Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Proof in Their Own Words

By Anna Von Reitz

From the first salvo, my objection to what the Michigan General Jural Assembly and other such groups have done is that they have attempted to include US Citizens --- both United States Citizens (Territorial) and Citizens of the United States (Municipal) as part of their membership.  

I pointed out that our States of the Union don't allow any Dual Citizenship and never have allowed Dual Citizenship from the first blush, because the Founders considered Dual Citizenship a built-in conflict of interest.  

There is also Biblical injunction against it that the Land Law is bound to honor: no man can serve two Masters.  

Almost immediately, I was attacked for taking this stand and pointing out this requirement --- yet it is clearly stated in Article IV of the Constitutions that States cannot act as States of States, and it is indicated from the fact that no mention of any other kind of "citizenship" other than State Citizenship is ever mentioned in any of the Statehood Compacts or other documents related to the formation of our States of the Union, and it is also implied by the existence of the original Confederacy formed under The Articles of Confederation.  

If States could act as States of States (that is, as incorporated entities) they would lose their sovereignty.  They would, in effect, be demoted to the status of a mere commercial corporation like any other commercial corporation on the planet -- and in fact, there is language admitting that fact:

The government, by becoming a “corporator” (See:  22 U.S.C.A. 286e)  lays down its sovereignty and takes on that character and status of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter.  (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L.  Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242).  

Therefore, no actual State of the Union can be incorporated. The States can charter corporations to act in their behalf, just as they did when they created the States of States that were members of the original Confederation, but the States themselves are attached to the physical world and geography of the land and soil; in their sovereign capacity, they are utterly unique. 

This is also the Common Sense of the issue.  Just as Ohio cannot act as Wisconsin, and I and my Sister are not "the same as" each other, even though we are closely related, there is no such interchangeability in the natural world, nor is there in the realm of sovereign States. 

Thus it is literally impossible for me to be both a Texan and a Wisconsinite at the same time.  There is only one of me, just as there is only one Texas and one Wisconsin and only one State Citizenship possible. 

Federal "Citizenship" is an entirely different animal, allowing numerous possible attachments, as these forms of citizenship merely represent obligations of shareholders of incorporated entities.  You can easily be a shareholder in two companies and you can be indebted and subjected to various vicissitudes by their Board of Directors, too.  This is in fact part and parcel of how Americans have been enslaved and defrauded.  

Our turf and our natural home is the land and soil of our States of the Union, each one utterly unique as we are ourselves.  This is our position of strength. This is where we rule, and it is as State Citizens that we control the operations of our States.  This is the natural political status that we lose when we adopt any Dual Citizenship offered by the federal corporations---- and here is more proof in their own words (thanks to Karen Gore): 

The Oath of Office-- Title 5 USC 331, 332, 333, backed up by Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations 92.12 - 92.31 and Title 8 USC section 1481 -- The public official relinquishes his "national citizenship" and are thus "foreign agents" as stipulated under Title 22 USC chap. 11 section 611 , "loss of national citizenship" ' Public officials are no longer US citizens , but rather are "foreign agents" and must register as such.  

The United States Citizenship being lost in this case is "national citizenship" --- the citizenship of the soil jurisdiction of our State of the Union.  It's "The United States" not "the United States" being discussed here. So when we cross over the invisible line known as "the Bar" and act as "public officials" in the Federal System, this means that we are acting as elected officers of a foreign corporation incorporated by a foreign government---- and thereby becoming Foreign Agents.  

This is the same circumstance reflected by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

Just the fact that there is an "Oath of Office" involved should be enough to tell us that we are on foreign ground, because our Biblical Land Law forbids the taking of oaths.

Thus, it is impossible for us to assemble as Americans, impossible for us to Assemble our States of the Union, and impossible for us to exercise the sovereign dominion of our States so long as we cling to any foreign office or political status as a shareholder or officer of a foreign corporation.  This is a conflict of interest and kind that neither the law nor Common Sense can allow. 

If I am a shareholder in a commercial corporation that stands to gain from controlling a State's natural resources, can I be trusted to administer the State's resources for the State's good?  

This is why our State Assembly members must forswear US Citizenship of all kinds and why only those who do so can invoke, inherit, and operate the States of the Union.  This is also why all these foreign commercial corporations on our shores have been anxious to "confer" their citizenship upon us, so as to muddy the water and hobble us and keep us from exercising the rights and prerogatives our States are guaranteed.  


See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. Check this stuff out
    Pledge --

  2. Wow, great explanation! I'd love to learn more about FARA's application and whether it applies to BAR card carrying attorneys? Blessings, XTC

  3. I don't think they removed our actual birth-status. We're still state citizens, they just added-on entities that look like our name.

  4. From what I understand Shelby, we aren't supposed to pledge to anything, according to Anna. I'm referring to your second link, correct me if I'm wrong.

    If my memory serves me, we shouldn't even say the pledge of allegiance to the flag.

    1. No don't pledge to nothing - just put out the link for informational purposes only

  5. i have a lot of questions about biblical land law. so many questions.
    password: idiocyabounds

    at the moment, i see "void for vagueness" all over the place. and catholics aren't supposed to put their names on masonic-type membership lists.

    masonic/illuminist things include things like natural law like "all men are created equal" which denies the fall, adam and eve, original sin, need to be saved through christ, christ, his mother, holy ghost, even the idea of satan and/or lucifer really, if no savior no official grand tip-top adversary, etc.

    utah has a masonic beehive logo "industry" (although this looks to always have been "federal" and never actual state), amongst a million other problems, so that is out.

    us senate some permutations has a liberty cap, so scratch that.

    lots of roman/greek lady liberty lady freedom etc. the scales blindfolded/etc. are these masonic?

    which land-based states are and are not masonic-inspired and/or ran by masons anna?

    1. i suppose this is my 90-some theses for anna and team.

      instead of a masonic/gnostic rosicrucian "rosy cross" seal like heretical occultist luther used, and instead of invoking 2nd coming antichrist and the vague undefined "the lord" character like anna did

      instead, my seal is you get a vague undefined meaningless ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ?

      is this a symbol/word/abbreviation/nickname? who knows.

      that is what bible-based land law seems to amount to. fill in the blank to worship yourself under whatever disguise you wish.

      utterly utterly meaningless. there are at least 2 ways to try destroy a "word" or "the word":

      - censor/destroy all copies
      - expand/promote it in a million variants/translations, so the definition loses all meaning

      i see the latter. "bible-based land law" is completely undefined and meaningless.

      is this why jefferson wrote a bible? not to be heretical, but to avoid infinite "interpretations" ?

      although i found some of his homoeroticism-laced posts to be disturbing, on this matter, i must concur with ucadia (well, the imposter). too many bibles out there. people seem to just make stuff up.

    2. theres another problem too. the astrotheologist lunar cult seem to say the "bible" appears to be astronomy/astrotheology. and tarot deck represents personality types/etc.. and morals and dogma says the truth is told if you view the pictures of tarot cards in order.

      if we are doing this type of bible interpretation, which telescope should i buy? which deck of tarot cards? do i get a crystal ball? a dark curtain i can pop out from? do i need a sun dial?

      should i put on gothic makeup and handcuffs when i "interpret" the bible?

      the lunar cult apparently (at least the higher ups) were female. where do i find the proper priestesses to interpret the lunar-cult astrotheology-inspired "bible"?

      when you say bible-based land law, i guess this means "based on the moon" ?

    3. i also still have no idea of anna's/america's (one and the same) definition of "family"

      various churches say we become "born again" and basically join a new family. but then pope anna says the poor priests and nuns are prevented from starting families of their own. ???

      so, the "church" of bible-based land law? is this a "family" ? are we supposed to bring our own? do we join this "church" first and then start a family?

      the "communists" imply there is no family aka we are all family. except for non-satanists. mystery babylon/gnostics/mormons/freemasons/rosicrucians/etc. are pretty much the same.

      when you throw "the bible" in there, then "family" becomes hopelessly confused. are we brothers and sisters with other "church" members? amen? or is "family" by blood only?

      i thought the priests and nuns sworn to celibacy do have families. they have a flock to tend to, directly or indirectly.

      the bible-based land law definition of "family" also looks to be void for vagueness.

      annas definition seems to be: churches (at least catholic) aren't family (i thought pope meant papa?), but land law is bible-based and we should all start families?

      ???????? WTF?

    4. i thought there were fathers, papa/pope, sisters...

      what do you mean nuns and priests can't start their own "family" anna?

      this makes no sense. that's all they do all day long is tend to their families.

    5. my dearest anna: "our friends the mormons" is also void for vagueness. what is the bible-based land law dogma on this topic?

      theres some polygamy "traditionalists" and then theres a modern "mainstream" incorporation that says king satan doesnt like nicknames (you are supposed to call him by his proper name lord jesus of masonic saint johns apocalypse, but we're not masons, lots of people wear funny aprons and do mysterious veiled ceremonies).

      LOTS of people make the grand hailing sign of distress when an angry mob of masons attacks them.

      it is implied the mark of the beast doesnt like to be called that either, call him seal of god.

      satan gets mad if you call him satan. a lot like socialism.

      some of the people who do the book of mormon dont want to be called mormons anymore.

      none of this "bible-based land law" makes any sense.

      what is the "american" dogma?

      you might say "just call them what they want" but a) that is satanic/promoting satanism b) if they aren't land-based, why should they get a vote, that would be conflict of interest/trying to serve 2 masters

    6. my dearest anna, from what i see, "the creator" in the declaration of independence looks to be "void" to all christians/catholics/similar on account of bible christ "noone goes to the father except through me."

      what is the american dogma on this topic? are we officially denying christ/calling him a liar?

  6. xerces yakir, Have u written any books or done work similar work as Anna? Your comments r the first time I seen u. You said lots,some I get, and others I know Nothing about. I Love how You use Language, I found it entertaining. Your questions, and arguments to Anna thought provoking. I'll keep my opinions to myself on them, however from all I've read on this Status issue I feel Anna is the Most Clear in What she shares, and the things she points out about different angles people take, have helped me tremendously in my understanding. I thank God she's there how she is, I would Not be able to see lots of these hidden things without her,and company's help. Say what You will how u do, But from where I sit, Unless You have Put in the Time, Dedication, and Sacrifice Anna has put into her Work, with resources, common sense, and Discernment then with All Due Respect, I Wouldn't say too much, Unless it's Simply Satire. Cause that's how it comes across.

  7. Xerces: It's clear from your comments that you really don't understand what the Catholic Church teaches about most things, or what Catholics really believe. Very clear. You seem to be flopping around like a dying fish in that regard.

    My suggestion is to get two little booklets written by a protestant minister who wrote them as a result of years of study.

    Confession of a Roman Catholic

    The Catholic Church has the Answer