Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Cheat Sheet to End Confusion


By Anna Von Reitz

Cheat Sheet to End Confusion

1. The United States is the Proper Name of the Union of republican soil jurisdiction states, representing our combined National Jurisdiction

2. The United States of America is the Proper Name of the Federation of land jurisdiction States, representing our combined International Jurisdiction.

3. the States of America is the Proper Name of the Confederation of States of States -- commercial corporations chartered by the States of the Federation, representing our combined Global Jurisdiction.

4. the United States of America is the Proper Name of the British-controlled Territorial Branch of the Federal Government and the Territorial United States.
5. the United States is the Proper Name of the Holy Roman Empire-controlled Municipal Branch of the Federal Government and the Municipal United States.

You can now clearly see all the opportunities for deceptive word-play that have been possible with this situation and why so many people have been confused.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

23 comments:

  1. Good time to consider a new name: The United States of America (Soil Division), (Land Division) and (Global Division) and scrap all the other confusion. Then the British United States, The Vatican United States and make it clear who's job is what.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UCADIA, what a very sad life you must lead with nothing better to do than troll Anna's website. Did your parents never teach you that if you have nothing nice to say it better that you say nothing? Has it not occurred to you that you have nothing to say in this forum that interests anyone but yourself? This is obviously not the audience of morons that you must be accustomed to addressing elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he has chosen to be a sick 'citizen' ! nothing to offer in/of live! totally mind controlled perception managed and can't help himself !! only thing he has proven to us !

      Delete
  3. Don't bother to answer UCADIA Bob, because he has lost his right to post anything on this site. In other words I will delete everything he posts to the comments, regardless of what he says. He has worn out his welcome. When I delete his comments if your response is a reply under his comment it gets deleted also.
    Paul

    ReplyDelete
  4. The naming is confusing like hell. I am still confused with the list. If the crooks are consistent with their stolen name, it would help. But they are sneaky. They jump in and out, omitting the word Inc. when they wish, even their employees are so confused too.

    The crooks also use the subname similar to the STATE NAME, sometimes in Upper-lower cases, sometimes in all Capital.

    They also pretended like there is only 1 Govt when there are two. They also use the term “Territory Jurisdiction” to expand their scamming scheme to rob all blind, to fall into their false Jurisdiction. This is extremely confusing.

    So I solve the confusion by tracing their Money Trail to find who paid the Corrupt courts in my city. Then show the corrupt court, that their omitted INC Court is still a dba of their Foreign Corporate USA.Inc. Because their DOJ is the one paying all corrupt Courts and Sheriffs to rob people blind, without any Proof of lending. My tons of proof that they didn’t lend anything other than extracting our 5000 Trust and Bond funds are conclusive.

    Their Corrupt Court still railroaded me. However I know the DOJ, A.B.A,. I.B.A had been sued. So that’s it, that’s their same house of corruptions.

    The house of Windsor is rocking right now. What they did to others will return to them. The Queen Son will have no choice, and will fall. They really should have learned, what goes around, will come around at them.

    How can they cheat and get rid of us, when they need us?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pinkham...let me give you something for your tool belt...here it is: MIS-CONSTRUCTION. mis-construction a legal term meaning: catachresis, distortion, fallacy, falsification, misapplication, misjudgment, misrepresentation

    Take your driver's license out of your wallet...look at the signature line...then look at the way they spelled your name in print! Do you see any mis-construction? Look at the way they use the title/name UNITED STATES, do you see any mis-construction?

    Now,think about the full ramifications of it and why they had to do it to begin with?It they disclose to you, that's what they were doing? why, why, why did they have to CREATE a mis-construct? why didn't they just use your real name? so in the very beginning, the very foundation stone, of the entire process was based on mis-constructs!

    Think on these things! Have a great day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PINKHAM fact: in law can not be used in these courts...but fraud can be exposed!the question to ask yourself, can they legally and/or lawfully use a mis-construct to id you? and if so, who agreed [contracted] with them in the absence of threat, duress, coercion and with full disclosure being provided?
      CAN YOU TELL ME, HOW THEY GOT JURISDICTION OVER YOU? and you are welcome!

      Delete
  6. In light of the 13th amendment:

    co·er·cion the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.
    synonyms: force, compulsion, constraint, duress, oppression, enforcement, harassment, intimidation, threats, insistence, demand, arm-twisting, pressure, pressurization, influence

    can the CORPORATION obtain your consent by acts of threat, duress, coercion?
    https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/unenforceable-contracts-tips-33079.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. I created a business called my same name. Got an EIN number, also have same address. Kinda strange as now I have me and another me that is a business entity spelled exacthly the same. People cannot tell if it is me or me the business unless looking at fine details on paper. Prolly should no have done it since contracting at all with IRS means loss of standing in my own nation. Kinda harsh it seems, just one contract and you lose all your rights and your country and just are a corporate for eternity, no switching back.....I have my trade name claimed but now IRS owns it? What about my VA, social security, and military service? I got tired of starving and having no clothes, tires, gas and just basics so am getting help from the beast. Very confusing, seems like you cannot do anything including use currencies without losing you national status permanently once taking it up. Seems to me as primary creditor and signor on the darn money stuff I would be able to say if choosing a base or home national status like where I was born and still be able to trade and survive. Too many things for most people to even learn about or spend time doing all the research and once known people only ridicule and call you names. "That weird conspiracy kook" or some other racist spawned reaction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. They get the basic jurisdiction from your mom signing off on it. After that they presume you want or are choosing that status. A presumption unless re-butted stands. Most people are afraid to rebut it or do not know how and get themselves in to trouble. Do you really believe in your heart you have a right to be here because if you do not your doubt is the crack needed to dislodge you beliefs, cast aside your rights to be on the planet, and process you since you are presumed to be like enlisted in to the system by the officer signing off on your application for a certificate ( signed your mom) and like any other low ranking even lower than a private first class even and your job is to pay the debts off you master enjoys from your labor. Maxim "He or she who fails to excercise their rights has none" So until you do rebut it any protests or complaints y

    ReplyDelete
  9. ( stupid thing sent before I was done) you offer are looked upon as a belligerant or enemy of "their corporation" Just like someone at Walmart working as a stocker protesting our in front of the store the corporate polices of Walmart but worse since you are lied to and do not even know they are doing it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Air Cravings...stop and think for a moment. Please! WHOSE THE BOSS? Once you reclaim your standing? You! right? Now that we are in agreement! Ok, so they put a form in front of you, you know you don't need a SS# to work and conduct 'PRIVATE' trade!RIGHT? You do know that right?
    Ok, so there's this form in front of you and its got a box, that you are supposed to check 'yes' for U.S. CITIZEN. NOW, stop! Don't go any farther. What are you the boss, going to do about that box? You know they can not submit you to involuntary servitude, your know you have the pen in your hand, your know the power of the pen is in your hand and you know all your rights are reserved, to amend contracts with the pen! So what are you going to do with that pen in your hand? What can you do with that pen in your hand?
    Now, lay the pen down just a second and push that paper out of the way for a moment? Now, I want you to change your mind! You have been taught and trained from the time you came into this world, you had to check that box yes and you had to complete that paperwork, just the way they want you to do it! REALLY? Is that the truth?
    My friend, if you don't overcome that brain washing, you will never be free! That paper and that pen is the binder to them and their system. How you function in their system, is not up to them, you are the boss, it is up to you! But, you must change your mind!
    Now, go ahead and pick up the pen again and bring the paper back! Now, what do you want to do, before you sign that paper? If you don't know the answer to what you want to do, when are you going to find out?
    I have said and I will repeat it again for you: make great contracts..the entire system is contracts based on your signature! Your signature gives power to the entire system. Use your signature with wisdom. You are not trapped as you commented. The only entrapment you are in, is you are not thinking deep enough about what you want to do with that pen! That pen is the most powerful instrument you are ever going to hold in your hand. Do not waste the magic it can perform. Change your mind!

    WHAT EVER YOU PUT ON THE RECORD...IS LAW! That's what they will do and there is nothing they can do about it...once you have made your reclamation of yourself...PUBLIC!

    And always remember, you have the un-alienable right to contract and contracts that are not CONSENSUAL...CAN NOT BE ENFORCED. NON-CONSENSUAL CONTRACTS ARE NULL AND VOID FROM THEIR INCEPTION. DURESS, THREAT AND/OR COERCION CAN NOT BE USED IN CONSENSUAL CONTRACTS. IF THEY ARE, THE CONTRACT IS NULL AND VOID FROM ITS INCEPTION. Now, think really think what I said in this paragraph. Think of all the implications of what I just said.

    Then let this burn inside until it becomes fully alive: "Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent."

    Then let me give you this gift [KEEP IT VERY CLOSE, READ IT VERY SLOW AND DIGEST EVERY WORD]:

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603
    "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which would abrogate them."

    Its warm by the fire, I hope you can feel the heat!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS. AIRCRAVINGS...I constantly color outside the lines!

      Delete
    2. Connie, am I missing something here? Isn't your great prompting after the fact? It seems to me that he already signed the contract. Correct me if I am wrong please. Thanks, love the approach.

      Delete
    3. No, in my analogy, I never told him to sign the contract. Read it again. I am not the state, telling him he has to sign here on the dotted line so he can be legal pursuant to what I determine is legal. lol!
      I told him what he had in front of him, then lay the pen down and push the paper away, until he thought!
      Point being...signing stuff without thought..is where we fail. Man, we just give our authority away like, stale bread we feed to fish in the pond. We don't think what we are doing and we don't think should we make some authority amendments, heck we don't even think can we make amendments! We just sign!
      We just give it away. We comply with the slightest thought! Fact, its all B/S. There's nothing true about what they are telling us to do.
      Dan, we just got to get it, deep inside of ourselves...ITS ALL B/S AND THERE'S NOTHING REAL ABOUT ANY OF IT! ITS ALL AN ILLUSION.

      Ever had a rubber band around your wrist and been thinking about something and unknowingly be popping that band, until you pop it once, it hurts and you ask yourself what the heck? You stop popping it real fast, because you becoming conscience that was an idiot thing to do.

      Well, Dan I am the one popping the rubber band on the minds of everyone I can. I am trying to get them to feel within themselves, what I am saying. Because then they will go, what the heck, I am not doing that anymore. The system relies on us...coloring within the lines! If we stop, the system will collapse! It needs our compliance!

      This is all a war of the minds. That is where the battle is truly being fought. That's why I didn't tell air carving to sign anything. That is why I have chosen to color outside the lines.

      Let me ask you a question! What is truly wrong with coloring outside the lines? Dan...it's all B/S!

      Delete
    4. Connie, I know you weren't telling air carvings to sign, and yes your comment was an awakening call, but it appeared to me that he already applied for a business and an EIN number which meant he/she had already signed something, and the horse is out of the barn. Colouring outside the lines is fun!

      Delete
    5. So what if he did get an EIN? What does that really mean? Can anything be done about it now? Can it be amended? Can it be rescinded or canceled? Can it be used for PRIVATE TRADE? What can be done about it now? How can it be used PRIVATELY? Is it truly a CORPORATE ID? really? Is any of it true? Does it really give the govt more jurisdiction than they had before or is that just a B/S thought?
      Conditioning! Mind control! What's the truth? How do we find out? Who painted this image anyway?
      So many questions, but where the heck are the answers? WHAT CAN BE DONE RIGHT NOW THIS MOMENT ABOUT THE EIN?
      Did I ever tell you I have a PRIVATE EIN? It says it right on the IRS DOC they sent me! Did I tell you, I wrote the IRS with specific instructions to change my mailing address to c/o domestic mail only and to my rural route, no zip code for my homestead address. Then I told them in the letter PURSUANT TO US TITLE 5, to change all records concerning that EIN AND MY SS# to PRIVATE, UNINCORPORATED. They sent me back the private ein and told me in the letter, I could not call to get assistance, I needed to write and they gave me a special address. So now, I can only communicate in writing. Did you know in the US TITLE 5 privacy act, they have separate data bases for private records? Oh and since they know, that I know that private trade is not taxable, they told me, if I have any income, then I could file taxes to that address. But, I wont have any income, because private trade can't have income because there's no capital gains from any U.S. SOURCE. Oh and here's what they specifically put in the letter: I needed to be certain whenever I contacted them, in writing, that I wrote the name[s] and the address, just the way it was on the ein doc. what to know how it was written? oh I will go ahead and tell you:
      example: Jane Jill Doe [PRIVATE], under that dba Jane Jill Doe [PRIVATE], RURAL ROUTE 9, 112 TEMPLE COURT, ARLINGTON, TEXAS
      THAT WAS IT. NO capital names, no zip code. Imagine that!

      Oh and guess what? no one taught me to do that! I just did it, based off what I learned.

      Oh on the application for the EIN, I wrote in America State National, non-U.S. CITIZEN. The where they asked for business type..I wrote in PRIVATE TRADE. They had the boxes to check for all these different corporations, including self-employed. I didn't check any of them. I wrote in PRIVATE TRADE. They asked for a ss# to attached to it. I wrote, consent refused. I wrote in my certificate of live birth number. I figured they could attach it to my creditor account and not my debt account.
      I received it in the mail within 2 weeks, with the letter for special instructions.
      I colored all over the place on that application. I was completely outside the lines. LOL!

      Delete
    6. Dan, I just do stuff! Heck, you don't know what can be done until you try! So I do!

      Delete
    7. DAN, ps. isn't this fun? Once you know who you are, I mean really get it, it changes everything!

      Delete
    8. Dan, JURISDICTIONS:
      thought about this, upon waking this morning, and hope it flips the rubber band. They know their is a private side....its in their laws....
      RIGHT TO SUE: 8 U.S.C. § 1503 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1503. Denial of rights and privileges as national(a)  Proceedings for declaration of United States nationality
      If any person who is within the United States claims a right or privilege as a national of the United States and is denied such right or privilege by any department or independent agency, or official thereof, upon the ground that he is not a national of the United States, such person may institute an action under the provisions of section 2201 of Title 28 against the head of such department or independent agency for a judgment declaring him to be a national of the United States, except that no such action may be instituted in any case if the issue of such person's status as a national of the United States (1) arose by reason of, or in connection with any removal proceeding under the provisions of this chapter or any other act, or (2) is in issue in any such removal proceeding.  An action under this subsection may be instituted only within five years after the final administrative denial of such right or privilege and shall be filed in the district court of the United States for the district in which such person resides or claims a residence, and jurisdiction over such officials in such cases is conferred upon those courts.

      NOW WATCH THIS: You must see how they WRITE stuff. If you read other sections of title 8 you will find....U.S. National. This chapter of title 8 doesn't say that at all. what it does say is national (small 'n') of the United States. Now, think this: national is before the United States and it has a small n! Why did they not just say U.S. National or U.S. NATIONAL?

      Because those entities are not referring to the same entities. Its called stylization. They are not speaking or making laws for all those same groups as one group. In this chapter, they took the small 'n' nationals and set them apart from the rest of the group. Why? Because of jurisdiction! And because mis-construction is fraud. ALL MIS-CONSTRUCTION IS FRAUD! Why do you think it is so important to understand what Anna says about the style in which names are written. I am giving you a very important key to the kingdom right now. Think deep of these implications.

      WITH THAT IN MIND: think about this...[remember what Anna said about the spelling of The United States, the united States and UNITED STATES].

      22 U.S. Code § 2705 - Documentation of citizenship

      The following documents shall have the same force and effect as proof of United States ((B)the term “United States” includes the territories and possessions of the United States and the customs waters of the United States (as defined in section 1401 of title 19 and) citizenship as certificates of naturalization or of citizenship issued by the Attorney General or by a court having naturalization jurisdiction:

      Dan, I just picked up my pooper scooper and now I will use it. ITS B/S...IT'S ALL SMOKING MIRRORS. We have been led to believe, everything they write a statute, they are talking to us. Are they? Really? I will give one more below:

      Delete
    9. 22 U.S. Code § 6010. “United States person” defined [keep the stylization of United States, in mind, it is very important.

      United States person
      As used in this chapter, the term “United States person” means any United States citizen or alien admitted for permanent residence in the United States, and any corporation, partnership, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States.

      OK...DID YOU SEE IT? United States and the United States, both used in the same definition! Why? because they are not the same jurisdictions. these are separate jurisdictions.

      did you also see the TERM...RESIDENCE?

      Now, asking yourself this question, would U.S. title 22 apply to you? If you don't know, find out!

      ALL MIS-CONSTRUCTION IS FRAUD! ALL OF IT, IF IT IS MIS-CONSTRUCTED OR MIS-APPLIED IS FRAUD!

      If you look up that code online and click on United States this is the definition:
      United States
      (B)the term “United States” includes the territories and possessions of the United States and the customs waters of the United States (as defined insection 1401 of title 19; and

      So after reading that statute...who is the U.S. CITIZEN/PERSON?

      They wrote this, not me! So is it illegal for me to claim I am not that PERSON? Is it unlawful for me to claim I am not that person? Is it fraud if they try to make me that person?

      Delete