Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, August 12, 2019

A Useful Screed, But.... An Important Edit

By Anna Von Reitz

I have run across this particular article on numerous occasions over the years and it is indeed a very useful and enlightening article, except for two really grave semantic errors that are repeated ----the part where the writer claims that there are "no Judicial Courts in America" and again, where they claim that there are "no Judges in America".  

If we are going to give people a solid education and reliable guides, it's important that we get it right and pay close enough attention to our reader's inexperience to describe the context of what we are really saying.  

A better way to explain the situation is that there are no Judicial Courts in the Federal Government. All the Judicial Courts are supposed to be in America, instead.  Our Forefathers kept every iota of authority and ownership related to the land and soil of our States inviolate.  So when they created the Federal Government to operate in the foreign jurisdictions of the sea and air, they didn't create any Federal Judicial Courts.  Why would they?  They were not allowing the foreign  Federal Government to enter their jurisdiction nor letting them exercise any authority over them and their assets at home on the land and soil of their States, therefore, the Federal Government had no need for any Judicial Courts. 

There was only one exception: The Supreme Court of The United States. You will note that to this day, the Supreme Court Justices are the only "Justices" in the Federal System.  This first and only Supreme Court was supposed to provide oversight for Federal Government operations and to act as a faithful Interpreter of the Constitutions for the members of the Federal Congress, the Territorial Congress, and the Municipal Congress. 

Instead, with the incapacity of the States of America following the Civil War, this Supreme Court fell into disuse, a separate Territorial United States Supreme Court and later, a separate Municipal United States Supreme Court began operations under slightly different names.  As these two subcontractors, Territorial and Municipal,  fell into the obvious malpractice of  unilaterally amending their own Constitutions,  the intended role of the one Supreme Court faded away and the remaining institution(s) became increasingly political. 

In 1991, the Municipal United States Congress moved to eviscerate what was left of the Constitutional Federal Judiciary,  by amending the Federal Judge's Oath to make it meaningless and to remove any obligation of the Judges to render decisions "agreeable" to the Constitutions.  In this way, whatever power that remained vested in the Federal Judiciary as a whole was undermined and frittered away upon the discretion of individual Judges, rendering the Judicial Branch of the Federal Government ineffective and unable to mount any credible restraining influence upon the members of Congress.  The Checks and Balances built into the Federal System were thus eroded and the People of this country betrayed.   

No greater duty of reform is set before us than the overturning and repeal of this infamous Congressional meddling with the requirements of the Federal Judge's Oath. 

So, instead of there being "no Judicial Courts in America", in fact, all the Judicial Courts are in America-- and the situation is just the opposite of what the writer assumes.  All Judicial Courts are in America and none are vouchsafed to the Federal Government except for the One Supreme Court which is not functioning as intended, and that is the way it has been since the very beginning.

This is an important distinction and one that has to be thoroughly understood by Americans in search of Justice in this country.  The return of our Judicial Courts to full operation will automatically signal the shut down and withdrawal of all the foreign federal military and maritime courts.  The issue has already been decided by Milligan Ex Parte in 1863.  All we have to do is kick-start Old Bessie and get our own Judicial Courts organized and serving the people again, at which point the admiralty courts and administrative tribunals have already agreed to retract back to their natural limited status and stop trying to gain false jurisdiction over us "out of necessity".  

Once again, people, we have to govern ourselves, or someone else will do it for us.  

The other incorrect meme in this article is the statement that there are "no Judges in America".  There are Judges in America --- far too many of them, in fact.  Our Judicial Courts are run by Justices, but because we've stupidly let so many of our Judicial Courts fall silent, there are precious few Justices to serve the people who claim their birthright political status as American State Nationals and American State Citizens.  I know, because I am one of those few Justices. 

The title "Judge" is, in our American system of government, unique to the Federal United States courts and their jurisdictions, not ours, with the exception of the Postal District Court Judges, who are obliged to enforce the laws of the the land jurisdiction of our country and to enforce the international and global laws affecting the land jurisdiction owed to our States of the Union. 

So, contrary to what this writer says, there are scads of Judges in America, most of whom should not be here.  

These Federal and Federal franchise State of State Statutory Courts are taking up the work of the largely vacated Judicial Courts and striving to keep control of the situation by impersonating Americans so as to draw them into the foreign jurisdictions of the admiralty and statutory courts.  

On one side of the issue, this is a worthy above-and-beyond service--- they are, after all, for the most part,  protecting us from murderers, armed robbers, rapists, and other violent criminals.  

On our side of the issue, however, they are operating under color of law, prosecuting Americans under known false legal presumptions, and abusing their positions of trust to defraud and pillage us.  These are still foreign "carpetbagger courts" and they are still milking and bilking Americans under completely fraudulent premises.  

The take-home message for Americans is to take exception and exercise the exemptions and protections owed to you as non-combatant civilians, and meantime, get off your duffs and take up the work of self-governance: correct and record your political status as American State Nationals and American State Citizens, join your State Assembly, educate yourselves, and take up the work of operating your own Judicial Courts.  

Our Judicial Courts are simple to operate, all our land and soil Law is based on The Ten Commandments, there have to be actual Injured Parties presenting their own issues (the one exception being when the victims of crimes are too  disabled to present their own case, or dead, in which case, the Public Prosecutor takes over in their behalf), and the jury is "king".  Not the Justice.  

In our Judicial Courts, juries have the unequivocal right of jury nullification.  If an American Jury finds a law repugnant, unjust, impractical, or unworkable, it is free to nullify the law, as if it never was.  In this way, Americans have insured themselves against legislative error and injustice, and have maintained their sovereignty.  But with the lapse and relative scarcity of Judicial Courts and growing public ignorance, the foreign admiralty and commercial and administrative courts have crept in and raised both Hell and Havoc.  

When Americans complain about these foreign courts they need only reflect that if they got busy and organized and educated themselves, they wouldn't be under the thumb and at the mercy of these increasingly corrupt federal and federated state-of-state courts. 

Another fundamental difference that lies between our Justices and their Judges is the role they play in the respective courts --- Justices ensure a level playing field, fair rules of evidence, and keep the proceedings in order under the rules of Due Process.  At the end of the proceedings, the jury renders a decision and the Justice reads it --- a process called "pronouncement".  That's it.  The Justice in an American Judicial Court doesn't address the facts or interpret the Law; the jury does all that.  This is because in our courts, the people are sovereign and the juries in America literally act as the king.  

This is in stark opposition to what goes on in a Statutory Court, where in fact the Judge acts as a Hired Jurist paid to interpret and enforce the statutory law in one of four possible specific venues and capacities.  The Judge takes over the place of king and decides everything and the function of the jury is in the manner of a group of corroborating Witnesses, paid to sit and listen and nod their heads. 

The only power that such a jury has is the power of "voiding error".  If some jurors absolutely disagree with the conclusions of the Judge, they can void the judgement and the findings are inconclusive. Unless the Judge agrees that an error has been made (which is a rare occurrence, as this requires them to admit that they made an error) the whole issue can be re-tried.  

Alternatively, if the Prosecutors bringing a  claim are shown to deliberately lie or misrepresent material fact or to lie about the applicable statute or fail to bond the case or, or, or.... the Judge in a Statutory Court can throw the whole case out the door "with prejudice" and the issue cannot be raised again. If the procedure is not air-tight, the case is not air-tight, which is why procedure takes up such a dismal amount of time and attention in Statutory Court --- the object is to acquit the Judge, not to guarantee Justice.  

We saw an example of this in the Bundy Case where Federal Agents outright lied and misrepresented fact, and the Judge reacted by throwing the whole thing out the door with prejudice. They endangered her by lying to her, so she was well-justified in this reaction, which just happened to serve the cause of justice, too.  

With these caveats and insights as to where our American Judicial Courts exist and who is supposed to be operating them, and also the reasons why Judges (who should be relatively rare) are over-running America like lemmings on a stampede, read on:  

We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or dead entity.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344, 1348 (1985).
Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. “Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).”  


  1. Annamaria,
    Why do you have TWO different Cancellations of Powers Of Attorney in your free basic packet you are encouraging people here on Paul's blog to use to "Correct" their "status"?

    I have notified you of that and of other, very sincere and serious, questions I have as well.

    You actually DO have to answer.

    Or it ends up coming across that you don't WANT to answer, and then that is unnerving to those of us who are waiting to hear the answer from you, the author.

    You are not talking about dog grooming tips or the best quiche recipe or even American history per se; You are making some very serious claims of having very unusual authority, one being:
    You have claimed to be/related to the "Hereditary Head of State" of the USofA when there isn't one and if there is, that is a "Title", which by and of itself, prevents you, the claimed Titleholder, from holding Common Law Offices, such as Justice, that belong to the free, sovereign and independent living people who are natural born upon the land and soil that belongs to them and they do not belong to the land and soil as if they/we were inhabitants on the land and soil like a tree or a squirrel or a bobcat, as you have claimed we are inhabitants, when we most certainly are not, we are free, sovereign and independent people.

    In my opinion, your bases upon which you are building your claims are tremendously flawed to the point if even looking more and more "rickety" all the time.

    Then when you won't answer valid, lawful questions, it does not look good.

    Please answer the question for starters:
    Why do you have TWO different Cancellations of Powers of Attorney in your free basic packet?
    Why are TWO necessary?
    What is the specific purposes of each?
    How do the two relate to each other pertaining to the Corrections the people think they are making?

    I'm still looking forward to your direct, complete and substantive answers.

    jan-marie on bluebird acre.
    Thank you.

  2. Have a read - the first world trust????
    They don't meet at the vatican to discuss policy they meet in Switzerland G7, G20
    The entire earth except greenland and those in their underground houses is slated for destruction at their whim via the militaries and medical mafia
    The triple crown winner this past year was JUSTIFY
    If Anna has such power then she needs to use it fast else they wiping us out all over the world for centuries to get to this end game
    No accident either that they have The Avengers The End Game either
    Next step is they throw us all in to The Hunger Games
    Sick ass heathens we dealing with here

  3. I read the case you cited Rodrigues v.Donovan, 769 F. 2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1985) and did not find the following "quote":

    ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…"

    In fact, here is summation of the case as set forth by Judge Fletcher for the court:

    Rodrigues challenges the termination of his workers' compensation benefits, contending that he has been deprived of due process. The district court dismissed his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, on the basis that Rodrigues had failed to exhaust available administrative remedies. We reverse and remand.

    Nowhere in the Rodriques opinion does the court even mentioned "God's Law" creator or humans.

    Also, I have a problem with the Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 So. 1067, 3 So. 2nd 244 (1941) where you cited it for the proposition that a "statute is not a law." In reading cases following the Flournoy decision, the state courts in Louisiana have held that the Flourney decision is recognized in "Our jurisprudence is settled to the effect that a contract based on an unconstitutional statute is void and creates no obligations to be impaired by subsequent legislation."
    Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244. Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. James, 189 So.2d 430 (1966)

    1. Reply for atticus finch from Anna Von Reitz:

      I didn't write that part of the article. I wrote the introduction and spoke to the two major flaws that jump off the page. As for the rest--- You are not looking at the case transcript only at a court process synopsis as is shown by your supposition that the remand was fruitless. In fact, Rodriguez established an important precedent in the treatment of Territorial Citizens by Municipal Courts which routinely short change any "appearance" of Due Proceed because left to themselves, they are not required to operate under any standard of Due Process.

      You can say that this case should not be included in any information we study, but I differ, in that every case that exposes the underbelly of the beast in any venue is worthy of our attention.

      And again, as should be obvious from the context of my comments about someone else's writings, I did not say that "a statute is not a law." I would have said that a statute is not a Law, as in Public Law meant for people to obey in the context of their private lives--- in that sense, no statute has ever been a law of any kind, nor intended to be used as such.

      "Statutory law" is to be applied to entities created by legislation (that is, created by statute), corporate charter, incorporation, etc., and those officials involved in the administration of such legal fiction entities.

      Statutory law does not pertain to average people who are not engaged in such activities and never has; but, given the deterioration of the legal profession and practice in this country, innocent people are being deliberately misidentified as legal "persons" and subjected to statutory law in gross error and breach of trust.

      I hope that clarifies the actual issues for you.

    2. You skipped my question again annamaria. Did you see it? About why you have placed TWO Cancellations of POA in the basicfreepacket of forms you are encouraging the people to Record.

      I'm pretty sure we are owed an answer since it has to do with creating and recording Official Public Records in the U.S.INC's. Records system that could be the starting point of an absolute NIGHTMARE for people if we don't understand what you have prepared and shared with us to Record.

      I haven't given up! I trust that your helpful, substantive, complete and honest answer is on its way!
      Thank you in advance.
      jan-marie (not Parker) on bluebird acre

  4. So happy to see others are waking up to the duplicity of Anna Whoever She Iz! Her silly husband's claim to be the "Hereditary Head of State" of the USA is DIRECTLY tied to her pernicious insistence on the use of the completely fraudulent "Civil Flag of Peace". Beware the Jabberwock, my friends.

    1. ...and beware the jubjub bird my friend and the frumious bandersnatch! :):):).

      1. "Titular"/Titled and the common law
      2. Corporate and actual, physical
      3. Dead and the living
      cannot be mingled with one another.

      Titles and Corporations are FICTIONS. Dead.
      Common law and actual, physical are NATURE (found in nature). Living.

      Those things cannot be mingled. It is a spiritual abomination to the only, true, and living creator to mix them.

    2. Oh, now I'm thinking of that poem!!!

      It should have been:
      ....[Beware the Jabberwok my friend,] the jaws that bite, the claws that catch; beware the jubjub bird AND SHUN the frumious bandersnatch!

      I loved that poem!

    3. The system "seems" to be moving my text again. I checked three or four times while I was entering text to see if I was in the right place and I was, then when I got ready to preview it, it kind of like jumped down and I had to go find it... Its the 8/13 1:16pm comment that should be here.
      New censoring tool? Leave the comment there, but move the comment out of context so that it breaks the cohesion of thought for the reader???

      Warning. Warning.
      This next part is kind of gross in a couple places;
      the next thing is going to be that the people are waking up to the grossness and the perversions that have been taking place, apparently by the people who hold Offices in the Corporation.
      Seems perhaps perversion is a qualification for Corporate Office holding.
      Then they go around the world and blame it on us, the people, saying its OUR Offices the perverts were holding, Offices of The United States of America.

      But like the rest of the world, we, realizing the utter worthlessness of the red high heel wearing queers in the U. S. Navy and Air Force and Marines who are the Quaines and Popesters quaares who get sausages stuffexed in their anu[nnaki]s in order to get a promotion, see that the worthless freeloaders need to be relieved of their 20 year careers in loafing, mooching and freeloading off the backs of the people with an additional 45 years of loafing, freeloading and mooching in "retirement" for their "service".

      They know what they are doing.
      I dont blame the ones who get in and find out what is going on and then get out, but anymore, since the 1990's anyway, the ones who are in for 20 years or more in ANY "service", know something is WRONG.

      If anyone thinks this bunch of deformed, worm-infected, murdering quaares that have been electrocuting the sons and daughters they kidnap, and others, if true, aren't going to be put on trial and have a jury of true Americans hear and decide their cases, then they need to get caught up!!
      Everybody who understands what I just said is ALREADY getting ready to, no, has already GOTTEN THEMSELVES READY TO take on the responsibility of trying these cases. If someone thinks what I just said is too harsh, then you probably need to go sit down and wait for other people to clean up this mess. We will call you when were through!

      We've unknowingly allowed the U.S. INC. to carry out their promises to protect the criminals they apparently sent to try to destroy us. They've got these same worthless freeloaders (they know they are freeloading pieces of humancrap) out stalking Americans. Almost every time I go out my door, for years, there just happens to be a murdering fake Military trash aircraft/private corporate type jet/small single engine type airplane, all similar to the ones we see are supposedly being used for drug and people trafficking, going over bluebird acre. Since its being reported that these same fake Military trash murdering coward freeloaders are number 19 out of 3000 top child pornography traffickers, I am wondering, are the "jew" queers the freeloading fake Military trash members "service" for their promotions (if true,) using the trash "Military" for their canines too?
      Do they get orders to take a break from their chd sex porno trafficking and go terrorize the American state nationals from the "Jew" queers they "service" in exchange for their bread and butter and promos??? Idk.

      Those Officers and Principals and others of the Corporation that are letting the criminals go, if any, are complicit in their crimes now. They call it aiding and abetting. We call it committing a crime.
      We don't care what their unilateral, unratified "Constitution" says. It applies to them, not to us, the people. The living peoples' foundational declaration is the Declaration of Independence...there was only ONE... JULY 1776. (Sept., 1776 was only the first convocation of the Continental Congress.).

  5. wink wink left a link a few articles back[A].htm
    The Rocky clan
    The Rocky family secret
    When you read the RBF site you will see a whole mess of information about their role in the UN and the agenda 21 planning
    Climate change means not only the weather itself but the overall climate of the populations all over the world
    The dumbed down education that the goy throughout the world are receiving
    Should come as no surprise that Rocky found the Board of Edjucation and that the teachers are taught the nonsense history to pass it on to the kids
    Just like they doing in israel they putting the people in settlements they are likewise doing the same thing here in the u s

    Switzerland hmmm
    G7, G20 hmmm

    Their fake history

    1. The salute
      The roman senate

  6. Here's what it looks like we have:

    1. Humanoids and associates
    2. Who are admitted liars
    3. And thieves
    4. Who want to murder us
    5. Calling themselves "our government".
    6. Whose time is up
    7. Who are trying to salvage what they've stolen.
    8. But it's not working because they broke "the rules".
    9. And they are getting panicky.
    10. And sloppy.

    We have to figure out what we are going to do about it because they are NOT about to bring justness to their cohorts.... hell, they're the ones who gave out the licenses to go commit the crimes in the first place.
    They're not going to punish the people who were following their orders!!!
    They were promised a reward, right here, here on earth... since they seem to be the ones who don't believe there is life after death or a resurrection... That, I think, makes them the Saducees.

    The criminals have to be tried on our land and soil in our courts of law by our people because that is where the alleged crimes took place.

    They CAN be immunized and pardoned in *their* inferior Corporate "jurisdiction" but that will not prevent us from claiming them for trials here.
    They know they have to, and WILL, stand trial in our courts because it is actually "the rules".
    They are completely hierarchical.
    They do follow the rules.
    If they don't, they are in trouble like they are in now!
    *WE* DONT!

    But we are actually a higher authority.
    We have superior position.
    Our standing is on the land and soil that is the actual physical, the living and ... their's is only FICTION...imaginary...dead....corps(es)... sea/water/air...ships... nowhere to "stand"= no standing.

    They are fatally flawed.

    So is their game.

    1. Go watch this women in this video on the top right
      She put the below document together
      Based on what I am hearing is that the military all across the lands in every nation are holding the nations under military rule except the nations don't know it
      I would say that is what they doing with military bases of the us all over the world - they are holding the people in obeyance
      Which falls in line with their world order plans
      Anyway hope this helps in some way

  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

  8. This is why they targeting nuclear power
    Their green new deal scam and save the earth from us pesky humans

  9. Did you each have your powerful BULLET PROOF? Strengthen your Front doors? make them undrinkable, unbreakable. All of these are possible and done. Find bigger GUNS, you are the Governors. You all are the Bosses. Focus, on getting even, Keep the bible belief separate. As Anna said, don't talk about moral with those Gov'tal Thieves.

    1. As in the days
      A Must Watch by Everyone
      This is the exact scenario
      People must not sit idly by either as you have indicated

  10. Google mispelling me, see they're not perfect:

    make your deadbolt-lock undrilleable, unbreakable, inside out, but allow yourself to exit quick. It's simple interlocking mechanism.

  11. Get rid of your home security too - they are in on the data collection and spying as well
    Just came out that the RING doorbell is being linked up to become a neighborhood spying tool
    Lots people opting for their home to have electronic lock of which they have the combination to is also a spying platform where they collect data on the entire neighborhood
    Anything digital remove from your home, thermostats, appliances, etc etc etc

  12. Always be careful driving your cars - it has been proven they can take over a car while you are driving - self driving cars my ass - more like help those you want to get rid of be in a convenient deadly accident
    That's why many years ago they did that junker car buy back program - those cars did not have chips in them, they would run without all the electronic bullshit they putting in the cars since then
    Their plan is to take all the oil and gas and leave the people riding public transportation, bicycles or you walk
    Only they will have cars, jets, yachts, seaside mansions, the serfs will live in their assigned FEMA stack and pack human settlement zones
    Ole Rocky and his philanthropy is working hard to make sure
    The four horseman, maybe the Rocky brothers
    Shh the family secret

    1. Remember one of the ole Rocky boys was pictured on the cover of a magazine while the towers were being built with 9 1 1 set on his watch

    2. No coincidence either that the steel used in those buildings came from Bethelehem steel either and they recently demolished the headquarter building where Bethelehem Steel was housed
      Of course that demolition was not selected as a psyop to put on tell lie vision so they could sell their open air prison surveillance equipment