Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Jon Rappoport, Amen!

By Anna Von Reitz

Well, it's no secret that I have "highly valued and appreciated" the work of Journalist Jon Rappoport for many years.  He's been called a "maniac" and "renegade" from the Old School of Journalism, that is, Un-Fake Journalism. Perhaps that is what inspired him to delve into this dirty corner of what the "scientific community doesn't want you to know".  Maybe it was just his usual plucky and determined effort to get to the bottom of the dog pile?  

However it happened, this article is a gem for many reasons for many people. 

It is especially important for us and for those in our line of work -- because recently, the Municipal COURTS have taken to accusing patriots of being "crazy" and subjecting them to psychiatric evaluation and drugging them half to death.  

So, thanks to Jon Rappoport --- again ---read this.  

Similar to the one question that all these courts dread --- where's the contract?  
---here is the one question to torpedo all this "mental illness" drivel being applied to anyone who stands up for the actual law --- where's the definition?  

And then.... 

What's the definition based on?  

Where are the lab tests and other evidence that any mental illness exists, including this one?   

Uh....uh.....uh.....UH!  Read on.  Enjoy. 

Jon RappoportGuest
Waking Times
Devotees of science often assume that what is called science is real and true. It must be. Otherwise, their faith is broken. Their superficial understanding is shattered. Their “superior view” of the world is torpedoed.
Such people choose unofficial “anti-science” targets to attack. They never think of inspecting their own house for enormous fraud.
For example: psychiatry.
An open secret has been slowly bleeding out into public consciousness for the past ten years.
And along with that:
ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE CONCOCTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.
Their findings are published in periodically updated editions of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), printed by the American Psychiatric Association.
For years, even psychiatrists have been blowing the whistle on this hazy crazy process of “research.”
Of course, pharmaceutical companies, who manufacture highly toxic drugs to treat every one of these “disorders,” are leading the charge to invent more and more mental-health categories, so they can sell more drugs and make more money.
But we have a mind-boggling twist. Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out in front in inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for several years, almost no one noticed.
His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.” (Dec.27, 2010).
Major media never picked up on the interview in any serious way. It never became a scandal.
Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV. This tome defines and labels and describes every official mental disorder. The DSM-IV eventually listed 297 of them.
In an April 19, 1994, New York Times piece, “Scientist At Work,” Daniel Goleman called Frances “Perhaps the most powerful psychiatrist in America at the moment…”
Well, sure. If you’re sculpting the entire canon of diagnosable mental disorders for your colleagues, for insurers, for the government, for Pharma (who will sell the drugs matched up to the 297 DSM-IV diagnoses), you’re right up there in the pantheon.
Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired’s Greenberg and said the following:
“There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.”
That’s on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, “Well, I knew there would be a problem.”
After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, “These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders.”
Frances should have mentioned the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had unscientifically rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many MORE diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.
Here is a smoking-gun statement made by another prominent mental-health expert, on an episode of PBS’ Frontline series. The episode was: “Does ADHD Exist?”
PBS FRONTLINE INTERVIEWER: Skeptics say that there’s no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.
BARKLEY (Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center): That’s tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn’t have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid…There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn’t make them invalid.
Without intending to, Dr. Barkley blows an ear-shattering whistle on his own profession.
So let’s take Dr. Barkley to school. Medical science, and disease-research in particular, rests on the notion that you can make a diagnosis backed up by lab tests. If you can’t produce lab tests, you’re spinning fantasies.
These fantasies might be hopeful, they might be “educated guesses,” they might be launched from traditional centers of learning, they might be backed up by billions of dollars of grant money…but they’re still fantasies.
Dr. Barkley is essentially saying, “There is no lab test for any mental disorder. If a test were the standard of proof, we wouldn’t have science at all, and that would mean our whole profession rests on nothing—and that is unthinkable, so therefore a test doesn’t matter.”
That logic is no logic at all. That science is no science at all. Barkley is proving the case against himself. He just doesn’t want to admit it.
Psychiatry is all fraud all the time. Without much of a stretch, you could say psychiatry has been the most widespread profiling operation in the history of the human race. Its goal has been to bring humans everywhere into its system. It hardly matters which label a person is painted with, as long as it adds up to a diagnosis and a prescription of drugs.
300 so-called mental disorders caused by…what? No lab evidence. No defining diagnostic tests. No blood tests, saliva tests, brain scans, genetic assays. No nothing.
But psychiatrists continue to assert they are the masters of causation. They know what’s behind “mental disorders.” They’re in charge.
What about the generalized “chemical imbalance” hypothesis stating that all mental disorders stem from such imbalances in the brain?
Dr. Ronald Pies, the editor-in-chief emeritus of the Psychiatric Times, laid that hypothesis to rest in the July 11, 2011, issue of the Times with this staggering admission:
“In truth, the ‘chemical imbalance’ notion was always a kind of urban legend—never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.”
The point is, for decades the whole basis of psychiatric drug research, drug prescription, and drug sales has been: “we’re correcting a chemical imbalance in the brain.”
The problem was, researchers had never established a normal baseline for chemical balance. So they were shooting in the dark. Worse, they were faking a theory. Pretending they knew something when they didn’t.
In his 2011 piece in Psychiatric Times, Dr. Pies tries to protect his colleagues in the psychiatric profession with this fatuous remark:
“In the past 30 years, I don’t believe I have ever heard a knowledgeable, well-trained psychiatrist make such a preposterous claim [about chemical imbalance in the brain], except perhaps to mock it…the ‘chemical imbalance’ image has been vigorously promoted by some pharmaceutical companies, often to the detriment of our patients’ understanding.”
Absurd. First of all, many psychiatrists have explained and do explain to their patients that the drugs are there to correct a chemical imbalance.
And second, if all well-trained psychiatrists have known, all along, that the chemical-imbalance theory is a fraud…
…then why on earth have they been prescribing tons of drugs to their patients…
…since those drugs are developed on the false premise that they correct an imbalance?
The honchos of psychiatry are seeing the handwriting on the wall. Their game has been exposed.
The chemical imbalance theory is a fake. There are no defining physical tests for any of the 300 so-called mental disorders. All diagnoses are based on arbitrary clusters or menus of human behavior. The drugs are harmful, dangerous, toxic. Some of them induce violence. Suicide, homicide. Some of the drugs cause brain damage.
So the shrinks have to move into another model of “mental illness,” another con, another fraud. And they’re looking for one.
For example, genes plus “psycho-social factors” cause mental disorders. A mish-mash of more unproven science.
“New breakthrough research on the functioning of the brain is paying dividends and holds great promise…” Professional PR and gibberish.
Meanwhile, the business model demands drugs for sale.
So even though the chemical-imbalance nonsense has been discredited, it will continue on as a dead man walking, a zombie.
Two questions always pop up when I write a critique of psychiatry. The first one is: psychiatric researchers are doing a massive amount of work studying brain function. They do have tests.
Yes, experimental tests. But NONE of those tests are contained in the DSM, the psychiatric bible, as the basis of the definition of ANY mental disorder. If the tests were conclusive, they would be heralded in the DSM. They aren’t.
The second question is: if all these mental disorders are fiction, why are so many people saddled with problems? Why are some people off the rails? Why are they crazy?
The list of potential answers is very long. A real practitioner would focus on one patient at a time and try to discover what has affected him to such a marked degree. For example:
Severe nutritional deficiency. Toxic dyes and colors in processed food. Ingestion of pesticides and herbicides. Profound sensitivities to certain foods. The ingestion of toxic pharmaceuticals. Life-altering damage as a result of vaccines. Exposure to environmental chemicals. Heavy physical and emotional abuse in the home or at school. Battlefield stress and trauma (also present in certain neighborhoods). Prior head injury. Chronic infection. Alcohol and street drugs. Debilitating poverty.
Other items could be added.
Psychiatry is: fake, fraud, pseudoscience from top to bottom. It’s complete fiction dressed up as fact.
But the obsessed devotees of science tend to back away from this. They close their eyes. If a “branch of knowledge” as extensive as psychiatry is nothing more than an organized delusion, what other aspect of science might likewise be parading as truth, when it is actually mere paper blowing in the wind?



  2. I witnessed a good and honest man taken to court when he refused to respond to his physical therapists license renewal application with the stock answers demanded when he wrote he was domiciled in California, not State of California. He was complained of by his licensing board and brought in to a hearing to determine if he was fit to renew his license. A State of California licensed psychologist was ponied into the court hearings and he commenced to answer canned using canned answers to pre scripted questions about the accused man, his answers pigeonholed the Physical Therapist as being so abnormal for not admitting he did not live in the State of California, causing the accused to fear he would be marked for life as insane, so he withdrew his application to renew his physical therapists license. On the spot therefore he left the profession he had chosen so he would not be officially marked as insane on State of California public (i.e."identified government") records in the pseudo psychology exam of the trial. The case was then dropped against him. The State of California, the hired expert psychologist, and the corrupt court all conspired to sustain the fiction that the State of California could not allow itself to be challenged as it not being a real, actual place on land, and being accused of being the fictional paper entity corporation it is, so yes, Anna, the courts will resort to this self serving tyranny to achieve their objective of controlling the society through co-operated pre-planned, scripted lies performed by a State licensed teamwork of criminals. Best to stay out of these dens of iniquity.

    1. Joel, I think your observations of this account deserves a much wider audience as could be had with a book (for starters). I can also imagine the story presented in theatrical forms.

    2. Glad you were moved by the tragic result to destroy an honest man's profession through the "conjuring", using word manipulations of the physical world in to a theoretical paper one so that a select few can control the masses with obvious lies. Since it is very obvious to any candid observer how the system is based on lies at every level, I think it won't be long before people will simply refuse to cooperate with such madness. A great deal of good can be done just working quietly on worthwhile projects among trusted people.

    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    4. Those who leave the battlefield first Loose!

      Does the man have a Certificate from a School where he learned his profession. If he claimed back his name and he redomiciled it on the land to be protected under public law, he needs to register the NAME as his own, get an EIN number and then get a license in that NAME, which will be the same NAME with a different number.

      Unfortunately the man believes he is not allowed to perform his passion and learned profession because he does not have a license from a fiction, so therefore in his mind he can't. If he had a different belief system this would be a story about a win. He is not the NAME so he has to learn how to manage the NAME.

      I closed my s-corp business when I learned I did not want to be part of or controled by the STATE OF STATE.

      When the code enforcement officer came by from the town and said to me, you need a business license, I told him that business is closed and I have a right to work and now i have no business under the STATE. That was in 2012. No one from the STATE OF STATE showed up. Never stopped having Private Contracts with living people.

  3. To answer Mr. Rappoport's last question: many of the vaccines that are currently given to our youth.

  4. The Rockefeller Foundation founded the AMA and the DSM is how they create new 'diseases' and 'procedures' and 'billing codes' to run through their fraud insurance corporations

    I would add that one of the new ICD10 codes they recently added was death by beheading - hmm I wonder how that fits in with being a medical procedure especially in light of their coming NOAHIDE 'laws'

    One of those so called 'laws' is that no idolitry of Jesus and if you do not rebuke him you will be sentenced to death or banished from heaven on earth

    And how about that, they get to put you to death even when one of their commandments is thou shall not kill
    And they get to bill your insurance company (Obamacare or medicare for all sound familiar) for the medical procedure of beheading and then they get your trust - it's a win win win

    Not trying to be harsh here but these NOAHIDE Sanhedrin 'laws' are created by man, not God

    1. which ICD-10 code are you referring to? Do you have a reference Shelby?

    2. Here you go

    3. Also note that the Bill and Melinda Foundation donated 4.3 billion for the UN cause of global genocide and sterlization of all nations - also note that Billy and Melindas kids are exempt from vaccines

      The affordable care act was nothing more than a trap to bring in the poor and start working their data to target populations for extermination

      See what they dumped on the British Petroleums so called oil 'disaster'

      See after they purposefully flooded out the gulf states then they resorted to the gulf oil spill to kill what was left of the people and the area

      Exxon mobile moves in to gulf that would be rockefeller standard oil

      This is all about data folks and how they can use that data to target populations and exterminate them through any means they can come up with

      Forced relocation out of California - moving populations to target areas as per the UN maps and agenda 21

      If you read the article about Exxon you will see that they have discovered vast amounts of natural gas in the gulf
      On the flip side under climate change they are now banning the use of natural gas because it is cheap and affordable
      And on the other flip side Rockefeller is now offering GREEN loans to retrofit you homes and eliminate natural gas usage

      So ask yourself if they just discovered huge natural gas resources why are they banning the use?

      It's the GREEN NEW DEAL, global serdom for all while they hoard the earths resources for themselves, that's why

    4. Also note in the below link the relationship of the Bush clan to IG Farben
      Rockefellers and Duponts as well
      Also note in the below video, Coca Cola, cc = 33, IG Farben, Texasco and Standard Oil, DOW chemicals and various others who were all part of the vatican 3rd reich
      Also read all this guys articles about how the EU is part of the IV Reich under the Vatican II Umbrella

    5. And while you're reading all of this remember the

      So you got groups of private organizations, NGO's, international organizations all working towards making the same apply to all but to those who are the ones making the rules and laws to fit their objectives and they create the force behind the planned genocide of complete sects of people, entire nations

      And PROGRESSIVELY they work to obtain their goal

  5. Thanks Anna!
    Citizens Commission on Human Rights has been documenting & exposing these frauds since 1969! "Mental Illness" factually is a myth! Here are several supporting references: Psychiatry: An Industry Of Death - Full Documentary Dead Wrong: How Psychiatry Can Kill Your Child - Full Documentary Diagnostic & Statistical Manual: Psychiatry's Deadliest Scam - Full Documentary The Marketing of Madness - Full Documentary Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging - Full Documentary The Hidden Enemy: Inside Psychiatry's Covert Agenda - Full Documentary Age of Fear: Psychiatry's Reign of Terror - Full Documentary
    "Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock" - Full Documentary Premiering 23 November 8pm est at; and available on demand thereafter.
    Look for yourself, make up your own mind.
    All The Best, Wirkin

    1. And the 'dock'tors prescribe medicines that are the by products from the petro chemical industries - hence you get big pharma - the Medici family (which is where medicine derives from)

  6. Thanks for offering nothing to research, also we can see you still don't spell check.

    Unless your saying that "One Doctor" is the name of some successful practitioner???

    Do you just expect people to agree that your right all the time?

    Documented Americans, Assemble and Educate

  7. I think the law recognizes some people, like delusional to still have valid testimony, if "off the deep end" and unable to speak etc or under some age like a child. So their claim on its face is fraud and in violation of the law.

    I know one fellow, a pilot who had a good job flying and was climbing the ladder, near a perfect record and is still healthy today. Psychologists performed an exam, tests, paper and computer questions, chatting. A psychiatrist told me that 4 other veterans had lost their medical due to "insane" lables or one sort the other "Note the actually flying a plane and those tests are entirely separate and not in the psyche lab and not done by them at all" So this judgment of theirs is lab only.
    So now years later, broke and in poverty this fellow is pursuing disability that VA medical records created that cost him is good job.
    A visit to a local VA clinic and first thing the "psychological" counselor said was that they will call the cops if they perceive the vitim er I mean veteran is going to commit suicide or might harm others.
    When do you go to a doctor and the first thing they say they must tell you is they are gonna call the cops on you.
    And this is quiet and peaceful conversation,not angry vets ready to tear something apart that has been happening for years at VA from time to time and VA police trained to take care of vets and are on their side by law quiet things down. The new program is local police who might just taser a vet no knowing anything about why they sometimes act the way they do. Most often it is waiting months and still not getting anything like medication months over due that would make anyone irritated and upset.
    They say you are lucky to survive and encounter with a psychiatrist. The phony court stuff is sick. One thing is no attorney or any or their normal officers in the court have credibility to determine anyone needs a mental exam, not qualified.

  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

  9. >Similar to the one question that all these courts dread --- where's the contract?

    From Anna:
    "Arbitration" is Law-by-Contract, and it doesn't work unless there is an Arbitration Clause built into the contract to begin with.
    Trying to enforce a one-sided arbitration results in attempted unilateral contracting process, which is why none of these numerous "successful" arbitration actions work.
    Both the people bringing the issue and the people issuing the judgment didn't check: (1) the status and standing of the Claimant relative to the Claim; (2) the existence of an Arbitration Clause in the contract; (3) the proper jurisdiction of the Law being addressed, which must match the jurisdiction which the Claimant is claiming.
    Phil loses on all three counts.
    As I keep trying to tell you, as far as law is concerned, there are no living men in the international jurisdiction of the sea, nor in the global jurisdiction of the air ---either one.
    So Phil has an unenforceable arbitration award and you are trying to make yourselves out to be Great Sages.
    For the record:
    Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.
    So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
    Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.

    From me:

    >For the record:
    Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.
    So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
    Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.

    For the record pretty much all areas of common law is based on contracts what is embarrassing in my opinion is someone such as yourself claiming to have all this knowledge on this subject doesn't understand this.

    hahaha I am dying here. Oh Anna you huckster you


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.