Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2500 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Nepotism and corruption in the Hammond case? Can Anybody refute this?

Subject: Fw: this is how it works...
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 03:26:59 +0000
These articles both appeared on the Shasta Lantern website.

 This is the way government operates. They can't make it on merit of a case or law, so they have to rig the deal. Just like the ambush. Have Obama state that he is sending in his best crisis negotiator and then he laughs as they carry out the ambush and commit murder. That is how he negotiates. Now all they have to do is alter all the evidence, that they control, to fit the script that they released to the media.

 Power Corrupts Absolutely: Ties that Bind Run Deep with Aiken Family in Hammond Case

 by Red Smith · January 26, 2016


 Ann Aiken, Chief Judge of the United States District Court of Oregon 9th Circuit, is no stranger to accusations of inappropriate relationships regarding her Courtroom. She is not a stranger to willfully failing to disclose those relationships and has even allegedly illegally ruled in her own favor to attempt to hide those relationships. In one recent complaint filing, a visiting out-of-circuit judge was requested by motion because the Defendants, including Ninth Circuit judges who are a member of the Oregon State Bar, had several political, business and social ties to Judge Aiken who was to be the presiding judge in the case. These ties constituted a very real potential conflict of interest against the Plaintiff’s interests. There are specific guidelines to be followed when requesting inter-circuit visiting judges and Judge Aiken refused to follow those requirements. Only the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court may decide such matters and Judge Aiken refused to follow those guidelines and the federal statute by ruling on these matters herself. Judge Aiken ruled on the motion against her in her own favor. Already brought to light is Judge Aiken’s potential inappropriate working relationship with Hammond terrorism re-sentencing lead prosecutor Amanda Marshall. Prior to being appointed U.S. District Attorney Amanda Marshall worked for the Oregon Department of Justice in Child Advocacy Services, a State Agency overseen by the Child Advocacy Services Board, a Board Judge Aiken has been President of since 1998. Judge Aiken was the Chief Justice that oversaw Amanda Marshall’s Oath of Office and swearing in and in conclusion to that ceremony instructed Marshall to “now hit the ground running”.
Judge Aiken was also the presiding Judge in a 2006 case
that overturned several key provisions of the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000 which she found violated the supremacy of the Federal Environmental Protection Act. A management plan that the Hammonds were key in helping construct. As well Judge Aiken’s decision weighed heavily based on affidavit testimony by Harney County Judge Stephen Grasty, whose actions have come into question and extreme scrutiny since the occupation began.
 Now in question is Judge Aiken’s relationship with two brothers who have started a counter occupation movement labeled as G.O.H.O.M.E. (Getting Occupiers of Historic Oregon Malheur Evicted). Started by brothers Zach and Jake Klonoski, the group seeks to raise funds and generate community sentiment to forcefully remove the Citizen Occupiers of the Malheur Reserve. Zach Klonoski is a special assistant to Charlie Hales, Mayor of Portland and is listed by the City’s website as the Mayor’s right hand. Jake Klonoski is an Attorney Adviser Department of the Inspector General 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
 In order to re-sentence the Hammonds as terrorists the United States Government had to file an appeal Under 18 U.S. Code 3742 (B). According to the code; “…The Government may not further prosecute such appeal without the personal approval of the Attorney General, the Inspector General, or a
> deputy inspector general designated by the Inspector General.” The same Inspector General where Jake Klonoski is employed as a key Attorney Adviser. These appeals to sentences are extremely rare in their dispensation. However, as troubling as Jake Klonoski’s capacity to influence that appeal process is, considering his recent political stance against the Occupiers seeking to defend the Hammonds rights, it is does not hold a candle to the inappropriate relationship between the Klonoski Brothers and Judge Ann Aiken, whose former married name is Ann Aiken-Klonoski. Jake and Zach are in fact her sons.

 Considering Judge Aiken’s working relationship with the lead prosecutor, her familial relationship with key members of the Inspector Generals office with the power to issue the rarely heard of sentencing appeal and her involvement in overturning a law the Hammonds were instrumental in crafting it is not outside the realm of logic to question Aiken’s fitness to serve as the presiding Judge in the re-sentencing matter. Taken in the light of complaints filed against Judge Aiken regarding her failure to disclose pertinent relationships and her capacity to circumvent the law in her own behalf, it is unconscionable that she presided over the Hammond case and as the situation now clearly reeks of nepotism, political incest and corruption the Hammond case clearly must be revisited by a new and impartial means outside of the tainted District Court. At this juncture it would seem that a Common Law Grand Jury constructed outside of the Oregon or Federal Courts is the only mechanism remaining that can be trusted to operate under the color of law.

https://shastalantern.net/2016/01/power-corrupts-absolutely-ties-that-bind-run-deep-with-aiken-family-in-hammond-case/

NEXT ARTICLE TIES IN AS WELL: It is about the FBI guy heading the Burns OR operation.

Can anybody refute this?

Special Agent in Charge of Oregon Occupation Greg Bretzing Linked to National security Breach, Fraud and Corruption in Salt Lake City

In 2011 KSL-TV out of Utah conducted a year-long investigation of the FBI Field Office in Salt Lake City regarding security violations. The alleged violations had been first reported by a special agent in Phoenix and alleged a leak of classified information that could threaten national security. Greg Bretzing, now out of the FBI’s Portland, OR. branch and current Special Agent in Charge of the Malhuer Occupation and LaVoy Finicum shooting was an Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the time of the investigation. The report prompted the Salt Lake City field office to begin re-evaluating its security procedures, according to sources inside the FBI. Security clearance procedures were reassessed to ensure each individual had the appropriate credentials and access.
Read the rest of this article here:
https://shastalantern.net/2016/01/special-agent-in-charge-greg-bretzing-linked-to-national-security-breach-fraud-and-corruption-in-salt-lake-city/

17 comments:

  1. More proof that the continual untruths perpetuated and perpetrated on the people of the United States of America by our own President of the the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. has established a precedence and procedure for his staff of thugs to follow. This is the perfect example of tyrannical government our Forefathers warned us of, and also gave us the basis for removing the tyrants. God help those tyrants as they will reach the end of their rope.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We have no legitimate courts. United States v Trowbridge demonstrated that. This is premeditated murder and an Kidnaping or an abduction. It is time for the citizens arrest and fill up the fema camps.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We have no legitimate courts. United States v Trowbridge demonstrated that. This is premeditated murder and an Kidnaping or an abduction. It is time for the citizens arrest and fill up the fema camps.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Let me tie one more thing in...

    Amanda Marshall worked for a child advocacy group, and Dwight and Suzie Hammond have a special needs Grandson, who's testimony the judge allowed, but ruled that he was unreliable after he gave it, then allowed the prosecutors to 'use' the testimony later.

    As for article two, yes, that is what I understand as well. There are people backing up these facts, with Pacific Patriots Network, and you can contact them for absolute verification at pacificpatriotsnetwork.com and documentation, if it is "safe" to publish the evidence for both.

    One last thing, I read on a co-founders page, that PPN had proof, already, that the STATE mandated investigation into LaVoy's Death, has already been compromised!

    On Pete Santilli Livestream with Deb Jordan (labeled she saw Pete), she stated that "everyone" was deliberately brought to Portland so they could be "railroaded" or some such term. Its on his YouTube Channel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The closest fed court to Burns was an hour and a half away. That is Eastern Oregon, all Ranchers,Farmers and true Cowboys. Instead, they were drive 8.5 hours to Multnomah County, one of the most liberal cities in the U.S. It will not be a "jury of their peers". Also, don't forget that Shawna Fox's son in law mysteriously was killed after removing her guns from her home. Supposedly a gun "caught on fire" in his warehouse, while he was busy doing paperwork in his office. Ever hear of a gun "catching on fire"? Doesn't happen.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  5. Harry Reid = Bundy land = Chinese resources
    Hillary Clinton = Hammond land = Russian resources

    Next = so on = so on

    This will never stop until stopped by force. This is fascism in its highest form.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It seems that there is evidence to put together an International and independent GRAND JURY to hear the evidence. I'm not a attorney but I suggest:
    1) You know and follow the law to immediately take & video (with multiple copies) sworn testimonies to have legal and recorded documented evidence to preserve and protect it and the people - from "lethal" accidents caused by the other side.)
    2) Appeal to Judge Andrew Napoletano to advise people regarding this issue and their rights and steps to take.
    3) Contact Jesse Ventura for interviews on his site.
    4) Contact all HIGH VOLUME alternative radio and youtube folks for "protective" exposure.
    5) I would learn muscle testing (Kinesology) and test everyone for being "real" and not being a "shill" for protection against infiltration.

    Those who run the government think they have nothing to loose. Their gain is only money. But we have everything to loose if this corruption and killing continues. Our gain is getting our country back.
    BLESS THE TRUTH TELLERS.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. all the problems in this country stem from one issue:

    you all never accepted nor pledged into the PUBLIC TRUST known and described as the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; can't be done when one is borne as that would be involuntary servitude.

    this omission on your part places your LEGAL NAME ESTATE inside the Article IV section 3 clause 2 act of congress jurisdiction of the international debt collection document called the United States Constitution; a general deposit of an any interest instead of a special deposit of a specific usufructuary interest (ie: give up right to the FALSE PROFITS) ... complete the negotiation that initiated with the birth event and all this shit stops ... http://iamsomedude.com

    You were given a BARE TRUST: accept the grant and modify the trust .... or you all can keep doing what you have been doing for 30+ years ... I forget, what is the definition of insanity again?

    http://iamsomedude.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Since the Hammond's are caught up in the system, they should be working on establishing a record until other remedies arise, preferably without an attorney. It wouldn't hurt to disqualify the judge..they can do that. the U.S. Supreme Court has held that "Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified." Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994); and, In Liljeberg v Health Services Acquisition corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S. Ct. 2194 the Court said: "What matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance"; In pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 the Court said: "It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes he has received justice". D

    They need to demand an article III judge...there aren't any, they're all in the BAR. They need to get affidavits on file attesting they are not U.S. citizens numc pro tunc to their age of majority, and an affidavit of non-corporate status, both which will be un-rebutted, then challenge the jurisdiction of the court by hitting the lack of legislative jurisdiction over the land upon which the so called crime took place hard, and stick to that subject only. May God Bless these good people during their time of need, and give them the strength and wisdom to persevere.

    M

    ReplyDelete
  10. "This is the way government operates" is an unfortunate kind of statement which accepts the fraud as authority. People need to get unbrainwashed and discontinue referencing the fraud as anything but fraud. "This is the way the fraudulent impersonation of government operates"...

    So far as court is concerned:
    1. These are private fraudulent courts without justice.
    2. Arguing/pleading is entrapment into their false authority.
    3. I suggest:
    1. Stating for the record "there has been a mistake". (resets the clock)
    2. State:
    a. "I do not consent to any of this situation xxx"
    b. Nothing I say or do or do not say or do not do should at any time be interpreted as entering into a contract with this commercial enterprise known as xxx court, nor will I contract with the municipal corporation of washington d.c. known as "the state of xxx" or contract with "The United States of America" or any of you or the entities you claim to represent.
    3. I am not the name in all caps "xxx xxx xxx" nor am I a proxy, surety, accomodating part, trustee or otherwise liable or obligated or associated with that all caps name".
    4. I vehemently deny knowingly or willingly joining any association or benefit privilege scam and I have never sacrificed my natural rights.
    5. I do not consent to this, I am the wrongly accused and I will not volunteer or contract. I refuse to participate in an of these commercial endeavors being perpetrated here.

    Simply stand on a refusal to participate. As Judge Bork said "everyone is prison is a volunteer". Don't volunteer to participate in their system. You have every right not to. Stand your ground and don't get suckered into participation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. check out "contract revocations" at Galactichistorian" - You Will Like> betcha

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very well put Paul thank u for ur knowledge. I send my love a cross the Multiverse to all beings. Cuz when love is given to evil it DISSINEGRATES !!!

      Delete
  12. They have been caught in the act red handed with their pants down.
    What are you going to do now, implement the second amendment and shoot all of them. It is quit possibly the only way. If you take them to court they will deny e everything and ignore everything and put you in prison for filing a law suit against them and they will call it 'obstructing justice,' and make up a multitude of other trumped up charges. They will choose their own jury. They will advise the lawyers and judges on how to run the Admiralty Court and they will do it and no one will say anything about it.

    All these articles and comments are very good with truthful content, 'now' what are you going to do about it. Writing it down is the first step. Now the follow through must take place. A victory here will upset the apple cart across the board as the 'script' is the same everywhere, the U.S. Canada, Australia, etc etc

    ReplyDelete
  13. Both sides right -both sides wrong> both fckin up..truth's in the middle..seems t'be Classic cold-hearted soldier overwhelming good-hearted Warrior...Killed for Maybe going for gun(didn't) he Might have had.. is like; sending a person to prison cuz he May have commited a crime

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.