By Elias Alias – November 9, 2018
IT IS FINISHED!
WORLD PREMIERE! GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS TO PREMIERE ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2018!
James Jaeger is a happy camper, and rightly so. As loyal Oath Keepers know, James has been working hard to complete a very important film entitled “GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS: How An Armed Citizenry Deters Tyranny And Atrocities“. Now it is time to announce the World Premiere so one and all can celebrate with James the fruits of more than a year’s dedicated work.
James Jaeger called me on the phone this week and offered me an opportunity to write the announcement of the premiere of his latest documentary movie, “Good Guys With Guns”. Because of my history with James Jaeger’s production company,Matrix Entertainment Corporation, and Oath Keepers, I am grateful and honored that he offered me the opportunity to visit with you about this exciting new movie. When I agreed to write this announcement, it also meant that I would be the first man to see the completed movie. I have seen it, twice, and I am pumped!
We will get into it, but first, for those who are on tight schedules, here is the “need to know” info —
The entire 132-minute documentary will premiere on the Home Video Network on Friday, 30 November 2018 from 8PM – 3AM Eastern time (5PM – 12 Midnight Pacific).
Here are the salient links:
| 
AND...do you need to REGISTER a gun if your are an [AMERICAN STATE]National? No! Matter of fact:in law....you don't have to REGISTER anything. Because of your right to privacy: you have the right to UN-REGISTERED GUNS, UN-REGISTERED AUTOS, UN-REGISTERED PROPERTY, UN-REGISTERED KIDS,UN-REGISTERED PRIVATE TRADE AND UN-REGISTERED EVERYTHING. If you have brought your PRIVATE NAMES back to the land of your HOME [NON-RESIDENT] you can then begin UN-REGISTERING EVERYTHING. Here read this: https://www.justice.gov/opcl/file/844481/download Your RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS ACTUALLY A SECURED RIGHT IN THE CONSTITUTION. That right secures all your other rights...if you are not a U.S. CITIZEN.
ReplyDelete😅🎯
DeletePS make sure to pay attention to item 8: two system of records and...WHAT FOR IT.....NON-FEDERAL RECORDS! What are NON-FEDERAL RECORDS? hum...what could not federal records mean?
ReplyDeletere: c. johnson:
ReplyDelete"Registering" is moot.
see www.dict.org bouviers 1856 "militia"
2nd amendment, they are supposed to be "well regulated" (state training them)
with < 1% state citizens/nationals, and no actual states (only "Federal citizens only" fake states/elections), and no actual specie-based treasury: noone is training them.
if the "agents" dont run actual militia, then powers should devolve back to the principals, which ends up being common law county level waupentake. again, they should be training any "militia": WHO IS ACTUALLY DOING THIS?
likewise, states are supposed to run state court martials for militia, as they are "military" when invoked ("rendezvous"), (and only "militia" when called up).
"us citizen" can mean state OR federal, see www.supremelaw.og re: 14th. it is not bad on its own, just void for vagueness. see blacks law dictionary "federal citizen" as mentioned there.
we should call a spade a spade: "Federal citizen"
common law view is "property in rights and rights in property". rights ARE property. property comes first. else someone can just ask you to leave. property precedes ALL other rights, INCLUDING PRIVACY. "right to privacy" is a property. you have to be able to own property to say i HAVE a "right"
i have pointed out previously, anna's proposed plan to tax everyone not militia for thought crime, is also disallowed on multiple grounds.
ReplyDeletethe closest common law precedent is tax a whole county JOINTLY, AFTER THE FACT if there was inadequate "security"
i have yet to see any actual militia, or any actual states, or any non-federal citizens, or any actual banks.
color me unimpressed. i dont see any "militia" worth a damn anywhere.
if you want "militia" bare minimum requirements are:
ReplyDelete1) trained people only
2) state citizens and/or nationals only
(federal citizens are not "we the people")
3) someone has to run either state level court martials, or run county-level equivalent in the meantime until actual states are back up and functioning
NOONE IS DOING THESE THINGS. the so-called "militias" are a sad joke. a "hoax."
them's the breaks. if you want to be state-level "militia" ("military") you dont get civilian trials, you get state court martials if you act up, fail to rendezvous, etc. see www.dict.org bouviers 1856 "militia"
ReplyDeleteWHO IS RUNNING THESE STATE-LEVEL MILITIA COURT MARTIALS? NOONE.
until that gets fixed, "good guys with guns" just equates to MORE UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNACCOUNTABLE PEOPLE RUNNING AROUND WITH GUNS WITHOUT ANY REGARD FOR LAW.
we already have enough fake "cops" at multiple levels.
do we really need more fake "militia" impersonators?
see www.dict.org "heraldry" "2. emblems indicating the right to bear arms."
ReplyDeletewe got rid of hereditary "knighthood", opened up the "militia" to all of "we the people", but
1) they still have to be trained
2) they still have to identify which "lord" they are protecting with appropriate emblem/ID
3) someone has to run state or county-level court martials as they are NOT civilians.
ironically, the "militia" is probably one of the few people that should either fly/wear emblem of federal horizontal stripes military flag, or a state level equiv. indicating they are not civilians.
ReplyDeletenowadays, football referees wear little patches. that is how far gone things are. number of people impersonating "militia" and "military" is infinite at this point.
"registration" or not, "privacy" or not, it is century-old "law of nations" all people/vessels have to identify their state aka "port of entry"
ReplyDelete"militia" also have to identify themselves as such with appropriate emblem/patch/flag/helmet/boots/shield/tattoo on forehead/etc.
it is a "war crime" even during "war" to impersonate other nations ("false flag"), or for military to impersonate civilians
knights/militia have to wear an emblem, else they are "mercenaries" "pirates" "outlaws" etc.
on the sea, others are ALLOWED to fire on vessels who dont identify themselves.
ReplyDelete"militia" had better identify themselves with an emblem.
Xerces Yakir, you need to read my comment below. There will be no advocacy of initiating any violence here. It's a fine line, but advocating something violent is how they operate as agents provocateur and suck the patriots into their jail system.
DeleteYou are right when you say we don't need untrained people running around with guns, but who is going to decide if they are "unacceptable"? Read my comment below.
Xerces Yakir The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
ReplyDeleteDo you see the two parts?
1.) well regulated militia
2.) the people
OK, I agree with you about the need for DE JURE STATE GOVTS. However, here's history: the national guard is the well regulated militia. It is controlled by the governors of the STATE OF STATES, under the authority of the U.S. MILITARY. 1871 Reconstruction Acts set up the U.S. DISTRICT STATES [temporarily, de facto] they forced out of office all the leaders of the DE JURE STATES by military force and replaced them with these de facto state: governors, reps, courts and senators! This is still in effect today. We truly are still under U.S. MILITARY RULE! So the well regulated militia became the 'NATIONAL' guard or to say it a different way the guard to protect the Nation of sovereign several States. Remember the U.S. owes us a REPUBLIC FORM OF GOVT, but the glitch is this, its not a REPUBLIC as everything in it is actually controlled out of DC. You are right about the missing de jure State. But, trying to get the people to re-ESTABLISH the de jure several States, is extremely difficult because they don't understand they can only use their sovereign powers when they come out of the de facto government voluntarily. They have to INDIVIDUALLY DECIDE to come out of the control of DC and back to the sovereign, several State jurisdiction. Can the de facto govt stop them, by deception only. But, the more people wake up and spread the truth the more they will realize how bad they are being used, abused and stolen from and killed needlessly. Now, that's the end of the part one of the 2nd amendment. That is the STATE PART....THE WELL REGULATED MILITIA.
Now, to part 2 'THE PEOPLE'. Does that amendment say the well regulated militia has rights that cannot be infringed? NO! It says the rights of the People can not be infringed. GET IT? Now, those PEOPLE are not U.S. CITIZENS. U.S. CITIZENS are federal citizens of DC. Those PEOPLE are the individuals of the sovereign several States de jure. They had their nativity on the land of one of the several states of the nation and they have made their homestead on the land of a several state. The several States are AMERICAN STATES. Thus those People are American State Nationals, non-U.S. CITIZENS. Thus U.S. CITIZENS are citizens of the U.S. and not the Nation. U.S. Citizens have no rights to guns or to the PRIVACY of gun ownership. Privacy to gun ownership ONLY belongs to NON-U.S. CITIZENS. U.S. CITIZENS ARE REQUIRED BY THE LAWS OF THE U.S. TO REGISTER THEIR GUNS. Nationals do not have to REGISTER their guns.
In your writings, what you have done is mixed up legal rulings with secured rights [""Registering" is moot."]. Registering guns is not moot in the U.S. The U.S. demands all their CITIZENS to register their guns. It would only be moot for Nationals. See here is the issue in explaining this to people. fyi...BY YOUR WRITINGS I CAN TELL YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATIONALS AND U.S. CITIZENS.
ps. IT IS AN UNDISPUTED FACT THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE CAN NOT BE INFRINGED. But, the issue is always this: WHO ARE THOSE PEOPLE WITH THOSE RIGHTS? That is what we have to wake THE PEOPLE UP TO! The PEOPLE are NON-U.S. CITIZENS. Everytime the People on a PIECE OF PAPER claim to be a U.S. CITIZEN..they just sold their birthrights. All the shenigans of DC would stop tomorrow if the PEOPLE would stop signing paper! The paper system would collapse tomorrow!
DeleteYou all need to read the works of Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. on the militia of the several states and the meaning of the second amendment.
ReplyDeleteYou will be surprised about what this Constitutional scholar has to say about who the militia is and how it's supposed to be trained.
Pay special attention to his little booklet called "Thirteen Words"
https://www.amazon.com/Thirteen-Words-Edwin-Vieira-Jr/dp/096717595X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1543418817&sr=8-2&keywords=edwin+vieira+jr
You should also watch the upcoming movie on Friday as outlined above in this article based on that book.
For an archive of all his work go here:
http://edwinvieira.com/
For my attitude on this, read this article I wrote in January 2016 about patriots who have the warrior mindset.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/01/what-world-needs-now-is-peace-not-war.html
I will not allow the advocacy of violent confrontation on this blog. That is exactly how patriots get sucked in to doing something that will land them in jail and has landed many in jail. I do recommend you read the books and article and realize that we need a purely DEFENSIVE posture in regard to the Second Amendment, and we need to understand the true intent of that Amendment.
And as far as the National Guard being the Militia spoken of in the Second Amendment, no not by a long shot. On the sign of their base north of Kalispell Montana, and as far as I know every other base it's always in all caps. So what does that say. The real Militia is UNORGANIZED, but read Dr. Vieira to find out what that really means. It's only called up for certain reasons. It's NOT a part of any standing Army. It is correct that the militia should be equipped and trained with state money, and can be called up by the Governor or President, but what we have now in the so called NATIONAL GUARD as they spell it is not the Militia spoken of in the Second Amendment.
Paul that is right...the govt took it over and instituted their own state militia. It's however not the militia of the People. The National Guard is their counterfeit! But, it is what they meant for the People to believe is their militia. The truth is this, the militia of the People is totally separate from federal control! The NATIONAL GUARD...THE COUNTERFEIT IS NOT! You are absolutely right...the NATIONAL GUARD is not the de jure militia!
DeletePS.I should have made that more clear in my post...the difference between de jure and de facto. It as I said...it is without dispute the People have rights secured that can be abrogated by any legislative act. But, the PEOPLE are the ones of the several States [de jure] the NON-UNITED STATES [de facto]. The National Guard is the de facto...STATE OF STATE....COUNTERFEIT!
Deleteedwin vieira video about the 2nd amendment....pretty awesome
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idrbKYDyQIk
"Thou shall Not Kill" Period. "Honor thy Neighbor." Period. "Thou Shall Not Worship IDOLS" Period. "Though Shall Not "Covet" Any "Things" Period.
ReplyDeleteSo IT IS Written and Spoken into the Hu-Man (colorable "body") hearts and Inferior minds of Man, and yet the Actions IN VAIN Tell the True Dark Soul-Spiritless Story INdeed and In Fact On our World!!!!! Enough Dark hearted and Double Speaking, Imbalanced mental Insanity By the Weak and Vain in this New Day and Peaceful Living Age Now!!! No more man-made shallow, and weak False FEARS!!! Time to meet your True Master Protector and Peaceful Leader of your Soul-Spirit In the Living Flesh Now!! Truth Is the Only Weapon we Ever Need, or have ever needed. Get over your Physical Selfie body/mind and Grow your Spiritual "pair" Now!!! Its time we All fully, consciously Wake Up to all the double speak & Grow up in our True Hearts/minds Now!! We got this!!! Its time!!
Much Gratitude, Unconditional Love, True Faith-filled Awareness and Eternal Peace Be For All Living Souls Now
The Commandment does not say 'thou shalt not kill''.......it is ''thou shalt not Murder''. Big big difference between the two.
ReplyDeletekill [Anti-Christ Worldly Trained, IN VAIN Religious/limited "Fight or Flight" of the Flesh "Beast Mind" thoughts, behaviors and deeds "passively ACTING OUT" without Living Spirit consciousness-Pure Soul-Will within]
ReplyDeleteVERB
cause the death of (a person, animal, or other living thing).
"her father was killed in a car crash" · [more]
synonyms:
murder · cause the death of · take/end the life of · do away with · [more]
put an end to or cause the failure or defeat of (something).
"the committee voted to kill the project"
synonyms:
destroy · put an end to · bring to an end · be the end of · end · [more]
informal
overwhelm (someone) with an emotion.
"the suspense is killing me"
synonyms:
overwhelm · take someone's breath away · leave speechless · shake · [more]
pass (time, or a specified amount of it), typically while waiting for a particular event.
"when he reached the station he found he actually had an hour to kill"
synonyms:
while away · use up · fill up · fill in · fill · occupy · beguile · pass · spend · [more]
NOUN
an act of killing, especially of one animal by another.
"a lion has made a kill"
synonyms:
death blow · killing · act of killing · dispatch · conclusion · ending · finish · end · climax · coup de grâce
Paul I've been sick for the past two weeks and haven't been able to get out and about, however just wanted to tell you I have been watching vids by Edwin Vieira....love this guy! Thanks for sharing....I am going to get a couple of his books. I added him to my reading list. He makes me think deeper about the things I already knew. Have a great day!
ReplyDelete