Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, April 9, 2018

Territorial Hypocrites

By Anna Von Reitz

Everyone please bear with me. So much has been going on and so many needs are so urgent that my mail and messaging system is in flood stage. Paul recently forwarded a message that broke my heart, but it got lost in the slipstream and I am stuck replying to it in public, or not at all.  

It came from a black patriot wanting to join the Texas Republic and wondering how that could work, since prior to 1860, slavery was the rule in Texas and elsewhere in the South.  He wanted to know if he would be welcome at the meeting in Kerrville, Texas, April 14.  He had written and not gotten an answer back. 

Well, if a white woman can come and be welcome to speak, I assume that a black man is welcome, too, as it should be, for we all love this country, and we have all suffered together.  And we all have gifts, knowledge, and experience to offer. 

If you aren't welcome, you and I will adjourn to the sidewalk and if anyone else wants to hear what I have to say, they'll have to come join us.  

While the rules were generally that you had to be white to vote, you only had 
to be free, of age, male, and a landowner to elect.  There is a difference between "voting" and "electing".  

Our ancestors didn't focus on color, but on condition. As long as a black man was not under obligation to serve someone as an indentured servant or slave, and was at least 21 years of age, and had the moxie to own a bit of land, he could participate in the elections in most states.  

After the so-called "Civil War" the Territorial Hypocrites were in charge, so they and their bankruptcy trustees pulled a real fast one.  They abolished private slave ownership and permanently enshrined public slave ownership, instead.  They arbitrarily conferred their Territorial Citizenship on the freed slaves and made them slaves to the government corporation(s) instead. 

Purportedly in voluntary and equitable exchange for their names, their labor, their assets, and their freedom, the victims of this vicious scheme received the benefits of the "Public Charitable Trust" or "PCT" set up for displaced plantation slaves. 

Of course, all the "benefits" amounted to a tiny fraction of the value of the assets the vermin seized upon by this process. 

'They have since tried to apply the same reasoning and the same process to enslave everyone in this country, black, brown, yellow. or white.  They are equal opportunity Slave Masters. 

So where does this leave a black patriot with respect to the Republic of Texas?  Like so many other things -- like the status of the western states which haven't yet been formally enrolled as states --- African-Americans are still waiting for our states to officially recognize them as non-citizen nationals.  I don't believe that that is any problem, it's just another part of the backlog of work facing the land jurisdiction states and the Continental Congress. 

It was grossly wrong what they did to the former plantation slaves and it is wrong what they have done to everyone else in the years since then. It is more than past time that we all said a big, fat, "No!" and slapped their greasy paws and joined together to put an end to this criminality. 

There are still bigots and victims of group-think prejudice, but it turns out that the real bigots and hypocrites were never the land jurisdiction states or people.  That distinction belongs to the Territorial United States and the British snobs running the Territorial Government. 

See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here:
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. There really is no black or white...only red or green.

  2. Once I started learning the truth about our situation and how the STATE turned everyone's status into indentured slaves, I don't care what color, race, religion, or culture you came long as you are a committed "patriot" who loves the "truth" you are my brothers...!! But anyone who doesn't want knowledge or seeking it and the truth, than by definition you are my enemy ...!! What I have found out is that there are many Black people who are brilliant patriots and extremely knowedgeable....a room full of these people feels like home....!! No judging each other, just a sincere sacrifice (with you time and personal enjoyment) in constantly seeking knowledge....there is so much to know about and man has uncovered, that it literally makes me sick that people simply don't care to be educated about anything...they are perfectly content with only using 1% of their mind, as long as they have nice things that are often supplied by other people and friends...they don't even want to work for a car...there are tons of people now who only care about living good lives, even if it comes at everyone's eleses expense!!! They are truely useless eaters and the world has no need of them... I hope these people finally are put to work in heaven or face the there minds, both represent hell...!! Right now I'm listening to KFI and the discussion is about magicians....the guest (a magician) has given me a whole new perspective about language in general which I have been aware off but not quite like he put it.....magicians use "spells" to create illusions..simply meaning that to spell a word, means to use magic (The art of language manipulation) to cast "spells"..!! Because there are so many words that have double meanings... language , like anything else man creates, can be used for good or evil..!! Therefore, God created the perfect language....Babbal. Today the church calls this "speaking in tounges", but at its core is just a form of babbling which no one can copy or understand except themselves with God....Man is always trying to centralize and globalize everything from language to money to religion so a few people can control the planet and supposedly the perfect society..!! But they always try and do it without first recognizing that we have a creator and have always failed throughout history because man never wants to admit that he isn't the smartest thing in the universe. But it's his own pride and personal intelligence that keeps him from connecting to his creator...!! I hate talking to people with absolutely no knowledge of anything because of their sustain of reading, but are so arrogant as to actually convince other people of nothing but their opinions which they defend to the death, with absolutely no valid facts...!! They just want to show people that they are not uneducated, and are nothing more than good "cons"..!! They go through their whole life that way, thinking unrealistically conning everyone they can into believing their lies...!! That is how insecure they are about themselves...intelligent people cannot live in peace with uneducated , stupid people who spent their whole life avoiding "pain" and seeking instead only "pleasure" and lieing to themselves that life alone was their education. Pleaseeee!!! I am so happy to be away from all those people...!!

    1. james, I must correct one thing you said here: God never created the babbling we hear in some 'churches'. It is nothing more than learned muttering which is never interpreted and never understood by anyone, simply because it is NO language of any kind. It is counterfeit babbling that only sounds like a language, but is no more a language than the sounds that babies make.
      If you ever notice, these ''tongue talkers' always say exactly the same thing, make the same sounds. It is all very disgusting for these people to even suggest that God would sound so damned ridiculously foolish.

    2. Abby, before you condemn and deprive yourself of one of God's gifts, you may want to read this:

    3. 1Free. Over the years we have had numerous conversations and debates and discussions about this topic. I came away with seeing no need for it except in one situation.
      That situation would be for example, if God wanted you to speak to a person who only knows his own native foreign language, and you only knew english.........then God could definitely give you a temporary ''gift of that foreign language'. You would speak it without having learned it.
      And that foreigner would immediately understand it, but you would not. But definitely there will be someone with that foreigner who knows both languages, and confirm to you what you said, and you would immediately realize its entire purpose.
      Otherwise, I know the bible tells us that ''when you pray, or speak, pray WITH understanding'. In otherwords, we are not to pray or speak without knowing what is coming out of our mouths. This is probably the most counterfeited 'gift' of all and I just have no interest in it. The word even says, do all speak in tongues; no. Well, I am one that doesnt and in 40 plus years I've never seen any good purpose in it.

      On the day of pentecost, I notice that when the foreigners heard the gospel preached to them in their own language, it says ''and they immediately understood it upon hearing'.
      We are also admonished to ''prove all things'. How can we prove what sounds like babbling to us and there is no way to prove it.
      So those are some of my reasons for my opinion about it all.

    4. are you picking and choosing what suits your purposes? It is in your bible, it must be true. Personally, I think Gods hears from your heart to his and speech is not necessary. Probably wrong again right ? Faith and spirituality are not religions. Just a statement and I know I have been found wanting. Save me.

    5. Abby, I don't believe you read the article. You say that you see no need for it. Are you disagreeing with God who gave it as a gift? Why would God give us a gift that you see no need for? Why did Paul, the foremost of the apostles, speak more with tongues than any of the disciples (which means that they all spoke with tongues)? Could it perhaps be the cause of his many revelations for which he received a messenger of Satan to buffet him as a thorn in his side to keep him humble? Don't you want such revelations in your life? Do you disagree with Paul when he says that when you pray in the spirit, which is speaking in tongues, you give thanks well? James is right, it is the perfect language between man and his Creator. It is a private language between you and God. A direct secure channel that no enemy can hear or thwart your prayers and give you direct answers to your questions. It was given to us as refreshing for the saints so when you come to the end of your prayers in English you can continue in tongues and keep right on going and pray all those things that you may not have words for much faster and much easier and more effective than just praying with the mind only. Why limit yourself? Yes, the babbling you hear in some churches is unruly and even Paul came against this and explained how it should be done. But he was adamant that no one forbid the practise of it for he knew the riches of it. Again, do you disagree with Paul? Or do you simply not understand it and are therefore afraid you might look or sound foolish doing it? Is it your pride that prevents you from exercising it? Or even trying it? Think about it. Would you have brushed away salvation so decidedly and so quickly? Or healing? Or casting out demons? All I can say is a man with a testimony is never at the mercy of a woman with an argument. I can assure you that I have seen it work miracles in my life and in the lives of many people. I would highly recommend reading the free book download at the same link called Walk of the Spirit, the Walk of Power. I guarantee that it will change your life.

    6. Abby:
      The "GOSPEL$" are also foolishness to the natural man.
      Certainly ALL "gifts" are missused + manipulated= as man is prone to do.
      One size opinions cannot fit all aspects of something missunderstood by most as if it in of itself is personalml gospel

    7. Paul had such a 'gift' probably because he traveled to so many different places where the languages were each different, IMO. Who knows. It was not explained. I did not go seeking any such gift and it was not given to me, and that is quite fine with me.
      What we see is a lot of counterfeit because most of the people who claim to be christians, are themselves counterfeits IMO. So of course any gift that would be genuine would be rare. Regardless, I will settle for anything that is in english. Things that I cannot prove, I want nothing to do with it. It is really just that simple.

    8. Nope. You are missing the message. He prayed in tongues to God and received his many revelations because of it. It had nothing to do with traveling to different countries. You are thinking of known tongues. It is a gift to all believers and not a special gift only for some. But since you say you want "nothing to do with it", I can only quote this in response:
      37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let
      him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the
      commandments of the Lord.
      38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.
      39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to
      speak with tongues.
      40 Let all things be done decently and in order.
      1 Corinthians 14

    9. Abby, just leave it alone, I can tell you know where understanding comes from and that God is not the Author of confusion. (Babel)

    10. 1Freeman, in 1 Cor 12, tongues is the least of the gifts. In chapter 14 v 14 for if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful
      v. 15 what is it then? I will pray with the spirit And I will pray with Understanding ALSO
      16 Else, when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at they giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth NOT what thou sayeth?
      Ch. 12 also tells us that all of the gifts are given by God as He sees fit. I have seen too many folks be pressured by
      christians and forcing them to think ''they have to speak in tongues, or they aren't saved, if they don't'. They are misleading people to believe that tongues is the evidence of their being saved........that is surely not true.
      I've seen way too many 'being taught how to speak in tongues, by other people'. And THAT is why we have so much of this counterfeit 'speaking in tongues' which is nothing more than babble, and God has nothing to do with.
      Gifts of the Spirit (of God) cannot be taught, but are Gifts given by God.

    11. So why are you fighting this gift, Abby, that you so clearly confirm is a gift of God according to the very scriptures you are quoting. Not to some disciples, but to all. Hey, you are not fighting me but Jesus Himself who, when He ascended, gave gifts unto men. That includes you. Or are you the girl who on Christmas morning looks under the tree and says "These gifts I like but this one I don't! You can it back! I see no use for it!" Yet your Father knows you have need of it. I knew I had been baptized by the Holy Ghost when I had a physical experience of Him washing over me and filling me to the uttermost to the point of almost choking. They say the difference between being filled with the Holy Spirit and being baptized in the Holy Spirit is like a cup and a pitcher. Being filled is like you are the cup being filled by the water from the pitcher. But being baptized is like you as the cup being dunked under in the water inside the pitcher. When this happened to me I did not realize I needed to open my mouth and start speaking though the physical urge was there. This is what the disciples did "and they began to speak with other tongues" Because of years of sacred cows and wrong teaching, my flesh was fighting it and it wasn't until years later and after killing some other sacred cows did I realize that I had already received the gift of tongues if I would only just start exercising it. BTW: this has nothing to do with salvation but has everything to do with walking in the fullness of the Spirit. It is not the evidence of salvation but of your baptism in the Holy Spirit. It is part of the enduement with power from on high to invoke Jesus name to cast out devils, speak with new tongues, pick up serpents, receive protection from poisonous drink and to be able to to lay hands on the sick and they will recover as Jesus perfectly commissioned us to do in Mark 16:17-18. O yes, there is much counterfeit tongues and other so called works going on, but as a true believer you cannot ever use that as an excuse not to be obedient yourself. They are not your servants and you are His servant if you indeed claim that you are. If I did not believe that I was communicating directly with God through surrendering my mouth for His Spirit to operate and pray the perfect prayer as Paul calls it, I certainly would not do it. Now I could be callous and say "O well, your loss.", but if you are my sister in Christ, then I cannot let this go without offering to properly disciple you. Spiritual gifts need to be exercised for you to be able to operate in them and be effective unless they are special gifts which require no exercise at all. But these are rare and few and something you do not need faith for to operate. Any and all of the given gifts are for all to exercise by faith and you can only operate them in the exact proportion in which you exercise them. If you deny them, they will simply not manifest in you. But that does not mean that they are no good and should be spoken against simply because you do not understand them and refuse to renew your mind and the spirit of your mind. We will already have to eat many of our own words before Jesus. Let this not be one of them.

  3. It took no time at all, before I even started studying law, that working for any corporation is just being a "slave"..they are constantly threatening you with your job to keep you in line. And they fire people constantly as a lesson to the rest of the slaves, that you could be next if you try the same thing...!! If people treated everyone like their pets we would have heaven on earth...But they dont...and most of them can't because they don't know how to love...its that simple..!!

  4. Republic of Texas is good ppl.
    Don't wear tour trousers around your ankles and you should be ok.

  5. I hate talking to people with absolutely no knowledge of anything because of their sustain of reading, but are so arrogant as to actually convince other people of nothing but their opinions which they defend to the death, with absolutely no valid facts..

    They sometimes call them selves truth tellers. They claim to be Christian and no one can get to God without first going through their god. The absolute worst kind of mind control.

    1. Just to clarify something Freeman, the first paragraph above was copied from a composition written by James, I simply copied and pasted it and the second paragraph I wrote. I should know better by now as I am always wrong.

  6. Hey blue, sounds like you are talking about yourself since you have readily admitted that you really have never studied the scriptures. You have even said that you really don't need to because it all just make sense to you, right? Well, that is merely relying on the flesh and nothing spiritual at all. All I have ever read of what you have written is just your own personal opinions and hyper speculation "with absolutely no valid facts" to use your own words. And since you deny that Jesus is the Son of God, though I have proven it to you in the first chapter of John that He is, which I will repeat for your benefit here:
    1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    14. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
    which is basically stating that Jesus was the Word who was with God and also was God Himself and was made flesh to become the Son of Man, you have no scriptural or spiritual authority whatsoever. All I can say to you at this point is "Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting." (Daniel 5:27).

  7. Hey freeman, thanks for setting me straight.

    1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    14. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and say it is basically saying that Jesus etc but it does not mention Jesus. I see you refer to the ot Daniel 5-27 when it suits your purposes. I refer to genesis and the first commandment and the warning to not have any strange gods before me. I was brought up RC and the bible of choice was the douay+rheims The Royal Stewart's were originally catholic but eventually turned protestant and adopted the spelling Stuart. Ie King James Stuart protestant. I am a Stewart and was told that i came from the king's people by an English man. That would make my ancestors pre James.
    We were never ever told to attack others beliefs nor force our own on others. We were thought to believe in God, the ten commandments and to love our neighbor. I find it unbelievable that there is no way to talk to God without going through Jesus. God created all, why would he put these restrictions in place. I spent many a Sunday in church plus summer time up to two weeks at a time. Benediction , sacraments etc. i have been taught much but apparently all i have been taught is wrong. I asked my mother years ago why we do not sing the beautiful hymn The Old Rugged Cross in church and she said because it is a protestant hymn. She never ever explained why. Do you know where the New Testament originated from? The quote from John is NT but Jesus is not mentioned in the quote. Why do the Jews not recognize Jesus as being the one expected? They still hold the Scepter until Shiloh comes? I do not dispute that Jesus was here, Mark10:45 from his own mouth says he is a son of man. I agree that I am found wanting, that is why I am seeking. There are 140000 religions in the world but only one God according to the ten commandments. What the hell are the protestants protesting over anyway? I know Martin Luther got pissed off about something and wrote 95 thesis and nailed them to the door. Funny thing and I always found it strange why we always sacrificed and ate Jesus at every mass since 325 ad. I am not a Vatican or Roman fan. The way it was explained to me was the great Emperor pagan Constantine allowed us to practice our FAITH aka SPIRITUALITY in a religion called Roman (corporate) Catholicism. Catholic means universal and the church is not the building but the aggregate of ALL people regardless of race,sex,religious beliefs etc. All are God's even Abby. I do not push catholic on anyone but find those alleged Christians who are born again will not relent. My wife's grandfather was a Baptist minister from Boston. Her and I have been together since 1971. I can't be all that bad. Again, thanks for the lesson. I actually have KJV by my bed but not a douay+rheims yet.
    It says in the KJV I and the Father are one. Ok Jesus, when can we expect you to come back and he says only the father knows. Explain that. Free speech and free will. Your beliefs are yours and I have no right to try and change that. I do have the right to question No ?

    1. "1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
      ... so he who controls the Word (the bible) is God, and he who manipulates the Word (lost in translations,and by the power of the copy-holder) is creating the new Word and is the Creator. Every Author is the Authority the Creator the God of whatever they publish, simplest way to control the future is to control the past, simplest way to control the past is to create your own version and now reign as God of the new Word.
      Did God create the Word or did the Word create the God?

      Funny after 12 years of Catholic school my thoughts on the bible at the time was it was a collection of old stories, who knows in 1,000 years what people with think about the "Lord of the Rings", or "Start Wars" just change a few dates and were the descendants of Jedi Knights crash landed on earth still fighting the dark forces, same as now just different beginnings from a different Word.

  8. Blue, yes you have that right and it is a good thing that you are seeking and looking for answers and I sincerely hope I can help you with the answers you are looking for. But why are you so bent on denying that Jesus is the Son of God? Was it something in your upbringing? Even RC's do not deny that. What could be more simpler than "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us" If that does not refer to Jesus the Son of God becoming flesh and dwelling among us as the son of man, since you say it does not mention Jesus, then pray tell who does it refer to? No one else fits that description. How about this one?
    Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. John 14:6
    Pretty hard to get around that one. But you told me a lot when you told me about your upbringing. I too was raised RC. My father had studied to become a Jesuit priest but did not complete his studies and married instead. Good thing or I would not be here to communicate with you! When I became born again and left the RC church, WW3 broke loose between my dad and I and I had to study to be able to defend what I had done and what the differences were between RC dogma and biblical faith as a true believer in Jesus Christ without any church in between. RC doctrine denies that one must be born again. But Jesus stated unequivalently in John chapter 3 that unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God:
    Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. John 3:3
    Then he makes another bold statement that unless one is born of water (not water baptism but washed by the water of the word) and of the Spirit, they cannot enter the kingdom of God.
    Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. John 3:5

    1. My question to RCs is always where they will go when they die. They will almost always tell me they don't know or purgatory. No assurance whatsoever. Very few might say heaven but then I remind them that that is not according to the pope or their catechism which states that unless one commits a mortal sin, all go to purgatory to burn off their sins. My next questions is, why did Jesus die on the cross, to which they all respond to pay for our sins. So that is when I ask them: If Jesus died on the cross to pay for your sins, then why would you have to pay for them in purgatory if Jesus already paid the price for them in full? I never thought of that is the usual response. Then I show them the above scriptures and most are ready and willing to become born again to know for sure they will go to heaven when they die. This is Jesus' simple and straight forward message. It takes religious people to mess it up.
      yes, the Jews rejected Jesus as their Messiah so God took the gospel to the gentiles but not all of them because all of the apostles and disciples, over 500 of them were all eyewitnesses of seeing Him after He rose from the dead and ascending to heaven. It were the religious Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes and other religious types who arrested Him and turned Him over for execution claiming they had no God but Caesar. So the Jews became the first Christians and spread the gospel throughout the whole world. Fast forward to Martin Luther, he was a RC monk who studied the scriptures and came to the conclusion that RC doctrine and practices did not line up with scripture and even violated it. He did not want to leave the RC church but wanted to reform it. Those were the 95 theses, or topics of discussion mostly in question form, he nailed to the door of the Wittenberg chapel for open discussion to try to help the RC church and rulers see their error and make corrections. However the same Pharisaical spirit dominated them and they declared him a heretic and wanted to burn him at the stake. No, not all are God's. Yes, they are His creation, but not all belong to God. That is our free will choice and those who choose him belong to Him and the Lord knows who belongs to Him and who does not.
      19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. 2 Timothy 2:19a
      You are quoting Matthew 24:36 “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.”
      This may answer your question about that and hopefully a few other ones too:
      5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
      6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
      7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
      8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
      9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
      10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
      11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:5-11

  9. So, the son of man mentioned in Daniel who is not called the messiah or anointed one but will be given dominion over the whole world is in your mind Jesus ? It does not say he will come twice. I was told recently by a Jesus follower that if we die in our sins without accepting Jesus, we will go to hell. If Jesus died for all sins, why is there the ten commandments? Don;t worry, I have lots of questions on purgatory for venial sins and hell for mortal sins but their is remedy for sin in the OT and you do not need to go through a third party. Did your father end up in hell in your opinion.? Or did he go through a third party and confess his sins and did penance and make it home. My father was the holiest, most gentle and kind man I have ever known. In the 40's as a young school teacher he would go from parish to parish teaching farmers about banking and was instrumental in setting up a credit union funded solely by the bankers. He did not go to hell when he died July 4 1999.
    On the 6 th day, God created man and saw that he was good. man has been at war in the usa 222 years out of the last 250 (approx) so when did God see man was good. where are we in God's time? I say we are at dusk of the 6 th day. I think the dude spoken off in Daniel is here now for the first time. That is why things are going so out of control...the secularists lost and are going crazy. I could be full of crap. The calendar has been tampered with, we have no idea where we are in time. Could it be we are in fact in 60 ad or there abouts and not 2018 at all. ? Keep an open mind. I know i am not going toend up in hell, in fact i think the most wicked will just be extinguished. It would be the kindest thing a loving God could do. The world is way off the rails and God is out the window, evil had 100 years uninhibited control recently and lost. That is a story for another time. We all have a mission and some of us have different missions. The academic is very happy in their world and well paid to lord it over the working class. They have no need for God and I think they are going to be in for a shock. Thanks for your earnest attempt and concern for my salvation. Mighty Godlyof you. I think, therefore I am and I am not done thinking yet. peace, I know you mean well.

    1. meant to say funded solely by the farmers

    2. Hey blue, sorry for my delayed reaction. Had some distractions to take care of. Oh yes, it most certainly does say that He comes twice. He first came as a sacrificial lamb (Isaiah 53) and He will return as the lion of the tribe of Judah (Rev 5:5). Yes, Jesus paid the price for all sin by dying on the cross and shedding His blood which is the only biblical atonement for sin in both testaments. But since God will not go against your free will, it is up to you to accept his sacrifice for your sins. He will not force your hand because it has to be your freewill choice. He came to fulfill the 10 commandments which He did. Look, there is no forgiveness of sin w/o the shedding of blood. In the OT is was done with animals, in the NT Jesus became the sacrificial lamb to be slain once and for all. With this He took the sins of the world upon himself and paid for them in full. But one must apply the payment and claim it for themselves or is does not apply. This requires acknowledgement of this fact by confessing Jesus as Lord and Savior and a voluntary surrender of self and submission to God and His provision through His Son. No my father finally apologized and became a believer. If your father believed on the name of Jesus, confessed his sins and was forgiven, then yes, he is in heaven. Jesus said "All who come to me I will in no wise cast out." No, we are in Daniel's 69th week. We are out of control because the devil knows he has but a short time and is losing big time. Apparently you are serving a god of your own creation and imagination because the God of the bible does not fit your description. It is not for God to fit to our imagination but for us to fit to His reality. Yes I am very concerned for your salvation and urge you to realize that just thinking or saying so does not earn you heaven which no man can. All of us have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. But God in His mercy provided his own Son Jesus that whosoever will believe in Him will not perish but have everlasting life. He did not send Jesus to condemn the world but that the world might be saved through Him because the world was condemned already. I pray right now that you will repent of your sins and confess with your mouth that Jesus is your Lord and that He rose from the dead and washed all your sins away by the shedding of His blood on the cross and sprinkling it on the mercy seat of the ark of the covenant. “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Acts 4:12

    3. 1Free, I'm afraid there is quite a bit more to Salvation than simply agreeing to accept Jesus to save his sorry ass from hell. What we are to confess is our SIN, in order to be saved; not 'confessing Jesus'.
      What none of the so called 'churches' want to talk about is Repentance. Repentance of one's SIN.
      2 Cor.7:10 for godly sorrow (over ones own sinfulness) worketh Repentance (in one's heart) TO Salvation.

      That is the basic recipe for one to obtain salvation; this popular 'just confess that Jesus is Lord' can be said very insincerely, very glibly, and just to please others - - but will be meaningless.
      However, when there is sincere repentance, with a true regret for having done all the sinfulness, then that is what causes the Holy Spirit to enter into a person, and CONVERT them. Conversion = born again. And the bible says ''except a man be Born Again, he cannot (will not) see the kingdom of God''.
      In other words, Salvation requires one to be totally CHANGED by God. There is no Salvation by God doing a favor and deciding to just let anyone ''in'' out of the goodness of His Heart.
      The reason for this is that in the Kingdom God orders that ''we must all be in ONE ACCORD''. We all are taught by the one same Holy Spirit of the one true God, and therefore all speak the same thing, and have the one same Mind of Christ which has been given to all of those who are in the Kingdom.
      We may not all be at the same speed of understanding, and we still maintain a good deal of individuality; we are not all carbon copies being identical or robotic. It takes all kinds, and we each have our various missions.

      I might add, that Jesus did not die for people to live in their sins; he died for Repented sin, and then mandates that we cease sinning, and go and sin no more.
      Far too many think they are free to sin all they want to, because they have been misled and lied to, being told Jesus died for all sins. The bible clearly says ''he that sinneth, is not of God''.

      The blood of Christ is what cleanses us of all unrighteousness, upon our Repentance. But just as a mother gives her young child a bath and puts all clean clothes on them. If they go out and get those clean clothes dirty, Mother will admonish the child, and brush the dirt off.
      But if that child turns right around and goes out and gets dirty again, after being admonished already, then he is going to get a good spanking.
      And God will do the same thing. Count on it.......if anyone thinks they can keep on sinning.
      (continuing in sin, rejecting correction repeatedly, leads to being turned over to a reprobate mind. I can name you a few pastors this has happened to.)
      Scripture says ''for My Spirit will not always strife with a man''.

    4. Abby, what part of "I pray right now that you will repent of your sins..." in the last post did you not read?

  10. Hey Freeman, the answers at the bottom do not cut it. When asked when he would return he said "only the father knows". You answered like a trained double speaker. Politicians do this all the time. I wonder what Paul Stramer thinks?

    1. Hey blue, the Father and the Son are one but the Son is submissive to the Father out of His own consent. If they have agreed that only the Father knows the day and the hour than so be it. Who are we to question? I too am an adopted son of God according to the power that He gave us to become sons of God. But I don't know the day nor the hour of my own time to go to be with Him. I pray that you will choose to become a son of God too.
      But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: John 1:12

  11. re: "Where we are right now?"

    just what i have read, if you follow anna's postings, within past 10 was one with scribd document if i recall, re: quotes about bankers. at least one quote mentioned UnionJack.pdf THE UNION JACK by Helen Peters (or, google for it)

    claims we are not in the "69th week" of tribulation, already occured, and ritish israel/the "jews religion" (pharisees) tries to insert an extra centuries-long "week" inside already-fulfilled old testament prophecies.

    similar to, the claim is this is a luciferian trick to come as an angel of light and "rescue" everyone from the purposely set-up "disaster"

    also justifies us/british presence in middle east, israel, syria, etc.

    The seriousness of this unscriptural doctrine
    cannot be over estimated as Scofield and the
    whole school of British Israel Millennial cultists
    puts, not Christ--but a future anti-Christ at the
    center of the last seven years, which they say is
    yet future. This is no little thing and is not merely
    a difference in doctrine or interpretation as the
    Cross of Christ is involved.
    i only mention this to say, those are at least 2 sources that believe "the bible" IS true, and literally, but that the "tribulation" already occurred, and "christ" is not coming back again (supposed to be "living" already), and "my kingdom is not of this world" (as opposed to "millenialism" reign of 1000 years of peace...they claim that already occurred)

    1. it also is obvious, but never said, "millenial" is 1000. the so-called "millenial" generation look to be programmed to expect the anti-christ.

      2000 is bi-millenial. if that sounds sketchy...what other "millenial" could they be referring to? why be so vague? why label a generation "millenial" now, out of nowhere, when it is clearly bi-millenial by gregorian calendar?

      see various british rhodes scholar type works, e.g.

      Title: Looking Backwards from 2000 to 1887
      Author: Edward Bellamy
      or, see brotherhood of darkness, stanley monteith (google for PDF or youtube)
      or, watch h.g. wells "the time machine" movie versus jack the ripper, re: "utopia" by the year 2000
      QUOTE: (sleeping on park bench, transported to 1970, homeless and broke) "so, this is utopia"
      i never liked any "labelling generations from above" i suppose, but this "millenialism" is particularly bad.

      if people disagree with sources, i will note, there are many "milleniums" out there, and those who wish to set up a luciferian "utopia" are happy to mix and match, try to steal "1000 years of peace" to justify their empire of universal slavery/"initiation".

    2. i would say the simple opinions are "my kingdom is not of this world" (but world to come perhaps)

      while the other opinion is that means "no fleshly kingdom at all, ever, only spiritual kingdom, the "world" will always be "satanic", the only way to enter "heaven" is by not being friends with this "world" whatever year it is, any "fleshly kingdom" is false).

      i lean towards the latter, simply because "the world" i have seen is clearly "satanic"

    3. nnnm, It seems you get a lot of your ideas from reading various books that people write, which are generally nothing but their own opinions. One will know when to throw such books into a bonn fire, as soon as you see their opinions are contrary to the Bible.
      In actuality, the words ''luciferian and utopia' are oxymorons; lucifer being an evil one, immediately indicates they cannot create any such thing as utopia.

      All the questions you seem to present here, are all answered right in scripture; mostly right in the book of Revelation.
      It tells us clearly there is coming a literal Kingdom of God, and it will be a flesh-type kingdom with living people, along with the saints of God who will have bodies of the same type that Jesus has.
      Millennial has always meant 1000; nowhere is it referred to as a 'generation'.
      I might add, that everyone I've ever met who is greatly confused about the bible, are those who have read LOTS of books about it.

  12. Wasn't there something about casting first the mote out of thine own eye? Flinging bible verses at each other probably won't encourage Buddhists, Hindus, or even .. more landed than us European settlers.. Native Americans, to get behind this work.

  13. Miss Mae, what makes you think I have 'motes in my own eye". Is it because you like to think I do, or is that your way of dissing the bible verses which you seem to disdain, and hope we shut up about them?
    Buddhism and Hinduism are both false religions and I see no place where God tells us to 'encourage' them or anyone else. His Word is meant to bring everyone to repentance, and background or ethnicity are of no consideration. ''For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God''. (as for me, mine are all in the past tense, including all the motes and splinters.)

  14. It occurs to me that there are a lot of teachers and no students. More listening and less arguing. Lots of good points here to ponder, but if you don't listen as well as you hear, it's like you are all talking in tongues to each other...

  15. doonstr, I hear that! And Abby, let me elaborate on the point I was trying to make. First, I understand that Anna is Christian, and this site of Paul's contains in depth Christian teachings applicable to the season, and the founding fathers of the country were Christian. The context at the time the country was established, which insured freedom of religion, and all Men being equal, was Christian, 'white' and male. The struggle for equal rights for women and people of color is ongoing. The labeling of all other religions and spiritual ways as 'false' and 'pagan' was economically and territorially convenient, and still is, in regards to appropriation of resources. Convert or die has been a very convincing argument. Every group has it's bad actors, as Anna exemplified by explaining the infiltration of the Church by the black lodges. Likewise, there are kind and loving people in all walks of life who practice the teachings of Jesus, without, perhaps, even having heard of Him. Each of us views life through the color of our life experience. I doubt if there's anyone without a 'mote' or two. I'm here on this site because the great barrier reef is dying, species are vanishing every day, much of the available food is toxic, I have to buy water, and if I want to walk in the forest I grew up in, I have to get a permit! This land, this Turtle Island, that I love, is being decimated, someone is responsible, and I'd like to see them unhorsed from that position and be held accountable. They're threatening my grandchildren. That's pretty basic. Love God, love Life, love your kids .. keep 'em safe. Anna has a big piece of work here and she needs help. It's going to take all kinds of strong, brave allies who are willing to stand up for their own freedom. They may not be Christian. They may want to engage in discussion with others who have been aware of what's going on longer. The Native tribes are intimately involved in this work, as you heard in Anna's video. Not all of them are Christians. You are obviously strong in your Faith and I respect that. Your rightness does not necessarily make me wrong. My relationship with God is really my own business, and I'd like to be able to glean teaching from the exchanges here without having to get my Bible out or feel that my immortal soul endangered.

  16. Hey freeman Please take a little time and watch this video. In fact you too Abby et al. Please. I was raised catholic and by the Grace of God I am not only still Catholic but I am more catholic each and every day. It is really the truth. I cannot explain, it is just a deeeep feeling. I will die one. Just watch this video and you will see that I am not alone.

    If not try here:!!&app=io.ox/mail&folder=default0/INBOX

    1. Sorry, Michael, been there, done that. My father had studied to be a Jesuit priest and I had to study hard to tell him why I left the RC church. All you are going by is a feeling of tradition, not by the truth of the word of God. RC does not believe you need to be born again and claims that salvation is in the RC church. This is not scriptural even according to RC versions of scripture. Just read John 3:3 and 3:5. These are Jesus very own words. You could be the best RC in the world and still RC doctrine condemns every RC to purgatory. To burn off your sins, they say. This is nothing other than hell itself. There is not one single verse that supports purgatory. It does not exist. There is only heaven or hell. There is no in between. If you claim that you believe that Jesus died on the cross to pay for your sins then why would you have to pay for them yourself in purgatory? This is the same as saying that the price Jesus paid was not enough. That is a slap in His face. And if they lie about this, then what else will they lie about? Do yourself a favor and read the 95 thesis Martin Luther nailed to door of the Wittenburg Chapel for open discussion of the differences between RC doctrine and scriptural truths. These differences have not changed over all these years since RC will not bow to scripture. When I discovered the disagreement between the two, I had to make a choice which was of greater eternal value, RC dogma or scriptural truth. I chose scriptural truth. Let God be true and every man a liar. That was 40 years ago and their is not one day of regret or look back whatsoever. I embraced Jesus Christ and His truth and turned my back on man made religion. Now I am truly catholic, which means universal, but no longer subject to Rome.

  17. Replies
    1. These articles are only further proof and confirmation of RC antichrist position and doctrine of purgatory and claim that Christ's sacrifice was not perfect, not complete and and not enough. Not one canonical scripture is given to support this manmade theory and doctrine. Only RC traditions and non canonical writings and mere men's opinions. Paul tells us that Christ suffered "once, at the full end of the ages, for putting away of sin through his sacrifice, he hath been manifested;" Heb 9:26. Sin is sin. There is no such thing as venial sins as separate from other sins. This is just another RC invention created for confusion. Once sin is confessed and repented of, it is forgiven and he "remembers it no more." Paul further teaches that "Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin." Heb 10:18. So if Jesus remits the the sins of those who have properly confessed and repented of their sin, it is done and as the above scripture confirms "there is no more offering for sin." And certainly not by man paying it off himself in the the fires of purgatory. Man cannot pay for nor redeem his own sin. Only Jesus can do that. Therefor this doctrine is totally flawed and bankrupt and will condemn the believer in it to reap what he believes. "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:" Heb 9:27. There is no second chance after death to burn off one's sins. Death is final, and after death man faces judgement. Believers at the judgement seat of Christ and unbelievers at the great white throne judgement. "By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all." Heb 10:10. Once for all means Christ died once for all and through His death we are sanctified. It does not mean that a second time in the fires of purgatory is necessary to be sanctified. This again is confirmed by "But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.” Heb 10:12-14. Do you see that? "he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever" which includes all sins and He has perfected us forever who are sanctified. Paul wanted to be very clear about this and concludes "And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more." Heb 10:17. There is no wiggle room anywhere in these scriptures for an in between purgatory.
      RC doctrine is like US statutes and codes, starting with truth but leading you into all fiction and made to thoroughly confuse you so you end up lost, convicted, broke and in jail which in this case is their purgatory which is nothing more than hell itself.
      Jesus never preached purgatory. He only preached heaven and hell. Anything else is mere man's invention.



Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.