Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Monday, March 6, 2017

Reply to Michael R. Hamilton in Regard to Continental Marshals Service


By Anna Von Reitz

Mr. Hamilton, my information on the subject of what the "founders" who started the Continental Marshals knew and didn't know comes directly from Bruce Doucette, who was in fact the one who started the whole ball rolling.

It was NOT the intention of those acting that night on a teleconference to create a Continental Marshals Service. 

They had no idea that there was a separate, special, international jurisdiction involved that is the special province of international police officers called "marshals".   They just wanted protection in place for the people and they thought "marshals" sounded good. 

That is straight from the horse's mouth, and it was corroborated by three witnesses who were present during the initial and subsequent discussions. 

I have never said otherwise and have had no cause to say otherwise.

The plain fact is that they were stumbling around without a clue and trying to form a security force akin to state militias for the land jurisdiction.  Their idea was that the State Justices should have peacekeeping forces acting in support to protect the people----and they were correct----they just didn't realize that the state militias are the ones who are supposed to be providing that service. 

Anyway, you can't cross jurisdictions and it makes absolutely no sense to confuse people by calling apples oranges.

We need Continental Marshals and we have them.  That's the Good News.

There is a completely stupid and unnecessary controversy about this.  That's the Bad News.

Those who want to serve in the state militias and give themselves fancy names and badges are free to do so.  Those that can make the cut to serve in the Continental Marshals Service are more than welcome to submit their applications.

And that should, logically, be an end to it.

The "people" you reference haven't even been proven to be part of the "people"----that is, their own state militias.

You haven't produced a single piece of evidence that the individuals voting on all this via a teleconference were verifiably  (1) American state nationals who have surrendered their PERSONS and reclaimed their birthright political status, (2) that any vetting process occurred preventing U.S. citizens and even entire groups of Bar Attorneys from "voice voting" on the matter, (3) that the intent of the group as a whole was what you have supposed it to be, since it is clear that their intent did not match their actions, or (4) any proof of your idea that a handful of "the people" --- even those who actually are part of the "people"----can arbitrarily give Grand Juries totally new authorities and jobs, convert State Justices into international court justices so that they hold both land jurisdiction offices and sea jurisdictions at the same time, alter the structure of the American Government at whim, and make yourself petty little gods over the rest of us.   

Accusing me of "lying" based on --- again --- your own completely unjustified assumptions isn't going to hold water any more than your similar accusations against Bella Haywood.

Unfortunately, Sir, the only one causing trouble, passing around falsehoods based on flawed logic processes, and dishonoring the high standards of the other State Justices----is you.

There have been zero sworn statements coming over my desk about Bella Haywood and none of the unsworn hearsay complaints have turned up anything substantive, either. 

But there sure have been a lot of complaints coming in about you, Justice Hamilton, including sworn court testimony.


My advice to you is to pull in your horns and do what is right.  You can never get into trouble by doing that, but you are cruising for a bruising otherwise, because we all reap what we sow. 

---------------------------------------
See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

1 comment:

  1. Unfortunately, and I don't say this derogatorily, Anna is correct in her criticism of Mr. Hamilton. He also encourages people to use the government forms to apply for what he calls a state national passport, but when you read the verbiage on the form, that's not what you are applying for at all, and under penalty of perjury, you state you are a citizen or non-citizen national of the United States. No state national would sign that. It really sickens me that there is so much in-fighting and misinformation going on amongst all of us who want to be free of the yoke of tyranny, and the last thing we need is another "guru", who charges to access his site, passing out more. There is a lot of good information on Mr. Hamilton's site, but just a few examples like the Marshal's Oath and the passport negate it all

    M

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.