Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Friday, June 9, 2017

Paul Harvey and the Reign of Heavens

From Judge Anna Von Reitz


This is a reply to the article published by the "Reign of Heaven" group (see below)-- first my response to their queries and suppositions, then "The Rest of the Story" from the immortal Paul Harvey, and then the article from the Reign of Heavens Society, so you can see what Paul and I are replying to and why this is a sad state of affairs:

My Reply:

The unincorporated entity known as The United States of America and the incorporated entity also calling itself "The United States of America" are NOT THE SAME entities just because they appear to have the same name.  They are fundamentally different in nature, jurisdiction, and law.  Trying to obfuscate this in any way just slows down any solution to the problem this country faces.


It will also be seen that the quasi-military offices such as "Postmaster General" were NEVER  part of the lawful government of the actual United States and have instead existed in the Territorial United States and Municipal United States -- that is, in international jurisdiction of the sea prior to the Civil War and afterward usurped upon the land as part of the Territorial United States' administration.

But if you don't know that there are three versions of "United States"--- our version, the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States (both of which routinely just refer to themselves as "the United States" also) --- it's nigh on unto impossible for people to wrap their heads around which entity and which offices of which entity you are talking about.  

This is just another example of "similar names deceits" being used by lawyers to create deliberate confusions and wrong assumptions and keep us all at each other's throats and unable to square off and deal with the actual problem.

It leaves people like the Reign of Heavens spinning their wheels in actual fact, contributing all their effort to a hopeless cause and ranting and accusing those of us who DO see the whole deceit of "telling lies".  But then, they are confused and not rightly understanding or replying to what I actually said, and maybe they have a right to be confused, because after all, they have been misled by professionals. Read on for another apt and timely history lesson:

The Rest of the Story from Paul Harvey:

If there is a stain on the record of our forefathers, one dark hour in the earliest history of the American colonies, it would be the hanging of the so-called “witches” at Salem.
But that was a pinpoint in place and time, a brief lapse into hysteria.
For the most part, our seventeenth century colonists were scrupulously fair, even in fear.
There was one group of people they feared with reason – a society,  you might say, whose often insidious craft had claimed a multitude of victims, ever since the Middle Ages in Europe.
One group of people, hated and feared from Massachusetts Bay to Virginia.
The magistrates would not burn them at the stake, although surely a great many of the colonists might have recommended such a solution.
Our forefathers were baffled by them.
In the first place, where did they come from?
Of all who sailed from England to Plymouth in 1620, not one of those two-legged vermin was aboard.
“Vermin.”
That’s what the colonists called them.
Parasites who fed on human misery, spreading sorrow and confusion wherever they went.
“Destructive,” they were called.
And still they were permitted co-existence with the colonists.
For a while anyway.
Of course, there were colonial laws prohibiting the practice of their infamous craft. Somehow a way was always found around those laws.
In 1641, Massachusetts Bay colony took a novel approach to the problem. The governors attempted to starve those “devils” out of existence through economic exclusion. They were denied wages, and
thereby it was hoped that they would perish.
Four years later Virginia followed the example of Massachusetts Bay, and for a while it seemed that the dilemma had been resolved.
It had not.
Somehow the parasites managed to survive, and the mere nearness of them made the colonists’ skin crawl.
In 1658 in Virginia the final solution:
Banishment. Exile.
The “treacherous ones” were cast out of the colony.
At last, after decades of enduring the psychological gloom, the sun came out and birds sang and all was right with the world. And the elation continued for a generation.
I’m not sure why the Virginians eventually allowed the outcasts to return, but they did.
In 1680, after twenty-two years, the despised ones were readmitted to the colony on the condition that they be subjected to the strictest surveillance.
How soon we forget.
For indeed, over the next half-century or so, the imposed restrictions were slowly, quietly swept away. And those whose treachery had been feared since the Middle Ages ultimately took their place in society.
You see, the “vermin” that once infested colonial America, the parasites who preyed on the misfortune of their neighbors until finally they were officially banished from Virginia, those dreaded, despised and inevitably outcast masters of confusion were - LAWYERS!
And now you know THE REST OF THE STORY.

___________________
Below is the Reign of Heavens article. You can see for yourselves how they are confused and why:


International Public Notice
Claim in red, rebuttal in blue
This particular document was posted on the Anna Von Reitz website called ” Let’s Settle This Hash……”: LINK  on 04-26-2017
Wherein it states the following:
“The de jure government of this country is called The United States of America (Unincorporated). It has to be unincorporated to serve as a sovereign government, because if it held a corporate charter granted by some other government, it would be subservient to that government. Okay? Everyone got that?”
We can agree upon that statement because The United States of America and the Government of The United States of America is not incorporated. Embassy: LINK
“During the so-called American Civil War the rats in Congress created a doppelganger entity incorporated in Britain called “The United States of America, Inc.”. This is called “The United States of America” but it is not your de jure government. It is just a corporation granted a charter like any other British corporation.”
Where is the evidence of this claim? There are no links or documents, nothing….. This is the first time that the Government of The United States of America has ever heard of such a claim or the subject matter.
“Now we have Keith Livingway running around claiming that he basically went to a bankruptcy trustee sale and “bought” the office of “Postmaster General” out of a claim on abandonment. He is telling everyone that this abandoned office is the land jurisdiction trustee office once held by Benjamin Franklin and that it is the land jurisdiction de jure government that he is representing.”
Keith Livingway never claimed that he attended a bankruptcy trustee sale, nor did he ever claim to have bought the office of Postmaster General. Where is the evidence? Where is a publication of the claim? There isn’t any because it is a complete lie. The whole scenario was completely made up by Anna Von Reitz and Paul Stramer.
“But here’s the kicker—- Franklin held the office of Post Master (land) not Postmaster (sea) —- and on top of that, none of these quasi-military offices like “Lieutenant Governor” and “Attorney General” and “Postmaster General” even existed prior to the Civil War.”
Here is an image of the original ledger of Doctor Benjamin Franklin, and a LINK to the whole ledger now in PDF. (page nine)

Everyone can see that “Postmaster General” did in fact exist before the civil war, and here is the link to the successor of Ebeneezer Hazard:LINK The Postmaster General credentials are towards the bottom of the page.  The National assembly did create a department of the General Post Office to operate as a Government agency, however that was done to protect the original General Post Office of 1775 from foreign powers when doing business with them. The National assembly has that right and power to create such agencies when doing business with foreign powers. Further, everyone can see that Benjamin Franklin did in fact hold the office of Postmaster General and not this made up difference in spelling and land/sea jurisdiction garbage. All surveys require both, metes and bounds and seaward boundaries in order to be legitimate.  No one can land lock a country.
“Therefore— is Keith Livingway filling Franklin’s vacated office? No. He is claiming to own an office in a defunct British corporation that was bankrupted in 1907—- The United States of America, Inc. He is not occupying Franklin’s [land] office which was as a “Post Master” –two words, notice? And not a “Postmaster” and not a “General” anything. The de jure government of this country has never been incorporated and never can be incorporated. Period.”
True, the dejure Government of The United States of America cannot be incorporated in another country and it isn’t incorporated anywhere. As a matter of fact, corporations are required to be registered with the Government of The United States of America when doing business within its metes and bounds and seaward boundaries. Benjamin Franklin never vacated his office, it was succeeded as written in the Declaration of Chain of Title:
“Declaration of Chain of Title
IT IS DECLARED THAT; the office of the Postmaster General of the Confederacy of The United States of America of 1775, first held by Doctor
Benjamin Franklin on 26th of July 1775, was succeeded by Richard Bache on November 7th, 1776, succeeded by Ebenezer Hazard on the 28th
day of January, 1782, and died in the year of 1817 without naming a successor. The office of the Postmaster General of the Confederacy of
The United States of America of 1775 was vacant from the year 1817 until the year 2010.” as published April 2nd, 2012 at the link above. 
Keith Livingway is not and has never claimed to personally own any office, however he was appointed successor of Ebeneezer Hazard as stated in the Declaration of Chain of Title here: LINK  by the National assembly to the office of the Postmaster General and or Post Master General of the General Post Office of the original Confederacy of 1781 back to 1775 and now the Government of The United States of America. The appointment is for life or until succeeded to keep chain of title to the country known as The United States of America.
These facts as stated in blue may be a source of distress, jealousy, embarrassment or otherwise to Anna Von Reitz and Paul Stramer.  Those emotions do not give them the right to print lies, deceive people, or slander people. Neither of them have the right to attack people personally with lies and deceit. Neither of them called to verify the facts of their documents, ever…That is called libel and others that are parroting these lies and twisting the facts are also libel. All of this back and forth really needs to end because it is beginning to have the look and feel of high school all over again.
The office of the Postmaster General of the Government of The United States of America will never be vacated or released into the hands of proprietors seeking to use Patriot tricks to gain control of the country on behalf of foreign powers. Upon the death of the current aforesaid office holder, the chain of title reverts back to the National assembly to appoint a new successor and further there exists other protections of said office that is privileged information. Further, it is a vary serous crime to attack the General Post Office of the country.
THE T-ROH SHOW will broadcast and cover the real story and facts about how all of this came about when it pertains to the General Post Office and the original Government when more important issues are already covered.

19 comments:

  1. I have a copy of a The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America. I noticed in original state constitutions it is handwritten clearly "agreement with United States" So maybe I am not seeing this clearly but other writings as well indicate that the States of America is not the United States and entity created to assist and do certain limited business for the States of America. Where is there any title or deed describing the metes and bounds from sea to sea etc of any land or country called the United States? Most likely songs like America the Beautiful, Star Spangled Banner, Pledge of Allegiance and writers have created this idea. A clever ploy but the corporate United States to make everyone think it has become the new monarchial power, a central tyrannical authority just as was detailed and corrected for by absolving and dissolving it, with the people sharing the sovereignty previously used to shove the business of the elite monarchs and friends of devious nature, down upon the colonies by the Declaration of Independence. The United States has been a thing much like the European Union seeking to gain power over independent states, creating a false idea that the entirety was all one under one central power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. read this it will tell you exactly how it was done similarly all over the world.

      Public Law 94-241

      Delete
    2. its not false and it has been done legally all over the world. you just have to know how so you can "come out of her my people."

      Delete
  2. I wonder how long it is going to take this person to realize that pope Anna is infallible and her prophet Paul are two peas in the same pod!!! If you don't believe it, ask them!!! What, no rebuttal!!!??? Let's see how much stinky "shinola" Anna can throw at this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personal attacks how Saul Alensky, rules for radicals of you .lay down some dated events to support you slanderous talk.

      Delete
    2. Believing everything anyone tells us is EXACTLY how we allowed ourselves to get into this horrific mess! Listen, think and do your own research!

      Delete
    3. anna has attempted to wake up the people more than you or anyone else, so for that at a minimum is amazing, now it is up to each one of us to get off our lazy asses and do the due diligence and help her and the people to fine tune it all....

      Delete
  3. William Penn jailed and the judge demanded a guilty . The jury refused they were denied food and water finally jailed.the founding father had great contempt for judges and they were only permitted to rule under 50 dollars .
    Otherwise trial by jury. And the 13 th ammendment to band foreign agents acting as bar attorneys .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The jury used the power of "nullification". Today, a defendent cannot even mention that word in a court room!

      Delete
    2. you must tell the judge that it is not lawful to practice law from the bench and enquire is it he that has a claim against you? if he continues you must tell him to recuse himself as many times as necessary and have an affidavit of bias and prejudice ready if you have let it get that far.

      honestly, if you have let it get that far then you really do not know who you are and you are challenging them - at war with them which you should not be. preferably you should have the case dismissed (motion to dismiss frcp 12 b 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and your state annotated code to match) before that point if you really know who you are and not justfy ANY cause of action... it is only your controversy that allows the administrative or legislative court any jurisdiction at all.

      Delete
    3. First of all I dont care if you call it "Trial by Jury" or "Jury Trial", because you have missed 3 important words after that that describes what the true jury should be comprized of to give it legitimatezy....a jury "of his peers". Thats what has been lost. Never does the constitution refer or define "peers" as complete strangers to a "defendant" they have never meet or known their whole life. "Peers" back then referred to people in his own community who knew the defendant personally and could attest to the nature of his character. Otherwise, it easy for any stranger on these jurys today to automatically convict the defendant before even hearing the evidence. The mindset now goes something like this.."why is this person being charged if he isnt guilty of something". In other words, the defendant is constantly trying to prove a "negative". "Guilty" until be proven innocent. Instead of "innocent" until proven "Guilty". Almost immpossible to defend against. To top it off, most people either hire attorneys, or use a Public Defender, both of whom are also complete strangers to the defendant and who have dealt with many liers already. Why should this defendant be any different. Thats why the hated attorneys so much back in those days. Because the constitution ONLY talks about "Conselors" not Laywers and attorneys. Council means anyone in the community who could represent the defendand (like a good friend) without pay, to ensure the defendant s got the full benifit of the doubt. Back in those days, people thought it reprehensible to take money from a defendant he personally knew of , making it synonamous with "unjust enrichment" of his friends and community. How in the world can anyone be my peer when they cant even answer the easiest questions about the constitution or law. I only had one case that lead to a jury trail. And my first question to the jury was the most basic of understanding the constitution..I simply asked anyone to raise their hand if they knew what the first 10 amendments to the constitution were called. Not one person rose their hand. I couldnt believe this. Not one person could tell me that they were called "the Bill of Rights". I looked at the judge contemptually as he just shook his head as if to say....it is what it is. Theres nothing i can do about it if people want to remain ignorant. For me, that was testament of how the system got so powerful. People either dont care at all about law and their inheritance or they want to be paid to study it. I have friends just like that. He told me he doesnt or wont study anything unless hes paid for it...RIGHT!! These jurys today are imbecles. We could never empanal a jury of our peers in this system. They dont exsist..The jurys today are no help to us at all. In fact, they tend to hate us right from the start because they dont understand what we are talking about.Just like this site. The average person seeing this site would simply dismiss us all as mental patients. Guilty as charged. Next case...!!!

      Delete
    4. well they say jury trial not trial by jury, an inverse of the true meaning, of course on purpose; they are not people either ;o)

      they are persons, 14th amendment citizens.

      another little play on words is emapanel a jury, look up the word jury with some 1800 dictionaries and you will see many times they are speaking of 3 or more judicial peers such as the supreme court or appellate court with 3 or more true judges.

      Grand Jury typically has "people" 12 or more which is why jesus had the 12 disciples everywhere he went.

      tricky word play and juxtaposition of words these foreign citizens attempting to bond us and send us to "hell" (debtors prison of the exchequer if you look up the definition)

      remember you should NEVER let it get that far, what are you doing warring with them as an enemy combatant? they are playing 4 dimensional chess in the game they created and contiunally change the rules and we bring checkers to the table...

      Delete
  4. One fact Lincoln unlawfully changed the jurisdiction , coined money unlawfully , waged war in reality an attack of northern agression, jailed anyone who protested . He's the one who ushered in British maritime law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. some would say was at least half black, watch the movie where they say his hair is wirey unlike most white men, started the violation of the original 13th amendment (no lawyers/titles of nobility) and started the executive orders via his buddy, lieber and his codes, which is why obama cherished him so much in the beginning remember? obama knew it would end with him just as it started with lincoln. time for the Republic and the United States of America. Trump is the battering ram to catapault us back into the Republic.

      Delete
    2. Unfortunately, even Trump refers to Lincoln as a great and intelligent man who faught for freedom and end "slavery" of both blacks and whites , after he was told by the banks after the war was over,which was now bankrupt completely as a country, that they would refinance the country immediately and make it solvent again, no problem, but at 30% interest. That was the second time he asked the banks for money....once before the war ended (because he already bankrupted the "North" and could never win the battle without a cash injection that could last long enough ...another 2 years...to win the war effort) and again right after. And both times he denied the loans for the same reason...they wanted a totaly unreasonable amount of interest. So high in fact, that he was quoted as saying.." I didnt start this war to end "black slavery", only to enslave everyone by the banks. But thats exactly what happened. Because it turns out that even Lincoln had no clue about the difference between "REAL MONEY", and "CURRENCY"(Commercial Instraments), which are only IOU's. The only thing Lincoln(honest Abe) was familiar with was money that had real value because it was based on substance(gold and silver). But he should haved, because his solution to finishing the war effort was given to him by his own tresurer. Hes the one who suggested just to print his own "NOTES". But Lincoln's responce to his treasurer was "We can do that".?? But if it isnt backed by anything wont the people know it. And his tresurer simply told him, if the people see you using it, Mr president, they will too. And hence, the "Greenback" was created, and used successfully to finish the war. Of course, being honest Abe, he cancelled the Greenback right after the war because he thought it was fraud. But when he asked the banks again for another loan of real money, thinking he now had the advantage to negotiate a better interest rate, the banks said its still at 30% interest. Thats when he told the banks what he was going to do , so he wouldnt have to ask them for loans anymore...that he would just simply reinstitude the "Greenback" again without any interest. That statement would lead to his immediate death. The banks couldnt take a chance like that, even if it was meant as a bluff. They didnt want America to have control of its own currency ever again. That was the whole reason and purpose of creating the "slavery issue in the first place by the banks.

      Delete
    3. true, but he was the one that also initiated the current dilemma and many of his actions still stand today for the cabal so by his deeds it shows that either he was cleverly manipulated or was aware of his actions and the affects it has had and their negative consequences. The 2 greatest enslaving amendments 13th and 14th were in that period. Even when they passed the 13th amendment, the senator said he did not believe in equality of men but rather equal protection under the law obviously of persons. have even read that he may have been mixed in with rothschild blood or something to that extent.

      Delete
  5. So you claim libel, over a post master general office.

    That sounds like threat for disagreement .
    So much for freedom of speach .
    I say so what it's not important how about the deep state creating falce flags , using corperate statuary law to turn america into a police state .
    Do you have a dog in the fight ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Where is the evidence of this claim? It's everywhere!!!
    Look all around you! Look at your birth certificate, drivers license, mortgage documents, social security paper work, bank statements etc........even the stop sign at the end of your street is private law.
    Only the unaware can't see the forest because of all of those dam TREES.
    H O W E V E R
    I would love to get my hands on a copy of articles of incorporation or see mention of it within some US publication. These types of documents would go along long way if not all the way in satisfying the burdens of Proof to claims made, when talking to the unaware.
    My 2 cents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. read this it will tell you exactly how it was done similarly all over the world.

      Public Law 94-241 also the Organic Act of 1871 it shows the incorporation of the District of Columbia DBA United States. get certified copies, and you are golden, from the archives easy to do.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.