Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Use Your Heads


By Anna Von Reitz

Destry has never declared his political status as an American State Citizen and put it on the Public Record. 

Anna has. 

Why would any honest American have any problem declaring their status as an American? 

They wouldn't--- unless they were working for foreign governments. 

And that is the long and short of it. 

Where is there proof that any actual American State ever allowed Dual Citizenship? 

They --Destry and MGJA--are the ones making the claim and promoting the practice. They are the ones that have to "prove" it. 

And they can't-- because our forefathers never allowed Dual Citizenship in any actual State. 

It was common and still is in the Federal Government but never in the jurisdiction of the actual States--- and for obvious reasons. 

Otherwise, we'd have people like Destry Payne, employees and Undeclared Agents for foreign governments coming here and telling the States what to do. 

So. Enough said. 

Anna's records are posted at the Palmer Alaska Recording Office and at the Anchorage, Alaska UCC Office and all over the Internet. She isn't afraid of or hiding from anything.  She's an American. Her whole pedigree is Public Record. 

So why not him? 

If he is really an American and acting as one-- let's see him stand up and expatriate from any other Citizenship. 

If he's so right and trustworthy, let's see credible proof that any actual State EVER allowed Dual Citizenship? 

We say that the Federal entities are the only ones that have ever practiced Dual Citizenship. 

Prove us wrong or shut up and obey the actual Public Law. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

17 comments:

  1. So Destry.is a communist working for for foreign country .I always thought so he got a communist flag tacked up in his garage . LOL

    ReplyDelete
  2. So why couldn't Anna answer the Flag Officer questions of her personal claims and knowledge of US History..
    Who swore you in as Judge?
    What oath did you take and please provide a copy?
    Who and by what authority made your husband head of State?
    What impact did the 1783 Definitive Treaty of Peace have on the recognize sovereignty of We the People?
    What impact did the 1st Act of Congress 1789 have on the oath of office?

    Crickets was the response.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing wrong with the Netherlands, those poor people though are being euthanized into extinction, same here in states where it's been made legal in just a few states. Our Founders and many of us would not be here if not for the "Pilgims" sailing to America in 1620 from the Netherlands to escape the english and roman catholic with their priests and nuns and religious persecution.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I found this today and thought it very fitting
    Dear NWO:

    TOP TEN THINGS YOU FORGOT WHEN PLANNING THE WORLD TAKEOVER

    Number 10 - There are more than a million of us for each one of you, and we don't really like you very much- because you keep trying to kill us.

    Number 9 - We know how desperate you are to appear like you are actually still in control of the situation.

    Number 8 - Despite many years of effort on your part to stamp us out, we are *ahem* still here, and growing exponentially.

    Number 7 - We can dramatically reduce the effectiveness of your multi- million-dollar EMF mind control technology with 25-cent devices that a ten year old kid can build.

    Number 6 - Your system is not sustainable. We sometimes enjoy watching the contortions you go through trying to keep it up and running, but lately we are getting hungry and that makes our BS detectors more active.

    Number 5 - Everything you have depends entirely on us, since you guys usually can't even locate the 'on' switch. So, even if you push 'the button,' WE still have to push SEVERAL THOUSAND MORE buttons in order for anything to happen. Most likely, when you tell us to 'look sharp,' we will just crack a beer and fart.

    Number 4 - In order for people to be good zombies, they have to be fully aware of what you are doing, in order to successfully pretend they don't know.

    Number 3 - Punishment loses its effectiveness with overuse, and you are WAAAY past the point of overuse.

    Number 2 - Nobody actually believes clouds are long straight lines that come out of airplanes.

    Number 1 - There is a God. (see universe for reference.)


    Sincerely,

    The Flesh and Blood Breathing Beings of the World

    This did say Citizen of the World but that would not be correct
    ALL living, flesh and blood men and woman are not Citizens nor are we your chattel
    All comments made without prejudice and all rights reserved

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shelby this ROCKS!!! I love it! Thanks!

      Delete
    2. Please clarify number 7. What devices are you referring to?

      Delete
  5. I am not a Bar Attorney. Not that kind of a Judge. I work in a different jurisdiction. What is so hard about this? Lawful Persons which is what I am work for Lawful Courts. Legal Persons work for Legal Courts.

    We, living people, belong in land jurisdiction Courts, not statutory courts.

    So, we formed our lawful Jural Assembly of Lawful Persons and I was elected. Go figure.

    If you don't know the different jurisdictions and the difference between the Public Law that I represent vs the private statutory law of corporations they represent, you will never understand the first thing about any of this.

    For example, our Justices and Judge's don't take Oaths. The Bible which is the basis of Land Law forbids that.

    You have been hoodwinked into thinking that foreign practices are your own, and into making assumptions that are prejudicial to your own interests.

    I am probably the only real "people judge" you have ever even heard of, these bad assumptions and practices have become so pervasive and the ignorance has, too.

    My husband is the direct heir of Willlism Belcher whose sovereignty sponsored the sovereignty of both The United States of America and The United States. Look up the Belcher Coats of Arms and the Great Seals under which every ship from this country sails.

    In the absence of the rest of you waking to Hell up and saving yourselves, he has taken up the hereditary post to try to save you all from your own cluelessness.

    The Treaty of Peace 1783 dictated the power sharing that happened when the Constitutions were adopted.

    The "recognized sovereignty of the People" came from William Belcher who made you all sovereigns in your own right in the same way that his ancestor William the Conqueror made him and his family sovereigns in their own right.

    So the Treaty of Peace had nothing to do with the sovereignty of the People. It was just an agreement of who gets what after a war.

    There are no Oaths of Office in the American Government--only the Federal Government does Oaths and those Oaths are not Oaths to any God any Christian professes.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I commend you for refusing to take an oath, for the King commanded us to refrain from such acts, as well as taking oaths upon our own head. However, just recently you penned an article in which you advised that men joining the jural assemblies should "swear allegiance" to them. The act of swearing is the taking of an oath. It is the making of a pledge by a higher power, and our King commanded us not to do that. What you advocate is the same practice that splintered the people of Georgia in February of 1777 when some self-appointed "trustees" offered a constitution to the people that required swearing allegiance to "this state." Some of the men knew their scripture and refrained, while others who did not regard the commands of God's appointed Sovereign took the deal.

      I have proposed a foundation upon which both the Church (the political body named in 1 Corinthians 12 and Ephesians 4) and heathens can peacefully co-exist. It sets forth three tenets. 1. Institutions of government are created by the people to serve the people, and such institutions owe their allegiance to the people from whom they receive protection. 2. Each man owes to his neighbor a duty to love his neighbor as he loves himself. 3. The people joined as a political body receive their protection from God, and owe their allegiance to Him.

      All that this foundation requires is the acknowledgement that God is the creator of men, and that He commanded men to love their neighbor as themselves.

      If you get stiffnecked about the requirement that men swear their allegiance to a man-made construct, then in another 240 years our progeny will be contending with the same issues we have been contending with our entire lives. Declaring allegiance to man-made institutions is no different than worshipping a golden calf.

      It was prophesied in Daniel ch.7, verse 13-14, that mankind would be ruled by a monarch, and his rule began when he ascended into heaven after God raised him from the dead. Any man-made institutions that violate the Sovereign's commands are an exercise in futility. God has made His choice and He is not going to renege. If the form of government we devise is not congruent with the commands of the Sovereign, it will end up being a curse instead of a blessing.

      Delete
  6. Make sure all archive this.
    There are a few people who have said that the Emergency and War Power
    Act written into the Constitution was used by Roosevelt during 1933 to
    create certain laws that made us the enemy. This statement is true to
    the extent that Roosevelt made us the "enemy" of the Federal Reserve
    System. However, we have to go back further in History to find when
    these powers (Emergency Power /War Power) were first and subsequently used.


    The first use of the Emergency and War Power Act

    The first use of the Emergency and War Power Act was by George
    Washington in 1791. Washington used the Emergency Power portion of the
    Act. This was to enable Washington, at Hamilton’s insistence, to use an
    existing private bank, controlled by the Crown through its British Board
    of Trade, to become the first bank of the United States. Jefferson and
    two other men wrote constantly to Washington telling him that there was no
    such authority in the Constitution to create a bank. Neither Jefferson
    nor the other two men could sway Washington. Washington, using the
    Emergency Powers Act, went ahead and created the First Bank of the
    United States. Also at this time he overlaid the states into "districts
    of the United States." He did this so that those state banks, who after
    the creation of the first Bank, were forced to contract with the First
    Bank in New York so they could continue to operate with United States
    money. Washington did this because the United States deposited all the
    money it collected into all the private banks in each of the states from
    before the Revolutionary war to the institution of the first Bank of the
    United States.
    The United States wanted to centralize all its accounts in this First
    Bank while allowing the hundreds of other banks scattered throughout all
    the states to continue to hold its money. This is much like the
    corporate takeovers of today, where a large bank absorbs small banks
    that continue to operate as satellite banks with all the accounts having
    to clear through the parent bank. This then allowed the foreign British
    controlled bank to more easily collect and pay back the debt owed the
    Crown by the State and United States as was directed in Article VI of
    the United States Constitution.

    The First Bank

    The First Bank of the United States was not at all owned by the Congress
    but was privately controlled by the British Board of Trade stockholders.
    The Bank, if begun in France, would be called the First Bank of France.
    Do not let the terminology fool you into thinking that it was a Bank
    created by Congress. The ownership was foreign. The "foreigners," noted
    as Stockholders, were many Americans and therefore, foreigners to the
    international banking industry. Most of these foreign bankers came from
    England. Chief Justice John Marshal held the second highest shares in
    this bank. The documents I have, show that Marshall was considered a
    "foreign stockholder." He was foreign because the bank was a foreign
    concern operating within America. Marshall, being a United States
    citizen, was a foreign Stockholder.

    The Tories were helpful in setting the stage for the inception of the
    Bank. The Tories were people controlled and working for the King. The
    King did not want the Rothschilds or the Lombards to take control of the
    first bank in the United States. The King wanted his bank of England to
    control the first bank. This setup went back to the Treaty of 1783 and
    emanated from that treaty and those created after that.

    Know thy American history of its true founding or you will never know the corrective actions that must be taken.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How many people have gone to jail by following Anna's advice. and she always says the didn't follow my instructions and walks away.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What else would she say if it's true? Like Destry setting everyone up for a big fall, she warned all of them about correcting their status and stopping the talk of violence.
    These are some of the reasons that I refuse to change anything in previous articles. I want a running 100% account of everything that has transpired over the last 4 years, for the record.

    Rich, maybe you have not read enough yet on the website.

    annavonreitz.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. First she said to represent the Popes - then denied it even though it was her claim on her website.
    Many of us know the following when we read her BS.
    False in one thing, false in all things.
    It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
    Fraud and justice never dwell together.
    Fraud lies hidden in general expressions

    Those of us using Private Law are doing just fine with immunity and remedy. Remember there are more Private laws than public in the very beginning. Just seek them for your needs. The truth is never complicated and always a short story. Unlike the long winded Judge Anna.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There is a book on The Common law for America as entitled 'Colonial Law, by Reinsch', he sums up what the Thirteen Colonies considered to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America... "the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law"
    Yes, back then there were some white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 by President Washington was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; "Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority".
    Forget the jury crap, fix repair or replace the faulty foundations first.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1.) Consider what the claims of the King of England were in the 1783 Definitive Treaty of Peace and that Ben Franklin agreed to them. The spoils of the war were awarded to the King not We the People. We the People were not recognized as sovereign, we became citizen subject and debt slaves. good bye to Common Law based on God's law and Natural Law. Lost control of their money, banking and body politic.
    2.) The very 1st ACT of Congress 1789 change the wording of the title/preamble to the constitution. They changed it from the organic phrase "the Constitution for the United States of America" to "the constitution of the United States". From this point on all that we think who are our representatives swear to a document that does not exist in law or at law. Remember the Constitution is a employment contract however, there is no penalty stated for breach of it anyhow. A PPM and new verbal oath must be written and signed by all that are to represent us.
    At this point what do you also think of the Declaration of Independence as a document enforced?
    3.)The Genesis of the Emergency / War Power Act was 1st issued by George Washington in 1791. Always follow the money.
    There are a few people who have said that the Emergency and War Power Act written into the Constitution was used by Roosevelt during 1933 to create certain laws that made us the enemy. This statement is true to the extent that Roosevelt made us the "enemy" of the Federal Reserve System. However, we have to go back further in History to find when these powers (Emergency Power /War Power) were first and subsequently used.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Tree of life or knowledge is your free will choice.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I thought swearing as defined in the Bible meant not at all. Also I thought that money was evil yet it is the love of it that is destructive not money itself. Reading up a bit on the swearing definitions of language etc, it appears that the Bible says not to make vain and use less perhaps dishonest things but swear only to the truth, that which is of God and good. If you are attesting to something you mean in your heart and are putting you word in it rather than swearing before a wooden idle or statue or for that matter a Roman Emperor working for greed not good as well and certainly not God.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So who were the founders if so many were Esquires and Masons. Always ask, how man masters can one serve.

    ReplyDelete