Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Bundy Morning Quarterbacking

by Mark Steyn
Topical Take

Lost in the tumbling headlines of a busy week was a ruling that reminds us the corruption of federal justice is not confined merely to a few politicized bureaucrats monkeying around in the Hillary and Trump investigations. On Monday, US District Court Judge Gloria Navarro dismissed with prejudice (against the Justice Department) all charges against Cliven Bundy and his sons. If you've forgotten the Bundys' stand-off with the Feds in Nevada, here's how National Review's David French summarizes it:
On one side was a collection of dangerous, out-of-control armed men who were deliberately provocative, prone to saying unhinged things in a single-minded quest to destroy their enemies, and who lied time and again to cover their misdeeds.
On the other side was Cliven Bundy.
That's an entirely reasonable characterization given Judge Navarro's finding that "the universal sense of justice has been violated" and the government is guilty of "a deliberate attempt to mislead" the court. "The government's conduct in this case was indeed outrageous," she ruled. "There has been flagrant misconduct, substantial prejudice and no lesser remedy is sufficient" - other than a dismissal "with prejudice" to prevent the Justice Department embarking on new ways to screw the Bundys over for another few years. (They're already spent most of the last two in jail.)

Read the entire article here:  


  1. This is what happens when an attorney represents you...why wasn't there a "countclaim" filed against the perpetrators at the same time..?? Now it's up to the Bundys to sue the do you think that will work out for them...why didn't the attorney ask the judge to file the complaint themselves for them....

  2. The corruption within most of their agencies runs deeper than anyone cares to realize. Navarro only dismissed the entire case because she was threatened with a long prison term. She is still just as rotten as she was before this 'forced ruling'.

    1. The whole reason for this land grab as George Webb put forth was because the land is perfect for uranium one mining and processing. Of course you'll never hear that narritive on MSM. Yellowcakes is one of the products produced in the making of Enriched uranium. You need a lot of land and dirt to abstract a small amount of enriched uranium.

  3. Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse. However The "Law of the Sea" IS Legal CODE ONLY, UCC for ALL PRIVATELY REGISTERED LEGAL TITLES AND ENTITIES. IT's for PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL BANKING PURPOSES & TRADE ONLY. It's NOT Public Law on the Real Substance Land and All Living beings/lawful public. So important in understanding "presentment" "represent or re-present" Are you bringing forward a presentment based on "representation" of your now claimed "legal title" (your corrected political status claim) as "Authorized Representative", All Rights Reserved UCC 1-308
    Once the living people (the public) create correct public records (through post office "Court" of Official Land & SEA jurisdictions, either by RM to yourself or by having postal clerk "red date stamp" your document") this Authenticates your dual status of "legal representation/Lawful living man jurisdictions. And that IS what gives us our power and authority back. You see we were led to believe we as living men/women were being "represented" by these representives Only legally "APPEARING" to be Public elected officials. Nope, that again is only the Appearance, a representation of the Public Office, AND NOT the official office. A Fiat "legal title" ONLY on paper. To legally facilitate Authorized Representative Status ONLY for private commercial fiat banking systems and purposes. The Legal Entity Does NOT represent the living public, but we the living public were intended to SELF Govern and "Represent" our given "Legal Title" entity for the same ends in this fiat "money" system. Again, just false perspectives and beliefs WERE programmed/conditioned into us to participate without understanding the reality and nature of the benefit/privelge of the legal titles.
    Now WE know!! It is OUR individual responsibility to "represent" ALL of our "legal Titles" and start to be the sole owner's, landlords as we failed in the past to be. We have to take both public/private responsibility IN creating and keeping proper records. At ALL times.

    1. Remedies to be recognized/acknowledged By "LEGAL TITLE" ONLY acting as " LEGAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY(s) was inspired by watching a video "Rob Ryder" produced a few days ago concerning applying for EIN for your Private Legal Trust. The Ah Ha moments of Real remedies NOW are amazing and so promising.

      So awhile back Anna posted an article regarding State Credit Unions. Well consider WE ARE the "LEGAL TITLE" owners of the "Individual" State chartered Credit Union, or at least unknowingly ALREADY a member of one through our "Legal TITLE" Created for "Banking Purposes" by the STATE.
      Our Sole Beneficial Ownership "Creditor/lender" side IS OUR SS NO DASHES, which IS the legal public beneficiary acct number.
      The SSN-with dashes Itself IS The US "DEBTOR/OBLIGOR" and says right on the card "THIS CARD IS THE PROPERTY OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTATION" So THAT side of the PRIVATE account number IS Not Your LEgal Title or Property. But ONLY for your beneficial USE. AS Beneficiary of a TRUST. NOT AS a TRUSTEE Authorized to Administer the TRUST. The actual Trustee IS the Federal Reserve. To Find the "Branch Location" holding "Legal Title" of the account on the private side- look on the back of card at the numbers located on bottom left side. (Ha Left side!!)

      So with all that being said, it just simply makes huge sense to me that we legally re-create or re-present Our own "LEGAL TITLE" NAMES registered correctly as OUR OWN Sole proprietorship so that we can correctly, properly Represent ourselves As Owners, Chief Executor of our Legal Commercial affairs. Establish a corrected status "LEGAL TITLE" for YOUR NAME and correctly apply for EIN ONLINE. See Robs Video for complete, correct instructions and to DO IT CORRECTLY. IMPORTANT PROCESS and it puts us back in the game but with correct/proper standing!!!

    2. And/or We as the living men and women the Real public land of Self Governance, Our Real Actual Land States can absolutely form our Own State Trust "Legal Title" for banking purposes, To have both Legal/ lawful standing to conduct our fully lawful public Assemblies- elected "OFFICERS" (Non-Bar Card holders/members) and FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN COMMERCE By Our Living Laws Against any illegal commercial crimes/actions upon our physical property or "Legal Titles"
      ALL Living men/women are the "members" collectively represented under the Private Trust. This can also be used as our pass through between our public credit acct, That's been reclaimed and IS our Credit and Lawful/legal property and the US OBLIGATION side for proper lawful bookkeeping. YES!!!!
      If we set it up correctly it can Absolutely be the Dual Lawful/Legal standing and Jurisdictions we have all been needing for Our Freedom, Peace and prosperity!!! No More CORPORATE TAXES EVER!!! Starve that Corporate Beast our Own Land State Trusts!!!

    3. And the amazing solution to the problem and dependence on "Applications & Forms" that we have all been programmed and indoctrinated with can be absolutely provided as the legal/lawful solution to Anna's process of Correcting Political Status/Certification of Assumed Names and bringing ALL "Legal Titles" back on Land. Plus notification to be sent to Old "Trustees" that their services are no longer needed!

      This can all be done through our Legally formed State, County or Town Trusts governed ONLY by the self governed and their Privately Elected "Officers". This creates both the Legal standing/Lawful Standing and support needed to create the forms/applications for proper registration and membership qualifications needed to Correct your Political Status/standing. This can absolutely streamline the "paperwork" process and have the legal representation and lawful standing collectively of the membership already standing to support the process for "applicants" that have NOT already done the process but would like to. It's perfect and soooooo needed from what I have observed.

      People are Scared, confused, angry. They know something is wrong, or they DO KNOW what's wrong, but they just lack the self confidence /Knowledge or REAL Legal support that they're needing to complete the process to be part of the solution vs. continuing to contribute by participating voluntarily in the PROBLEM. This IS a VIABLE Solution For everyone to consider. The possibilities are unlimited in my perspective as together having both balanced Legal Plus Lawful Jurisiction Authority Standing TRUMPS LEGAL FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS. We Win Individually and collectively!!

  4. ''there has been flagrant misconduct' per judge navarro --
    Sheesh, the entire 'legal' system/court system is flagrant misconduct ! ! It is STILL going on in all court rooms this very day. Nothing has changed, this Bundy case will blow over, and it will go right on, business as usual.
    We can now verify that the BAR assn. is totally ignoring Anna's Notice to vacate court houses. Our local news station provides a wednesday evening call-in to ''ask an attorney'' about your problem;
    attorneys provided by the BAR assn. DLD was Jan. 1, so we see.
    There cannot be two different systems in place, side by side. If you get ticketed in a traffic stop, they will tell you to appear in THEIR court system, same as always.

  5. sadly, from reading a newspaper summary, it comes across as "FBI refused to give information to judge" and "judges dont like people withholding things from them"

    ie substance seemingly played little to no part in the ruling, the judge seemingly went through the motions:

    1) "state" BUT BUT BUT armed men occupied a gov. building
    2) defense: FBI had armed snipers pointed at us, we had received threats, that was a necessary precaution.
    3) judge: is this true? under what grounds were they being surveilled?
    4) FBI: silence, state privilege, plead the 5th, classified
    5) judge: lacking the facts to do a proper ruling, case is dismissed

    1. without accusing the judge of anything...this seems like standard operating procedure when the "state" does not wish to disclose any "classified" things

      seems like a move to not have to disclose FBI authority, BLM, etc.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.