Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Thoughts About Kings and Brothers

By Anna Von Reitz

The problem with kings is that they are men and men vary widely in their characters and abilities, so that one may be a perfectly good king and another, even his own son, a disaster.

Witness the Hebrew's experience. They demanded a king, so God told Samuel--- it's a bad idea, but if that's what you want, have Saul for a king. 
And yes, it was a bad idea. Years of war and bloodshed and tragedy and all sorts of scandal and nastiness, even madness at the end----- and finally, the people had the great King David, who was a good, brave, and talented man, but also deeply flawed, and then his son, Solomon, the "wisest" king ever, and yet, he fell away and worshiped idols and accepted all the nastiness of Babylonian religious practices.

The plain fact is that men are not -- generally speaking --- able or willing or wise enough to govern themselves, so what realistic hope is there that they will be able to wisely govern others?
Everything that Samuel reported as God's advice and instruction is as true now as it was then. Better to accept God as your King and men as your brothers, than to try to fill God's shoes and become confused about who and what you are.

This is the wisdom of the Belle Chers (Belchers) who have never been eager or indeed, willing, to exercise the Great Seal of the United States of America and impose their will on anyone. Free will is the rule and gift of God. Who are we or anyone else to change that? And in the end, it is the journey of each one to know themselves and rule themselves, so again, isn't that enough to occupy an entire lifetime of striving?

So for two hundred years, the Belle Chers have stood stolidly by and fought their own battles and let the politicians squabble and the idea that they should interfere with the people sorting out their own affairs has remained repugnant and is repugnant still. 
Yet there is a time when respect for free will and agreement that the only true kingship remains with God, comes head to head with the responsibility we each bear toward our fellowman to do all that we can to safeguard and preserve them from harm so that we act not as kings, but as brothers.

I agree with Frank O'Collins that the Unam Sanctam Trust was conceived in fraud and is therefore a nullity in terms of Law, together with all its later developments.

Having solved the problem in his head, Frank is ready to move on to whatever other questions await him. 
The rest of us are left to clean up the mess on Aisle 5 which results from over 700 years of building a vast edifice of interlocking trusts, legal fictions, and forms of law peculiar to these devices---- all conceived in fraud--- in "legal fiction", yet nonetheless having identity and force and vast powers to build or destroy.

This is what is spoken of in Revelation, where angels seems to speak in riddles about those that "are" and "are not"--- that were and were not and yet will be. Corporations exist in exactly that manner. We conceive of these organizations like GMC and Exxon and Nestles and yet they aren't real. They "are" and "are not". They have names, they have employee rosters, they have officials and logos, but in a sense, they don't exist.

They are fraud in the same way the the Unam Sanctam trust is fraud. They are nullities, and don't exist in Law, yet they exercise tremendous power as commercial organizations and even more when they usurp the governance of entire countries.

We are left with a terrible dilemma of criminality and rulership, in which each man and woman must seek to rule their own lives and use their own minds and having faced that responsibility which we owe each other---- join together to find solutions and replace the fictions with the facts--- knowing that what we have is built on sand, an edifice however vast that is unlawful and illusory as any shadow.

Try to imagine a world without corporations. Try to imagine a world without kings, only brothers. Try to imagine a time when we cast down idols whether made of gold or words or flesh and embrace the divinity that lies within? 

"The Kingdom of Heaven is within you."

See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.  


  1. Sheriff Mac acknowledge there are two forms of law .one what we were founded on america common law .
    And the Lincoln version British maritime law .we actually lost both the revolutionary war and (civil) war.the British came back and used s agents to subvert the legal system .and implement servitude boom and bust cycle of money was used to milk the colony . The real reason of 1812 war Jackson kicked em out and he beat them in new Orleans .

  2. The same hands that created the YOUniverse are the same hands that created YOU. Awakening, remembering, shining your light and love and returning to full consciousness and oneness with Creator Source/God.

  3. And Andrew Jackson was the only president that survived two assassination attempts, which finally forced the banks to function as a National Bank and forced to act lawfully. They only lasted 5 years working as an honest bank, before claiming bankruptcy, proving they arent capable of honest business. They can only survive by deceit and lies. Stealing, rather than lending. And using only fiat money and colorable laws to prosper as a criminal syndicate. They couldnt wait until Jackson was replaced.

    1. WE hope that "The Donald" has the moxy of his chosen hero/example - Andrew Jackson

    2. WE hope that "The Donald" has the moxy of his chosen hero/example - Andrew Jackson

  4. I read that a fellow went to a court in Seattle few years ago for a ticket issued against his "interests" undoubtedly a NAME account. He said he did get an attorney but had to fire him. When asked if he was going to represent himself, he said "Your honor I am myself" Judges for some reason fumed and spat, could not even finish sentences and become angry about him saying this. Finally a 4th judge noticed that he had pointed out in another case how the description said that vehicle had just barely touched the center line and in his the car was not even that close. The judge suggested just using that and closing out the case. It was on tape so and I never forgot and now understand why his not representing "himself", the dead corporate thing, and simply saying "Your honor I am myself" is such a problem for the certain courts.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.