of, so I (and others)can get additional info on the materials. Also, does anyone have a link as to whether the $340.00 is in Australian Dollar, or, US Dollar or some other.
Thanks.
http://annavonreitz.com/doglatin/doglatin12817.pdf
DeleteI was very touched by Romley's research and works. He deserves all our support whenever we can, wherever we are.
ReplyDeleteAnna PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION: I did all the paperwork on having my house deed authenticated by the Secretary of State in Kentucky I think that's what they are called, then I sent it to the county clerk to have it RE-REGISTERED and it has Indonesia as a non Hague country, they REFUSE TO FILE IT. SO WHAT CAN I DO? Thank you all.
ReplyDeletewell, there is nothing wrong with "sign languages" so long as it is understood as SHORTHAND -- a language that "translates" to something else.
ReplyDeletethe problem is when the "to" and "from" are not declared or understood, and then it masquerades as being something it is not -- and becomes so prevalent it is impossible not to see it as an intentional effort to deceive. and it is not disclosed how the "translations" are occuring, and they instead become invisible "adhesion contracts" that noone agreed to, or even could, because noone was told how such things "translate"
in the days of st. jerome this was well known -- this was why he lamented he probably studied shorthand too much. in pre-catholic rome this was also well-known, and the lawyers and judges were put on leashes on how much "shorthand" they could use -- because they could "translate" one way in public, another way in private, and who would know?
"mercury, the swift messenger" book notes some of this. that was cryptography back then.
there is nothing the matter with systems of shorthand -- except when people are not given the "key" that it is supposed to "translate" to.
and when instead of being used to provide speedy transcripts, the lawyers and judges start speaking in private code that noone else knows, that they can interpret a multitide of ways depending on circumstances, to best benefit themselves, THAT is when it becomes an issue.
its the same problem as "rule of law" (which type of law?)
"american" or "citizen" (federal or state? municipal, territorial, native, naturalized? ...native americans? south american?)
"dollar" (law merchant private credit? public specie? (debt free)? private specie ($X worth of bullion, uncoined, not "money" or "legal" or "lawful" tender but just raw materials)?
again, shorthand systems are fine IF everyone can agree on the meanings. as these above examples show, even plain "english" that is "abbreviated" IS INTENTIONALLY AND ROUTINELY USED TO DECEIVE.
the problem with all these examples is there is no "dictionary" that provides the "code" (well, thousands of law books, millions of pages) -- the only way one knows the possible meanings is 1) context 2) history 3) studying different types of law
in essence, all languages, written or spoken, are "shorthand" for some whether real, imaginary, conceptual, physical, mental, etc. language will always only be an approximation of other concepts or entities or things.
this type of stuff was (eventually) ALREADY OUTLAWED in pre-catholic rome, AND was also considered borderline "sorcery" in jerome's days -- people were aware of the mass potential for fraud.
DeletePOINT BEING: this type of stuff getting into "law" goes back before Justinian, and he may have intended to "standardize" on a system to avoid or prevent such deceptions.
it may very well be he intended to shut this down, but was unsuccessful or (in the long term) ineffectual.
roman law itself, pre-catholic or AD, THIS WAS WELL-KNOWN AS BEING CAPABLE OF BEING USED FOR FRAUD.
Deletei think it is specious to blame roman law in this case -- they were well aware of these types of frauds.
these types of things are issues with any language and any type of law.
thats why that book i referred to is called "mercury" -- because one can make cryptography or shorthand or steganography using any language.
Please comprehend that in their legalese definition of words only what follows the word includes or including is what is defined as defined . Example the definition of child the complete expulsion of a product a immature member of the humans specie and includes stillborn child. So the word Child is defined as a stillborn child and nothing else . kinda makes you realize how sict these legalese atorners are !!
ReplyDelete