Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Keeping Track of the Federal Fence

By Anna Von Reitz

We must always remember which foot we are standing on, and which side of the Federal Fence we are standing on, too.

From the perspective of the foreign state-of-state franchises, we are "residents" or other temporary "inhabitants" of their jurisdiction when we enter either the State of _________ or the STATE OF __________ by such acts as entering their courts or administrative offices,  as well as when we formally enter United States Territorial or Municipal United States jurisdiction by, for example, living on an Air Force Base or taking political asylum in a Consulate Office. 

From the Municipal Government perspective we are even one step more removed from them and are considered to be "non-resident aliens" -- true foreigners. 

From our perspective they are all  "residents" and "inhabitants", too,  when they enter our jurisdiction for more than a visit,  because they are living among us temporarily as "residents" or "inhabitants" while providing "essential government services".  

So, it is always a question of who is calling who a "resident" or an "inhabitant" at any given moment and also, what capacity we are acting in, and in which jurisdiction.

Am a "resident" if I go to Washington, DC, and rent an apartment there?  You bet  I am.  I am then a guest there, just as they are guests when they venture into my jurisdiction. 

Are Federal Employees and their state-of-state franchise employees who are in my State providing "governmental services" also "residents" in my jurisdiction when they take up jobs and live here? Yes.

The same kind of parallel universe exists with respect to "voters" versus "electors".

By pretending that we are Federal Citizens of one stripe or the other, they contrive to control and "regulate" us and claim that we are either: (1) employees of the corporation(s); (2) elected or appointed officials of the corporation(s); or (3) dependents of the corporation(s).   They interpret "voters" as being "persons" operating in one of these capacities and having a "right" to give their proxy as shareholders in the corporation to one or more corporate officials up for "election".  

This is a very different kind of "election" than any public election that we, Americans, are heir to---- and even though they appear to be quite similar, they are not.

One is a private corporate shareholder "election" involving "voters" who often belong to political parties and who choose their CEOs and Board Members and fill other corporation offices by voting.  These are rough and woolly affairs like beauty pageants and in recent years they have used electronic "voting machines" to tally votes, which is strictly forbidden in American Public Elections.

Our Public Elections don't involve political parties and we don't vote.  We act as "Electors" to elect people from among our population of State Citizens to fill our Public Offices. As Americans have not been made aware of the falsification of their political status records and have been encouraged to assume that the corporate elections are their elections, fewer and fewer people and candidates have been available to fill our Public Offices -- but that doesn't mean that we and our Public Offices have ever ceased to exist.

All attempts made by our Territorial and Municipal Subcontractors to give away our state offices and laws to the United Nations -- see the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act and the International Organizations Immunity Act -- are the most spurious kind of fraud and just another example of our erstwhile Employees trading upon assets that are not theirs to give, define, or dispose of.  All such deals are fraudulent by nature, null and void from inception.

Bottom line -- do we have any right or interest in participating in the elections of foreign corporations operated by our Subcontractors?  No.
Do we have control of their contracts with us?  Yes.
If they do things that displease us, or dis-serve us, or are in violation of their contracts, can we enforce their contracts? 
Yes, so long as we are operating in our own properly constituted capacity as State Citizens--- the actual Parties to the Constitutions.

They have a right to organize their businesses however they see fit, and so do we.  If they want to operate as corporations for "any lawful purpose" we have no grounds or reason to object, so long as they faithfully perform the duties we require of them and take no action adverse to our well-being, they can do all the silly things they do and waste all the money they waste on their flim-flam political elections, as long as they are spending their own money.  It's no skin off of our noses. And not our business.

We are perfectly competent to trudge along and do our duties and fill our offices and count our old-fashioned paper ballots --- and tell the Federal Citizens of both stripes what to do, as our Employees.  And we conduct our own no-nonsense elections among ourselves by holding simple Public Meetings, taking candidate nominations, holding our elections and fulfilling our functions. That's no skin off of their nose, either. 

The problem is that over the years, there have been fewer and fewer people recorded as American State Citizens.  People simply weren't told and didn't understand how they were being mis-characterized and impersonated, so they were "acting as" voters and as Federal Citizens, without having a clue what that meant or what it cost them.  Most were not even aware that they were doing anything wrong or improper or contrary to their own best interest.  They were in fact solicited and defrauded by the foreign government services corporations acting in Breach of Trust.

So, here we are.  The Employers.  The State Citizens.  The Parties to the Constitutions.  And here is our Federation of States, gearing up and getting ready at long last to finish the Reconstruction of our long-lost Confederation of States of States.  Please note, our Federation can do everything that the Confederation ever did, and a whole lot more.  Please also note that it's our business how we operate, just as it is our Subcontractors business how they operate.  We are, after all, the Employers.  And they are not. 

Instead of being deceived into acting in a second-class and, I might add, foreign citizenship status, and trying year after year to control foreign corporate elections so as to get someone who will do a good job for the country, it makes much more sense to simply take up your own responsibilities as an American State Citizen, conduct your own elections, and then tell whoever they elect what they are going to do. 

It's a straight-forward matter.  Declare your proper political status.  Conduct your own business and your own Public Elections. Take back control of your property assets.
And whoever they choose as their leadership and however they organize their business, you tell them what you want done and how you want it done. 

That, my dears, is how we solve the problem of the Tail Wagging the Dog, and spending our days and nights worrying about what idiots our employees might elect.  Simply by standing in our own lawful capacity and taking responsibility for directing our own business, we solve the problem.  And we no longer have to worry about them; they have to worry about us.

And the Pope, well, he may not like it, but short of breaking all the laws he has put in place for other people to obey --- in public --- he doesn't have any choice.  And neither does his UN Corporation.  And neither does the United Nations.  He owes what he owes to us, including peace.


See this article and over 2200 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here. 


  1. As one whom spent 16 months in a State of California prison system trying to enforce my status as an American State National (BTW, I don't use the term citizen as that term literally means "public employee"), all I can say is good luck with that. You're sitting up there in snow bound Alaska and nobody really cares to mount an expedition to round you up and put you in prison. So for the most part they just laugh at you and shrug their shoulders. But just you try to walk your talk in California, just move there for a year, see what happens to you. I had to flee my home town leaving everything behind. I am now in exile in another "State". I can never go back or they will arrest me and put me back in prison. That is what your talk has wrought me.

    1. Gamesmedic, are you ok with a visit with me about your experience? It catches my attention that you say "that is what your talk has wrought me". How can I contact you for a visit? Perhaps our moderator Paul would be willing to help us connect.

    2. Gamesmedic, I sincerely hope Anna reaches out to you and discovers how all that happened to you. Your time spent incarcerated should not be in vain. We all diligently try to correct our status and live free, and then we hear stories like this and shudder. Your whole life goes a different direction and you wish you had never known what you now know. The greatest test is the legal system or IRS and no one wants to find out if they "did it right" through them. Were you able to learn anything other than the obvious, about how we all can improve upon the process including yourself? They must have been afraid of what you know and represent if they locked you up. I am in ca too, and have seen just how far they will go to get rid of "citizens" lat alone ASN's. God Bless You and watch over you.

  2. Organized crime is as organized crime does. Government makes the public's perception of organized crime look small in comparison.

    Organized crime only will back off under two circumstances:

    1. Mutual respect

    2. In fear of their own survival.

    The mutual respect aspect is a slippery slope for the population. What it leads to is designed subservience or in fact serfdom.

    The ability to make the government players fear for their own survival, again a slippery slope of going 400 MPH into a stone wall in the general application of force and armed confrontation.

    It all boils down to that old saying: When the government fears the people there is liberty and freedom. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny and slavery.

    And thus the militarization of the police and state. Government wants the population to fear them. The government is taking more from the population than our forefathers would ever have imagined. Government aggressively is disarming the population.

    Is the population disarming the government? Not at all. Until and when that happens will be the 1st step in taking back the country for an by the people.

    If the existing trend continues of government disarming the people continues as they are doing openly in California for the last twenty-years. The theft by government will exponentially increase and correspondingly continue.

    There are two ways to disarm government:

    1. Restrict their ability to war type firepower.

    2. Take their funds, income, and investment wealth away from them. Freeze and seize the assets government holds.

    But then the old saying of: "Not an ice-cube's chance in hell" comes into play there.

    And always remember: "The only thing to fear is fear itself."

  3. From Anna Von Reitz:

    I get reports back like this, and upon investigation, I find out why that particular person experienced what they experienced ---- usually, they got stuck in the mire with some regulatory infraction or commercial faux pas ---- went looking for answers under the duress of "the System" cracking down on them, found my process online, did it, and then were disappointed when it didn't solve their problems.

    But to be fair, I have always told everyone that this is not a retroactive process. You have to do it before the problem starts, and if you don't, you get stuck fighting the battle inside their system of things.

    If you start a game of chess you can't change to Parcheesi rules.

    So I have embittered people who are half-awake, wandering around saying, "It didn't work! Look what happened to me!" ---but I have yet to find anyone who properly informed themselves and who did their paperwork BEFORE their issue started, making this complaint.

    Gamesmedic is welcome to contact me and tell me exactly what happened in his case and I will go through it to see if there was any self-evident reason he didn't get what he wanted out of adopting his birthright status or any error in his process.

    1. That is truly encouraging news Anna. I sincerely hope he contacts you and get things worked out for him and he is willing to share his experience with all of us.God Bless You.

  4. That seems a fair reply Anna, thanks for paying note to his response. And now it becomes Gamesmedic to contact Anna, reveal his details of the whole episode he referred to from inception to current, and allow Anna to reflect on causes and effects, and comment where mistakes may have been made, for her students edificaton.

    We students of American Common law and American State Nationals need properly applied information about restoring our Assemblies functionalities, and case studies are needed that show us effective and non effective applications of the subject matter to be able to make effective application of what Anna is teaching. We find, once awakened to the political reality, we are being subjected to a political straight jacket environment administered by zealous employees who are determined to use every strategy to continue manipulating the system they created for control of minds, labor and taxation to support their criminal ruses and continue to have all things their way. The Federales, States of States, and misguided Counties are all too willing to target anyone who is not "politically correct". Let's get the details and learn from them.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.