Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Thursday, July 19, 2018

Answers to Questions


By Anna Von Reitz

1)  What is the current status of the International Obligation Lien? 

The Lien is there for all to see and it is still standing.

2)   Should we add the authenticated birth certificate as an addendum to the Deed of Re-conveyance?

No, the BC is a private document that you should use in the conduct of your private business.  Some of us who have had cause to act in public capacities have recorded BCs but if you are not in such a situation there would be no reason to do this.

3)  On a show about 6 month ago, you had talked about doing three UCC filings.   Do these still need to be done?


Yes, there is need to do it if possible. The UCC-1 Financing Statement and Addendum are used for three different processes.  In the first case you use it to give International Notice of your interest in your Name and NAMES.  In the second use, you check the "Non-UCC Lien" box to claim back your private property.  In the third, you check the "Agricultural Lien" box to lock down your land and soil interests.  These have to be filed in order. An example of their first use of a UCC-1 Financing Statement is shown in the Appendix of our book "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".  You just fill in your name in the form: JOHN MARK DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN DOE as the debtors, and your re-conveyed Trade Name -- John Mark Doe-- as the Secured Party.

4)   What about getting a passport as an American National?    Some have tried this (including me), but keep getting put back as a "US citizen" status.    Do you have a fail-safe procedure?

The Post Office is the actual issuer of Passports and they could care less about our squabbles over which "United States" or which "United States of America" either, so they just send out a generic passport and leave it up to you to sign it in such a way as to indicate your political status.  I signed mine with a by-line, as in by: Anna Maria Riezinger (claiming copyright and ownership of my Vessel.) and "Retired" ---(serving notice that I am not under any obligation to any corporation) and "All rights reserved" -- (serving notice that my Powers are my own and cannot be usurped by any attorney without my consent).  I also obtained a "global postage stamp" --- which guarantees first class postage for a letter to anywhere, and affixed it to the passport in the upper left above my signature and cancelled it by writing my full name and my place of departure (Big Lake, Alaska) across the face of the stamp in red-ink.  This identifies me as a land-lubber mailing myself to the rest of the land-lubbing world. A passport is basically a giant stamp mailing you to other destinations and giving the foreign authorities information about who you are and where you came from, so use it and think of it for what it is --- a postal service product.  And think of yourself as a Post Master, because under international law, that is exactly what you are. You handle the mail all the time, buy stamps, and when you mail items you sell stamps.  Think about it.

5)   I've heard of a status called "Secured Primary Creditor".    How does this differ from simply doing a status change back to an American national?

Secured Party Creditor refers to the international commercial code process of claiming to be a Creditor with a "Secured Interest" in assets (see UCC-1 comments above).  In addition to the UCC-1 Financing Statement, you file a Security Agreement between the Creditor (Trade Name) and the Debtors (the NAMES) for the purpose of guaranteeing the interest of the Creditor. You also file a Hold Harmless Agreement in which the DEBTORS hold the Creditor harmless for the administration of THEIR affairs.  You also file a Power of Attorney for the Creditor making your Trade Name the Attorney-in-Fact and revoking all other Powers of Attorney.  You also need to file a Declaration of Permanent Domicile on the land and soil of the state where you were born for all the names --- Trade Name plus NAMES--- all need to return to permanent domicile on the land of your birth state.  Last but not least you file a Property List showing what it is that you are claiming an interest in. 

None of this makes much sense at first because it appears on the surface that you are making claims for and against yourself, but you must learn to think of your Name and any NAMES as things apart from yourself ---in fact, I find it most efficient to think of them as boats, literally "vessels", that you can use to "travel" in various jurisdictions of the law and exercise various capacities.

When you "return" the permanent domicile to the land and soil of your birth states for both your Trade Name and all NAMES associated with or derived from it, you reverse FDR's "New Deal" and exercise your "reversionary trust interest" in your own estate.


6)   Are you and/or the Living Law Firm working the Trump Admin to usher in the return of the American Republic?

There is a great deal of confusion here.  There are fifty American state republics, not one.  So to speak of "a" single American Republic is another confusion and semantic deceit that must be avoided. 

What we are helping to do is to put an end to the so-called "Reconstruction" that began after the equally so-called "Civil War" and all the British inspired fraud, guile, and bunko that followed.

Strange as it may seem to most Americans, officially, our rightful federal government has been "held in abeyance" for 150 years pending action by the sovereign States of the Union to "reconstruct" the  States of America.

There's a whole layer of our Federal Government missing.  It was moth-balled in 1868 by British/Scottish sympathizers in the U.S. Territorial Congress.

The States (meaning Maryland, Georgia, New Hampshire) formed a Federation of States known as "the Union".  This Union of States came into being on September 9, 1776, and adopted the doing-business-as-name The United States of America.  This is a Holding Company.  The goods being held for the States by The United States of America are all their rights and prerogatives in international jurisdiction. 

Secondarily, the States split off another kind of union called a Confederation of States known as the States of America, which was formed under the Articles of Confederation on March 1, 1781.  This Confederation's members were all "States of States" such as The State of Maryland, The State of Georgia, and The State of New Hampshire.  These are the original Federal States of States which "went AWOL" after the Civil War.  They are the doing-business entities of the actual States of the Union, which should be conducting our business for us.

Instead what happened is that these original "States of States" doing business under the name of, for example, The State of Florida, were secretively and deceptively and fraudulently replaced by British Territorial entities doing business as "the" State of Florida.   In this way a cuckoo-bird like substitution was achieved.  The difference between "The" State of Florida and "the" State of Florida went either unnoticed, or was not understood by the clueless populace for what it was---- an undisclosed and heinous Breach of Trust by the British Government, which then and now seeks to hide its actions behind Scottish skirts.

As we speak, they are trying to continue this scam by creating yet another "ringer" --- a Scottish corporation doing business as "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [LTD.]" --- and no doubt trying to put in their "states" to replace us entirely----when we are in fact their Priority Creditors. 

Obviously, this Scottish imposter is not our government and does not represent our government and no matter what claims may be made for it, should never be trusted as anything but an attempt to continue fraud and pillaging against us.

We are calling the actual States of the Union to Assemble.  The States will then "reconstruct" the actual Federal States of States doing business as, for example, The State of New Hampshire --- at which point, the so-called Reconstruction will finally be finished and the Territorial and Municipal United States kicked back to the curb where they belong.

7)   What is going to happen to these judges and attorneys that took our kids, took our houses, took our paychecks, etc?    Will these scum actually wind up in prison?     I know we need to bring charges upon these rats, but do they have a "get out of jail free card" hidden?     Serious question.

I imagine that many of them will have to be forgiven as Third Parties and held harmless, because they have been forced to do what they are doing for the most part.  The only difference between the guilty and the innocent is whether or not they enjoyed doing it.  They won't be allowed to keep their ill-gotten gains and a lot of money and property is going to change hands. The actual guilty parties in many instances, however, are politicians, captains of industry, and military officers who betrayed our trust and concocted this monstrous fraud in order to pillage, plunder, and control us.  The legal beagles were just that --- a pack of hounds employed to do their dirty work. 

8)   Once we become American national status, how can this be enforced with respect to the courts and law enforcement?   I've heard one particular story where an American national was still held accountable for a "paper crime".    Is the best we can do would be to keep records of all this injustice and hold those accountable at a later date (like question #7)?

It is better to get even than to wreck vengeance in my opinion, though anger is certainly understandable--- the object is to force these vermin to leave you and your property alone or suffer perdition for disturbing you.  It is also to get back control of your country and your assets and to squeeze the vermin to start repaying at least part of what you are owed. 

It is to those two goals -- enforcing peace and establishing control -- that I suggest we turn our attention.

By their own rules, if they transgress against you (I believe it is 18 USC 2333?) you are owed treble damages, for which you can sue in the United States Federal Court of Claims.  This applies, because once you realize that you have been "mistakenly" misidentified as a Territorial or Municipal United States Citizen, and have taken the time and made the effort to correct the Public Record, they are responsible for recognizing you and indemnifying you against loss or damage.  See Army Regulations AR 27-20 for a clear statement regarding the indemnification they owe you and the Hold Harmless owed to the court as a result of the fraud being perpetuated against us by the British Crown.

If you suffer loss or damage as a result of being in their "custody"--- they owe you just compensation and if they exacerbated their crime by ignoring your status as a Third Party civilian -- they owe you treble damages. The more people who become aware of this and who begin to make these claims stick, the better, as it hastens the day when everyone concerned wakes up.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

12 comments:

  1. I am a little confused. If anyone can give me proper directions it would be greatly appreciated. Anna talks about filing 3 sep UCC filing. 1) a UCC1 financial, an addendum (2) a non-UCC filing and (3) an agricultural filing. She states to do them in order. My confusion comes from on the ucc1 form. There are boxes for all of those. Does she mean to just check all three when filing you financial statement and addendum? or do a Non UCC financial statement as a non UCC1 and then an exact copy with agricultural marked. Please post your reply anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jim, this Margaret:...just by her languaging('they have to be done in order")...I'm guessing it's thus:
    1)
    then separately 2)
    Then separately again 3).

    I haven't done this YET. The cognitive dissonance clearing yet, but smog n all, I am getting it into print/"/publish" form.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am going to go out on a limb and say we cannot change the description of our property as long as there is a mortgage on it and we do not own it out right. Is that correct?

    ReplyDelete
  4. How about drafting our own "Declaration of Independance" from the Corporate UNITED STATES, and be done with it, like in the old days...!! That was the only piece of paperwork the British ever recoginized and took action on...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James,

      Thats what has to be done, simple declaration on the public record. Here is the trick, the document must be without deficiency which renders a judgement made. Fruit, the county owns the intellectual property/address that you are using which has nothing to do with land. Land must be granted, no one can by land, which is why the states ceded the land to the federal government under trust and there is your standing under the supremacy clause! Any one can accept a land grant, make sure you have complete chain of title for the highest proof. This is why the criminals had to do away with land owner=ship which we are granted to hold, forever. Not to be subject to tax, theft, etc........

      Delete
  5. I brought forward the patent on my land last summer without doing a complete chain of title because, when I bought ("bought") the property, it was bare land and lemme' tell you, getting a complete chain of title even on that was arduous. So instead I did all the paperwork and then published (4 times) in the local paper of record a Legal/Public Notice of Update of Land Patent that gave everyone the opportunity to rebut my claim to my portion of the Land Patent (only my portion, not the whole of it--very important!) within 60 days of initial publication of the Notice.

    When no one made any claim, I published another Notice that the land had been reconveyed and the land patent had been brought forward.

    I also sent the County Tax Collector two offers to pay if she would send me a verified true bill, which she didn't (surprise!).

    That was a year ago. I believe I was successful. And I believe that it might be possible to forego a complete chain of title, even if the land has already been developed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you have a dead pledge with the banks on the premises? Two different issues here, legal and lawful.

      Delete
  6. genevieve,

    Good for you, it takes courage to stand unto these criminals. Remember this, if you are challenged on the grant, without chain of title, you do not have enough proof to overcome the presumption that the grant is not complete. That means, they can just wait on taxing you years down the road if they want to, putting pressure on you to yield.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cube,
      Hopefully the offers to pay will count for something.

      Delete
    2. Here is something to consider, put the house in trust and the trust buys the house for fair market value in gold. 100,000 FRN's is a 100,00 in gold dollars. Tax liability is 100 dollars! Hope this helps.

      Delete
  7. Can someone clarify the statement that the Post Office is actual issuer of the passport? Don't you receive your passport from Department of State?

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.