Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, July 6, 2018

For All Attorneys Through Larry Becraft


By Anna Von Reitz

Larry-- the Law of these United States is the American Common Law.  As of 1954 the courts that we now deal with stopped accepting Common Law pleas and started accepting only statutory pleas. There is no more sure or binding proof of the nature and jurisdiction of these courts than the nature of the pleas being heard by them. So we may conclude with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that: (1) these are not the courts the people of this country ordained and are owed and (2) that these are Maritime Courts. 

From these  facts then we can conclude that every "Plaintiff" and "Defendant" being addressed by these courts is not a living "Person" and that our most basic identity as one of the living people has been unlawfully and unconscionably converted to that of a business. We have been "impersonated"-- literally.  And when we face charges  in these courts we are suffering barratry because of these false presumptions.  


Both the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States are foreign entities with respect to us and both have created "franchises" for themselves named after us.  These franchises created by infringing upon our Common Law copyright to our own given names are what are being addressed as Defendants and represented as Plaintiffs in these various courts. 

The more typical cases are being addressed to franchises of the Municipal United States. These PERSONS are slaves as defined in the 14th Amendment to the Municipal Constitution and they are guilty and liable for the Public Debt by definition--- so Eazy Pickens for the COURTS and their OFFICERS who put on a show and an appearance of justice when in fact they are only deciding how much the poor bugger will be fined and how long he will be jailed. 

This is the reality and this is the shameful, deceitful, deplorable estate to which your profession has sunk in this country: institutionalized crimes of knowing impersonation and barratry based on equally purposeful and malicious falsification of public records. 

I call down the wrath of Heaven on the worshipers of Ba-El who have done this.  I expose them as the frauds and charlatans they have been and have willfully become.

That includes you, Larry, because you have cause to know all these things and yet you are dishonest about them and try to obfuscate the facts. 

It's perfectly true that Admiralty Law is the creature of the High Seas jurisdiction.  It is perfectly true that it only applies on the "High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways" in this country. 

But it is also true that since 1933 we have all been "presumed" to be "inhabiting" that watery jurisdiction and to be "missing, lost at sea", so that, conveniently, all that remains are ESTATES and Public Trusts named after us, which the members of the Bar Associations seize upon and "administer" for "salvage" purposes. 

Larry, you need to have a fire hose of truth applied up your ass and if you keep raising your head around me or in reference to what I am telling people, that is what you are going to get each and every time you open your mouth.  So if you really want to protect the trade secrets of the Bar Association I suggest you be quiet and not give me such an obvious platform for exposing everything you say and do. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

63 comments:

  1. Makes complete sense and answers where 'THEY' are getting their authority from, because in actual fact, 'THEY' have none over a living fellow man. Man is a 'who' every other description is a 'what'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 33 CFR 2.32 - High seas.(a) For purposes of special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7, high seas means all waters seaward of the territorial sea baseline.

    (b) For the purposes of section 2 of the Act of February 19, 1895, as amended ( 33 U.S.C. 151) and the Inland Navigational Rules Act of 1980 ( 33 U.S.C. Chapter 34), high seas means the waters seaward of any lines established under these statutes, including the lines described in part 80 of this chapter and 46 CFR part 7.

    (c) For the purposes of 14 U.S.C. 89(a), 14 U.S.C. 86, 33 U.S.C. 409, and 33 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.,high seas includes the exclusive economic zones of the United States and other nations, as well as those waters that are seaward of territorial seas of the United States and other nations.

    (d) Under customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and without prejudice to high seas freedoms that may be exercised within exclusive economic zones pursuant to article 58 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and unless the context clearly requires otherwise (e.g., The International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, 1969, including annexes thereto), high seas means all waters that are not the exclusive economic zone (as defined in § 2.30), territorial sea (as defined in § 2.22), or internal waters of the United States or any other nation.
    [USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42598, July 18, 2003, as amended by USCG-2007-27887, 72 FR 45902, Aug. 16, 2007]
    18 U.S. Code § 7 - Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined: United States
    The term “United States”, as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone.

    ReplyDelete
  3. from INA: ACT 101 - DEFINITIONS \ Act 101(a)15P

    (21) The term "national" means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
    (22) The term "national of the United States" means:
    (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent
    allegiance to the United States.
    (23) The term "naturalization" means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.

    number 21 (american state national) number 22 (citizens of Samoa and swain Island. Number 23 (birth certificate holders, who use B/C to get driver's license, bank accounts, ss#'s) persons who are naturalized by B/C to be U.S. CITIZENS.
    The definition for the UNITED STATES for territorial govt laws is in the above definition. It's the martial admiralty laws.
    The definition for the municipal UNITED STATES, is WASHINGTON DC.
    The definition for the continental UNITED STATES is 48 states plus alaska and hawaii.
    Anna's paperwork, is addressing the municipal and territorial govt which is DC AND THE WATERS THE TERRITORIES ARE WITHIN, which is known as THE U.S. INC. Congressional legislation is found in UCC AND US STATUTES only and the CONTINENT and the People are never found in those statutes. But, those are the statutes used against every U.S. CITIZEN WHEREVER THEY ARE FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. All state of courts, are courts of U.S. statutes and U.C.C. Everytime someone gets a traffic ticket, it is given under U.C.C. the U.C.C is municipal and territorial law! Congress makes a distinction, when they pass legislative acts. don't you think you should make the same distinction. Congress made up these terms: national, u.s. national, natural, naturalized, domestic, non-domestic, municipal, territorial, continental. Why do you think they made up those terms and use them in their legislative laws? Do you see yet, there are others, beside U.S.CITIZENS? Congress knows, attorneys know, the queen of england knows, the elites know, the president knows, the courts know...they all know! Why don't you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. even in postage there are different terms. mail is non-domestic and American. letters and packages are domestic and are not to be called mail.the term for letters and packages is postal and its carried by the postal service. mail is handled by the post office. it is non commercial. the post man or woman are rural route mail carriers and it is illegal for them to drive U.S.P.S. TRUCKS OR WEAR U.S.P.S uniforms. The rural route carriers hand private, non-commercial mail (not letters or packages). Why, because the UNITED STATES, INC. has the right of transportation in commerce on the high seas. I didn't make this stuff up, the U.S. CONGRESS did in their postal legislation. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/756

      Delete
    2. A letter is a offer through statement/proclamation and a mailbox is a court. People are looking for disclosure, does opening a statement pro-claim the content and have you been informed? Trickery, lets start with your opening statement!

      What is LETTER?

      1. One of the arbitrary marks or characters constituting the alphabet, and used in written language as the representatives of sounds or articulations of the human organs of speech. Several of the letters of the English alphabet have a special significance in jurisprudence, as abbreviations and otherwise, or are employed as numerals. 2. A dispatch or epistle; a written or printed message; a communication in writing from one person to another at a distance. II. S. v. Iluggett (C. C.) 40 Fed. 040; tT. S. v. Denicke (C. C.) 35 Fed. 409. 3. In the imperial law of Rome, “letter” or “epistle” was the name of the answer re turned by the emperor to a question of law submitted to him by the magistrates. 4. A commission, patent, or written Instrument containing or attesting the grant of some power, authority, or right. The word appears in this generic sense in many compound phrases known to commercial law and jurisprudence; e. g., letter of at- torney, letter missive, letter of credit, letters patent. The plural is frequently used. 5. Metaphorically, the verbal expression; the strict literal meaning. The letter of a statute, as distinguished from its spirit, means the strict and exact forec of the language employed, as distinguished from the general purpose and policy of the law. 6. lie who, being the owner of a thing, lets it out to another for hire or compensa- tion. Story, Railm.

      Delete

    3. What is PROCLAMATION?

      action of proceedings against him and to compel his appearance, in either civil or criminal cases. See State v. Gnilbert. 50 Ohio St. 575, 47 N. E. 551, 3S L. R. A. 519. GO Am. St. Rep. 75G; In re Smith (D. C.) 132 Fed. 303.

      Delete
    4. Are you ready?

      Record of live birth:

      What is LETTERS PATENT?

      A government assigns title or rights to a private entity through this legal instrument.

      Delete
    5. What is ASSIGNS?

      Assignees; those to whom property shall have been transferred. Now seldom used except in the phrase, in deeds, “heirs, administrators, and assigns.” Grant v. Carpenter, 8 R. I. 36; Baily v. De Cres- pigny, 10 Best. & S. 12.
      The State is holding this estate in trust for the people, look at the words, administrators and heirs.

      Delete
    6. What is HEIRS AND ASSIGNS?

      These are words found in an habendum clause in a deed that says exactly what the heirs will receive.

      Delete
    7. What is ASSIGN?

      When a receiver and giver have the same rights and responsibilities.

      Delete
    8. Cube that is exactly right, by the B/C, the heir has assigned their rights to the trustee (for safe keeping LOL). The deed is the B/C. It is the heirs title to the rights. The trustee, the U.S.INC. is acting trustee until the heir re-assigns the rights of the trust to their own POA at the age of maturity (THE AGE OF MATURITY OF THE TRUST). But, the issue is: THE PEOPLE WON'T WAKE UP AND DO ANNA'S FORMS!!! Sorry Cube, about yelling just now, but its extremely frustrating and so hard for me to understand why people want to complain about their own trustee and how crooked that trustee is, but they won't do what is legally necessary to revoke the trustee's rights and assign the rights to another trustee. UGH! Cube, you and I did not make this stuff up. Anna did not make this stuff up. The Congress, by legislative acts made this stuff up. We are just trying to do our due diligence to tell others what Congress has done!Call me, when you make another post. Have a great day! to EVERYONE ELSE: FIRE YOUR TRUSTEE AND ASSIGN THE RIGHTS OF YOUR TRUST TO SOMEONE ELSE, OR STOP YOUR COMPLAINING. Sorry Cube, I wasn't yelling at you!

      Delete
    9. FYI for any one who wants to know age of maturity: https://info.legalzoom.com/age-need-inherit-trust-will-25855.html

      Delete
    10. FYI...the UNITED STATES, INC. for its purposes of its U.S. CITIZEN-PERSONS has set the age of maturity as 18. Some states have it as 21 for alcohol purposes. So everyone your age of maturity of your trust and to become the legal decision makers of it: 18. If your trust is going to drink alcohol in some states: 21.

      Delete
    11. C,

      I get it! I think we should say too, that there is more than one way to let these crooks know you do not consent to being treated as a dead ledger. BUT- your actions will be the tell. I can use the word crooks because I know when someone is trying to lie to me or cheat me. I have yet to find an honest man or women in the role of a gatekeeper. Just my experience.

      Delete
    12. the name of the trust, FYI is the legal name. when women get married, they are not changing their natural name of their family, given at their nativity. The only name that is being changed is the name on the trust. Legal name changes by marriage, divorce, court actions is the only legal way to change the name on the trust. For legal purposes of the US, INC. they need a paper trail through their legal system back to the B/C, because everything in the system works off of the B/C. If you claim the legal name of the trust, you claim all the rights of the trust back to you and away from the trustee. The legal name claim, covers all ID's or accounts that bear the name that is on the trust. If you haven't claim the name, by POA, the trustee is still the administrator of the trust. It's up to you to become the only TRUE AND LIVING administrator of your own trust and its name. Have you done it yet?

      Delete
    13. cube well said. there is no gatekeeper for our own lives. We have to be the only TRUE AND LIVING gatekeeper. If the wolves are going to stay out of the hen house, the farmer better be out there prepared to take action. Or don't. But I can guarantee the farmer this one thing, you let the wolves run the hen house, you won't have many hens left when they get done! think I'm right cube? LOL! The problem being, we have to many people who think either the wolves running the hen house is a good thing, or they think complaining about the wolves is going to stop the wolves or they simply think, THERE'S NOTHING I CAN DO, THE WOLVES HAVE IT! I want to call BS, but I won't because I don't curse. But, I wish more people understood they have the power to take the wolves out of the hen house and inflict a severe hurting on them, so they will never come back and try that stuff again. The thing is the hurt can be applied via lawful and legal means! I am a gatekeeper for my hen house, I truly want to help others be a gatekeeper for their own.

      Delete
    14. C,
      Look at this link,

      and yes I did this some time ago with a different twist. The legal name/ID/alter ego is incorporated grammatically. A given name is one name with one or more words. A family name is the-FIRST- name existing before the given, being its origin. When a given name and a family name are conjoined and accepted by use, it becomes the presumption of fact there has been a merger/business of the two names created by the State. With that said, a legal name belongs to the State, letters patent, but with a power of appointment from the State, we as attorney in fact control the issue/decedent. When the name acts, it is the State that acts, not the man.
      I can share some of this with you privately if you have an email.

      https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.36491

      Delete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete

    16. C. JohnsonJuly 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM
      dat gum Cube, I am getting old in my old age. I almost forgot this: TRUSTS are legal persons, per the legal definition of persons. When we get hauled into court and they call the legal name, they are looking for the administrator (hopefully the POA) to administrator the affairs of the trust. No administrator for the legal person (corporate fiction-the trust), than the head administrator of the court has to administer the account as trustee. All the people in court, standing in for the trust is agreeing the trust caused hurt or injury to another legal person (the state) and the head administer causes the fine to be paid from the trust account or its representative. Its representative is the one who answered: "THAT'S ME OR HERE I AM" in court! So the representative pays the fine because the trust caused injury or harm. See the courts never deal with Natural persons, they only deal with corporate entities, 99% of the time the trust is the corporate entity. I mean that is the name they called in court!

      Delete
    17. When filling out an application, by putting the given name first, are we accepting position of surety for all that comes after? There are other considerations as well that are hidden from most.

      Delete
    18. Yes, it is true, however, there is more going on here. There must be subject and matter/mother to hold jurisdiction. When the court goes on discovery, what are they attempting to un-earth? Do you know what CRS does for every court dig? All records concerning infants are held at the Library of Congress. What is an impression/imprint of your foot called, a (LAST) and what is the Library of Congress known as? The house of-LAST- Resort. The State holds the record but needs a body attachment which they get when one claimed to be the name of war. One does not have to know the details to break free of presumption, I surely wanted to know!

      Delete
  4. Remember the goat and sheep analogies? How did this water cover the land, through the sewer which means-GOAT- and who controls the source of that flow? Treasury through the coast guard. A canal zone is not a sewer, wow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is GOAT, GOTE?

      In old English law. A contrivance or structure for draining waters outof the land Into the sea. Callis describes goats as “usual engines erected and built withportcullises and doors of timber and stone or brick, invented first in Lower Germany.”Callis, Sewers, (91,) 112, 113. Cowell defines “gote,” a ditch, sewer, or gutter.

      Delete
  5. Capitis Deminutio Maxima,

    This is the highest loss of status due to being transported to an island, meaning a territory lost at sea/see.
    Novation is the result.

    What is TRANSPORTATION?

    The removal of goods or persons from one place to another, by a carrier. See Railroad Co. v. Pratt, 22 Wall. 133, 22 L. Ed. 827; Interstate Commerce Coin’n v. Brimson, 154 U. S. 4 17. 14 Sup. Ct. 1125, 38 L. Ed. .1047; Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pennsylvania, 114 U. S. 100, 5 Sup. Ct. S26, 29 L. Ed. 158. In criminal law. A species of punishment consisting in removing the criminal from his own country to another, (usually a penal colony.) there to remain in exile for a prescribed period. Fong Yue Ting v. U. S., 149 U. S. 698, 13 Sup. Ct. 1016, 37 L. Ed. 005

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cube how about Capitis Deminutio Maxima, capitis deminutio minima and capitis deminution minor (all three identities). its like Pro Se, Sui Juris, In Propia Persona and Pro Per Information.

      Delete
    2. C,

      Connections! All in-form-at-ion is one subject evidencing one half zygote or the other half maternal tissue, which will it be?

      What is INFORMATION?

      In practice. An accusation exhibited against a person for some criminal offense, without an indictment. 4 Bl. Comm. 308. An accusation in the nature of an indictment, from which it differs only in being pre- sented by a competent public officer on his oath of office, instead of a grand jury on their oath. 1 Bish. Crin. Proc

      Delete
    3. cube, it would be awesome to sit down with you one day and to have a conversation regarding these things. question where did you learn the hyphenation? another question do you use such writing on court documents or is it for acknowledgement of the meaning of terms?

      Delete
    4. cube, oh yeah. the information about the Pro Se, Sui Juris, In Propia Persona and Pro Per: that is exactly right, everyday in courts in the U.S.!

      Delete
    5. Cube its this: The old adage is, "He who represents himself has a fool for a client." But, many times, the reality is, "He who is represented is taken for a fool."

      Delete
    6. C,

      That would be interesting in-deed. Lets plan on it at some point. I started to look at how Congress writes differently in accord with delegation of power or mere/mother of all contracts and majority issue we face. Anyone will see it the moment the search begins. IRS will be grammatically correct where law is concerned, in other words, descriptive text without co-mingling. Corporations use illustrative text with descriptive text which means no-thing. Ever heard of the presumption of law? People think they can read, CAT IN THE HAT, presumption, no we can't because there is a stop after every sign, CAT. IN. etc.... Chicago Manual of Styles, 16th Edition explains the rules and there is no one to one correspondence between any two languages!! Yes, my documents use certain rules pertaining to law. There is no fraud if you are sent statements that only we presume say anything, right. Presumption of law. No accountability when documents say no-thing.

      Delete
    7. What is DOG-LATIN?

      The Latin of illiterate persons; Latin words put together on the English grammatical system.

      Delete
    8. For those who do not know, look at the outside of the Vatican building and read the proper Latin, THE-CAT-IN THE-HAT. Sign language. Now, get online and look at the writing on the inside of the building/tomb, THE CAT IN THE HAT, in plain sight, why? One living, one dead?

      Delete
    9. cube, I have seen glimpes of this here and there! But, have not really researched it. I know that is linked to true English grammar and the true means for use of verbs, adverbs and nouns, etc...! I must make a point of researching the chicago manual of styles. As I know everything the do is style. assumption and presumption in law, understanding, acknowledge, liability, everything has grammatical connection. Thanks for sharing, going deeper into the knowledge of the matrix all the time. example: That's like law:in fact! The fact that is in the law, is power, especially if it concerns common law. It supercedes everything!

      Delete
    10. ps correction for above comment: everything they do is style.

      Delete
    11. cube just looked it up. pretty amazing. everything in plain site! what a bunch of thieves.

      Delete
    12. cube check out this site: the bank thing. pretty amazing. https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/2016/07/14/dog-latin-foreign-corporate-governments-and-the-dog-latin-effect-the-poison-in-the-gloss/

      Delete
    13. cube so basically: when we see this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. In real latin, it would be united.states.of.america. which is fraud. why? because its a misconstruct. And all fraud is a crime! so the key is look for the misconstructs. I have known that for a while, when we see the misconstructs, its fraud, like last name first. This even deepens my knowledge of how bad the fraud is really. The other thing, is everything is backwards. Incredible. Just incredible. No wonder they write the last name first. They are showing us right in plain site the fraud.

      Delete
    14. C,

      Yes, Rom is excellent, watch all his videos. He is missing a couple things, but, he has nailed that end of it. The misconstruct is the conjoining of illustrative text and descriptive text which is called glossa. Words and signs are different languages and if one thinks they can read it, that is the presumption of law. THE-UNITED-STATES-OF-AMERICA, is Latin. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, is dog Latin. The United States of America is english. They are putting this right out in the open and then claim people are stupid sheep and need to be ruled! The fraud is so deep that when we discover it, the State says we need a sych test. People love their rulers, wow.

      Delete
    15. cube, it just amazes me, the deeper I go into learning the more corruption I see. I mean, they have done everything they can to steal everything and they've done it in ways we can't even imagine. Schemes. No wonder they call all the legislative acts schemes! The thing about the united states, caps and hyphens, I saw that in the writing. incredible. so much crappola, just to steal the very lives from people. and the people either don't want to know or don't want to do anything about it. yet its the people who truly have the power to stop it. Thanks cube!

      Delete
    16. "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Knowledge is information and the lack of of it is ignorance that is no excuse. I have never met anyone who knew they were being deceived!

      Delete
    17. cube, by now we ALL know the whole apple is rotten. We don't need to keep on dissecting it to find our how MANY diseases it has which made it rotten. We know! We know!

      You see how many people have 'left the arena' because its always about more Rot, but never any CURES? You guys get that yet?

      Delete
    18. Abby,

      We must know what makes us sick before we can cure it. You realize I post for whoever can profit from it. If that happens not to be you, just stop reading my posts, problem solved.

      Delete
    19. Yes, Thank you Cube!! Awareness IS Life changing and your posts have been a timely and valuable contribution for deeper consideration for All who choose a deeper understanding !!
      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be

      Delete
    20. Kelli,

      Lovely thing to say, I know that the more serious we are about finding what ails us, the better off we all will be. This picture can be really toxic, I get it, not all are ready for it and understandably so. Anna brings her thoughts forward, you bring yours, C brings another as well as others which multiplies our power to know those things we did not know. I do not know how anyone with good intentions could find fault with that, and I suspect there is more to meet the eye with those that do. Compassion is missing today because it's being bred out of man, and I for one am grateful to all those who work to bring us up together. We should be able to reconcile different points of view when the intent is clear. People express themselves in unique ways, sometimes breaking the old ways that bind us and discovering something totally new! Let us continue to light our own way and in that process perhaps, others can catch a glimpse that light belongs to no one and everyone awaiting only recognition of it.

      Delete
    21. Cube, not one has the monopoly on light. No one. It is in us all, if we only allow it to shine. Our greatest use of light, let it shine for whomever wants to be warmed by its glow. But, to those who want to spew darkness to cover it up, let them depart. How, evil is the one, who wants to squelch the light? LET THE LIGHT SHINE! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLl37aGkrwI

      Delete
    22. Yes, Yes agreed whole heartedly and so beautifully, and uniquely expressed cube!! Love, Love, Love to and For All Now!!
      All Is Now

      Much Gratitude, Love, Peace and Joy Be

      Delete
  6. All of this crap just goes to prove what I've said all along; what a tangled up mess they have made out of everything, and almost NObody is going to bother with untangling it. Just proves why they are all going to get ''armageddoned' as they so justly deserve; then the few of us left can celebrate, woo woo, good riddance to all the garbage....forever and ever. It will be the final end to all these 'word games'.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Disclosure 101. i am up to about page 70 and nearly every line i am reading twice. This is so good with history and factual occurrences. Don't know what i was doing without it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amazing, just look at how many have been suckered in to playing their silly word game. They just walked right into that, eyes wide open, and took the bait.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Abby, when do you finally understand this one thing: 'THOSE OF US IN CHOOSE TO KNOW TRUTH AND WALK IN IT, DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU THINK! So choose darkness if you want John 3:19!

      Delete
    2. CJ, listen up. If you wanna waste your time constantly 'fighting the system' then you go right ahead. Good ''luck' with that. But I choose to actually LIVE my life which has been on a great extension BY God himself (which you know nothing about)
      Just because I refuse to jump on your Train does not mean I am in ''the dark'. In fact its BECAUSE I am in such LIGHT that I can see the futility of anyone spending their 24/7 on the One Track you are on.

      CJ, you are hilarious. Trying to tell other folks they are 'in the dark' when You dont even know it was David who fought with Goliath, LOL. Goes to show just how mixed up you are.

      So keep on trying to show the world you are the "bestest, and the smartest", know-it-all on the planet Lol. Thats all you are about anyhow; full of YourSelf. But in reality, it shows your personal insecurities.
      The only 'Light' you know about, is that lightswitch on the wall when nighttime comes.

      Delete
    3. CJ,all in all you are really a coward. There are a few Guys in here who say much the same things I say, in different words, but you are too much of a Coward to say you shit to them, LOL.
      You think I'm an easy target for your spew? Guess again. You know I have ''your number' and thats what bothers you so much. How sad for your silly SELF.

      Delete
    4. Abby, really? ever notice who I post to as individuals? Only those who post to me as an individual first! Now, go away, before I get my fly swatter out! You don't have a clue! Mindless!

      Delete
  9. GREAT EXPLANATION by Anna of course, Cube, C. Johnson, Jill...Big Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BB, if anything I post, helps you live free, then I am incredibly thankful. Be blessed, live free!

      Delete
  10. Just to add perspective, abby has got a point about 'the silly word game' every single one of us had no definitive knowledge about DOG-LATIN, not being part of the English language, until the fact of the matter was proven. It is the same with the actual meaning/definition of a lot of words. For instance, 'suffer, suffering, suffered' basically means.............allow, go along with, agree.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jill, word game yes! Silly no! It is a very real word game with very serious consequences. The fact that it is a word game, is what we who know are trying to make everyone who does know, to understand. The problem with Abby, she doesn't want the knowledge of the word game to go forth. She tries to stop the truth from being known by ridiculing anyone who even talks about it. Most people won't talk about it, because she is like a vulture, ready to pick their dead bones dry. This game is word game is real, they have used it to build a mega behemoth and every time anyone has any contact with it, their lives are in jeopardy.

      Delete
  11. Jill,

    A silly word game it is, with tragic consequences.

    All words are defined by context. When one looks at the written record, we ask, is the result in line with the word? If not, somebody is telling one side of their story.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Here we have full grown adults who have sat up all night full of a mentality of trickery and deceit, who dreamed up all this stupid childish Word Game. Now if y'all can't see the absolutely Silliness in all that, then you need to rethink it all.

    If you don't want to call it silly, then call it devilish trickery.....which is what it is. And it is devilish people you are so willing to participate with, and 'play your part' THEY have set forth for YOU.

    Instead of spending all this time, Years, trying to 'figure it all out...how to win against all odds these idiots have set forth for YOU".........I say it is best to annihilate ''them''.

    It was initially thought by many, that when Anna set out to file all those Filings she was doing, tons of them, that THAT was aimed at ''annihilating'' them......removing them, lawfully......or ''whatever it takes'.

    But now people are beginning to realize, perhaps, that that is not being successful. But in NO case do thinking sane people go and fight big guns with a wet noodle.

    As a few of us have already tried to tell y'all, this Rabbit Hole is much much deeper than you all want to wake up and fully realize.
    So if there is no actual working Plan to remove them from their fraudulent power thrones, then you are forever fighting a housefire with glasses of water.
    I am not one who ''needs to wake up'. It is those who continue to think you can change your world by filing papers and presenting them TO the very devils who remain IN power and still hold power over The People.
    Yet, not one of you has ever asked Anna where progress stands on getting rid of the BAR and other such nefarious culprits. About 9 months ago she Noticed the BAR to remove themselves from the court houses BY Jan. 1, 2018. Yet, they are still THERE. What does that tell you? And you think 'playing their word game' is going to give people Remedy? Now that is really silly. You are plucking feathers off chickens in hopes of getting rid of them; I'm for just cutting off their heads. But as long as they are still ruling the Roost, your word games will be never ending.
    DUH !

    ReplyDelete
  13. For American State Nationals, if you ever paid in SS, you can claim SS benefits as a national-non-U.S.CITIZEN. Thought everyone might like this info. https://www.fool.com/retirement/general/2015/03/08/social-security-5-surprising-facts-about-noncitize.aspx

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.