Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Christmas Turkeys

By Anna Von Reitz

Ever hear the old saying, "He's full of S@$!$! as a Christmas turkey!" 

There's a lot of that going around.

Here's the first Bad News for the Bad Guys:

Nobody can contract away a constitutionally guaranteed right (which is a material property interest), nor land nor other assets held in a national trust. 

Not Joe Blow.

Not Jane Doe.

And certainly not the President of the UNITED STATES, INC., e.g., Barack Hussein Obama.

What is created by land jurisdiction treaty stands until: (1) a new treaty is made or (2) only one party to the treaty survives or (3) all parties voluntarily vacate the treaty or (4) an actual factual declared war renders a fundamental change in the character, identity, or ownership interests of one or more parties.

There is absolutely nothing in any of the research we have done to suggest that in the tawdry history of the ingloriously mis-managed foreign corporations doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC., the United States of America, Inc., etc., etc,. that they have any valid claim to any of our assets, nor is there any evidence that the Queen and the Pope and the governments they represent have ceased to exist, nor is there any actual, factual war involved in any of the history involving us from 1860 onward.

There are certain businesses, mainly in France, now howling and claiming that we, Americans, individually contracted away our inheritance and accepted "Esau's Bargain" --- our inheritance for their Pot of Porridge (that is, social welfare benefits).  However, we will take exception to their claims. At least Esau consciously knew that he was making a bargain and didn't have to additionally pay for all the ingredients in the stew.

The essence of the problem is that the victims were never individually able to contract away their rights and land to begin with, and even under commercial law, the intended victims of this scheme are not under any obligation because the purported contract was "unconscionable" --- that is, they couldn't even know that they (or anyone else, such as their Mother)  made such a contract, and finally, also it is invalid because they received nothing of equitable value from the perpetrators in exchange, that they did not pay for themselves.

So first the Bank of England took it in the shorts and now the Bank of France is taking its turn and Rothschild et Fils is getting out of the trust business -- that they should never have been in, in the first place.

No doubt they are disappointed to find out that they can't cash in on all the American ESTATES set up as Cestui Que Vies in Puerto Rico, but then, this is what happens when people who deal only in sea law meddle with land law, and the Rothschilds, if anyone, should have known that. 

I firmly believe that they did know---- but after hearing nothing much from us for 150 years, they took their chances and tried to hang a vacuous commercial claim around our necks --- counting on us not to know or object. After all, they had pulled lesser schemes in the past and gotten away with it.

Quote Gomer Pyle, "Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!"

I want you all to stop for a moment and fully realize that you have been paid absolutely nothing of equitable value for your labor or your goods since the Federal Reserve took over.

Imagine being the owner of a factory and discovering a way of "paying" your workers with paper I.O.U.'s that you never have to pay back?  

That is essentially what the "Federal Reserve" did beginning in 1913. They issued all these paper "notes" --- I.O.U.'s ---  at face value plus interest, and reaped all the benefit of that, and then, in 2009, they bankrupted the trademarked "Federal Reserve System" and skated. 

So the first swindle was the face value plus interest payment people made in actual labor and actual goods without receiving anything equitable in return and the second swindle was claiming bankruptcy protection to escape the consequences of their crimes.  

This, and the prior swindles that took place from 1868-1907, is how we became the Priority Creditors of all the "federal" corporations and their underwriters.  And as I explained in my short video for President Trump, there is no escaping the fact of what went on and the fact that the American States and People are owed for all that labor and all those goods.

There's no escaping the reality of the debt owed the American States and People, but there are ways of dealing with that debt that are wiser and more honest than anything that anyone inside the Beltway has come up with yet.

Certainly, the Kim Goguen, aka, "Kim Possible" answer---- steal all the off-ledger assets in the central banks that actually belong to private parties --- isn't going to work. 

Neither the Central Banks nor Kim have any valid claim to those assets and the "government" is just continuing to indebt itself to criminals for no good reason.

If you want to build something to last, you can't build on lies and sand.

And you also can't build on hearsay and suppositions. 

"The" Michael Stephen Young I support and approve as the lawful trustee/administrator of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust is a chief of the Athabascans in Alaska, who has "indigenous" DNA going all the way back to Ramses, confirmed by the same experts who analyzed the Queen's DNA.  He is also a scholar competent to write "The Shekinah Prophecy" and to work out the exact dimensions and orientation of King Solomon's Temple.  He is a good man, his heart and his intentions are in the right place, and he is absolutely not "an agency contractor" or "operative" of any kind.  He is a man with a Service Agreement under land law and a published Irrevocable Will, who gave up his own right to be a Beneficiary in order to make it possible for others to benefit from trust money that should have been dispersed almost two hundred years ago.

Why Kim continues to mis-represent and lie about Michael and equivocate about beginning to disperse the funds of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust to the intended beneficiaries is beyond me. She has been given the facts and continues to mis-represent them--- and him.

Perhaps it has to do with actual "agency" efforts to get Michael in trouble by sending out impersonators with false ID's claiming to be him? The vermin have done that.  Just like a transvestite in New Jersey recently came out of the closet and claimed to be me.  Hoot-hoot. 

Lest there be any doubt, there's a fake "Anna Maria Riezinger" who is a (by now) former manager of a rum distillery in Barbados and an "Anna Von Reitz" running around New York City applying for credit cards in my name and getting into trouble--- and that's just two I know about.

Besides the usual con artists and opportunists and grifters, the government agencies have been sending their personnel out to try to pull the same kinds of things.  

Or maybe Kim is just naturally full of !#!$#! as a Christmas turkey? 

I can verify for sure that the accounts Kim gained computer keys to are not her personal accounts and not her own assets, that the information about these "off-ledger accounts" was furnished to her and her buddies by the same guilty banks that have been responsible for all the rest of the fraud, and I can verify that I have repeatedly asked her for an accounting of all that is owed to the American States and People since the Brits and the Popes glommed onto our assets and rolled them into the 'U.S. Trust" ---without result. 

So, until further notice, 'tis the season to be jolly and not take any wooden nickels.  To the transvestite in New Jersey ---- even I laughed.  To Kim -- paying bills with other people's money just results in new, different debts for the government corporations. It may be a stop-gap but it's no solution.

The actual debt that is owed by the banks and the government corporations and the entire "military-industrial complex" to the American States and People has to be dealt with, and it can't be dealt with by: (1) the criminal plan to kill off the Priority Creditors (Agenda 21, et alia)  or (2) stealing from other private sources and robbing Peter to pay Paul. 

Sooner or later everyone inside the Beltway including all the agency personnel have to grow up and learn to tell the truth again. And meanwhile, there are plenty of Christmas turkeys.


See this article and over 1300 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. We need what court is taking up the matter what is next move minute by minute notice .it this an actual case?

  2. Anna? I was on FB and received a private message from my sister, who asked me if I knew you are of the Rothschild bloodline. I snorted "No way!" and dismissed the idea. Then I saw a YT video claiming this as well. My sister doesn't watch YT so there may be 2 different sources of info.

    I never asked you, so forgive my following question: Judge Anna Von Reitz, are you in any way a part of any "illuminati bloodline", a Rothschild specifically?

    Thanks for your clarification, Anna!

    1. Well, my father's side of the Roth family has been around in Alsace Lorraine dear possible rumor pusher far, far longer than the Bauer branch of thieves ☻
      Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis
      by Benjamin Fulford
      Rothschild rule ends after 250 years; new era to begin
      Author: Benjamin Fulford

      The announcement on October 24, 2018 by Rothschild & Co that they are getting out of the trust business (i.e., managing other people’s money) is a major historical turning point that almost slipped by unnoticed. It was in 1769 that Mayer Rothschild, the founder of the dynasty, first started to manage money for royalty.  Now, seven generations later, his …

    2. QUOTE from press release: "In a changing environment, we believe that the Trust business can operate more successfully in an independent structure."

      not seeing the change here

      they arent getting out of anything, just "outsourcing". more flexible. similar to independent "contractor(s)" new "owner(s)" doing trust stuff now, versus employee or a subsidiary.

      this gives them more flexibility, they can do things behind the scenes with a different temporary "Brand" out front that doesnt have the rothschild name on it.

      whether this is good for bad, all these "new eras" never amount to anything. thats exactly what the powers that be call all their crimes too: "a new era".

      thats how they justify all their crimes 90% of the time, that that pesky constitution and specie are outdated, barbarous relics for uncivilized savages.

      see any comcast ad, or geico insurance. the message is typically those backwards common law yokels in the wild west are obsolete.

      more of the same.

    3. from what i have read of rothschilds, this is more of the same. just another cover/cutout/front so they can continue behind the scenes, without their name so prominent.

  3. Forget they money...its time to clean house completely, starting with the entire judicial system and law enforcement.....its time for a revolution....!!

    If the founding fathers were correct about having one every 10 years, we are 20 revolutions behind....time to catch up....!!! It takes chaos to achieve least in this case...!!

  4. Love all your posts, Anna. Thank you for your work.

  5. Worth Watching

    Royal Babylon The Criminal Record of the British Monarchy HD

  6. If Michael Stephan Young was/is such a benevolent man who gave up his beneficiary benefit 'for others to benefit from the trust monies''......then tell us just who did he ever disperse it to? Seems to me he was quite inept......unless you can answer that question.

    It also seems apparent to me that Kim is the only one in 200 years who has made any real effort to such Aim, and even gives Update Reports as she goes along. Now That is what I call a Real Novelty; something we've never seen from Anna, nor should we ever expect to.
    Actions speak much much louder than words, and more words, ad nauseum.

    1. Tell me please Abby, and everyone who follows Anna's writings, EXACTLY what "Actions" you have seen and can prove, with certainty (that means irrefutable evidence, BTW), that Kim's actually accomplished ANYTHING? Please! You have a very foul attitude and apparently believe you have the right to criticize others who actually do put forth significant effort in an attempt to help all people, even bitter hags such as yourself! You're constantly condemning others yet, WTF have you done to help ANYONE to better understand what has transpired? Honestly, you are, perhaps, the biggest BITCH I've ever encuntered (intentionally misspelled for YOU, Abby!) and a very common know-it-all who, in reality, KNOWS NOTHING! You also condemn those who take issue with your constant resorting to your religious beliefs yet, you have NO PROOF of ANYTHING except to cite Bible quotes! You do know that the Bible was written after the death of Jesus, don't you? You do know that the Bible has had numerous revisions, don't you? You do know that the most widely circulated Bible was rewritten by a Rothschild's agent one-step removed, by the name of Cyrus Scofield, don't you? Yet, you act as if you're some type of prophet! Yet, you regularly fault-find, criticize, complain and condemn! THAT is NOT my understanding of Christianity! NOT by a long stretch! So, Kim gives updates? Has Kim written 1,300+ articles in the hope of helping people, like you, to understand the truth of our history? Has Kim helped you to understand what you need to do to correct your status? Tell me GENIUS, EXACTLY what "Actions", as you claim, has Kim done which you are able to provide irrefutable evidence/proof of her purported "Action"? TELL ME! I've also followed Kim, off and on, and I've listened to her sidekick, Thomas in their many videos and honestly, I hear CRAZY allegations with ZERO evidence provided! I mean really, some of the things Thomas has said makes me think he is Coo-Coo for Cocoa Puffs! I have made numerous inquiries asking for the evidence in support of the many claims but, all I have heard is...CRICKETS!

      BTW, with regard to your snide, bitchy question regarding Michael Young, and the bequeathing of his beneficiary interest; this act does not require one to name a specific beneficiary! While one normally does name a beneficiary, if one is not named, the law of descent and succession determines the next in line! Of course, I'm SURE you already knew that, and you were merely "testing" Anna, correct? I think I can say, without fear of contradiction, that NO ONE WANTS YOU HERE! You are obviously a disciple of Kim and so, I suggest you pack-up your shitty attitude, stick in in your ASS and go worship at the altar of your Kim-God!

  7. In Abbys defense, even though she may not know law , or know how to help anyone in that way, I say NO ONE IS TELLING THE COMPLETE TRUTH BECAUSE NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE TRUTH IS ANYMORE...And I have always stated that Anna is a good history teacher, but terrible at legal remedies...!! That is for other sites that actually share all their trials and errors and share them with the rest of the bloggers, who in turn either tell them where they went wrong or have figured out why something didn't is what this site sadly lacks..No one, or very few actually shares anything about their court experiances, because I doubt that even 1% on this site has ever stepped one foot in court to fight anything...and therefore cannot weigh in on any experience that could help the rest of us...
    My new aspect on life is no one is telling the TRUTH, until they prove it with paperwork or letters from the STATE, or court ....there are simply to many people involved in the deep state or others who just dont give a damn one way or the other as long as THEY are making a living...!! It will take a complete collapse of this system to really know who is who when the dust settles....!!!


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.