Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Sunday, February 19, 2017

JEFFERSON OR HITLER: WHOSE PLAN ARE WE FOLLOWING?

by michael.d.gaddy@gmail.com

When James Madison left New York for Philadelphia on May 2nd, 1787 he carried with him not the proposed amendments to the Articles of Confederation which was the mandate of the convention but an entirely new idea for a constitution that would make the “National” government supreme with the states nothing but subdivisions of the central government structure. His proposal would grant the national government veto power over all state laws. Madison’s plan was totally contrary to the results of the recent war with England which gave primary power to the states with the central government only allowed the powers the states saw fit to provide. Madison’s plan called for a consolidated union that would virtually annihilate the states. The states would only be maintained as long as they could be “subordinately useful.”
In opposition to this proposed form of government, New York delegate John Lansing would most astutely observe that the states would never have consented to select delegates to attend a convention that would lead to their destruction.
So, why is this of any importance? Simply because the Nationalist form of government which would allow a strong central government to act directly on the people, ironically what our government of today has become, was completely rejected by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Unfortunately for Liberty, the form of government rejected at the convention is now seen as supreme by the overwhelming majority of people in office; people running for office; all judges regardless of position in government; all of the bureaucrats and a huge majority of people in this country.
So-called “conservative” elected officials have been heard to state “no law is unconstitutional until the Supreme Court says it is.” A “conservative” candidate for US Senate was recently heard to remark that whatever the US Supreme Court rules must be considered as gospel. This is a complete repudiation of the rights of states to determine what is best for their own citizens and therefore a repudiation of the principles of Jefferson and an advocacy of the principles found in Hitler’s Mein Kampf which revolved around destruction of the individual states.
On the subject of the Supreme Court being the final arbiter of what is and what is not constitutional, Jefferson stated the following:
“…(T)he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.”
Giving the Supreme Court the power to judge what is and what is not constitutional, not only the federal level but also on the state level, destroys the very intent of the 9th and 10th Amendments. In other words, the Supreme Court Justices and other lesser federal judges have set about to amend our Constitution by judicial fiat.
On this subject George Mason would state the following at the Virginia State Ratifying Convention:
“If the laws and constitution of the general government, as expressly said, be paramount to those of any state, are not those rights with which we were afraid to trust our own citizens annulled and given up to the general government? . . . If they are not given up, where are they secured?
I do not believe the subject can be any clearer that when the “national” government supersedes those of the states, Liberty soon becomes first endangered and finally extinct.
So, how is this connected to Adolf Hitler you ask? The answer can be found on page 572 of Hitler’s magnum opus, Mein Kampf.  While lamenting that Bismarck had not gone far enough in destroying state’s rights in Germany, Hitler said:
"And so today this state, for the sake of its own existence, is obliged to curtail the sovereign rights of the individual provinces more and more, not only out of general material considerations but from ideal considerations as well…basic for us National Socialists is derived: A powerful national Reich . . ."
Are you beginning to see a pattern here? James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and the other nationalists among our founders believed that to have an omnipotent central government, the power of the individual states must be eliminated. Accomplishing this would lead to the destruction of the Declaration of Independence concept of “consent of the governed,” a concept vital to the existence of Liberty and Natural Rights.
Abraham Lincoln initiated a war to destroy the concepts of State’s Rights and consent of the governed, killing over 800,000 Americans and replacing the government based on consent with a strong central government ruled by a cabal unrestrained with the limits of a constitution.
Lincoln was praised by Karl Marx for his accomplishments and Adolf Hitler used Lincoln’s premise for an omnipotent central government to establish his National Socialist empire that led to the deaths of millions; some in furnaces and by firing squad to millions more on the battlefields of WWII.
The candidates, politicians and all members of the species Ignoramus Americanus who claim that decrees of the Supreme Court are infallible and constitute immutable law adhere to the beliefs of some of the most evil, murderous tyrants in history and should be treated as the enemies to Liberty that they are.
Contrast please the diametrically opposed concepts of Adolf Hitler and Thomas Jefferson.
“National Socialism as a matter of principle, must lay claim to the right to force its principles on the whole German nation without consideration of previous federated state boundaries, and to educate in its ideas and conceptions. Just as the churches do not feel bound and limited by political boundaries, no more does the National Socialist idea feel limited by the individual state territories of our fatherland. The National Socialist doctrine is not the servant of individual federated states, but shall some day become the master of the German nation. It must determine and reorder the life of a people, and must, therefore, imperiously claim the right to pass over [state] boundaries drawn by a development we have rejected.” ~Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, p. 578
“That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes—delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.” ~Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolution, 10 November 1798
As you read the two above quotes you must ask yourself: “Which of the two most closely resembles the government we have today, supported by candidates and politicians who claim the federal government and its attendant bureaucracies and decrees of the US Supreme Court to be gospel?”
Would it suffice to say that as the power of the individual states and the people are concerned, so goes Freedom and Liberty?
Who do you choose; Jefferson or Hitler?

IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY

8 comments:

  1. This is no a diametrically opposed view Jefferson vs Hitler . Jefferson wanted no foreign alliances and wanted self sufficient within borders .Hitler created thair own fuel from coal and everything was made internally .

    ReplyDelete
  2. The author of this article sort of leave us hanging with no hope. My suggestion is, if he has a following, to also tell the story of the remedy which are the things Anna informs us of. The central government can only be as strong as we let it be, and I believe the people are awakening, so the author should be directing those awakened.

    M

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed! Unlike Paul, Anna explains in clarity and is quite precise in her explanation(s). Anna shares her knowledge well and in doing so one is NOT left "hanging" & wondering. Paul's information is informative, just incomplete.

      Delete
    2. Most of what I bring to this blog is designed to get people to comment with original thoughts and text. The reason is that search engines love new and original content to index into their database, and that helps get Anna's work found a lot better, so your comments are welcome. Please write what you think on the issues, but no degenerate personal attacks. Stick to the issues as per the paragraph in blue at the top of the page.

      Delete
  3. The Continental Congress created the declaration unanimously of all the 14 colonies. It become the united American Republican Colonies. In Latin and due to preservation of literacy it must be viewed as what is meant at the time of usage. republican-of by to from and for the mother. The sovereignty was dissolved and absolved spreading the sovereign power amongst all the people. The articles were created by the deputies and senators of the people ( now called representatives and senators) then Northwest Ordinance, and the Constitution. The Continental Congress did not dissolve itself nor transfer over the powers to the services company calling itself United States. The united States or America created by the articles would have to be dissolved by the Continental Congress of the States of America. Did Iceland say "Oh we must follow the constitution?" The deals, constitutions are for our protection not for rulers to claim us as slaves. We can dissolve and make a new one. People need to wake the @#$% up and do some reading beyond today's, last weeks or last years news. We are the sovereignty and do not have to do any governing if we choose and consequently suffer the consequences thereof.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Again to reiterate-
    The lead up to and set up prior to Lincoln; this *after Jackson's one man stand- when nothing was done to stop the banks or the pressure to spread slavery. Just kicked down the road and the then Globa-lust's were working internally to finally use Buchanan to BANKRUPT America and have secession already in place for Lincoln to be crushed with this in his first day in office. After almost being assassinated coming into DC in the first place.
    I think a lot WE don't know nor understand was at work and you weren't there in his shoes facing *what was the fullness of all these things arrayed against America were.
    This just cannot not be glossed over and just "shoot" Lincoln again without full due process as to exactly was at stake what the options were viable.After all they did kill him in office immediately after Apomattox.
    Like I've stated the so called un-Civil War if possible should have been avoided = THAT is the crux of this scenario faced then- with ALL the players involved. Many are yet unknown and all WE seem to concentrate on is the aftermath wich was HORRENDOUS to say the least- and in the various unfavorable venues that emmerged.
    Time to dig into and dig up some detailed circumstances not just fill in the blanks as seen fit for an predetermined ideology.
    This tangled web of knots must be unraveled to full daylight.
    And to the valid satifaction Patriots now truly need to know.

    These same Globa-lust's then worked to set up WWI and got the first professorial useful-idiot potus "Wilson" to break his campaign promise to not go to war in Europe which thereby guaranteed WWII= and afterward the idiot said so himself .

    In total of that era(1914-1952) including communist's esp Stalin 150-million people were slaughtered one way or another(in 33yrs).
    THIS is what the actually beget while making money's by the train+tanker loads. Rothchild alone today is worth $300 trillion dollars. Even potus Eisenhower spoke out at the end of this grip and JFK wascnocked off for daring to speak of it.
    This is an EVIL that goes way deeper than humank8nd or the human mind and any critical thinking person must realise this.
    No one man can carry this blame alone and no WE don't yet know even what all actually was at play in history but the Lord God does and He Providentially gave this nation to us in the midst of all this EVIL descending on mankind ~!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.